RE: Driven: Porsche Boxster S

RE: Driven: Porsche Boxster S

Thursday 3rd January 2013

Driven: Porsche Boxster S

Third time's a charm for Porsche as the Boxster grows up



It may have had its doubters at the time but the original Boxster played a key part in pulling the brand out of the hole it found itself in during the 90s. 15 years on does the third-generation 981 version finally leave those ‘poor man’s Porsche’ connotations behind though?

New Boxster is longer, wider and lower
New Boxster is longer, wider and lower
At first glance, it looks blink and you’d miss it similar to the outgoing 987 – as is the Porsche norm. It’s longer, wider, and lower, though, giving it a sleekness that isn’t immediately obvious. The overall effect is a little like meeting an old friend from university, and finding that he’s cut his hair, shaved the stubble, and taken to wearing a Savile Row suit as daily threads.

The new interior, with its Panamera-inspired centre console, also feels far slicker than before. The indicator stalks still feel a little tinny, and the huge dash-top vents that stretch away toward the windscreen are an acquired taste, but otherwise there’s been a marked improvement in terms of both design and quality.

New interior clearly Panamera-inspired
New interior clearly Panamera-inspired
Celebrity Big Brother
Stick the 911-shaped keyfob into the dash, and the engine fires up with a bag of bolts rattle. At a cold idle, and less familiar with Porsche quirks, you’d swear there was something up. No, sir, they all do that. This one’s a Boxster S, which means it gets the 3.4-litre flat six with 315hp, as opposed to the standard Boxster’s 261hp 2.7. Also fitted in this case is a seven-speed PDK gearbox, a shame because the Boxster gets a proper six-speed manual as standard rather than the 911’s awkward ‘manualised’ seven-speed stick shift. We’ve a smattering of options, too, including PASM.

With the engine warm, it’s time to find an open road. Based on experience in warmer climes on the launch we were expecting it to be good, and it is, even in the bleak midwinter. At low speeds, on wet, cold roads, an unsubtle stab of the throttle can result in understeer, but only if you’re being really belligerent with it. Build the speed, though, and the Boxster feels solid, planted and unflappable. Through a fast series of turns, your confidence rises, and with it the pace, to faintly unbelievable levels. But what impresses most is the way the Boxster seems to key itself into the road. It feels as though turning the wheel carves a groove in the tarmac that the car tracks down without any hint of fuss. Push on with banzai determination and the steering will start to lighten, giving you an idea that loss of traction at one end or t’other – and an ensuing fiery death, at such speeds – might be imminent, but within the realms of sensible driving, understeer and oversteer simply aren’t an issue.

Driving experience is still fantastic
Driving experience is still fantastic
Ah yes, that steering. Messrs Trent and Harris have discussed the PorscheEPAS system in great detail already. Suffice to say it’s undoubtedly more artificial than a non-EPAS system would be, but there’s still enough feel there that it doesn’t distract you from the job in hand. Previous owners of Porsches with hydraulic or even non-assisted steering might miss that ultimate final margin of feedback, but for most, it won’t be too much of an issue.

What might, though, is the PDK gearbox. The theory is sound – and it has to be said, this is one of the best autos on the market. But it still can’t quite replace a manual for ultimate involvement, and while the fast upshifts and throttle blips on the downshifts are fun, the moments when it gets confused mid-way through an overtake in auto mode are less so. ‘Leave it in manual, then,’ you might say – but then, why not just save yourself the £1,922 and stick with the standard six-speed?

Best Boxster yet? We reckon so
Best Boxster yet? We reckon so
Price of change
That brings us to the thorny twin issues of price and equipment. At £45,384, the basic Boxster S is undoubtedly less of a bargain than it once was, especially when compared with its rivals. You don’t get much for your initial wedge either; toys like climate control, electric seats, full leather and metallic paint all reside on the options list.

Hang the toys, though, and the Boxster S does make sense. No longer does it suffer from the image problems that once blighted it, and with the 911 now stretching off into supercar pricing territory, it’s the one to have if you haven’t got pots of cash to spend. It really has come of age, too; somehow, it feels a more rounded, more mature car than ever before. Yes, it’s pricier, but it feels like a more premium product. Third time round, the Boxster is finally growing to fill the 911’s shoes as its big brother piles on the pounds to its bottom line and roars off into six-figure territory.


PORSCHE BOXSTER S (PDK)
Engine:
3,436cc flat-6, direct injection
Transmission: 7-speed dual-clutch automatic
Power (hp): 315@6700rpm
Torque (lbft): 267@4500-5800rpm
0-62mph: 5.0s (4.8s with optional Sport Chrono package)
Top speed: 172mph
Weight: 1350kg
MPG: 35.3 (NEDC Combined)
CO2: 188g/km
Price: £47,306 (£45,384 standard + £1,922 PDK)










Photos: Prime Exposures

Author
Discussion

SimonSaid

Original Poster:

407 posts

186 months

Thursday 3rd January 2013
quotequote all
Stunning. More than ever this looks fantastic, is evidently a super drive, and so liveable for a roadster. But not sure about sentences like '[the Porsche] to have if you don't have pots of cash to spend' - a £45k base price (and goodnessknowswhat to insure) for a 2-seat roadster most definitely is for people with pretty sizeable 'pots', I reckon!

Krikkit

26,515 posts

181 months

Thursday 3rd January 2013
quotequote all
I didn't like the Boxster at first, but this has a look to it that I love. The only thing that would give me pause would be the steering (but I'd have to drive it to find out if it's rubbish or not), and the Lotus Evora.

kambites

67,552 posts

221 months

Thursday 3rd January 2013
quotequote all
I find the steering in the 987 rather artificial feeling, so if this is worse it would completely ruin it for me. I'm not especially keen on the looks either.

Lovely car in just about every other way, though.

After_Shock

8,751 posts

220 months

Thursday 3rd January 2013
quotequote all
Think the pick of the range is a 2.7 manual, sensible (ish) price for a very good all round sportscar.

Really do like the looks of these however, look fantastic in the metal.

BRMMA

1,846 posts

172 months

Thursday 3rd January 2013
quotequote all
I think they're a great car and whilst at around 52-55k by the time all the usual options are added is a lot of money, when you compare it to the 911 it looks like amazing value. I think a gen2 987S with the same engine, PCM etc for around 27k would prove too tempting for me though

Dazed & Confused

202 posts

204 months

Thursday 3rd January 2013
quotequote all
Article said:
At £45,384, the basic Boxster S is undoubtedly less of a bargain than it once was
Ummm, the base spec Boxster S was £41,000 when launched in 1996. That'd be over £60k now.

Edited by Dazed & Confused on Thursday 3rd January 11:12

kambites

67,552 posts

221 months

Thursday 3rd January 2013
quotequote all
Dazed Confused said:
Article said:
At £45,384, the basic Boxster S is undoubtedly less of a bargain than it once was
Ummm, the base spec Boxster was £41,000 when launched in 1996. That'd be over £60k now.
Really? I thought it was more like 30k!

p.s. your username breaks the quoting mechanism. hehe

Dazed & Confused

202 posts

204 months

Thursday 3rd January 2013
quotequote all
kambites said:
Really? I thought it was more like 30k!

p.s. your username breaks the quoting mechanism. hehe
Sorry - typo. I meant to writer base spec Boxster S - i.e. the one this is being directly compared with.

LaurasOtherHalf

21,429 posts

196 months

Thursday 3rd January 2013
quotequote all
In practice, does this work?

kambites

67,552 posts

221 months

Thursday 3rd January 2013
quotequote all
Unquotable person said:
kambites said:
Really? I thought it was more like 30k!

p.s. your username breaks the quoting mechanism. hehe
Sorry - typo. I meant to writer base spec Boxster S - i.e. the one this is being directly compared with.
AH, that makes more sense.

TameRacingDriver

18,073 posts

272 months

Thursday 3rd January 2013
quotequote all
SimonSaid said:
Stunning. More than ever this looks fantastic, is evidently a super drive, and so liveable for a roadster. But not sure about sentences like '[the Porsche] to have if you don't have pots of cash to spend' - a £45k base price (and goodnessknowswhat to insure) for a 2-seat roadster most definitely is for people with pretty sizeable 'pots', I reckon!
Nail, head, all points.

Beautiful car. Not for your average Joe at £45K. But then this is PH, where your average Joe is a director.

Ari

19,346 posts

215 months

Thursday 3rd January 2013
quotequote all
The thing that's not mentioned in the report is just how much room there is in the new Boxster!

I went for an SLK over the Boxster last time because I do a lot of long journeys and need comfort, space and refinement from my two seater convertible. That and the fact that both me and my girlfriend are over 6ft tall. The SLK is brilliant at this where the Boxster felt cramped, more basic and less refined.

But we had a look at this this new one a couple of weeks ago and it is fantastic! It's a longer wheelbase, and the amount of extra room inside is phenomenal. Even on the passenger side I can stretch my legs out (a lot of small 2 seaters have shorter passenger footwells, the MX5 I once had is a joke in this respect!) I'd say it's now roomier than the SLK.

It's much much nicer inside than the previous model too, better finished and better equipped.

I adore my SLK, it works brilliantly for what I want and need, but this new Boxster could be the car to finally tempt me out of it, I absolutely loved it!

Scrof

197 posts

154 months

Thursday 3rd January 2013
quotequote all
Agreed on the price factor - £45k isn't cheap, but it's roughly on a par with similar rivals (although they tend to offer a less precise driving experience but more equipment). The point I was making, though, is that it's far more obtainable than a 911 is these days - these things are all relative. (FWIW, my personal budget for cars is around the £2K mark, so I'm no powerfully-built director myself!)

As regards the nav-in-dash shot, yes - it works in real life like that. It's rather a neat little feature that I wanted to highlight, hence the shot. That screen is scrollable, and also displays trip info, engine/vehicle info, G-force readings and entertainment system info, among other things.

MrTappets

881 posts

191 months

Thursday 3rd January 2013
quotequote all
1350kg? How much does the F-Type V6 weigh again?

CraigyMc

16,387 posts

236 months

Thursday 3rd January 2013
quotequote all
kambites said:
p.s. your username breaks the quoting mechanism. hehe
Yep:
http://pistonheads.co.uk/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&amp...

mwstewart

7,588 posts

188 months

Thursday 3rd January 2013
quotequote all
What a beautiful interior - the missing piece finally has been added.

After_Shock

8,751 posts

220 months

Thursday 3rd January 2013
quotequote all
MrTappets said:
1350kg? How much does the F-Type V6 weigh again?
Change the 3 to an 8 and its about that I think!?

Id love the F-type, massively so but unless its a total revelation to drive I cant see it being worth double (almost) the price of a boxster, also couldnt afford an f-type at that money however but its still a shock to see the price of it. Doesnt stop me building it on the online config tho smile

Ari

19,346 posts

215 months

Thursday 3rd January 2013
quotequote all
Scrof said:
As regards the nav-in-dash shot, yes - it works in real life like that. It's rather a neat little feature that I wanted to highlight, hence the shot. That screen is scrollable, and also displays trip info, engine/vehicle info, G-force readings and entertainment system info, among other things.
I believe I'm right in saying that it's also just a supplement to the larger in dash sat nav display.

kambites

67,552 posts

221 months

Thursday 3rd January 2013
quotequote all
After_Shock said:
MrTappets said:
1350kg? How much does the F-Type V6 weigh again?
Change the 3 to an 8 and its about that I think!?
)
More like a 6, I think, but still a fair difference.

Whatever Jaguar are saying, to my mind the F-type is not really a sports car. It's a mini-GT that competes more with the 911 than the Boxster.

Kong

1,503 posts

171 months

Thursday 3rd January 2013
quotequote all
I'm not saying £45k is cheap but I dont think it's overpriced at all. That's the same price as a top of the range twin turbo Z4, the SLK350 and cheaper than a TTRS - none of which come close to the the Boxster in my opinion.