The handmaids tail

Author
Discussion

stuarthat

Original Poster:

1,049 posts

218 months

Saturday 10th June 2017
quotequote all
Anyone watching this ?seen the first 3 not sure ,receives high ratings ,very strange cult takeover .

Magic919

14,126 posts

201 months

Saturday 10th June 2017
quotequote all
I presume you miss the opening credits.

bunglesprout

563 posts

91 months

Saturday 10th June 2017
quotequote all
rofl

stuarthat

Original Poster:

1,049 posts

218 months

Saturday 10th June 2017
quotequote all
Why would I have missed the opening credits ?the question was simple is anyone watching this and are they enjoying it ,so either a yes and a no or no and no or yes yes 🤔

joshleb

1,544 posts

144 months

Saturday 10th June 2017
quotequote all
I'm loving it, makes me feel so awkward whilst watching but I feel it has been done so well!

Want to read the book as never got round to it, but going to wait until I've finished the series.

nicanary

9,793 posts

146 months

Saturday 10th June 2017
quotequote all
stuarthat said:
Why would I have missed the opening credits ?the question was simple is anyone watching this and are they enjoying it ,so either a yes and a no or no and no or yes yes ??
It's not about a cult. It's about state use of fertile women to prolong the species.

Tail??

stuarthat

Original Poster:

1,049 posts

218 months

Saturday 10th June 2017
quotequote all
I only asked if anyone liked it ? Perhaps cult wasn't the word to use but if they are reading from the good book and are forced to follow certain rules by the powers that be for the good of humanity .
Politions dance less around an answer .

Dr Doofenshmirtz

15,227 posts

200 months

Monday 12th June 2017
quotequote all
So, does anyone actually understand what's going on yet?
I'm confuzzled.

(You might need to hide any replies to this behind spoiler tabs otherwise the special people will get all upset)

nicanary

9,793 posts

146 months

Monday 12th June 2017
quotequote all
Dr Doofenshmirtz said:
So, does anyone actually understand what's going on yet?
I'm confuzzled.

(You might need to hide any replies to this behind spoiler tabs otherwise the special people will get all upset)
An apocalyptic event on earth has rendered most women sterile. Those young women who are still fertile have been purloined by the state as breeding machines, using a skewed understanding of the Bible as justification. The world has become one police state. Those girls who won't play ball are executed.

Well that's my understanding.

lufbramatt

5,345 posts

134 months

Monday 12th June 2017
quotequote all
It's based on Margaret Attwoods 1985 novel of the same name, very famous book often used as a reference text for A-level English etc.

I'm liking it so far but its not exactly easy watching!



The gist of it so far is that the USA government is overthrown by Christian fundamentalists and put under martial law, which turns into a new government based heavily on the old testament (or rather certain parts of the old testament) which deny women of most human rights. such as being able to work, read, have money etc. same sex relationships are outlawed.

Pollution etc. has meant most women are infertile and lots of babies are born with deformities, so women that are found to still be able to bear children become slaves known as "handmaids" and are assigned to military/civil servant couples that cannot have their own children.


croyde

22,898 posts

230 months

Monday 12th June 2017
quotequote all
Liking this so far. Very haunting and I like being drip fed what happened before.

Ep3 last night, creepy and scary and some of it was like a Party Political Broadcast for the DUP.

checkmate91

851 posts

173 months

Monday 12th June 2017
quotequote all
lufbramatt said:
It's based on Margaret Attwoods 1985 novel of the same name, very famous book often used as a reference text for A-level English etc.

I'm liking it so far but its not exactly easy watching!
Indeed, Mrs Checkmate read it when it first came out, I thought she studied it at A-level but no, that was Testament to Youth by Vera Brittain (not recommended btw), she read it whilst doing her nurse training from 83 to 86, I did an English A-level during that time (she wanted to get a sociology a-level to supplement her nurse training iirc, so I kept her company at Redbridge Tech). I studied The Spire (WG), Saint Joan (GBS and saw a National Theatre version at the South Bank with Frances de la Tour, Brian Glover, Anton Rodgers and Timothy Spall in 1984), Chosen Poems of Thomas Hardy (still have will-to-live issues over some of those), Love's Labour's Lost and Antony & Cleopatra (WS and think we caught a live version of A&C somewhere along the line).

Handmaid's Tale and Flowers in the Attic warmly recommended by Mrs C as "good reads".

Edited by checkmate91 on Monday 12th June 20:28

nicanary

9,793 posts

146 months

Monday 12th June 2017
quotequote all
checkmate91 said:
lufbramatt said:
It's based on Margaret Attwoods 1985 novel of the same name, very famous book often used as a reference text for A-level English etc.

I'm liking it so far but its not exactly easy watching!
Indeed, Mrs Checkmate read it when it first came out, I thought she studied it at A-level but no, that was Testament to Youth by Vera Brittain (not recommended btw), she read it whilst doing her nurse training from 83 to 86, I did an English A-level during that time (she wanted to get a sociology a-level to supplement her nurse training iirc, so I kept her company at Redbridge Tech). I studied The Spire (WG), Saint Joan (GBS and saw a National Theatre version at the South Bank with Frances de la Tour, Brian Glover, Anton Rodgers and Timothy Spall in 1984), Chosen Poems of Thomas Hardy (still have will-to-live issues over some of those), Love's Labour's Lost and Antony & Cleopatra (WS and think we caught a live version of A&C somewhere along the line).

Handmaid's Tale and Flowers in the Attic warmly recommended by Mrs C as "good reads".

Edited by checkmate91 on Monday 12th June 20:28
You must be a similar age to myself. I also studied Shaw's Saint Joan (opening lines "no eggs, no eggs, what do you mean no eggs!?"). I remember it like yesterday, instead of 1968. The Spire was chosen by our English master who was as bent as a nine-bob note. Ooodles of phallic symbolism in the book, which he gaily (or is that gayly?) insisted on emphasising at all times. Maybe trying to find out which one of us was of his persuasion. Wouldn't be tolerated these days, but those were different times.

checkmate91

851 posts

173 months

Monday 12th June 2017
quotequote all
I guess, we're 61 and 64 born. And, you're right, The Spire was all about Jocelin and his enormous phallic symbol (reaching to God, oh ok...), Rachel and her husband Roger (no sniggering at the back) Mason. Exam answers were all about Jocelin's quest, adversity, the distraction of Rachel (really, I didn't notice) and Roger's rutheless commercialism juxtaposed with the town's folks ability to pay for the works and the fact that the foundations wouldn't support the mighty phallus. To this day I felt Rachel was an under-developed character...

Oh, and back in 1984, it was quite an experience to witness Brian Glover utter those opening words (no eggs) in, iirc, the minimalist Cottesloe Theatre, him being all TV gangster and all... what a night!

Edited by checkmate91 on Monday 12th June 21:30

4x4Tyke

6,506 posts

132 months

Monday 12th June 2017
quotequote all
nicanary said:
It's not about a cult. It's about state use of fertile women to prolong the species.

Tail??
It is a theocracy, so close enough.

I assumed that 'Tail' was a Freudian slip.

I remember the original film with Natasha Richardson as Offred.


Edited by 4x4Tyke on Monday 12th June 22:26

Halb

53,012 posts

183 months

Tuesday 13th June 2017
quotequote all
lufbramatt said:
It's based on Margaret Attwoods 1985 novel of the same name, very famous book often used as a reference text for A-level English etc.

I'm liking it so far but its not exactly easy watching!



The gist of it so far is that the USA government is overthrown by Christian fundamentalists.

When you look at US politicians, not really far-fetched...scary.

I recall studying AHT as part of a Dystopian course, along with a few other classics. Grim.

lufbramatt

5,345 posts

134 months

Tuesday 13th June 2017
quotequote all
Halb said:
When you look at US politicians, not really far-fetched...scary.

I recall studying AHT as part of a Dystopian course, along with a few other classics. Grim.
Apparently a bunch of trump supporters in the US got their knickers in a twist when it aired over there, labelling it anti-Trump propaganda, without realising it was written 32 years ago. People pointed out that if they are drawing similarities between AHT and Trumps administration they should probably be asking some serious questions about themselves.

AndyWoodall

2,625 posts

259 months

Wednesday 14th June 2017
quotequote all
A wonderful book (wonderful a poor choice given the subject matter but you get what I mean) and so far a very chilling adaptation in this series, I think its really well done.

For those not clear so far, we are seeing what remains of the United States, now a theocratic state called Gilead which ceased power as a fertility crisis struck the globe. Its never made clear about the rest of the world with the exception of people escaping to (what we assume to be free) Canada.

Don

28,377 posts

284 months

Wednesday 14th June 2017
quotequote all
rofl

Well it's all about her tail, isn't it...

vixen1700

22,902 posts

270 months

Monday 26th June 2017
quotequote all
Watched the first four episodes yesterday and had us gripped by it.

By no means an easy watch though.