What, exactly is a NFT?

Author
Discussion

eldar

Original Poster:

21,733 posts

196 months

Thursday 23rd September 2021
quotequote all
This news article puzzled me.

What is a NFT, what can you do with it, and why? Can you own a meme.


'Side-eyeing Chloe' Clem to sell iconic meme as NFT https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-5865966...

Byker28i

59,697 posts

217 months

Thursday 23rd September 2021
quotequote all
Pretty sure that article explains fully

LargeRed

1,654 posts

48 months

Thursday 23rd September 2021
quotequote all
A non-fungible token (NFT) is a unit of data stored on a digital ledger.


like crypto but not

Fabric

3,819 posts

192 months

Thursday 23rd September 2021
quotequote all
LargeRed said:
A non-fungible token (NFT) is a unit of data stored on a digital ledger.


like crypto but not
Basically this, as far as I understand it. Imagine you bought the Mona Lisa, and got a letter from the Louvre to say you owned the original item - thus everything else is merely a copy.

Or it's a complex vehicle for laundering cryptocurrency.

ReverendCounter

6,087 posts

176 months

Thursday 23rd September 2021
quotequote all
As I understand it, the process of assigning or creating the status of NFT to an item means from that point, its ownership can be irrefutably proven; therefore when it's bought and sold, there can be no question over authenticity/veracity/providence.

A woman has very recently, I believe, made an NFT out of her hymen. A person with a very unusual physiological anomaly was also considering whether it could be given NFT status.

Incidentally a quick google for NFT use cases showed fairly mundane things like event tickets, property, various documents could be registered as NFTs. Could be an answer to boundary disputes, ID theft and fake event tickets.

Edited by ReverendCounter on Thursday 23 September 15:22

eldar

Original Poster:

21,733 posts

196 months

Thursday 23rd September 2021
quotequote all
Fabric said:
Basically this, as far as I understand it. Imagine you bought the Mona Lisa, and got a letter from the Louvre to say you owned the original item - thus everything else is merely a copy.

Or it's a complex vehicle for laundering cryptocurrency.
Do you own copyright and the Mona Lisa physical picture, its certainly non fungible. The digital image, and the millions of copies and clones looks very fungible.

Or just, perhaps, a few bytes in a file somewhere?

CharlesElliott

2,008 posts

282 months

Thursday 23rd September 2021
quotequote all
Yes, an NFT is basically a certified version of a digital asset. Whilst you can probably copy the asset itself perfectly, you cannot copy the certification.

It's like being able to have the Mona Lisa as painted by Da Vinci, or a copy that is atom for atom the same, but is not actually painted by Da Vinci.

Whether you think NFTs have a value is a personal view.

Maybe it is a bit like a natural diamond vs a synthetic diamond.

Fabric

3,819 posts

192 months

Thursday 23rd September 2021
quotequote all
eldar said:
Or just, perhaps, a few bytes in a file somewhere?
That's my understanding - the metadata within the token itself being the only actually important part.

Interesting read regarding NFT's, ownership rights, and applications here; https://www.twobirds.com/en/news/articles/2021/aus...

eldar

Original Poster:

21,733 posts

196 months

Thursday 23rd September 2021
quotequote all
Fabric said:
That's my understanding - the metadata within the token itself being the only actually important part.

Interesting read regarding NFT's, ownership rights, and applications here; https://www.twobirds.com/en/news/articles/2021/aus...
Thanks. Looks rather complex and open to lots of challenges.

FrankAbagnale

1,702 posts

112 months

Thursday 2nd December 2021
quotequote all
Did anyone, or does anyone buy/sell NFTs here?

I got in to it a few months ago, and have done OK. My friends who got in to it in March-May have done very well!

carreauchompeur

17,846 posts

204 months

Thursday 2nd December 2021
quotequote all
It sounds bonkers to me, but then if you thought about normal currency closely the theory isn’t wildly different!

Oakey

27,564 posts

216 months

Thursday 2nd December 2021
quotequote all

_Hoppers

1,201 posts

65 months

Thursday 2nd December 2021
quotequote all
FrankAbagnale said:
Did anyone, or does anyone buy/sell NFTs here?

I got in to it a few months ago, and have done OK. My friends who got in to it in March-May have done very well!
I know a photographer who is based on the south coast. He’s made at least 100ETHs from selling his images!

FrankAbagnale

1,702 posts

112 months

Sunday 5th December 2021
quotequote all
_Hoppers said:
FrankAbagnale said:
Did anyone, or does anyone buy/sell NFTs here?

I got in to it a few months ago, and have done OK. My friends who got in to it in March-May have done very well!
I know a photographer who is based on the south coast. He’s made at least 100ETHs from selling his images!
Blimey, that's not a bad lockdown!

RobDickinson

31,343 posts

254 months

Sunday 5th December 2021
quotequote all
I know a bunch of photographers who have made a lot selling NFT's, really dont understand it.

I understand the tech, I understand what an NFT is and what it means, I just dont understand why anyone would buy one

CharlesElliott

2,008 posts

282 months

Thursday 27th January 2022
quotequote all
I'm sure there will end up being some valuable NFTs. But there won't be many of them and it certainly won't look like the hyper inflated values we are seeing for ape pictures at the moment.

Mr-B

3,779 posts

194 months

Thursday 27th January 2022
quotequote all
_Hoppers said:
I know a photographer who is based on the south coast. He’s made at least 100ETHs from selling his images!
Fair play to him. I know nothing about NFT's but I watched a youtube video linked on the automotive vloggers thread (so now I am an expert biggrin) and basically it would appear the photographer hasn't sold anything, he still has the copyright etc, he's just parked his photo next to a unique string of 1's and 0's verified as being unique. The buyer doesn't have anything other than a unique string of 1's and 0's.

Has a very strong whiff of Tulips to me.

matrignano

4,364 posts

210 months

Thursday 27th January 2022
quotequote all
ReverendCounter said:
As I understand it, the process of assigning or creating the status of NFT to an item means from that point, its ownership can be irrefutably proven; therefore when it's bought and sold, there can be no question over authenticity/veracity/providence.

A woman has very recently, I believe, made an NFT out of her hymen. A person with a very unusual physiological anomaly was also considering whether it could be given NFT status.

Incidentally a quick google for NFT use cases showed fairly mundane things like event tickets, property, various documents could be registered as NFTs. Could be an answer to boundary disputes, ID theft and fake event tickets.

Edited by ReverendCounter on Thursday 23 September 15:22
But that only proves that I own the "real" NFT. Someone could replace the real Mona Lisa for a fake one, and my real "NFT" would then only prove that I own the fake Mona Lisa.

I'm a bit confuddled about all this fungible stuff.

Like who the fk actually buys a home or a car in the metaverse for actual SSS/bitcoin, and why???

cml24

1,413 posts

147 months

Thursday 27th January 2022
quotequote all
The way I look at it is similar to the above suggestions, its no different to buying and selling original paintings or similar.

What's interesting, is the pace these things increase in value. You hear about a lot of artists just scraping by in times gone by, and their paintings are now only worth a lot of money after the artist has died, there can't be any more now, and sometimes hundreds of years has passed.

The guy taking photos can just take some more!

Mr-B

3,779 posts

194 months

Thursday 27th January 2022
quotequote all
cml24 said:
The way I look at it is similar to the above suggestions, its no different to buying and selling original paintings or similar.

What's interesting, is the pace these things increase in value. You hear about a lot of artists just scraping by in times gone by, and their paintings are now only worth a lot of money after the artist has died, there can't be any more now, and sometimes hundreds of years has passed.

The guy taking photos can just take some more!
I'm not sure he needs to take another photo, he still has the copyright to the original photo he sold the NFT for, I am not sure if it is down to the ethics of the photographer that would stop him selling another NFT for the same photo confused