How powerful is your V6 S ?

How powerful is your V6 S ?

Author
Discussion

frontfloater

Original Poster:

349 posts

142 months

Thursday 9th July 2020
quotequote all
Today I took my modified 1989 S2 for a dyno run at Motorsport Developments, near the old factory. The key figures are : max flywheel BHP 193.4 @ 6250 rpm (loud!) ; max flywheel torque 199.6. Using the factory figures from my original handbook, those numbers are +15% and +17%. If the handbook dry weight figure of 940kg is correct, that equates to about 206 bhp per tonne.
How does that compare with others who have modified the 2.9 Cologne engine but left it naturally aspirated?

Briefly, the main mods are :
Full stage 2 rebuild many years ago by Specialised Engines in Essex, including fast-road cam, enlarged inlet/outlet valves, gas-flowed head and full engine balance. 15,000 miles since then.
Stainless manifolds & downpipes by RT Racing, about 15 years ago.
Factory free-flow stainless exhaust (bought 1997, still going!)
Magnecor ignition leads.
Recent new air-meters by Bosch ( £500, eek! )
Timing adjustment by Heath at XWorks (increased to 14 degrees advance).

Here's the data printout :



BOB

Edited by frontfloater on Saturday 11th July 14:55

v8s4me

7,240 posts

219 months

Thursday 9th July 2020
quotequote all
That's pretty good. clap Here's my V8S figures for comparison (measured at the rear wheels)...



It still won't sound as good as a V8S though laugh

GreenV8S

30,186 posts

284 months

Thursday 9th July 2020
quotequote all
Difficult to put much meaning on the numbers unless you have a known car to compare against, but the shape certainly looks healthy.

AutoAndy

2,265 posts

215 months

Friday 10th July 2020
quotequote all
I recall that the V6 is notionally 170bhp.

I had my de-catted S3C dynoed a while back and it was down to 164.

Since then I had the injectors cleaned to try and solve a slow running issue and put on a new st st manifold as the old one was leaking- I did note that the flange welding on the old one was very poor, interrupting the flow.

With no other changes and as far as I am aware, no other mods, I had it retested on the same dyno- quite amazed at the improvement... see below
wink



GreenV8S

30,186 posts

284 months

Friday 10th July 2020
quotequote all
Judging by those numbers, you must have transformed the top end performance. Great result!

magpies

5,129 posts

182 months

Friday 10th July 2020
quotequote all
my S1 with Jag 3.0
torque isn't good as the vvt wasn't wired to work

AutoAndy

2,265 posts

215 months

Friday 10th July 2020
quotequote all
GreenV8S said:
Judging by those numbers, you must have transformed the top end performance. Great result!
I find that the lead filled divers boot does enhance performance... wink

GreenV8S

30,186 posts

284 months

Friday 10th July 2020
quotequote all
AutoAndy said:
I find that the lead filled divers boot does enhance performance... wink
biggrin


magpies

5,129 posts

182 months

Friday 10th July 2020
quotequote all
biggrin
GreenV8S said:
AutoAndy said:
I find that the lead filled divers boot does enhance performance... wink
biggrin

v8s4me

7,240 posts

219 months

Saturday 11th July 2020
quotequote all
How powerful is your V6 S?

magpies said:
VERY!!!

frontfloater

Original Poster:

349 posts

142 months

Saturday 11th July 2020
quotequote all
I did say at the start that I was specifically asking about modifying the 2.9 Cologne engine. At the risk of stating the obvious, OF COURSE your V8s and Jaguars and other significantly different engines are more powerful !!

BOB

Edited by frontfloater on Sunday 12th July 00:14

v8s4me

7,240 posts

219 months

Saturday 11th July 2020
quotequote all
It wasn't meant as a criticism; quite the reverse in fact. Comparing my V8 graph with the your V6 graph there isn't that much in it really. At least not in the area where it matters in normal driving. It's a lot more cost effective to tune up a good V6 than to buy a V8S thumbup

frontfloater

Original Poster:

349 posts

142 months

Saturday 11th July 2020
quotequote all
Please be assured I didn't take it as criticism : I was just trying to re-focus the thread.

The big difference between your figures & mine is flywheel versus wheels. In reply to your question on another thread, the dyno did also give wheels figures, which reveal the gulf between us : BHP 154.4, torque 157.

BOB

v8s4me

7,240 posts

219 months

Saturday 11th July 2020
quotequote all
That just means I can hang my elbow over the door and not bother the change gear laugh

DamianS3

1,803 posts

182 months

Saturday 11th July 2020
quotequote all
I won’t post my Duratec graph then.. wink

But I seem to recall a S with a cologne prodigies like yours but with increased compression (via skimmed heads) made over 200bhp (just) on 98 fuel at the flywheel.

Sorry can’t remember who’s car it was though..

Cheers

Damian S3 Duratec

razor11

126 posts

249 months

Tuesday 14th July 2020
quotequote all
DamianS3 said:
I won’t post my Duratec graph then.. wink

But I seem to recall a S with a cologne prodigies like yours but with increased compression (via skimmed heads) made over 200bhp (just) on 98 fuel at the flywheel.

Sorry can’t remember who’s car it was though..

Cheers

Damian S3 Duratec
Damian, I sent you an email, not sure it arrived. I’d like to make contact and talk engine conversions if you have a chance. Thanks