Multiple, simultaneous TV recording?

Multiple, simultaneous TV recording?

Author
Discussion

neil.b

Original Poster:

6,546 posts

247 months

Thursday 12th January 2006
quotequote all
My good lady is doing a research project for her degree. For this particular bit, she needs to record all 5 terrestrial channels for 2 hours at the same time, every day for 2 weeks. Quality is not that important, its the programme content that she needs to examine.

Does anyone know a way of doing it? I was thinking the simplest would be to buy a distribution box, feeding it with the aerial signal and then into 5 cheap video recorders but I was wondering (a) would splitting the signal 5 ways degrade it too much (and does such a box exist) and (b) if there must be a cooler, slicker way of doing it via computer, as I really don't want to have to buy 5 VHS recorders, in this day and age

Cheers,

Neil

Fish

3,976 posts

282 months

Thursday 12th January 2006
quotequote all
Neil.

You can buy splitters at most up to eight and alot have booster amps. At home I split it into four with no boost and it is good enough for digital. To record a channel you need a receiver either in a PCI card or VHS etc. PCI TV cards at the cheapest are about £30 so you would need 5x then you have the issues of whether you can stream and store enough data on the hard drives. I have a harddrive digital box which has two receivers but at TV quality you are looking at about 1hr per Gig of data unless you compressed it more.

Hope that helps..It won't be that cheap either way.

GregE240

10,857 posts

267 months

Thursday 12th January 2006
quotequote all
Er, you could always ask 4 friends to video a channel each for you, Neil?!!

Sorry, best I could do....

neil.b

Original Poster:

6,546 posts

247 months

Thursday 12th January 2006
quotequote all
GregE240 said:
Er, you could always ask 4 friends to video a channel each for you, Neil?!!

Sorry, best I could do....


So that's one channel sorted. Which one do you want Greg, C5?



We thought about that but if one person was to balls it up, the whole process would need repeating so we were wanting to rely on trusty electronic brains to remember to record the programmes.

Don

28,377 posts

284 months

Thursday 12th January 2006
quotequote all
GregE240 said:
Er, you could always ask 4 friends to video a channel each for you, Neil?!!

Sorry, best I could do....


Yep. But highly practical. All you need is four/five people willing to help, with a media-center/DVDrecorder/VCR each. Post each of 'em a DVD+R/VHS Cassette you'd like filled with TV from time A to time B on the such and so of whenever. Send with it an SAE. Job done.

If you pursue the idea I'd be happy to do burn a couple of hours of utter crap onto a DVD for you...

neil.b

Original Poster:

6,546 posts

247 months

Thursday 12th January 2006
quotequote all
Fish said:
Neil.

You can buy splitters at most up to eight and alot have booster amps. At home I split it into four with no boost and it is good enough for digital. To record a channel you need a receiver either in a PCI card or VHS etc. PCI TV cards at the cheapest are about £30 so you would need 5x then you have the issues of whether you can stream and store enough data on the hard drives. I have a harddrive digital box which has two receivers but at TV quality you are looking at about 1hr per Gig of data unless you compressed it more.

Hope that helps..It won't be that cheap either way.


Bugger, i thought as much - I was rather hoping to avoid the "5 x video card/pc" problem, thinking that there might be one card that could record several channels at the same time. Hard drive space is not an issue though.

>> Edited by neil.b on Thursday 12th January 08:38

neil.b

Original Poster:

6,546 posts

247 months

Thursday 12th January 2006
quotequote all
Don said:
GregE240 said:
Er, you could always ask 4 friends to video a channel each for you, Neil?!!

Sorry, best I could do....


Yep. But highly practical. All you need is four/five people willing to help, with a media-center/DVDrecorder/VCR each. Post each of 'em a DVD+R/VHS Cassette you'd like filled with TV from time A to time B on the such and so of whenever. Send with it an SAE. Job done.

If you pursue the idea I'd be happy to do burn a couple of hours of utter crap onto a DVD for you...


That's mighty kind of you to offer Don, thank you.

If all else fails (and it looks like it might), I may just take you up on the offer. I just need a few more volunteers.

GregE240

10,857 posts

267 months

Thursday 12th January 2006
quotequote all
neil.b said:
GregE240 said:
Er, you could always ask 4 friends to video a channel each for you, Neil?!!

Sorry, best I could do....


So that's one channel sorted. Which one do you want Greg, C5?



We thought about that but if one person was to balls it up, the whole process would need repeating so we were wanting to rely on trusty electronic brains to remember to record the programmes.
Mate, I'm a dab hand at recording programmes, and I can get all 5 channels. If you lived nearer, it would be no problem!!!

Plotloss

67,280 posts

270 months

Thursday 12th January 2006
quotequote all
Three twin tuner graphics cards and a 6 way coaxial amp.

JonRB

74,499 posts

272 months

Thursday 12th January 2006
quotequote all
Low tech option? Pick up 5 VCRs off eBay - they must be virtually giving them away these days - and use a splitter as previously discussed. If you have (or can borrow) one of more VCRs then the number of additional ones you need to buy obviously falls.

catretriever

2,090 posts

242 months

Thursday 12th January 2006
quotequote all
JonRB said:
Low tech option? Pick up 5 VCRs off eBay - they must be virtually giving them away these days - and use a splitter as previously discussed. If you have (or can borrow) one of more VCRs then the number of additional ones you need to buy obviously falls.


Surely most VCR's have an RF pass through, which means you shouldn't need a splitter at all but can simply daisy chain the recorders.
In addition to that, if you set each VCR to output on a diffenet channel then you should be able to monitor them all with a single TV.

scared but happy

24,110 posts

229 months

Thursday 12th January 2006
quotequote all
I agree, find a load of video recorders and just use the tuners and interface them with some security cctv system like this

http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/4-Ch-CCTV-PC-CARD-VIDEO-RECORD
(I have one of these and they are quite good)

and either use the CCTV bit as a recorder or monitor for the VCR's if using tapes that will save havin 4 tellys


>> Edited by scared but happy on Thursday 12th January 11:47

catretriever

2,090 posts

242 months

Thursday 12th January 2006
quotequote all
4 identical sanyo recorders for £120 inc delivery here.... (assuming you have 1 already )

http://electronics.search.ebay.co.uk/video-recorder_

Mikey G

4,729 posts

240 months

Thursday 12th January 2006
quotequote all
Now maybe if you could record the incoming signal as whole?
What i mean is if you could set up a device that would record the signal the aerial is receiving as one and not split down into seperate frequencies, then you could play it back into the TV and choose whatever channel you want.....

Am i being to ambitious?

scared but happy

24,110 posts

229 months

Thursday 12th January 2006
quotequote all
^^^ I think thats how the SKY+ box works, by recording the transport stream rather than each MPEG signal.

>> Edited by scared but happy on Thursday 12th January 15:20

JonRB

74,499 posts

272 months

Thursday 12th January 2006
quotequote all
scared but happy said:
I think thats how the SKY+ box works, by recording the transport stream rather than each MPEG signal.
I beleive you are wrong there. When you have Sky+ installed your existing dish is converted to twin feed and the Sky+ box has two receivers. If it could just record the transport stream then there would be no need for twin feeds.

neil.b

Original Poster:

6,546 posts

247 months

Thursday 12th January 2006
quotequote all
Mikey G said:
Now maybe if you could record the incoming signal as whole?
What i mean is if you could set up a device that would record the signal the aerial is receiving as one and not split down into seperate frequencies, then you could play it back into the TV and choose whatever channel you want.....

Am i being to ambitious?


Is this possible? That's a f-ing genius idea if it is. I suppose it's going to depend on the frequencies that terrestrial TV broadcats operates at?

annodomini2

6,860 posts

251 months

Thursday 12th January 2006
quotequote all
JonRB said:
scared but happy said:
I think thats how the SKY+ box works, by recording the transport stream rather than each MPEG signal.
I beleive you are wrong there. When you have Sky+ installed your existing dish is converted to twin feed and the Sky+ box has two receivers. If it could just record the transport stream then there would be no need for twin feeds.


Not to mention, given the number of channels it would probably fill the hard drive in a matter of seconds.

Zad

12,698 posts

236 months

Friday 13th January 2006
quotequote all
If Sky is at all like Freeview, the system is divided into a set of multiplexes (muxes), with (say) 10 channels to a mux. It can receive all those channels at one time and can theoretically stream the data to storage, but if you want a channel off another mux, it would need another tuner. Needless to say, the 5 terrestrial channels are split across several muxes. I'm with the cheap VCR method...

Mike

slapmatt

1,132 posts

222 months

Friday 20th January 2006
quotequote all
An old one, I know, but I think you need something like this:

http://blogs.snapstream.com/2006/01/18/godzilla-pvr/