Wednesday 1st February 2012

Spotted: 911 3.2 Speedster

An exercise in cult cool, or overpriced marketing puff?

---

For a car that is these days considered a bit of a cult classic, the 911 Speedster had a bit of an inauspicious start to life. Conceived in the late 1980s when the development of the new 964 was running late and sales in the crucial US market were in a bit of a slump, the Speedster was hurried to market effectively to help shift 911s in North America.

Porsche had originally planned to offer something in the mould of the Speedster as a simpler, more focused version of the convertible 911, based on the new 964 underpinnings (something it later did in a way with the 964 Speedster), but ended up creating a car base on the 'old' 3.2 chassis.

Aside from the double-bubble 'hump' where the rear seats ought to be (gone, in the interests of weight-saving), the most obvious difference is the more steeply raked, lower front screen. This can even be unbolted at 'sports events' for an even more dramatic look.

There's also a single-lined hood that Porsche was always keen to point out was merely 'weather protection' and shouldn't be considered as refined or comfortable a hood as the one offered in the ordinary convertible models.

That was pretty much it, though - everything else was standard 911. And yet, owing presumably to its rarity (Porsche made only 2,065 Speedsters), or possibly to its more dramatic looks, the Speedster has become somewhat of a collector's piece.

This particular Speedster has amassed a reasonably meagre 36,500 miles and seems clean and straight, but it's hardly a zero-mile time-warp car. And yet you'll need to part with £75,000 to get your hands on it. Compare that with just £25K or so for even a properly mint low-miler (more like £15k if you go for a more doggy example) and you'll see that there's rather a premium on that chop-top look.

There again, perhaps £75K is perhaps a bargain in Speedster terms - we also spotted this one, with a fetching shade of claret for the leather and roof, up for £89,000...

[don logan]

Not just the "more steeply raked, lower front screen" but a lack of quarter lights too which apparently makes roof down driving a bit breezey!

Really good looking though!

[VB]

another lottery win car.

[Chris71]

Meh, prefer my 911s with roofs. But I do have a bit of an attachment to this model as I had a matchbox toy of one when I was about 5.

[Robsti]

Should have kept your one Guiseppe!

[blackchrome917]

Cool

[BigTom85]

I didn't even know these existed. Lovely looking thing imho.

[Pat H]

Has none of the visual appeal of the aircooled 911 Coupe.

I would far rather have a 1989 911 Club Sport.

[Munich]

Definitely a cool car, but not worth the 200% price increase over a normal mint 911 G-series cab.

[Burnham]

Yum.

[vixen1700]

Pat H said:

I would far rather have a 1989 911 Club Sport.

Absolutely.

[Kazlet]

Nasty.

[y2blade]

Lovely

[griffter]

I like these, but if that asking price is a reflection of true market value, they've about doubled in 5 years.
A turbo-bodied version was available as well (in case you wanted to put the weight back on I guess).

[900T-R]

Doesn't the one in the pics have the wide body option, then? Surely looks like it...

[dave stew]

I really don't like convertibles - all about showing off. I'd much rather have a coupe, but a lot of people like them as they seem to fetch good money, so what do I know?

[cjb1]

that is a turbo bodied one, I'm not aware of a non-turbo bodied one being available but then I could be wrong (unlike the wife who is never wrong of course!!!)

griffter said:

I like these, but if that asking price is a reflection of true market value, they've about doubled in 5 years.
A turbo-bodied version was available as well (in case you wanted to put the weight back on I guess).

[clubracing]

I believe some were specced based on the normal carrera. The wide body cars based on the Supersport also have the Turbo brakes and suspension.

[Bob_Defly]

I honestly don't know what all the fuss is about, there are much nicer 911's IMHO. These just look too hunch-backed to me, same with all 911 cab's.

[cjb1]

Bob I do believe you hit the nail on the head!! I might be biased but I reckon the look of my 911 3.2 Carerra Coupé knocks spots off the speedster........

Bob_Defly said:

I honestly don't know what all the fuss is about, there are much nicer 911's IMHO. These just look too hunch-backed to me, same with all 911 cab's.

[Mogsmex]

Pat H said:

Has none of the visual appeal of the aircooled 911 Coupe.

I would far rather have a 1989 911 Club Sport.

Ding