RE: Driven: Lotus Evora 414E

RE: Driven: Lotus Evora 414E

Tuesday 16th October 2012

Driven: Lotus Evora 414E

Lotus's range-extender Evora proves engineering cleverness is very much alive and kicking at Hethel



The Lotus Evora Range Extender Electric Vehicle (REEV) 414E certainly boasts some impressive numbers. £19million is the total cost of the project, which has also produced the Infiniti Emerg-E and Jaguar XJ E. 1,000Nm (738lb ft) is the total amount of torque generated by the two electric motors. And just 4.4 seconds is the time it needs to sprint from 0-60mph.

Performance is, erm, electric (sorry)
Performance is, erm, electric (sorry)
But there's another figure that is a cause of some concern, and that's the weight. Making an Evora S into an Evora 414E has added 377kg, making a total of 1,759kg.

Having said that, who better than Lotus to create a viable driver's machine with such an apparent disadvantage? For thoroughness, attention to detail and engineering alchemy, there's surely few better. With such an increase in mass, it was vitally important for Lotus to keep as much of it between the axles as possible. To that end, the battery pack sits where the rear seats would in an Evora 2+2 and the 1.2-litre engine sits comfortably ahead of the rear wheels. This has resulted in a weight distribution of 37:63 front to rear, which compares favourably to the 38:62 of an Evora S.

Complex but convincing, Evora is impressive
Complex but convincing, Evora is impressive
So much for the tech...
How does this translate out on the track? Impressively, in a word. As the 414E is currently a one-off prototype and we were only given four laps of a track there wasn't quite the opportunity to go in hard like Mr Harris did with the Exige S earlier in the year. Lack of familiarity with 'new' Hethel's layout didn't help either.

Down the straights though... In EV mode, which gives a range of 30 miles, the performance is not as strangled as you might expect. Crucially also, the accelerator pedal is fantastically weighted, meaning you can add more electric performance easily without causing the range extender and generator to chime in.

When you do ask the 414E for everything though, it responds instantly and ferociously. There is seemingly no delay between applying full throttle and deploying 414hp and 738lb ft to the tarmac, despite the fact that the range extender must start up and power the generator before the power is there. The surge, as you would expect, is hugely linear and apparently limitless, the Evora rushing though 100mph almost disdainfully.

A brief test but a tantalising taste
A brief test but a tantalising taste
Seamless
But, because of this seamless nature, the performance isn't that engaging. The three-cylinder engine is a bespoke range-extender, so it spins only between 1,500 and 3,500rpm. Whilst this is the optimum engine speed to power the generator, it means there is nothing by way of crescendo as you accelerate, as there would be in a conventional car. Moreover, the noise emitted isn't particularly emotive currently, a rather industrial drone overlaid with a little three-cylinder hum.

The rest of the driving experience feels as well calibrated as we expect of any Lotus, with plenty of poise and feedback through the wheel. Moreover, whilst the suspension is stiffened to cope with the extra weight, it is still tolerable around the track's bumpy entry roads. And whether you are lifting off at 100mph or 30, the regenerative braking gives the same response, noticeably aiding the braking process but with such nuanced precision to be easily adapted to after just a few minutes.

The integration and feel is expertly balanced
The integration and feel is expertly balanced
Shop window
The 414E shows that a range-extender hybrid drivetrain is a viable option for performance cars. With the REEVolution (get it?) still nascent, Lotus is promising (and will surely deliver) further advances in terms of noise with its HALOsonic technology and a simulated paddleshift also. PH will be outlining this and all the other tech that comprises the 414E package soon, so watch this space.

Finally, it is worth noting the Evora 414E is not intended as production concept; the car is a showcase for the technology developed as part of the tie-up, to display to the world that Lotus can develop hybrid powertrains. Now it hopes to outsource these skills, to profit from what they've learnt by installing the tech into the products of other manufacturers.

The 414E is far more than the sum of its statistics then. It shows Lotus is again at the vanguard of automotive innovation, delivering tangible advances before the competition. Interest in this project will only increase as it develops, which can only benefit Lotus further. No doubt it needs some good fortune right now, and the Evora Range Extender Electric Vehicle deserves to return Lotus to prominence.


LOTUS EVORA 414E
Engine:
1,198cc 3-cyl range extender, 2x electric motors
Transmission: Direct drive twin electric motors in rear wheels
Power (hp): 414hp (combined)
Torque (lb ft): 738lb ft (combined)
0-62mph: 4.4sec
Top speed: c. 133mph
Weight: 1,759kg
MPG: 45mpg (approx, with range-extender)
CO2: c. 55g/km (overall)
Price: Development prototype

Author
Discussion

loudlashadjuster

Original Poster:

5,106 posts

184 months

Tuesday 16th October 2012
quotequote all
..and no mention of the actual extended range of the thing!

Go on, Matt, tell us how many miles Lotus expect the thing to do on a full charge and full tank?

Sicob

478 posts

228 months

Tuesday 16th October 2012
quotequote all
The colour upsets me, more than the weight.

chazwozza

729 posts

186 months

Tuesday 16th October 2012
quotequote all
Can you supercharge the range-extender....?!

loudlashadjuster

Original Poster:

5,106 posts

184 months

Tuesday 16th October 2012
quotequote all
Sicob said:
The colour upsets me, more than the weight.
Anyone seen that tin of Copaslip I left in the bar at the Park Farm in Hethersett?

MrTappets

881 posts

191 months

Tuesday 16th October 2012
quotequote all
Can someone explain to me once and for all why electric cars have such low top speeds? Sorry if I'm being obtuse but I just can't work it out.

Flatinfourth

591 posts

138 months

Tuesday 16th October 2012
quotequote all
so a rather good looking composite bodied car built by a company who's founder pushed the boundaries of weight reduction so far that cars would self destruct before the completion of a race in the sixties, has morphed into something that weighs the same as an early two door Range Rover....

SpikeyMike

2 posts

153 months

Tuesday 16th October 2012
quotequote all
MrTappets said:
Can someone explain to me once and for all why electric cars have such low top speeds? Sorry if I'm being obtuse but I just can't work it out.
I have to say, I'm not an expert, but....

Isn't it the lack of a gearbox? Electric motors provide huge torque at pull-away, and so don't need a gearbox for this.
But their top RPM is limited by the mechanics of spinning magnetic fields. Field weakening is used to overcome this, but then you lose torque....

Flatinfourth

591 posts

138 months

Tuesday 16th October 2012
quotequote all
So fit a gearbox and make it a driver's car!

John145

2,447 posts

156 months

Tuesday 16th October 2012
quotequote all
Flatinfourth said:
so a rather good looking composite bodied car built by a company who's founder pushed the boundaries of weight reduction so far that cars would self destruct before the completion of a race in the sixties, has morphed into something that weighs the same as an early two door Range Rover....
The real world is a bit more complicated than this...

The F1 era of performance through light weight used engineering to push the boundaries of what was possible, using technical excellence to achieve this. This car is exactly the same, only the boundaries are defined by more than just F1 regulations.

Mark-C

5,061 posts

205 months

Tuesday 16th October 2012
quotequote all
loudlashadjuster said:
Sicob said:
The colour upsets me, more than the weight.
Anyone seen that tin of Copaslip I left in the bar at the Park Farm in Hethersett?
Yep - I nicked it and dropped it off at the Bird In Hand in Wreningham ....

kambites

67,544 posts

221 months

Tuesday 16th October 2012
quotequote all
chazwozza said:
Can you supercharge the range-extender....?!
Well yes, and you'd be able to charge your batteries quicker, but it wouldn't actually go any faster.

Personally, I think this is the short-term future of performance motoring. I'm just amazed it's taken so long to come about.

kambites

67,544 posts

221 months

Tuesday 16th October 2012
quotequote all
loudlashadjuster said:
..and no mention of the actual extended range of the thing!

Go on, Matt, tell us how many miles Lotus expect the thing to do on a full charge and full tank?
Assuming the same fuel tank as the normal Evora, I'd guess something like 500 miles?

kambites

67,544 posts

221 months

Tuesday 16th October 2012
quotequote all
[redacted]

Flatinfourth

591 posts

138 months

Tuesday 16th October 2012
quotequote all
the fact remains that it takes a given amount of energy to move an object of a given weight, with a given drag co-efficient. if this car had a tiny forced induction engine it could maintain incredible fuel economy when not under hard acceleration,and could go like fury on demand. rather than an electric vehicle that has to drag its batteries around regardless. The physics and green argument simply do not stand up.

kambites

67,544 posts

221 months

Tuesday 16th October 2012
quotequote all
[redacted]

Thorburn

2,399 posts

193 months

Tuesday 16th October 2012
quotequote all
Flatinfourth said:
So fit a gearbox and make it a driver's car!
It actually has a single speed Xtrac gearbox, which looks like it basically acts as a 4.58:1 final drive.

I'd guess the torque (1000Nm) and rpm (12k) of the electric motors would make it hard to find an off the shelf gearbox.

kambites

67,544 posts

221 months

Tuesday 16th October 2012
quotequote all
Flatinfourth said:
the fact remains that it takes a given amount of energy to move an object of a given weight, with a given drag co-efficient. if this car had a tiny forced induction engine it could maintain incredible fuel economy when not under hard acceleration,and could go like fury on demand. rather than an electric vehicle that has to drag its batteries around regardless. The physics and green argument simply do not stand up.
So you think driving the wheels directly from an ICE at 20% efficiency is better than charging a battery from one at 40% efficiency and driving an electric motor at 90% efficiency? confused

Driving the wheels of a vehicle directly from an internal combustion engine is completely and utterly stupid.

Thorburn

2,399 posts

193 months

Tuesday 16th October 2012
quotequote all
Sicob said:
The colour upsets me, more than the weight.
http://wiki.seloc.org/a/Models_-_Evora#Evora_414E_Hybrid

"The interior and exterior are both styled to reflect the battery powered nature of the car, with the copper colour resembling that of a battery, while the roof and engine cover are made of glass with electrical contact detailing."

Don't think the mule has the same detailing on the engine cover as the original concept show car, but that's where the colour comes from.

kambites

67,544 posts

221 months

Tuesday 16th October 2012
quotequote all
[redacted]

Thorburn

2,399 posts

193 months

Tuesday 16th October 2012
quotequote all
[redacted]