RE: PH Blog: eighth wonder

RE: PH Blog: eighth wonder

Monday 7th January 2013

PH Blog: eighth wonder

Harris on why ZF's eight-speed gearbox is a game changer



The PistonHeads gongs (chief sponsor: Birds Custard) have been awarded for 2012, and the staff are still nursing hangovers from the enormous ceremony hosted by Stuart and Garlick down the local boozer - but there is one more prize I want to award. Component of the year.

No, not that Eighth Wonder...
No, not that Eighth Wonder...
The beauty of doing so now, and in the blog format, is that none of the others can disagree with me.

So, component of the year is: The ZF 8HP transmission. (Allows the applause to die down.)

If memory serves, this automatic transmission first appeared in the new Audi A8 - the one that looks like an A4, and an A6. Or was it the new 7 Series? Offering eight forward gears and weighing around 90kg this flagship product from ZF looked like it would perform the usual role: appear in the flagship German saloons and maybe percolate down into the fancier powertrains of the 5 Series class. This it did. And it was always absolutely excellent.

Then it appeared in the Panamera Diesel because PDK wouldn't work with the oil burner. It was miles more pleasant than PDK. This was a surprise.
And now this year it has appeared in a BMW 1 Series. In the M135i the ZF is so quick and intuitive I had to re-record a section of film because I had assumed it was a dual-clutch system. It will upshift in 200 milliseconds and then drop into BMW's Eco-Pro mode for some fuel saving. It's the first gearbox that appears to have the same breadth of aspirations, in terms of performance and economy, as the average car enthusiast's brain.

Script re-write required after revelation
Script re-write required after revelation
That Porsche can make it behave so smoothly in a Panamera, and BMW so aggressively in the M135i proves how remarkably flexible the unit is. Furthermore, it always seems to extract incredible efficiency wherever it is used.

A few years ago, in the midst of the double-clutch boom - when everything fast was moving in that direction - I asked someone from a German car manufacturer if he thought all cars would soon be using such transmissions. He grinned. "Just wait till you see the next generation of automatic." He was right.

Chris

Author
Discussion

toppstuff

Original Poster:

13,698 posts

247 months

Monday 7th January 2013
quotequote all
Over the next decade or so, the pace of change will be such that the next generation of drivers probably won't have much experience of a manual box and clutch.

The Co2 nonsense and general move to "efficiency" means that car makers are going to force us all into auto boxes one kind or another.

Now I like autos. But there is a part of me that thinks it will be sad to lose the manual box.


wab172uk

2,005 posts

227 months

Monday 7th January 2013
quotequote all
I'd like to be given the choice of a manual.

Who care's if the car can accelarate 0.2seconds quicker with an Auto, or that I'd have to pay an extra £30/year in tax for the higher C02 emmitions for having a manual.

I WANT A MANUAL GEARBOX !!!!

anonymous-user

54 months

Monday 7th January 2013
quotequote all
Back on topic......

I imagine that long term this gearbox would prove a more robust choice than the equivalant dual clutch, etc system?

J4CKO

41,526 posts

200 months

Monday 7th January 2013
quotequote all
90 Kilos, wow.

WCZ

10,521 posts

194 months

Monday 7th January 2013
quotequote all
I don't want that many gears, thanks.

CraigyMc

16,394 posts

236 months

Monday 7th January 2013
quotequote all
J4CKO said:
90 Kilos, wow.
Must admit: I was surprised it was that heavy. That's more than a whole Rover K engine.

C

Benbay001

5,794 posts

157 months

Monday 7th January 2013
quotequote all
WCZ said:
I don't want that many gears, thanks.
Why?

Otispunkmeyer

12,586 posts

155 months

Monday 7th January 2013
quotequote all
Sounds good to me

People can bang on about wanting a manual all they want. For me, my next cars will be autos for the plain reason that 99% of the time they make the journey more pleasurable. So many cars on the roads today, everything is stop start. I'd rather give my feet a rest than be endlessly holding the clutch down or feeding it in. For the 1% of time where a back road opportunity presents itself, I would say at least 50% of these opportunities are ruined by the growing hoard of complete idiots driving today. Bumbling along at 35 mph with a long train of people who dare not overtake.

So 0.5% of the time I may then wish I had a good manual box to stir away at. But given how infrequent that would be, I am happy to just forego it altogether.

Andy ap

1,147 posts

172 months

Monday 7th January 2013
quotequote all
It'll be like mountain bike gears in no time 3 main ratios and 9 on the back to choose with lol. Slow medium or fast.

VladD

7,855 posts

265 months

Monday 7th January 2013
quotequote all
wab172uk said:
I'd like to be given the choice of a manual.

Who care's if the car can accelarate 0.2seconds quicker with an Auto, or that I'd have to pay an extra £30/year in tax for the higher C02 emmitions for having a manual.

I WANT A MANUAL GEARBOX !!!!
Given that the BMW 5 series has artificial sound piped into the car, how long will it be before it has an auto-box, but with a gear stick that makes you think you're driving a manual?

andybu

293 posts

208 months

Monday 7th January 2013
quotequote all
Makes sense, given the current regulations new cars have to meet. The car brands have to hit better fuel emissions targets & multiple gears helps out there. Isn't someone (Mercedes? Lexus?) presently developing a 9-speed auto transmission set?

At the same time more car users live in an urban environment - global trend, this. Autoboxes make more sense than a manual, there.

I like a nice manual box as much as the next man but I can't see anyone wanting to manually shift through 8 or 9 gears every day. C'est la vie.

CraigyMc

16,394 posts

236 months

Monday 7th January 2013
quotequote all
Otispunkmeyer said:
For me, my next cars will be autos for the plain reason that 99% of the time they make the journey more pleasurable. So many cars on the roads today, everything is stop start. I'd rather give my feet a rest than be endlessly holding the clutch down or feeding it in. For the 1% of time where a back road opportunity presents itself, I would say at least 50% of these opportunities are ruined by the growing hoard of complete idiots driving today. Bumbling along at 35 mph with a long train of people who dare not overtake.

So 0.5% of the time I may then wish I had a good manual box to stir away at. But given how infrequent that would be, I am happy to just forego it altogether.
You sound like you live in a city. Lots of people don't live in a city.

My driving conditions are pretty much the opposite of yours.

C

PascalBuyens

2,868 posts

282 months

Monday 7th January 2013
quotequote all
Otispunkmeyer said:
I'd rather give my feet a rest than be endlessly holding the clutch down or feeding it in.
So you're telling you don't need to apply the brake on your automatic while waiting in traffic?

I rather prefer to put my manual car in neutral and give both feet a rest, then have to stamp on the brake all the time to keep it in place, or even if I put it out of D, to have to reapply the brake before being able to push it back into D and drive off.

J4CKO

41,526 posts

200 months

Monday 7th January 2013
quotequote all
I wonder if driving it feels like starting off in an electric commuter train ?

I can see the benefits of an auto if you do a lot of driving, especially in stop start traffic but when I drive one now it just bores me stless.

Wonder how much a manual box would weigh, I remember lifting boxes from Golfs and stuff easily but I suppose a box from a bigger car would still be pretty heavy even with only 3 ratios.

tyrrell

1,670 posts

208 months

Monday 7th January 2013
quotequote all
I have it in my M135i and it is bloody fantastic, i just love the way it waps through the gears on full chatt and the auto blips on the down change as you barrel into a tight corner or slowing down for a jucnction is very addictive. As Mr Harris says it is a game changer.

HokumPokum

2,051 posts

205 months

Monday 7th January 2013
quotequote all
Does the ZF 8-speed in the porsche and BMW allow throttle openings while on the brakes? IE Can I add throttle, while left foot braking?

kbird

1,036 posts

207 months

Monday 7th January 2013
quotequote all
It's a peach in the Conti GT V8

CampDavid

9,145 posts

198 months

Monday 7th January 2013
quotequote all
St John Smythe said:
Back on topic......

I imagine that long term this gearbox would prove a more robust choice than the equivalant dual clutch, etc system?
Not sure about that.

DSG boxes appear to be quite robust while some autos are made of chocolate.

Depeneds more on the car and the specific box. I'd imagine the 8 speed to be fine in an M135i though if it's coping with a Pana and a 760i

tomellingham

71 posts

165 months

Monday 7th January 2013
quotequote all
PascalBuyens said:
Otispunkmeyer said:
I'd rather give my feet a rest than be endlessly holding the clutch down or feeding it in.
So you're telling you don't need to apply the brake on your automatic while waiting in traffic?

I rather prefer to put my manual car in neutral and give both feet a rest, then have to stamp on the brake all the time to keep it in place, or even if I put it out of D, to have to reapply the brake before being able to push it back into D and drive off.
Holding the clutch fully extended is a pain in the bum in heavy traffic. Feeding it in also. I can't see your argument here, an automatic will always be superior in traffic.

450Nick

4,027 posts

212 months

Monday 7th January 2013
quotequote all
That is definitely not the Panamera's best side... I thought it looked pretty good in real life but it looks fat and very ugly from that side view!