Bonnet mascots - legal or not?

Bonnet mascots - legal or not?

Author
Discussion

joebongo

Original Poster:

1,516 posts

175 months

Wednesday 11th July 2012
quotequote all
Got a 2001 vintage jag sov with a leaping cat on the bonnet - a mate's told me this is illegal - is this true?

At work now so sorry if I can't reply to replies til later tonight.

SSBB

695 posts

156 months

Wednesday 11th July 2012
quotequote all
I don't know, but common sense says if fitted by manufacturer from new then legal, otherwise illegal these days as they wouldn't pass crash regs?

ajb85

1,120 posts

142 months

Wednesday 11th July 2012
quotequote all
Some snide garages who want to impress VOSA would fail the mot on it. Others wouldn't bat an eyelid!

Ari

19,347 posts

215 months

Wednesday 11th July 2012
quotequote all
Illegal or not, the thought of the damage one of these would do, even at low speed, to someone that accidentally walked in front of the car doesn't bear thinking about...


C.A.R.

3,967 posts

188 months

Wednesday 11th July 2012
quotequote all
Ari said:
Illegal or not, the thought of the damage it would do, even at low speed, to someone that accidentally walked in front of the car doesn't bear thinking about...
Exactly this. It would be cat-astrophic.

CampDavid

9,145 posts

198 months

Wednesday 11th July 2012
quotequote all
Ari said:
Illegal or not, the thought of the damage one of these would do, even at low speed, to someone that accidentally walked in front of the car doesn't bear thinking about...

Indeed.

Jaguar were prevented from fitting them due to crash test laws, however existing cars could keep them. Unsure how you'd fare fitting it yourself or if your insurance would be happy if you maimed someone with it.

I'd remove it because

A. It looks st

B. It's dangerous

SLCZ3

1,207 posts

205 months

Wednesday 11th July 2012
quotequote all
This iirc is the reason,
"Jaguar stopped putting the leaping cat on their cars in 1978 due to the introduction of legislation which demanded that all mascots be spring-loaded to prevent injury. Spring-loading the cat proved too problematic and so was dropped".

Baryonyx

17,996 posts

159 months

Wednesday 11th July 2012
quotequote all
OP, your friend must be thinking of the offence of using a vehicle with a dangerous mascot. In which case, yes, I would agree. Fixed Jaguar mascots are the very example I was given when I was told about that offence.

king arthur

6,565 posts

261 months

Wednesday 11th July 2012
quotequote all
I think they look ridiculous on the Jags that aren't built with them anyway.

Rude-boy

22,227 posts

233 months

Wednesday 11th July 2012
quotequote all
king arthur said:
I think they look ridiculous on the Jags that aren't built with them anyway.
Agreed, worse still are the horse mascots and so on you see Lady Likessmellypitsandstableboys you see on some RRS's and the like hurl

Bayerischer

194 posts

147 months

Wednesday 11th July 2012
quotequote all
I think this has the makings of an excellent thread

Regiment

2,799 posts

159 months

Wednesday 11th July 2012
quotequote all
Ari said:
Illegal or not, the thought of the damage one of these would do, even at low speed, to someone that accidentally walked in front of the car doesn't bear thinking about...

The car manufacturer or the driver can't be blamed for the clumsiness of pedestrians. If it impales them, it impales them.

Ari

19,347 posts

215 months

Wednesday 11th July 2012
quotequote all
Regiment said:
The car manufacturer or the driver can't be blamed for the clumsiness of pedestrians. If it impales them, it impales them.
What a stupid stupid comment.

GroundEffect

13,836 posts

156 months

Wednesday 11th July 2012
quotequote all
Regiment said:
Ari said:
Illegal or not, the thought of the damage one of these would do, even at low speed, to someone that accidentally walked in front of the car doesn't bear thinking about...

The car manufacturer or the driver can't be blamed for the clumsiness of pedestrians. If it impales them, it impales them.
wot.

ED209

5,746 posts

244 months

Wednesday 11th July 2012
quotequote all
There is a specific offence of having a dangeours mascot, whether a mascot is dangerous will ultimately be for the court to decide.

Japveesix

4,480 posts

168 months

Wednesday 11th July 2012
quotequote all
C.A.R. said:
Ari said:
Illegal or not, the thought of the damage it would do, even at low speed, to someone that accidentally walked in front of the car doesn't bear thinking about...
Exactly this. It would be cat-astrophic.
They'd definitely be feline a lot of pain, that's for sure.

mat205125

17,790 posts

213 months

Wednesday 11th July 2012
quotequote all
Ari said:
Regiment said:
The car manufacturer or the driver can't be blamed for the clumsiness of pedestrians. If it impales them, it impales them.
What a stupid stupid comment.
Not to mention nieve, given that we live in the era of the "no win, no fee, ambulance chaser"

GoneAnon

1,703 posts

152 months

Wednesday 11th July 2012
quotequote all
mat205125 said:
Not to mention nieve, given that we live in the era of the "no win, no fee, ambulance chaser"
Think Evian, but backwards...

300bhp/ton

41,030 posts

190 months

Wednesday 11th July 2012
quotequote all
king arthur said:
I think they look ridiculous on the Jags that aren't built with them anyway.
rolleyes

BigBen

11,639 posts

230 months

Wednesday 11th July 2012
quotequote all
king arthur said:
I think they look ridiculous on the Jags that aren't built with them anyway.
A lot of Jags in the USA still have 'leapers' on the bonnet so I think that they have all been built with them, just not for some markets.