RE: You Know You Want To: Jaguar XKR

RE: You Know You Want To: Jaguar XKR

Thursday 29th November 2012

You Know You Want To: Jaguar XKR

A supercharged V8 for sensible money. It will improve your life



The rising excitement around the Jaguar F-Type launch has left Jaguar's flagship sports car the XK in the shadows. More so now the lairy XKR-S is hogging the stage.

But the GT coupes have their owned starring role in the secondhand market, where the earlier 4.2 XK and XKRs are beginning to look like incredible value.

Full Jag service history is welcome
Full Jag service history is welcome
The 2007 car featured here is being sold at £22,990. For under £25k, a handful of dealer-backed XKRs are available and for a fraction less than £16,000 an XK 4.2 could be on your drive. That doesn't disappoint with 300hp, but we're focusing on the supercharged, 425hp XKR instead.

The XKR is undeniably attractive. The proportions are classic GT, and the features are good, although the front light clusters look a little cheap with the orange indicator lenses. This was only rectified with the 2011 facelift that also introduced the R-S models.

But the very fact that the XK has only been subjected to minor cosmetic tweaks since its 2006 launch is testament to the inherent appeal and success of the original design.

The XKR has also been mechanically updated regularly to keep it competitve in a crowded segment. The 2009 facelift saw the introduction of the 5.0-litre V8 for both models, and the swivelling gear selector from the XF. Around £35,000 gets you an early 510hp facelifted XKR.

425hp means 60mph in just 4.9secs
425hp means 60mph in just 4.9secs
Of course, the 4.2-litre supercharged car doesn't suffer a surfeit of performance. With 425hp and 413lb ft, 0-60mph takes just 4.9 seconds. Despite aluminium construction, the XKR was never truly lithe, but its 1,732kg kerbweight remains significantly less than rivals such as the Maserati GranTurismo and Bentley Continental GT.

This XKR, in Metallic Lunar Grey with Ivory leather, is fairly typical of what's on offer. Dark exterior shades are prevalent, often with contrasting interior leather. Every piece of equipment that could move electrically does, and a full Jaguar service history is a nice bonus.

One last thing; Jaguar regularly heads customer satisfaction surveys, reflecting the faith buyers have in both the products and dealers. So if you can support a 20mpg fuel habit and the inevitable decline into four-figure values, an XKR appears a solid choice.

Jaguar XKR (2007)

Price: £22,990

Why you should: It's the car that began Jaguar's recent renaissance, and an exceptionally good one at that.

Why you shouldn't: Any XKR still has some years depreciation left, so perhaps wait for a 5.0-litre car.

Author
Discussion

g7jhp

Original Poster:

6,961 posts

238 months

Thursday 29th November 2012
quotequote all
Lovely looking cars but I took one round a track (Bedford) and the weight was very noticeable! I opted the the 996 turbo route instead.

Prof Prolapse

16,160 posts

190 months

Thursday 29th November 2012
quotequote all


"Like a startled pervert, peering through a gimp mask"

MrTappets

881 posts

191 months

Thursday 29th November 2012
quotequote all
Prof Prolapse][img said:
"Like a startled pervert, peering through a gimp mask"
You've ruined it now

DJRC

23,563 posts

236 months

Thursday 29th November 2012
quotequote all
g7jhp said:
Lovely looking cars but I took one round a track (Bedford) and the weight was very noticeable! I opted the the 996 turbo route instead.
ITS NOT A fkING TRACK CAR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

First fking post. THE FIRST fkING POST FFS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

When I assume supreme dictatorship every single goddam bd ed mother fker who mentions "round a track" when talking about a road car...Im going to fking shoot in the dick. Its not enough you Goddam morons have tried your best to ruin every single damn car in the last decade, but you EXPRESSLY AND OBJECTIVELY SET OUT TO RUIN CARS WHICH ARE THE fkING OPPOSITE OF TRACK CARS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

And you ruin them for the rest of us!! So please, for the love of fking God, the next time you feel you might like something vaguely GT'ish DONT take it on the fking track and dont fking whinge about it. That way, maybe, just maybe those of us who actually do require a GT to do the GT job of crossing the Continent to get home can actually buy a car that hasnt had its ride ruined in search of some mythical time around the fking 'Ring!

Steamer

13,856 posts

213 months

Thursday 29th November 2012
quotequote all
MrTappets said:
Prof Prolapse][img said:
"Like a startled pervert, peering through a gimp mask"
You've ruined it now
hehe

Thats torn it.

Just another reason to love the previous model. (DONT tell me what you think that looks like thankyou)

kambites

67,543 posts

221 months

Thursday 29th November 2012
quotequote all
I hadn't realised they'd got so cheap. Fantastic value car, although I'd guess it will continue to depreciate at a pretty heavy rate.

XJR500bhp

1,192 posts

210 months

Thursday 29th November 2012
quotequote all
DJRC said:
ITS NOT A fkING TRACK CAR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

First fking post. THE FIRST fkING POST FFS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

When I assume supreme dictatorship every single goddam bd ed mother fker who mentions "round a track" when talking about a road car...Im going to fking shoot in the dick. Its not enough you Goddam morons have tried your best to ruin every single damn car in the last decade, but you EXPRESSLY AND OBJECTIVELY SET OUT TO RUIN CARS WHICH ARE THE fkING OPPOSITE OF TRACK CARS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

And you ruin them for the rest of us!! So please, for the love of fking God, the next time you feel you might like something vaguely GT'ish DONT take it on the fking track and dont fking whinge about it. That way, maybe, just maybe those of us who actually do require a GT to do the GT job of crossing the Continent to get home can actually buy a car that hasnt had its ride ruined in search of some mythical time around the fking 'Ring!
Man talks sense

big_boz

1,684 posts

207 months

Thursday 29th November 2012
quotequote all
DJRC said:
ITS NOT A fkING TRACK CAR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

First fking post. THE FIRST fkING POST FFS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

When I assume supreme dictatorship every single goddam bd ed mother fker who mentions "round a track" when talking about a road car...Im going to fking shoot in the dick. Its not enough you Goddam morons have tried your best to ruin every single damn car in the last decade, but you EXPRESSLY AND OBJECTIVELY SET OUT TO RUIN CARS WHICH ARE THE fkING OPPOSITE OF TRACK CARS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

And you ruin them for the rest of us!! So please, for the love of fking God, the next time you feel you might like something vaguely GT'ish DONT take it on the fking track and dont fking whinge about it. That way, maybe, just maybe those of us who actually do require a GT to do the GT job of crossing the Continent to get home can actually buy a car that hasnt had its ride ruined in search of some mythical time around the fking 'Ring!
8/10

Bravo clap

AC43

11,473 posts

208 months

Thursday 29th November 2012
quotequote all
big_boz said:
DJRC said:
ITS NOT A fkING TRACK CAR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

First fking post. THE FIRST fkING POST FFS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

When I assume supreme dictatorship every single goddam bd ed mother fker who mentions "round a track" when talking about a road car...Im going to fking shoot in the dick. Its not enough you Goddam morons have tried your best to ruin every single damn car in the last decade, but you EXPRESSLY AND OBJECTIVELY SET OUT TO RUIN CARS WHICH ARE THE fkING OPPOSITE OF TRACK CARS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

And you ruin them for the rest of us!! So please, for the love of fking God, the next time you feel you might like something vaguely GT'ish DONT take it on the fking track and dont fking whinge about it. That way, maybe, just maybe those of us who actually do require a GT to do the GT job of crossing the Continent to get home can actually buy a car that hasnt had its ride ruined in search of some mythical time around the fking 'Ring!
8/10

Bravo clap
10/10 from me. Factually spot on. And excellent swearing.

mnkiboy

4,409 posts

166 months

Thursday 29th November 2012
quotequote all
DJRC said:
ITS NOT A fkING TRACK CAR!!! etc...
Are you James May?

framerateuk

2,730 posts

184 months

Thursday 29th November 2012
quotequote all
I love the XK. I did some work with Shane Williams (ex Wales rugby player) and he's got a black XKR. Lovely car, but I just don't like the pre-facelift models. It'll be on my list of possible cars once the facelifted models have dropped to a more reasonable price though!

cuda

464 posts

240 months

Thursday 29th November 2012
quotequote all
g7jhp said:
Lovely looking cars but I took one round a track (Bedford) and the weight was very noticeable! I opted the the 996 turbo route instead.
...and the 996 turbo is a track car?

rtz62

3,360 posts

155 months

Thursday 29th November 2012
quotequote all
Say what you mean DJRC!
Thoroughly agree.
I've always wondered why Jaguar are so skilled at making cars like an inverse-TARDIS; big on the outside, teeny-weeny passenger space.

Ten Four

292 posts

151 months

Thursday 29th November 2012
quotequote all
Well... Certainly not a looker... The previous one, that's a thing of beauty!



http://classifieds.pistonheads.com/classifieds/use...

IAJO

231 posts

158 months

Thursday 29th November 2012
quotequote all
DJRC said:
ITS NOT A fkING TRACK CAR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

First fking post. THE FIRST fkING POST FFS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

When I assume supreme dictatorship every single goddam bd ed mother fker who mentions "round a track" when talking about a road car...Im going to fking shoot in the dick. Its not enough you Goddam morons have tried your best to ruin every single damn car in the last decade, but you EXPRESSLY AND OBJECTIVELY SET OUT TO RUIN CARS WHICH ARE THE fkING OPPOSITE OF TRACK CARS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

And you ruin them for the rest of us!! So please, for the love of fking God, the next time you feel you might like something vaguely GT'ish DONT take it on the fking track and dont fking whinge about it. That way, maybe, just maybe those of us who actually do require a GT to do the GT job of crossing the Continent to get home can actually buy a car that hasnt had its ride ruined in search of some mythical time around the fking 'Ring!
To be fair he didnt say it was a track car just that he took one around a track. I posed for a photo but i'm not a model.

phumy

5,674 posts

237 months

Thursday 29th November 2012
quotequote all
Am hoping to be getting a 5.0 XKR in the new year

big_boz

1,684 posts

207 months

Thursday 29th November 2012
quotequote all
AC43 said:
10/10 from me. Factually spot on. And excellent swearing.
Point off for no use of the "c" word and point off for aesthetics, IMO too many gaps where an extra Swearword could have been used frivolously. Cracking Effort pre-lunch though, would love to see what this would have looked like late afternoon with decreasing sugar levels.



B3ALP

491 posts

141 months

Thursday 29th November 2012
quotequote all
DJRC said:
ITS NOT A fkING TRACK CAR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

First fking post. THE FIRST fkING POST FFS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

When I assume supreme dictatorship every single goddam bd ed mother fker who mentions "round a track" when talking about a road car...Im going to fking shoot in the dick. Its not enough you Goddam morons have tried your best to ruin every single damn car in the last decade, but you EXPRESSLY AND OBJECTIVELY SET OUT TO RUIN CARS WHICH ARE THE fkING OPPOSITE OF TRACK CARS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

And you ruin them for the rest of us!! So please, for the love of fking God, the next time you feel you might like something vaguely GT'ish DONT take it on the fking track and dont fking whinge about it. That way, maybe, just maybe those of us who actually do require a GT to do the GT job of crossing the Continent to get home can actually buy a car that hasnt had its ride ruined in search of some mythical time around the fking 'Ring!
thumbup

garypotter

1,498 posts

150 months

Thursday 29th November 2012
quotequote all
What a great car, will be a specially cheap in another 4 yrs time!

IMHO bettter than the Aston version at a fraction of the price.

Prawnboy

1,326 posts

147 months

Thursday 29th November 2012
quotequote all
you know i want to....... not enough depreciacion yet, under 10k will be sweet.
But the previous model is on the long list for the new year!

oh, and i am with you all on the track day swear-a-thon....i concur(is that how you spell concur?)