RE: Driven: Audi RS3 Sportback

RE: Driven: Audi RS3 Sportback

Monday 5th March 2012

2011 Audi RS3 Sportback (8P) | UK Review

Surprisingly engaging hot A3 makes a play for 'posh Impreza' alternative



Please Audi, pull your head out of your proverbial and make more cars like this! And the secret? Stop trying to be perfect!

It's the RS3's rough edges that make it such an appealing prospect. Sure, you'll lose it in a car park full of S Line equipped A3 TDIs, especially with the standard stealth 19s. Better those than the naff, 'I've had a heavy night' red-rimmed alternatives though.

Immediately the RS3 gives off vibes of an old-school Audi long-since squashed by ever more lazy homogeny. But then it is an old-school Audi, relatively speaking. Those familiar with the brand will spot heater controls and other bits and bobs hailing from a previous generation.


No bad thing there of course. And it's a sense that goes further too, the ghost of the much loved RS4 apparently very much preserved - somewhat unexpectedly - in this RS3.

It's an even greater surprise given how uninspiring the car that donated the engine and much else - the TT RS - is. 340hp from just 2.5 litres of classic long-stroke, five-cylinder turbocharged engine is, of course, very traditional Audi. As is the burly power output and torque-rich delivery.

But where the TT seems stodgy, inert and curiously unexciting for one so rapid the RS3 is bursting with character and soul. A chunter in the diffs manoeuvring around a gravel car park is an unexpected indicator of how tightly wound this chassis is, a test period in the very depths of a cold, occasionally snowy winter admittedly playing perfectly to the strengths of a compact, powerful four-wheel drive hatch.


Unlike the last one we drove this one didn't have winter tyres on it, making it all but useless on compacted snow. You just spin four wheels rather than one or two. But on those curving, wet sliproads demanding assertive acceleration to muscle into tightly packed, fast-moving traffic the RS3 demonstrates the relevance of the Quattro drivetrain.

Try the same in the 1 M that's too often chosen as foil for the RS3 and, unless possessed of Harris-like confidence and sideways skills, you'd either be enjoying a DSC strangled 10 per cent of your 340hp and trickling up the slip road at 10mph or attempting to tame a wild tank slapper. Fun when you're in the mood but not always what you want.

The RS3 simply opens more opportunities to delve into its huge power band, a rich, thick seam of thrust underscored with a shamelessly evocative five-cylinder soundtrack. More so with the Sport button engaged to force open up the otherwise automatic flap in the exhaust.


Well, it worked for Subaru so why not Audi. Indeed, the Subaru comparisons are more relevant than the 1 M ones, the RS3 really the posh German alternative for Impreza and Evo owners looking to maintain the same driving model in a less attention seeking package.

True, the RS3 isn't as aggressive or poised as either of these two and the Quattro bit only kicks in once the front wheels have lost traction - ie, when you're already understeering - but the unusually pointy front end, surprisingly supple passive dampers and fast, direct steering all make it a very, very effective B-road weapon and one pleasingly free of the usual Audi gadget freakery.

S Tronic only means you can get creative with left-footed trail braking and other tomfoolery in an effort to counteract the default nose-heavy stance but you still have to ride it out before you can get on the power with any commitment. We're talking percentages here and on that default slimy B-road the RS3 feels compact, alert and eager.


And it's full of pleasing little details too. It's little things - the red cam cover on the engine, the massively over-engineered and machined aluminium bells on the front discs, the discreetly widened track and gaping front intakes that inject a bit of charisma and geek friendly, feel-good detailing. Discreet but enough to get fanboys offering thumbs up as you pass. Not usual stuff in an Audi.

The everyday appeal extends to tax-friendly 221g/km emissions and genuinely achievable 30mpg+ cruising, which is somewhat better than Riggers' alarmingly thirsty, and 100hp down, Golf GTI Edition 35. Boring numbers to be obsessing about perhaps but enough to mean you could slip an RS3 past bean counters, business or domestic, who'd see an Impreza or Evo coming a mile off.

It's that stealth ability that really appeals with the RS3, that and the sense that the performance attributes it possesses are both accessible and relevant in everyday driving situations. And you therefore get to enjoy them more.


It's still a little inert compared with the class leaders. But it's got charms of its own and that enough is something of a relief given the disappointments of the TT RS and RS5.

All of which suggests taking a break from the relentless Vorsprung Durch Technik stuff and seeking a bit of inspiration in highlights from the back catalogue might not be a bad thing from time to time.


SPECIFICATION | 2011 AUDI RS3 SPORTBACK (8P)
Engine:
2,480cc 5-cyl turbo
Transmission: 7-speed dual-clutch auto (S Tronic), four-wheel drive
Power (hp): 340@5,400rpm
Torque (lb ft): 332@1,600rpm
0-62mph: 4.6 sec
Top speed: 155mph (limited)
Weight: 1,575kg
MPG: 31mpg (NEDC combined)
CO2: 212g/km
Price: £38,705 (£43,560 as tested)




Author
Discussion

sinbaddio

Original Poster:

2,365 posts

176 months

Monday 5th March 2012
quotequote all
Reassuringly dull imo rolleyes

jakesmith

9,461 posts

171 months

Monday 5th March 2012
quotequote all
Proper sleeper, surely de-badging is the way to go to surprise a variety of folk @ the lights

jakesmith

9,461 posts

171 months

Monday 5th March 2012
quotequote all
sinbaddio said:
Reassuringly dull imo rolleyes
Really wanted to be the 1st comment!!

Anyway re dull, I think that's the point, for those looking for something fast but not flash who aren't hooning 100% of the time, want decent practicality & consumption... it does 'dull' in a classy way & the power will come in handy from time to time.

How long till someone comments about how a 2nd hand F360, 997S, 996TT etc can be had for the same money

goron59

397 posts

171 months

Monday 5th March 2012
quotequote all
I suspect the biggest barrier to getting this 'past the bean counters' is the very limited production run and the fact they're all (or almost all) sold.

IAJO

231 posts

158 months

Monday 5th March 2012
quotequote all
Nice if you want a sleeper but its a huge wedge for a car that looks the same as a normal a3. There is seemingly more a3's on the road than ford focus. Also when you suprise someone at the lights they'll just think remapped derv.

deadmau5

3,197 posts

180 months

Monday 5th March 2012
quotequote all
Nearly 1600kgs!

HeMightBeBanned

617 posts

178 months

Monday 5th March 2012
quotequote all
£40k for a tarted up Golf? The world's gone mad.

Mike Gill

51 posts

171 months

Monday 5th March 2012
quotequote all
Had I the money this woul be the daily to have. A 1M would be more fun but that doesn't have the practicallity of the hatch nor the subtlety.

Johnboy Mac

2,666 posts

178 months

Monday 5th March 2012
quotequote all
No doubt an excellent alrounder & fast car, I find it rather lacking. Certainly doesn't give me any inspiration to own an Audi even at 10 grand less.

j_s14a

863 posts

178 months

Monday 5th March 2012
quotequote all
A spiritual successor to the S2 then?

tjlazer

875 posts

174 months

Monday 5th March 2012
quotequote all
I've seen a grand total of one of these on the road since they came out. Utterly unremarkable in the flesh they are easily missed compared to the bulked up 1m which I've spotted considerably more of. I really like the concept and the performance/economy goes along way to making it an attractive buy but I can't really see why you'd buy one of these rather than an s3 or s4 or the old rs4, it doesn't do anything tangibly different to those cars and fails so completely on the looks front that I'd feel pretty short changed at that price. I do wish the new rs4 was using this engine though, it sounds lovely.

baz1985

3,598 posts

245 months

Monday 5th March 2012
quotequote all
Perfect replacement for my 8P 3.2. I'll have to bin the standard suspension once more....KW V3/Blistein PSS10 and H&R Anti-Roll Bars. Ditch the factory 19"s for some 18" BBS RG-R with 235/40 Michelin PSS.

Dave Hedgehog

14,546 posts

204 months

Monday 5th March 2012
quotequote all
haldex IV is permanent 4wd, albeit 90% power to the front, it is however reactive and shunts power long before slippage occurs, its monumental improvement over the haldex II in the R32

red rims naff?? pffft

and with the marketing power restriction off its 410bhp and sub 4 second wink

Edited by Dave Hedgehog on Monday 5th March 14:11

collateral

7,238 posts

218 months

Monday 5th March 2012
quotequote all
Is there no 3 pedal version?

Luke.

10,986 posts

250 months

Monday 5th March 2012
quotequote all
Will be buying one of these in 3 years time. The perfect second car to cart around a baby and all the detritus that entails.

Anyone reckon they'll be sub £20k by then? biggrin

Dave Hedgehog

14,546 posts

204 months

Monday 5th March 2012
quotequote all
Luke. said:
Will be buying one of these in 3 years time. The perfect second car to cart around a baby and all the detritus that entails.

Anyone reckon they'll be sub £20k by then? biggrin
glasses had them down as the lowest depreciating car, however with the way petrol prices are shooting skyward you will probably get 4 for 20k lol

Luca Brasi

885 posts

174 months

Monday 5th March 2012
quotequote all
collateral said:
Is there no 3 pedal version?
Nope. Frankly, you'd have to be mad to take this over a 1M imo.

Dagnut

3,515 posts

193 months

Monday 5th March 2012
quotequote all
what is stopping them fitting the RWD biased from the RS4?..Subaru had been using DCCD for years where you can dial in 65% of the power to the rear wheels....if you are comparing it to an Impreza you can get the Litchfield type 20 for that kind of money...be interesting to see them back to back

Dave Hedgehog

14,546 posts

204 months

Monday 5th March 2012
quotequote all
Dagnut said:
what is stopping them fitting the RWD biased from the RS4?..Subaru had been using DCCD for years where you can dial in 65% of the power to the rear wheels....if you are comparing it to an Impreza you can get the Litchfield type 20 for that kind of money...be interesting to see them back to back
i believe haldex IV can be tweaked, i have seen a couple of mods for the TTRS haldex to give it 50/50 split i think

http://www.amdalcester.com/content.jsp?instruction...

Edited by Dave Hedgehog on Monday 5th March 14:30

RichTBiscuit

430 posts

151 months

Monday 5th March 2012
quotequote all
Thought i'd try and get in first with the second hand comparisons... biggrin

Year old Alpina D3
+
Year old Elise Club Racer
=
40k

Perfect! or at least more interesting....