Any fast bikes wanting to take on supercars?
Discussion
LordFlathead said:
That's exactly what I thought R1 and I'm totally expecting to get my arse handed to me
It should make for a different day out that's for sure
This. I've been watching this thread in silent amusement at the constant merry go round of car v bike bullst. It should make for a different day out that's for sure
I'm going to have fun and a great day out, not fussed if I lose every run. lining up against exoticas finest on a desmo? Can't wait
Ha, the car got destroyed in every race there. When in the real world do you ever go over 160 on the road flat out in a straight line for that long. "Above 160 the gt2 is a monster", you have that then and ill stick with the bike that's a monster from a standstill
To be fair though he knew it.
To be fair though he knew it.
Edited by Yazza54 on Thursday 25th April 08:29
I can’t be arsed with this willy measuring anymore.
Why do we need to have it every month.
Who gives a flying fk if a car is quicker than a bike on this circuit or that circuit, or in a straight line……..
I doubt anyone on here could get the best out of a superbike or supercar/hyper car so its meaningless. Does having a bike/car that can do the neverbeen in 8 minutes mean you can do it in 8 minutes, does it fk.
In reality 99% of us who post on PH are st but very few will admit it, the laptop loyalist/keyboard warriors step in with pointless stats and gay as fk bickering. With no respect for other road users, it’s all about enjoyment is it not?
This is why I got out the car scene. Even at ST owners meets people were as wky as some that own supercars on ph. Oh 0-60 this and bhp pish that.
I like cars but the for me I can get supercar kicks from a 15 year old ninja that cost me £1800 2 years ago that’s never missed a beat. I’d need to spend 20 times this on a car to have the same thrill.
Add in the fact if I fk it up on a bike I’m most likely dead that’s what makes me like bikes more…
Why do we need to have it every month.
Who gives a flying fk if a car is quicker than a bike on this circuit or that circuit, or in a straight line……..
I doubt anyone on here could get the best out of a superbike or supercar/hyper car so its meaningless. Does having a bike/car that can do the neverbeen in 8 minutes mean you can do it in 8 minutes, does it fk.
In reality 99% of us who post on PH are st but very few will admit it, the laptop loyalist/keyboard warriors step in with pointless stats and gay as fk bickering. With no respect for other road users, it’s all about enjoyment is it not?
This is why I got out the car scene. Even at ST owners meets people were as wky as some that own supercars on ph. Oh 0-60 this and bhp pish that.
I like cars but the for me I can get supercar kicks from a 15 year old ninja that cost me £1800 2 years ago that’s never missed a beat. I’d need to spend 20 times this on a car to have the same thrill.
Add in the fact if I fk it up on a bike I’m most likely dead that’s what makes me like bikes more…
Ha
I do love posts like this and the banter that flows. But I dont understand how people with litre bikes say they dont enjoy straight line speed.
Dont get me wrong my favourite parts of biking are some nice quiet twisties but at the same time a huge straight pinning it to the point were your testes raise up to just behind your nipples, along side my mates puts a gigantic smile on my face. A day like this sounds like awesome fun even if you loose every round and if your in a car or on a bike.
I do love posts like this and the banter that flows. But I dont understand how people with litre bikes say they dont enjoy straight line speed.
Dont get me wrong my favourite parts of biking are some nice quiet twisties but at the same time a huge straight pinning it to the point were your testes raise up to just behind your nipples, along side my mates puts a gigantic smile on my face. A day like this sounds like awesome fun even if you loose every round and if your in a car or on a bike.
Shame this badboy won't be turning up....
ENGINE
Type V6 bi-turbo
Cubic capacity 3.2-litres
Number of valves 24
Position Mid-rear
Number of cylinders V6 (60°)
Maximum power 875hp
Torque 90mkg
Maximum revs 7,800rpm
Top speed 240kph / 150mph
0-100kph / 0-62mph 1.8s
0-200kph / 125mph 4.8s
0-240kph / 150mph 7.0s
Peugeot's new Pikes Peak contender. http://www.pistonheads.com/doc.asp?c=52&i=2759...
I don't think a factory supported Moto GP bike could match those acceleration figures?
ENGINE
Type V6 bi-turbo
Cubic capacity 3.2-litres
Number of valves 24
Position Mid-rear
Number of cylinders V6 (60°)
Maximum power 875hp
Torque 90mkg
Maximum revs 7,800rpm
Top speed 240kph / 150mph
0-100kph / 0-62mph 1.8s
0-200kph / 125mph 4.8s
0-240kph / 150mph 7.0s
Peugeot's new Pikes Peak contender. http://www.pistonheads.com/doc.asp?c=52&i=2759...
I don't think a factory supported Moto GP bike could match those acceleration figures?
fergus said:
Shame this badboy won't be turning up....
ENGINE
Type V6 bi-turbo
Cubic capacity 3.2-litres
Number of valves 24
Position Mid-rear
Number of cylinders V6 (60°)
Maximum power 875hp
Torque 90mkg
Maximum revs 7,800rpm
Top speed 240kph / 150mph
0-100kph / 0-62mph 1.8s
0-200kph / 125mph 4.8s
0-240kph / 150mph 7.0s
Peugeot's new Pikes Peak contender. http://www.pistonheads.com/doc.asp?c=52&i=2759...
I don't think a factory supported Moto GP bike could match those acceleration figures?
Gear a MotoGP bike to match the 150mph top speed and I'm sure it would be very close.ENGINE
Type V6 bi-turbo
Cubic capacity 3.2-litres
Number of valves 24
Position Mid-rear
Number of cylinders V6 (60°)
Maximum power 875hp
Torque 90mkg
Maximum revs 7,800rpm
Top speed 240kph / 150mph
0-100kph / 0-62mph 1.8s
0-200kph / 125mph 4.8s
0-240kph / 150mph 7.0s
Peugeot's new Pikes Peak contender. http://www.pistonheads.com/doc.asp?c=52&i=2759...
I don't think a factory supported Moto GP bike could match those acceleration figures?
It's going to be a fantastic event, as others has said some cars will beat some bikes and some bikes will beat some cars.
I have no problems at all losing out to exoticly tuned cars infact it would be thrilling to whitness one pulling away from me.
It's all horses for courses.
Fergus: Peugeot's new Pikes Peak car is a prime example, I'm just coming out of 3rd (of 6 gears) at 192mph when that car stopped accelerating some 40mph earlier. Granted it will get to 150 before me but this isn't 1/4 racing. Actually 150 is way to slow for that as well.
Please note for clarity the 192mph is the race bike not the ZZR14 turbo I'll be using on Sunday.
If I had far deeper pockets then I'd have a hyper car (as well as hyper bikes) but alas the Lottery God has yet to notice little old me!!!
Blimey thats 3 posts all typed by me and my grubby fingernailed mits
I have no problems at all losing out to exoticly tuned cars infact it would be thrilling to whitness one pulling away from me.
It's all horses for courses.
Fergus: Peugeot's new Pikes Peak car is a prime example, I'm just coming out of 3rd (of 6 gears) at 192mph when that car stopped accelerating some 40mph earlier. Granted it will get to 150 before me but this isn't 1/4 racing. Actually 150 is way to slow for that as well.
Please note for clarity the 192mph is the race bike not the ZZR14 turbo I'll be using on Sunday.
If I had far deeper pockets then I'd have a hyper car (as well as hyper bikes) but alas the Lottery God has yet to notice little old me!!!
Blimey thats 3 posts all typed by me and my grubby fingernailed mits
The Zedhed said:
Fergus: Peugeot's new Pikes Peak car is a prime example, I'm just coming out of 3rd (of 6 gears) at 192mph when that car stopped accelerating some 40mph earlier. Granted it will get to 150 before me but this isn't 1/4 racing. Actually 150 is way to slow for that as well.
Please note for clarity the 192mph is the race bike not the ZZR14 turbo I'll be using on Sunday.
"I was just getting out of 2nd, when we went super sonic..."Please note for clarity the 192mph is the race bike not the ZZR14 turbo I'll be using on Sunday.
That's some pretty tall gearing you're running there. What sort of power do you have, as to get to 192 in 3rd also needs a fair bit of torque.
Out of interest, what do you use the rce bike for? Drag Racing? Sounds very impressive either way.
Is your bike able to see off Jack Frost's turbo 'Busa (248mph, standing mile & 278 vmax IIRC)?
fergus said:
"I was just getting out of 2nd, when we went super sonic..."
That's some pretty tall gearing you're running there. What sort of power do you have, as to get to 192 in 3rd also needs a fair bit of torque.
Out of interest, what do you use the rce bike for? Drag Racing? Sounds very impressive either way.
Is your bike able to see off Jack Frost's turbo 'Busa (248mph, standing mile & 278 vmax IIRC)?
Presumably a dragster has long low gears to help the launch and really short top gears to keep accelerating as the speed increases?That's some pretty tall gearing you're running there. What sort of power do you have, as to get to 192 in 3rd also needs a fair bit of torque.
Out of interest, what do you use the rce bike for? Drag Racing? Sounds very impressive either way.
Is your bike able to see off Jack Frost's turbo 'Busa (248mph, standing mile & 278 vmax IIRC)?
Gary11 said:
srob said:
Not this old st again?!
Are you that Rob777 bloke or whatever he was called - in disguise?
No I'm not and its true then bikes are always faster everywhere than a car,as I said I have a bike Im just enjoying the banter a bit of fun!Are you that Rob777 bloke or whatever he was called - in disguise?
Gassing Station | Biker Banter | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff