5G no-no

Author
Discussion

deckster

9,630 posts

254 months

Wednesday 12th December 2018
quotequote all
Bullitt Five-Oh said:
As I said earlier, I need some time man. I'm at the "research" stage at the moment.
If you're still researching, then how have you come to any conclusions? (man)


Bullitt Five-Oh

876 posts

66 months

Wednesday 12th December 2018
quotequote all
deckster said:
Bullitt Five-Oh said:
As I said earlier, I need some time man. I'm at the "research" stage at the moment.
If you're still researching, then how have you come to any conclusions? (man)
And likewise, how come you're so sure it's not going to cause any knock on effects.

egor110

16,818 posts

202 months

Wednesday 12th December 2018
quotequote all
Bullitt Five-Oh said:
deckster said:
Bullitt Five-Oh said:
As I said earlier, I need some time man. I'm at the "research" stage at the moment.
If you're still researching, then how have you come to any conclusions? (man)
And likewise, how come you're so sure it's not going to cause any knock on effects.
He didn’t start a thread though re the potential dangers of 5g though .

Bullitt Five-Oh

876 posts

66 months

Wednesday 12th December 2018
quotequote all
egor110 said:
Bullitt Five-Oh said:
deckster said:
Bullitt Five-Oh said:
As I said earlier, I need some time man. I'm at the "research" stage at the moment.
If you're still researching, then how have you come to any conclusions? (man)
And likewise, how come you're so sure it's not going to cause any knock on effects.
He didn’t start a thread though re the potential dangers of 5g though .
Yes, the key is "potential". History teaches us that not considering potential knock on effects usually ends up in fking tears long term, e.g. fossil fuel powered economy, smoking, aerosol and so on.

Edited by Bullitt Five-Oh on Wednesday 12th December 20:53

deckster

9,630 posts

254 months

Wednesday 12th December 2018
quotequote all
Bullitt Five-Oh said:
And likewise, how come you're so sure it's not going to cause any knock on effects.
The prevailing consensus amongst scientists and engineers who have been working on this and similar systems is that there is no risk.

You are advocating the opposite position, and failed to back it up with anything approaching evidence. I would suggest it is up to you to prove your standpoint, which frankly you haven't even tried to do.

Bullitt Five-Oh

876 posts

66 months

Wednesday 12th December 2018
quotequote all
deckster said:
Bullitt Five-Oh said:
And likewise, how come you're so sure it's not going to cause any knock on effects.
The prevailing consensus amongst scientists and engineers who have been working on this and similar systems is that there is no risk.

You are advocating the opposite position, and failed to back it up with anything approaching evidence. I would suggest it is up to you to prove your standpoint, which frankly you haven't even tried to do.
Oh that's funny, I bet you can back up your claims right? Try the bolded bit first. I can't wait to see those sources proving the "prevailing consensus amongst scientists". Man, this is bound to be fun, irony vs irony = inception?

egor110

16,818 posts

202 months

Wednesday 12th December 2018
quotequote all
I just don't get why you don't just post up the facts as to why 5g is dangerous , surely that was the point of the thread you created to warn people?

Or maybe it's just attention seeking ?

clonmult

10,529 posts

208 months

Thursday 13th December 2018
quotequote all
Bullitt Five-Oh said:
deckster said:
Bullitt Five-Oh said:
And likewise, how come you're so sure it's not going to cause any knock on effects.
The prevailing consensus amongst scientists and engineers who have been working on this and similar systems is that there is no risk.

You are advocating the opposite position, and failed to back it up with anything approaching evidence. I would suggest it is up to you to prove your standpoint, which frankly you haven't even tried to do.
Oh that's funny, I bet you can back up your claims right? Try the bolded bit first. I can't wait to see those sources proving the "prevailing consensus amongst scientists". Man, this is bound to be fun, irony vs irony = inception?
Just buy yourself a new tinfoil hat.

I still don't see there being any more "potential" than prior wireless telecoms standards. You're more likely to be killed by a 5G mast falling on you than anything inherent in the technology.

Bullitt Five-Oh

876 posts

66 months

Thursday 13th December 2018
quotequote all
egor110 said:
I just don't get why you don't just post up the facts as to why 5g is dangerous , surely that was the point of the thread you created to warn people?

Or maybe it's just attention seeking ?
You're not referring to me, presumably? Hopefully? Please say you don't otherwise this might be the ultimate proof that long term exposure to increase in EMF radiation did some serious brain damage to UK's population.

egor110

16,818 posts

202 months

Thursday 13th December 2018
quotequote all
Bullitt Five-Oh said:
egor110 said:
I just don't get why you don't just post up the facts as to why 5g is dangerous , surely that was the point of the thread you created to warn people?

Or maybe it's just attention seeking ?
You're not referring to me, presumably? Hopefully? Please say you don't otherwise this might be the ultimate proof that long term exposure to increase in EMF radiation did some serious brain damage to UK's population.
Yet again you haven’t answered the question.

I’d say it’s pretty self explanatory I was referring to you as this is the thread you created .

I’ve no doubt you’ll post more crap that you thinks clever whilst not informing anyone why 5g could be bad .

Bullitt Five-Oh

876 posts

66 months

Thursday 13th December 2018
quotequote all
egor110 said:
I was referring to you as this is the thread you created .
You should really consult a specialist, I'd start from specsavers.

egor110

16,818 posts

202 months

Thursday 13th December 2018
quotequote all
Bullitt Five-Oh said:
egor110 said:
I was referring to you as this is the thread you created .
You should really consult a specialist, I'd start from specsavers.
Really , i'd start from specsavers ?

If you want to try and come over as knowledgeable then at least get your spelling and punctuation correct .

Bullitt Five-Oh

876 posts

66 months

Friday 14th December 2018
quotequote all
egor110 said:
Bullitt Five-Oh said:
egor110 said:
I was referring to you as this is the thread you created .
You should really consult a specialist, I'd start from specsavers.
Really , i'd start from specsavers ?

If you want to try and come over as knowledgeable then at least get your spelling and punctuation correct .
Nice bit of clutching at straws.

PS Did you check who the OP, i.e. the creatour of this threadour is yet?

Warmfuzzies

3,961 posts

252 months

Friday 14th December 2018
quotequote all
Bullitt Five-Oh said:
egor110 said:
Bullitt Five-Oh said:
egor110 said:
I was referring to you as this is the thread you created .
PS Did you check who the OP, i.e. the creatour of this threadour is yet?
I’ve been reading this with some degree of interest, but you’ve lost me here.

Bullitt Five-Oh

876 posts

66 months

Saturday 15th December 2018
quotequote all
Warmfuzzies said:
Bullitt Five-Oh said:
egor110 said:
I was referring to you as this is the thread you created .
PS Did you check who the OP, i.e. the creatour of this threadour is yet?
I’ve been reading this with some degree of interest, but you’ve lost me here.
Yeah, I can tell by how you structured your response with quotes making no sense. Not sure why you'd get so emotional over this though? And what exactly is the issue (hint, I'm not the OP i.e. I didn't create this thread).

PS it's great that the barrier of entry to this forum is so low, this is the true equality. It let's people will all sorts of backgrounds and IQ's "contribute" and makes them feel important.