RE: Hyper 12C breaks cover

RE: Hyper 12C breaks cover

Monday 19th November 2012

Hyper 12C breaks cover

Pray silence for McLaren's most powerful 12C yet



Fancy a 12C, but it’s simply not lairy enough for you? Well fear not, because the solution to your quandary could be here, in the shape of McLaren’s newest arrival: the 12C GT Can-Am Edition.

Yes, it bears one of those names that trips off the tongue like a walrus falling over a stool, but it’s worth learning because the 12CGTCAE... ahem... is the ultimate incarnation so far of a car that’s already rather remarkable.

Limited to a run of just 30 and billed as the ultimate track car, it’ll get a breathed-upon version of the standard car’s 3.8-litre twin-turbo V8 with a unique engine calibration and an optimised cooling system.

The key difference, though, will be the removal of the GT3 version’s FIA-mandated restrictors, allowing the V8 to deliver its full 630hp potential. This we consider to be a Good Thing, and it might well address the criticisms of the Macca which hold that it just feels a bit too clinical.

Aero package boosts downforce by 30%
Aero package boosts downforce by 30%
There’s nothing clinical about the way it looks, either: the Can-Am Edition will feature a unique aerodynamic package that’s been honed using Formula 1 technology and simulation, giving it a 30 percent boost in downforce. It’ll also sit on unique black satin-finish forged alloy wheels, also race-derived and, as a result, super lightweight.

Inside, there’ll be a steering wheel based on that of the MP4-24 Formula 1 car, as well as a full FIA-approved rollcage, black race seats, six-point harnesses, and... erm... an ‘integrated motorsport air conditioning system’.  Just like they fit to all the GT3 racers. Or something.

Of course, all this finery must come at a price, and the Can-Am Edition’s is a not-inconsiderable £375,000. That’s more than twice the cost of the standard 12C, which seems a lot when you consider the upgrades involved. That said, a vast portion of that cost will be the price tag attached to the Can-Am’s exclusivity, and if it’s an exclusive McLaren you’re after, you can’t really do much better.

GT3 racer makes a tempting alternative
GT3 racer makes a tempting alternative
Or can you? A quick scour of the PH classifieds has unearthed this little gem. It, too, is a rather special 12C, but this time it’s a full-fat, genuine GT3 racer.

That means it gets not only the magnificent aero package, but also all of the top-end suspension, braking and transmission upgrades that come with the territory.

Of course, it isn’t road legal, so this one’s strictly a circuit plaything for the wealthy, but we’d submit that it’s this, rather than the Can-Am Edition, which is probably the ultimate McLaren track car. What’s more, it’ll set you back significantly less at a shade under £300,000. You pays your money, you takes your choice – but we’d take the GT3 and spend the change on something to haul it around with.

Author
Discussion

tommy vercetti

Original Poster:

11,487 posts

163 months

Monday 19th November 2012
quotequote all
Liking that`

Life Saab Itch

37,068 posts

188 months

Monday 19th November 2012
quotequote all
Love it...apart from the fact that McLaren are using the Can-Am name for a car with a roof.


Real Can-Am cars don't have lids.

Monty Zoomer

1,459 posts

157 months

Monday 19th November 2012
quotequote all
I like that, I think it's loads better than the GT3 one.

It's got the full 630 horses whereas the GT3's only got 500.

I'd happily pay the extra 76 grand for the Can-Am, after all, not only do you get the full power, but you also get the missing hyphen back! yes

k-ink

9,070 posts

179 months

Monday 19th November 2012
quotequote all
Daft name, awesome car!

British Beef

2,209 posts

165 months

Monday 19th November 2012
quotequote all
A shade under £300k for the GT3 one until you add VAT, then it is a slightly larger shade under £400k!!! So £375k plays £360k.

Presumably race teams can reclaim VAT, is ther any way Jo public can avoid VAT for a track car??
Or would you need to make up a race team and register it as a company, still worth it if you are saving £60k!!

VladD

7,854 posts

265 months

Monday 19th November 2012
quotequote all

storminnorman

2,357 posts

152 months

Monday 19th November 2012
quotequote all
Life Saab Itch said:
Love it...apart from the fact that McLaren are using the Can-Am name for a car with a roof.


Real Can-Am cars don't have lids.
yeah, it should really be some sort of nutbag spyder type thing

SprintSpeciale

432 posts

145 months

Monday 19th November 2012
quotequote all
What is the point in stuffing it with FIA-compliant bits and bobs if you have made it FIA non-compliant by removing the restrictors?? A very expensive toy that you can't even race properly. Madness.

Edited by SprintSpeciale on Monday 19th November 16:40

BeirutTaxi

6,630 posts

214 months

Monday 19th November 2012
quotequote all
I don't get the whole bullst 'lack of emotion' comments that have surrounded the MP4. Looks fantastic and purposeful without being cheesy.

This car has got me thinking about something I thought of recently; Instead of having a compromise of car that's road legal and supposedly handy on a track why not have a dedicated track performance car instead?

Edited by BeirutTaxi on Monday 19th November 16:37

ukaskew

10,642 posts

221 months

Monday 19th November 2012
quotequote all
Hopefully somebody somewhere will put in the effort to make one of these road legal in the spirit of the converted F1 GTRs. For no other reason than 'just because', plus it would be an awesome sight arriving at Wilton House next year...

Frik

13,542 posts

243 months

Monday 19th November 2012
quotequote all
If you're going to compare the road and race cars on cost, wouldn't it be relevant to include running costs which are liable to be substantially greater for the non-road car?

jacklewisno1

376 posts

144 months

Monday 19th November 2012
quotequote all
Saw this testing at Donnington a while ago.


will261058

1,115 posts

192 months

Monday 19th November 2012
quotequote all
Love it but I would be over the moon with a lowly bog standard one.

garypotter

1,498 posts

150 months

Monday 19th November 2012
quotequote all
What a fantastic looking car, well doen MCL, love it

Godalmighty83

417 posts

254 months

Monday 19th November 2012
quotequote all
SprintSpeciale said:
What is the point in stuffing it with FIA-compliant bits and bobs if you have made it FIA non-compliant by removing the restrictors?? A very expensive toy that you can't even race properly. Madness.

Edited by SprintSpeciale on Monday 19th November 16:40
I would expect that if you are buying this for your own FIA GT3 race team then a couple of restriction plates including fitting is about 5 seconds work.

marcosgt

11,018 posts

176 months

Monday 19th November 2012
quotequote all
Pointless car which you can only use on the track...

Super-rich man's plaything, nothing else, you can't even go to the shops in it!

Better off buying an old F1 car! biggrin

M.

DanielSan

18,773 posts

167 months

Monday 19th November 2012
quotequote all
I suddenly don't want an FXX anymore....

wiliferus

4,060 posts

198 months

Monday 19th November 2012
quotequote all
will261058 said:
Love it but I would be over the moon with a lowly bog standard one.
Likewise... I'll quite happily have a poverty spec 12C! hehe

TNH

559 posts

147 months

Monday 19th November 2012
quotequote all
The way I read this article is that the Can Am IS road legal and the non-road legal bit is referring to the GT3?

So for your extra £75k you are actually getting a road legal GT3 with more power. Unless im reading it wrong of course.

Monty Python

4,812 posts

197 months

Monday 19th November 2012
quotequote all
TNH said:
The way I read this article is that the Can Am IS road legal and the non-road legal bit is referring to the GT3?

So for your extra £75k you are actually getting a road legal GT3 with more power. Unless im reading it wrong of course.
No - neither is road legal.