RE: Driven: new Range Rover

RE: Driven: new Range Rover

Monday 29th October 2012

2012 Range Rover Vogue TDV6 (L405) | Review

We've seen it, we've sat in it and finally we've driven it - all the goss on the all-new Range Rover



It looks like the old one. That's the first thought on seeing the new, fourth-generation Range Rover. All that work, all that expense, and it ends up just the same. Except that those vertical slats on the flanks look even less likely than before to have any function, because now they sit uselessly on the front doors instead of looking as if they might extract air from the engine bay (they didn't, as it happens).

Function fails to follow form, then, unless you accept that the visual purpose is sufficient in itself. "The vertical detail reduces the visual impression of length," says Land Rover designer Gerry McGovern, who makes it clear that this is quite sufficient to justify the garnish.

But then, you look a little harder at the new Range Rover and a lot of subtleties start to emerge. Its nose is shorter and less bluff, the windscreen sits back at a faster angle, the waistline rises rearwards and both front and rear lights have little tongues licking around the corners. Also, the wheelarches hug the wheels like never before, which has the unexpected effect of making the Range Rover look more compact than it really is. The body seems less of a burden.


It is, too. That's because the whole monococque structure is now made from aluminium, which contributes to a hefty weight saving of up to 420kg. Length, width and wheelbase have all grown a little but the roofline is lower. Rear-seat passengers have significantly more lounging room.

Which is part of the point, because more than ever before the Range Rover is the definitive luxury SUV. Never has the 'U' part strayed further from its origins; it's almost an oxymoron now. The RR was introduced to us in Morocco and the Range Rover's party piece was not simply that it can drive along the sides of sand dunes with barely any tail-slippage, nor that it can clamber along rocky riverbeds before clawing its way back up the bank, but that it can do so while keeping its occupants in near-silent, air-conditioned luxury with barely a body-wobble between them as it does so.

Range Rovers have always been good at that, but this one has yet more wheel travel and an extra-clever system of traction electronics called Terrain Response 2. You can dial the different modes - sand, rocks, snow/grass/gravel, semi-solid lava flow, etc - or you can leave it to its own automatic devices. Following a Defender along the dunes showed what it can do; the Defender was fishtailing with the rear wheels forever trying to fall down the gradient, but the Range Rover ran almost straight as the drive torque flowed to the wheels best able to make it do so. The 'probability estimators update 100 times a second' while sorting out how to do it, apparently.


It's a brilliant off-roader, then, but you expected that. It can now wade in water up to 900mm deep, too, thanks to air intakes right up just below the bonnet. They look like a ship's funnels. But can the Range Rover really do this while also rivalling the world's best luxury saloon for ride and handling, as claimed? Up to a point it can.

All new Range Rovers have height-adjustable air suspension, and the V8 versions - 4.4-litre, 339hp turbodiesel and 5.0-litre, 510hp supercharged petrol - have an active anti-roll system. That was true of the old model, too, although the systems are refined and the suspension arms are now aluminium. New to the Range Rover, though, are electric power steering and the entry-level option of JLR's 3.0-litre, 258hp, V6 turbodiesel made possible by the weight reduction. With this engine, weight comes down to 2,160kg.

The supercharged V8 is the hotrod of the range, with a claimed 5.4 seconds to 62mph and - with the right tyres - a 155mph maximum. It feels properly quick on the road, with enough torque to make you wonder if it really needs eight forward gear ratios in its ZF automatic 'box, but a 322g/km CO2 figure is the downside. The V8 diesel at 229g/km is a better eco-bet and still gives you 62 in 6.9 seconds; subjectively it feels nearly as quick as the supercharged car, and doesn't sound much different. That's how refined the diesel is.


The one to have, though, is the V6, preferably on the smallest, 20-inch wheels. 7.4 seconds to 62mph, 130mph, 196g/km, 442lb ft of torque and a £71,295 starting price. On real roads it might not have quite the ballistic surge of the V8s but it's plenty quick enough for an SUV. It, too, is ultra-refined and un-diesel-like, and it also both handles and rides the best. The V8s still feel a bit SUV-like, with large masses being shifted and a feeling of forces being fought, and they can thud heavily into road-breaks. The V6 steers sweetly and naturally, you're hardly aware of the minimal extra roll, and it eases beautifully over bumps while feeling much more agile than it should. Physics are defied best here.

All have the lush cabins and myriad trim possibilities you'd expect of a new Range Rover, with only a slightly untidy on-screen menu and an annoying beep when you press the start button to cloud the picture. England expects, and the Range Rover delivers. Again.


SPECIFICATION | 2012 RANGE ROVER VOGUE TDV6 (L405)
Engine:
2,993cc V6 turbocharged
Transmission: 8-speed auto, four-wheel drive
Power (hp): 258@4,000rpm
Torque (lb ft): 442@2,000rpm
0-62mph: 7.9 sec
Top speed: 130mph
Weight: 2,160kg
MPG: 37.7mpg (NEDC combined)
CO2: 196g/km
Price: from £71,295

Read our Range Rover (L405) buying guide here







Author
Discussion

chiefski26

Original Poster:

815 posts

201 months

Monday 29th October 2012
quotequote all
Looks impressive on paper will be good to see in flesh once released.

Noe

81 posts

283 months

Monday 29th October 2012
quotequote all

Did all the journo's / car sites all attend exactly the same driving event? Barely anything different to read between any other site review ..... Why can't some different be done / added to the reviews?

CoolHands

18,604 posts

195 months

Monday 29th October 2012
quotequote all
Another 'new' one? Do they bring out new ones every couple of minutes these days or is it my imagination...

Itsallicanafford

2,764 posts

159 months

Monday 29th October 2012
quotequote all
...'from £71,295'...Ouch!


mister.t

3,007 posts

196 months

Monday 29th October 2012
quotequote all
Lovely smile Looking forward to seeing one in the flesh.

zeppelin101

724 posts

192 months

Monday 29th October 2012
quotequote all
CoolHands said:
Another 'new' one? Do they bring out new ones every couple of minutes these days or is it my imagination...
Given the last properly new Range Rover was released in 2001, I'd say it's in your imagination!

Cassius81

283 posts

189 months

Monday 29th October 2012
quotequote all
Looks superb, and a real step on from the old one in terms of weight loss, peformance. Which wasn't exactly terrible...albeit a bit blingy and with the purity of the original design somewhat diluted.

I'll take a used one in a couple of years - as understated as possible in dark blue or dark grey, black or dark brown leather, no tints/chrome, small wheels, V8 diesel.

Add tasteful private plate and some mud. Perfect.

MyCC

337 posts

157 months

Monday 29th October 2012
quotequote all
Looks great and will sell very well. For those that are commenting about the high starting price, the new RR Sport will be moved up a level price, spec and trim wise to fill the void.

Regards,

My CC.

CoolHands

18,604 posts

195 months

Monday 29th October 2012
quotequote all
zeppelin101 said:
CoolHands said:
Another 'new' one? Do they bring out new ones every couple of minutes these days or is it my imagination...
Given the last properly new Range Rover was released in 2001, I'd say it's in your imagination!
meh

they all looks the same these days moan

bigminiandy

9 posts

142 months

Monday 29th October 2012
quotequote all
We passed a transporter full of them 3 weeks ago on our way to Poole, all with german registration plates on. We slowed down and eyed them up and down for a few minutes through the window of our RR L322.

I want one but know until depreciation hits I wont be having one.

dav123a

1,220 posts

159 months

Monday 29th October 2012
quotequote all
MyCC said:
Looks great and will sell very well. For those that are commenting about the high starting price, the new RR Sport will be moved up a level price, spec and trim wise to fill the void.

Regards,

My CC.
I think RR is being moved further upmarket ready to compete with other luxury 4x4's that will be out in the next few years , Jaguar , Bentley , Maserati , Lamborghini.

paulrussell

2,103 posts

161 months

Monday 29th October 2012
quotequote all
dav123a said:
I think RR is being moved further upmarket ready to compete with other luxury 4x4's that will be out in the next few years , Jaguar , Bentley , Maserati , Lamborghini.
I highly doubt Jaguar would make a luxury SUV, since Land Rover and jaguar are the same company now.

Cassius81

283 posts

189 months

Monday 29th October 2012
quotequote all
[redacted]

dav123a

1,220 posts

159 months

Monday 29th October 2012
quotequote all
paulrussell said:
dav123a said:
I think RR is being moved further upmarket ready to compete with other luxury 4x4's that will be out in the next few years , Jaguar , Bentley , Maserati , Lamborghini.
I highly doubt Jaguar would make a luxury SUV, since Land Rover and jaguar are the same company now.
I have read they are looking into a 'crossover ' so I'm guessing it it will not be in the same market as RR.

Cassius81

283 posts

189 months

Monday 29th October 2012
quotequote all
[redacted]

bakerstreet

4,760 posts

165 months

Monday 29th October 2012
quotequote all
Cassius81 said:
Looks superb, and a real step on from the old one in terms of weight loss, peformance. Which wasn't exactly terrible...albeit a bit blingy and with the purity of the original design somewhat diluted.

I'll take a used one in a couple of years - as understated as possible in dark blue or dark grey, black or dark brown leather, no tints/chrome, small wheels, V8 diesel.

Add tasteful private plate and some mud. Perfect.
The smallest wheels being 20in!

kambites

67,543 posts

221 months

Monday 29th October 2012
quotequote all
Arcticle said:
The one to have, though, is the V6, preferably on the smallest, 20-inch wheels.
yikes

Certainly seems like a good update, mostly due to the weight loss, but I still don't personally see the appeal of this soft of vehicle unless you actually need the off-road capability.

Dave Hedgehog

14,546 posts

204 months

Monday 29th October 2012
quotequote all
i find them completely unappealing

Burnham

3,668 posts

259 months

Monday 29th October 2012
quotequote all
I wonder how many of each engine variant they will sell, as a percentage. I would guess most will go for the V6, and a limited few for the Supercharged V8.

For me the 4.4 V8 would be the sweet spot though....I hope lots of other buyers agree, as I want a cheap 2nd hand one in a couple of years!

Burnham

3,668 posts

259 months

Monday 29th October 2012
quotequote all
Dave Hedgehog said:
i find them completely unappealing
I used to think the same (I tend to like small fast light coupes), but then I drove one of the now-old shape and was converted.