RE: Driven: BMW Z4 sDrive28i

RE: Driven: BMW Z4 sDrive28i

Monday 23rd January 2012

Driven: BMW Z4 sDrive28i

Four-pot power for BMW's Z4. But is it any good?



First the good news. Fans of six-cylinder BMW engines may have been dismayed to realise that the creamy naturally-aspirated straight-six is not long for this world - at least in terms of the blue-and-white roundel. The constant downward pressure on emissions and fuel consumption is forcing BMW, like every other carmaker, to make its motors ever-more efficient. And that means turbocharged fours are in, and six-pots are out.

Some bits are good, others not so much
Some bits are good, others not so much
We mentioned good news? Oh yes - said turbocharged 2.0-litre four is a corker, in the Z4 at least. There are two versions available for BMW's folding hardtop coupe-roadster thingummy: a 184hp version, and this, the 245hp option in the Z4 sDrive28i. The new motor, courtesy of such tricks as the variable camshaft control system double Vanos and the fully variable valve control system valvetronic (not to mention a twin-scroll turbocharger) is just 13hp down on the old sDrive30i, despite giving away two cylinders.

It's also got 29lb ft more torque than its predecessor, 258lb ft available between 1,500rpm and 4,800rpm, which not only gives a decent turn of outright speed (0-62mph in 5.7 seconds and a limited top speed of 155mph), but also provides some fairly serious and easily accessible real-world poke. It's a crisp, linear motor, too, with sufficiently sharp throttle response and enough eagerness all the way through the rev range to feel distinctly un-turbocharged at times. And all that's in conjunction with CO2 emissions of 159g/km and an impressive official combined fuel consumption figure of 41.5mpg. Which is suitably green.

No need to feel short-changed engine wise
No need to feel short-changed engine wise
BMW is also very conscious of the lack of aural merit relative to its older six-cylinder offerings. As a consequence it has come up with an electronic sound generator, to give it a better bass and baritone note both at idle and in the main 2,500-3,500rpm rev range. The result won't fool you into thinking you're driving a six, but its eager gurgle sounds pleasant enough.

So that's the good news. Unfortunately this is also followed by some bad news: the engine's comfortably the best bit of the Z4. It's not the build quality or design that's the problem - it's all well screwed together, has plenty of kit and looks sufficiently sporty, if a little awkward from some angles. It's the handling that's the issue.

Damping takes sheen off the handling
Damping takes sheen off the handling
And the main issue with the Z4 – much as with the Merc SLK – is that it doesn’t really seem clear what it is trying to be. Is it a relaxed boulevardier? It can’t be, because the ride is too tough and fidgety, the steering too sharp, and its general demeanour a little too lairy. A proper foucused sports car, then? Er, nope, because even though there’s a stiff-ride, the Z4 often feels under-damped, making comfortable – or even rapid – progress over rough B-roads pretty much an impossibility.

Essentially, it just doesn’t hang together as a dynamic package. And that’s a shame, because despite the lovely engine, a spot-on driving position with well-positioned pedals and a lovely six-speed manual gearchange (the eight-speed ZF auto is also an option), that unresolved chassis is a bit of a deal-breaker. Especially when there’s a new Porsche Boxster on the way...


BMW Z4 SDRIVE28I
Engine
: 1,997cc 4-cylinder, turbo
Power (hp): 245 @ 6,000rpm
Torque (lb ft): 258 @ 1,500-4,800rpm
0-62mph: 5.7 sec 
Top speed: 155mph
Weight: 1,490kg
MPG: 41.5 (NEDC combined)
CO2: 159g/km
Price: £33,645




Author
Discussion

CliveM

Original Poster:

525 posts

185 months

Monday 23rd January 2012
quotequote all
Four-pot power foUr BMW's Z4.....

CliveM

Original Poster:

525 posts

185 months

Monday 23rd January 2012
quotequote all
"The result won't fool you into thinking you're driving a six, but its eager gurgle sounds pleasant enough"

Has the PH shop onsidered selling a CD with "proper" engine sounds that could be downloaded?

Nope, because that would be lame.
Can't believe anyone who cares about cars in the way I'd hoped a PH reviewer does is happy to endorse a stereo playing the exhaust note?!?


Apologies for morning rant....
  • goes to get coffee and discover inner calm
Edited by CliveM on Monday 23 January 11:07

MrTappets

881 posts

191 months

Monday 23rd January 2012
quotequote all
I actually rather like it, though I think the main problem lies with the weight. Knocking 1500kg is a bit much for a 4cyl, 2-seater sports car. Surely one could lose 100-120kg and turn it into the proper sportscar it was before this version. Just wondering what the likelihood of doing over 40mpg is in real life is too.

Kawasicki

13,078 posts

235 months

Monday 23rd January 2012
quotequote all
If it is true that the chassis set-up doesn't allow fast progress on bumpy roads then that is a sad day for BMW and driving enthusiasts.

Gizmo!

18,150 posts

209 months

Monday 23rd January 2012
quotequote all
Shame.

Come on BMW, grow a pair and give us a proper Z4M again.

It only took six years of people asking for them to make the 1M...

Riggers

1,859 posts

178 months

Monday 23rd January 2012
quotequote all
Gizmo! said:
Shame.

Come on BMW, grow a pair and give us a proper Z4M again.

It only took six years of people asking for them to make the 1M...
Don't forget you can still get the six-cylinder in the sDrive35i smile

Gizmo!

18,150 posts

209 months

Monday 23rd January 2012
quotequote all
Riggers said:
Gizmo! said:
Shame.

Come on BMW, grow a pair and give us a proper Z4M again.

It only took six years of people asking for them to make the 1M...
Don't forget you can still get the six-cylinder in the sDrive35i smile
True, although that's still a 3.0 turbo, isn't it?

With the M3's V8 in it and the handling sorted (poor damping? on a BMW? What utter heresy!) it'd be a cult classic like the E46 CSL. They could knock 1000 of them out at £60k and keep the guys at ///M happy: I can't imagine the workforce are overjoyed at designing aero kits for diesel 5-serieses.

Ex Boy Racer

1,151 posts

192 months

Monday 23rd January 2012
quotequote all
That is one ugly car! Doesn't matter whether it's good to drive or not; it's like the ugly girl who might be a lovely person and dynamite in bed - all fine but you'd still choose the pretty one.

Bmw's were once so handsome - they seem to have given that ground to Audi now

Riggers

1,859 posts

178 months

Monday 23rd January 2012
quotequote all
Gizmo! said:
True, although that's still a 3.0 turbo, isn't it?

With the M3's V8 in it and the handling sorted (poor damping? on a BMW? What utter heresy!) it'd be a cult classic like the E46 CSL. They could knock 1000 of them out at £60k and keep the guys at ///M happy: I can't imagine the workforce are overjoyed at designing aero kits for diesel 5-serieses.
Love the idea of that. Are you listening in Munich?? shout

gforceg

3,524 posts

179 months

Monday 23rd January 2012
quotequote all
How long will it be before the wheel turns full circle and we're back with a 4 pot M3?

kambites

67,552 posts

221 months

Monday 23rd January 2012
quotequote all
Have they really got the damping that wrong? Stiffly sprung and under-damped is an awful combination, I wonder if the handling and ride could be fixed (or at least significantly improved) by simply fitting softer springs?

Bash Brannigan

211 posts

187 months

Monday 23rd January 2012
quotequote all
Riggers said:
Gizmo! said:
True, although that's still a 3.0 turbo, isn't it?

With the M3's V8 in it and the handling sorted (poor damping? on a BMW? What utter heresy!) it'd be a cult classic like the E46 CSL. They could knock 1000 of them out at £60k and keep the guys at ///M happy: I can't imagine the workforce are overjoyed at designing aero kits for diesel 5-serieses.
Love the idea of that. Are you listening in Munich?? shout
This'll never happen, you can lead a German to a sun lounger, but you can't make him put his towel on it....

seefarr

1,464 posts

186 months

Monday 23rd January 2012
quotequote all
CliveM said:
"The result won't fool you into thinking you're driving a six, but its eager gurgle sounds pleasant enough"

Has the PH shop onsidered selling a CD with "proper" engine sounds that could be downloaded?

Nope, because that would be lame.
Can't believe anyone who cares about cars in the way I'd hoped a PH reviewer does is happy to endorse a stereo playing the exhaust note?!?


Apologies for morning rant....
  • goes to get coffee and discover inner calm
Edited by CliveM on Monday 23 January 11:07
Easy tiger! If it's the same as the last model, I think it's just a pipe from the intake into the cabin so you can hear the engine.
nerd

kambites

67,552 posts

221 months

Monday 23rd January 2012
quotequote all
seefarr said:
Easy tiger! If it's the same as the last model, I think it's just a pipe from the intake into the cabin so you can hear the engine.
nerd
That wouldn't be very "electronic" would it?

toppstuff

13,698 posts

247 months

Monday 23rd January 2012
quotequote all
This article makes me sad.

The BMW petrol six in its various guises from 2 to 3 litre, is one THE great driving experiences.

I have owned lots of them. I learned about oversteer in a really lairy 328i saloon with dodgy tires years ago. I still miss that car, I absolutely bloody loved it and the noise that it made.

I really, really, really urge anyone who has not owned one to make sure that at least once, they own a 6 cylinder petrol 3 series with a manual box. Preferably a 328, 325 or 330. Drive it hard and learn about how sweet a nice 6 cylinder engine can sound. Learn about balancing rear wheel grip with power.

It is so much fun being able to spin the needle around the rev counter just for the hell of it and because it sounds good. Modern diesel drivers will never know how good that feels.

This new Z4 is a sad car. No one can tell me it is more fun than a six.

Sad times indeed.

Riggers

1,859 posts

178 months

Monday 23rd January 2012
quotequote all
kambites said:
Have they really got the damping that wrong? Stiffly sprung and under-damped is an awful combination, I wonder if the handling and ride could be fixed (or at least significantly improved) by simply fitting softer springs?
Perhaps it's a question of expectation - you expect a BMW to be spot-on dynamically. So when they're not, it's even more of a disappointment. It is unpleasant on bumpy roads, though.

danyeates

7,248 posts

222 months

Monday 23rd January 2012
quotequote all
Ex Boy Racer said:
That is one ugly car! Doesn't matter whether it's good to drive or not; it's like the ugly girl who might be a lovely person and dynamite in bed - all fine but you'd still choose the pretty one.

Bmw's were once so handsome - they seem to have given that ground to Audi now
Really? Now I don't like the look of almost all the new Audi's. They do nothing for me. I loved the look of my B5 S4's and other Audi's of that era, but the modern ones just look a bit bland, boring, and the whole model range seems to blend in with each other a little too much. I like the way this new Z4 looks a bit quirky, and I love the long sweeping bonnet! Just IMHO though.

GroundEffect

13,835 posts

156 months

Monday 23rd January 2012
quotequote all
Gizmo! said:
Riggers said:
Gizmo! said:
Shame.

Come on BMW, grow a pair and give us a proper Z4M again.

It only took six years of people asking for them to make the 1M...
Don't forget you can still get the six-cylinder in the sDrive35i smile
True, although that's still a 3.0 turbo, isn't it?

With the M3's V8 in it and the handling sorted (poor damping? on a BMW? What utter heresy!) it'd be a cult classic like the E46 CSL. They could knock 1000 of them out at £60k and keep the guys at ///M happy: I can't imagine the workforce are overjoyed at designing aero kits for diesel 5-serieses.
That wouldn't get homologated these days.

ZesPak

24,427 posts

196 months

Monday 23rd January 2012
quotequote all
Hmm so the version similary powered to the base Boxster now has a turbo 4-pot, which gives it another point to the boxster.

Good thing the Boxster is about £4k more expensive, but it becomes harder still to make a case for the Z4, where (imho) it had the "nicer" engine before, it certainly doesn't now. Looks like the only thing it has got going is a cheaper price imho.

Gizmo!

18,150 posts

209 months

Monday 23rd January 2012
quotequote all
GroundEffect said:
That wouldn't get homologated these days.
Why not? It passes the emissions tests in the M3.

Or won't the V8 go low enough that the bonnet is cushiony soft for any drunken paedestrians who don't hear a howling V8 approaching...?