RE: Driven: Range Rover Sport Supercharged (2012)

RE: Driven: Range Rover Sport Supercharged (2012)

Thursday 5th January 2012

Driven: Range Rover Sport Supercharged (2012)

The home counties yummy mummies might just be onto something here...



OK, let's get it out of the way. This 510hp, supercharged V8 Range Rover Sport uses a lot of fuel, the accelerator less a throttle and more a sluice-gate. If this troubles you then buy the diesel, which is excellent and will do 30mpg+.

Still here? Good.

New colours spruce up the looks a tad
New colours spruce up the looks a tad
Because the Range Rover Sport, especially with this engine, ranks very highly on the guilty pleasures stakes. True, it is the 'new money' Range Rover and the whole yummy mummy/footballer axis does it no favours at all.

Chances are a 500hp+ SUV doesn't figure as traditional PH fodder and arguing a logical case for such a vehicle is difficult. Of all such cars only the Range Rover Sport makes any pretence of maintaining serious 4x4 ability and it's this credibility that offers a shred of justification when compared with the likes of the X5 M and Cayenne Turbo. That the Sport can hold its own up to its axles in clag AND turn in an 8:55 'ring lap is truly a reason for a bit of national pride.

Up hill, down dale
PH's tenure didn't extend to putting that 'ring lap to the test, but the Sport did get a workout on- and off-road; the ability to haul ass across snaking moorland roads then chase camo-clad 'let's off-road' types through the clart proved most entertaining.

Nearly three tonnes no barrier to 'cornering'
Nearly three tonnes no barrier to 'cornering'
The 2012 model has brought various revisions, including a simplification of the range to just 255hp 3.0-litre SDV6 diesel or 'our' supercharged petrol V8. The diesel now gets the Jag-style rotary gear selector and the latest eight-speed gearbox, the petrol sticking with the familiar six-speeder and manly conventional shifter. Other additions include an expanded range of colours and trims, a nifty 'Dual View' infotainment screen and an irksome powered tailgate. This is one of those 'convenience features' that proves anything but when an argument over whether we wanted it open or closed turned ugly and resulted in one of the rams breaking off its mounting.

Where it counts, though, the Sport shows itself as a car of genuine substance, pun intended. Builders of mega-horsepower SUVs have long solved the unfavourable weight and distribution thereof with all manner of trickery and the Sport is no different, getting Adaptive Dynamics active dampers as standard. Where the Sport succeeds and others fail is making it work in an entirely natural way, with none of the artificially enhanced sensations of the tech-heavy Germans.

When you were a kid you did this in wellies
When you were a kid you did this in wellies
Weight distribution
Which means you can carry indecent pace along roads you'd usually consider only appropriate for a 'proper' sports car. One local test road with a combination of elevation changes, harsh crests and compressions and violent direction changes was enough to make that astonishing 'ring time entirely believable.

On this kind of road you'd expect the Sport to be out of sorts, but the quality of the damping is astounding and the confidence the body control delivers means even the most evil combination of crest and corner is swallowed with disdain. And with the view over the hedges from the lofty driving position the Sport proves itself to be an unlikely B-road weapon. At the extremes a degree of reluctance to turn in reminds you you're carrying nearly three tonnes, but it's otherwise remarkable in its agility.

Old school rules
And the engine is magnificent, with a much more progressive power delivery than the whoosh-bang turbos in the German equivalents and a traditional Range Rover woofle, overlaid with a hint of supercharger whine.

Autobiography a tad chintzy in places
Autobiography a tad chintzy in places
It's a car that soothes and compliments in other words, and at a relaxed pace on the motorway can just about tickle 20mpg - it's easy to see why some owners develop a certain sense of (ahem) impenetrable self confidence.

This, near-ubiquity in certain postcodes and some cheaper fixtures and fittings beyond the (bit too) flashy Autobiography trimmings don't do the Sport any favours. The Cayenne does it better, cabin-wise. But it remains a car of massively broad ability and, compared with the rivals, a deal more charisma. If you're going to do the gas-guzzling SUV it's good to know it still pays to buy British.


Range Rover Sport 5.0 Supercharged
Engine:
4,999cc V8 supercharged
Power (hp): 510@6,000rpm
Torque (lb ft): 461@2,500rpm
0-62mph: 6.2 sec
Top speed: 140mph
Weight: 2,590kg
MPG: 19mpg (NEDC combined)
CO2: 348g/km
Price: £74,595 (£78,100 as tested)

Author
Discussion

LongLiveTazio

Original Poster:

2,714 posts

197 months

Thursday 5th January 2012
quotequote all
Nice review.

Looks a lot less blingy in HSE spec with a subtle exterior colour, Autobiography isn't what it was 10 years ago.

V88Dicky

7,305 posts

183 months

Thursday 5th January 2012
quotequote all
I like it, but I'd rather have the same engine in the XFR.

Cheaper (or should that be less expensive?), faster, more nimble, as economical as the diesel RRS, better looking and, dare I say it, more reliable.

But I guess there's no getting some people out of their SUVs, is there?

Antj

1,047 posts

200 months

Thursday 5th January 2012
quotequote all
saw these going round the ring late last year in testing guise, have to say the drivers have the biggest balls of any test drivers i have seen, coming through wipperman on two wheels was some sight. Also a range rover with buckets and roll cage looked kind of cool, wonder if we will ever see a RS spec....lol

be interesting to know how many laps they can do on one tank though.....lol

anonymous-user

54 months

Thursday 5th January 2012
quotequote all
When I become a millionaire I will be purchasing one of these. Well unless the model is changed by the time that happens tongue out

LongLiveTazio

Original Poster:

2,714 posts

197 months

Thursday 5th January 2012
quotequote all
V88Dicky said:
I like it, but I'd rather have the same engine in the XFR.

Cheaper (or should that be less expensive?), faster, more nimble, as economical as the diesel RRS, better looking and, dare I say it, more reliable.

But I guess there's no getting some people out of their SUVs, is there?
The XFR doesn't have 4WD (but probably will within the next 2 years). Some people do take theirs off-road where a Jag wouldn't venture. It also helps a lot if you live somewhere with inclement weather, which lots of people do. Not forgetting advantages such as driving position which massively aid pushing on down a b-road.

V88Dicky

7,305 posts

183 months

Thursday 5th January 2012
quotequote all
LongLiveTazio said:
V88Dicky said:
I like it, but I'd rather have the same engine in the XFR.

Cheaper (or should that be less expensive?), faster, more nimble, as economical as the diesel RRS, better looking and, dare I say it, more reliable.

But I guess there's no getting some people out of their SUVs, is there?
The XFR doesn't have 4WD (but probably will within the next 2 years). Some people do take theirs off-road where a Jag wouldn't venture. It also helps a lot if you live somewhere with inclement weather, which lots of people do. Not forgetting advantages such as driving position which massively aid pushing on down a b-road.
Of course, and I'm not doubting the RR's fantastic offroad ability. My point was that most people who buy these things NEVER take them off road, and when the snow comes, they are invariably on 20"s with summer slicks, and are no better off than said XFR.

LongLiveTazio

Original Poster:

2,714 posts

197 months

Thursday 5th January 2012
quotequote all
V88Dicky said:
Of course, and I'm not doubting the RR's fantastic offroad ability. My point was that most people who buy these things NEVER take them off road, and when the snow comes, they are invariably on 20"s with summer slicks, and are no better off than said XFR.
I know that's true of some people but that's like every car, dangerous to make sweeping generalisations! How many XFR's are bought by people who really drive them other than simply being a range-topping Jag? Truth is that both are niche models, supercharged RR's account for a tiny percentage of their sales. I personally would find a lot more use all-year-round in an RRS than an XF but that's just me.

Cassius81

283 posts

189 months

Thursday 5th January 2012
quotequote all
Isn't the diesel being offered in two states of tune? One 208bhp, the other 252bhp... One called TDV6, the other SDV6

As someone above has said, the more basic HSE in a dark colour with sensible wheels is almost classy.


kambites

67,554 posts

221 months

Thursday 5th January 2012
quotequote all
Yuck - no thanks, not for me.

PascalBuyens

2,868 posts

282 months

Thursday 5th January 2012
quotequote all
V88Dicky said:
Of course, and I'm not doubting the RR's fantastic offroad ability. My point was that most people who buy these things NEVER take them off road, and when the snow comes, they are invariably on 20"s with summer slicks, and are no better off than said XFR.
Which is where the terrain response is VERY useful. I've had my RRS for almost 4 years and 150.000miles now, and haven't even felt the need to put on winter tyres, due to the electronics. And I go everywhere, on-road (taking it to the Ring), and off-road, snow, name it, it's done it all. If I have to change, AND I don't fall for a big American pickup, I'll definitely consider another one of those, regardless of the image they seem to get.

Luca Brasi

885 posts

174 months

Thursday 5th January 2012
quotequote all
Not much of an SUV fan but this is really cool. Much more stylish than an X5M of that ghastly Q7 V12.

Love the CO² figure too biggrin A big fk you to all those eco-terrorists out there nowadays.

JamesNutt21

11 posts

147 months

Thursday 5th January 2012
quotequote all
Just started selling these the SDV6 is brilliant to drive, can't wait to see what the 5.0 has to offer!

JamesNutt21

11 posts

147 months

Thursday 5th January 2012
quotequote all
Cassius81 said:
Isn't the diesel being offered in two states of tune? One 208bhp, the other 252bhp... One called TDV6, the other SDV6

As someone above has said, the more basic HSE in a dark colour with sensible wheels is almost classy.
I've read this on both Autocar and Evo mag but the 208bhp TDV6 doesn't seem to actually exist :S

margerison

734 posts

250 months

Thursday 5th January 2012
quotequote all
Wonder why they've dropped the TDV8 engine?

JamesNutt21

11 posts

147 months

Thursday 5th January 2012
quotequote all
margerison said:
Wonder why they've dropped the TDV8 engine?
Economy and emissions I guess.

EK993

1,925 posts

251 months

Thursday 5th January 2012
quotequote all
We have the choice of a N/A 5ltr V8 in the US -t hey don't do any diesel models here, only SC or non SC. I got the non SC - its a fantastic thing.


PascalBuyens

2,868 posts

282 months

Thursday 5th January 2012
quotequote all
JamesNutt21 said:
I've read this on both Autocar and Evo mag but the 208bhp TDV6 doesn't seem to actually exist :S
211hp TDV6 is offered in Belgium (and probably some other EU countries too). It's basically the same 252hp V6 engine, but electronically limited. It's cheaper to run a sub-211hp car, due to the tax rules here (which may change in a few months, as they're going to tax cars based on CO2-emmissions, and then it won't make a difference aymore)

LHD

17,000 posts

187 months

Thursday 5th January 2012
quotequote all
JamesNutt21 said:
margerison said:
Wonder why they've dropped the TDV8 engine?
Economy and emissions I guess.
3.6 TDV8 wasn't Euro 5 compliant.

Hence it was dropped in Sport at the end of 10MY and FFRR gained 4.4 TDV8 for 11MY.

vz-r_dave

3,469 posts

218 months

Thursday 5th January 2012
quotequote all
I think its insane how much power is lost 510HP and 0-60 in 6.2 seconds. Whilst it is not made for the likes of straight line performance If I bought one I wouldnt want to be out done by the likes of a Focus ST.

Digga

40,316 posts

283 months

Thursday 5th January 2012
quotequote all
JamesNutt21 said:
margerison said:
Wonder why they've dropped the TDV8 engine?
Economy and emissions I guess.
The new 3.0 twin turbo TDV6 delivers very similar perfomance, so I can see the 3.6 TDV8 is redundant, but since this is the 'sport' I can;t see why LR wouldn't equip it with the new, meaty 4.4 TDV8. That really would be a car.

The Article said:
it's easy to see why some owners develop a certain sense of (ahem) impenetrable self confidence
Used to have a 4.6 P38 Vogue. Had to have a word with myself about this. God knows what I;d be like with a blown 5 litre!

(I'm guessing listening to Wagner whilst driving is probably a bad idea.)