RE: Jaguar XF Diesel S Sportbrake: Driven

RE: Jaguar XF Diesel S Sportbrake: Driven

Thursday 21st March 2013

2013 Jaguar XF Diesel S Sportbrake | Review

PH doesn't make diesel estates. But if we did...



Yup, it’s a diesel estate. There, I’ve said it now. We’ve got that bit out of the way. Diesel estates are, of course, necessary evils; they’re the Wellington boot of the car world – capacious, practical, comfortable and waterproof. Well, maybe not that last thing, but still...

Trouble is, like a welly boot, most of them just aren’t all that exciting. Or weren’t.

Enter the Jaguar XF Sportbrake. Ostensibly a rival for the BMW 5 Series Touring, Audi A6 Avant and Mercedes E-Class... um... estate, it has one toe in the slightly desolate territory also populated by the Mercedes CLS Shooting Brake. It’s also available only as a diesel – for now, anyway.


A schlep across Europe is perfect for letting the Jag stretch its legs, first into Belgium and then across northern France. And first impressions don’t disappoint. It’s a rakishly handsome car – the front end square-jawed and scowling, with an elegant, tapering rear that belies its size. Inside surprise-and-delight touches like the knurled gear selector still … surprise and delight despite the novelty being a few years old now and there’s that same feeling of contemporary luxury that you might expect from a swanky London hotel. The touchscreen controlling the majority of the car’s functions hasn’t had universal praise but, for these digits, seemed instinctive and logical enough.

This XF’s a Diesel S, which means it gets a 275hp version of the JLR 3.0-litre twin-turbo V6 diesel. That gives it a 0-62mph time of 6.6 seconds, and a top speed electronically limited to 155mph, although it never feels as fast as it is. It’s not that the Diesel S is slow by any means; it’s just so refined. It simply goes about the business of gathering speed in such an unfussed manner that you don’t sense it overtly. There is, nevertheless, a satisfying glob of torque whenever you hoof the throttle. Don’t bother with the kickdown though – it simply spurs the eight-speed ZF box into too low a gear, the engine spinning uselessly up to the redline. Much more effective to use a touch less throttle, keep the gearbox unruffled and rely on the in-gear torque.

A quick punt on a Champagne country road reveals the Sportbrake to be a useful thing, if lacking in ultimate sharpness. There’s a touch more roll than the saloon, too, most likely as a result of the estate’s air suspension at the rear, but otherwise the XF’s well-controlled. Turn the traction control off and it can let its hair down with bouts of languid oversteer too. It’s no Elise, of course – but it isn’t designed to be, and the levels of involvement and satisfaction it does offer are plenty enough.


What it is designed to be is cosseting, isolating and endlessly refined. And in those respects, whether nosing through town or smearing along an autoroute, it excels. Cocooned within, few sounds from the outside world reach you; instead, the superb audio system bathes you in music of your choice, while the XF’s super-comfortable combination of suspension and seating swaddles. Only the occasional minor vibration upsets the S, most likely thanks to its standard combination of 20-inch wheels and low-profile tyres. Five’ll get you 10 the smaller wheels and chunkier tyres fitted to lesser models remove even that whisker-thin criticism. But even on the rutted roads of Belgium, progress is – most of the time – impressively serene.

While it might lack the precision of a 5 Series or the ultimate solidity of either of its rival Mercs, the XF Sportbrake is probably 95 per cent as good in any of those respects. But it does have its own trump card, something it does better than any car in its class. It makes you feel special. From the moment you move off to the moment you come to a halt again, the XF provides you with an overwhelming sense of wellbeing. It looks superb, inside and out; it’s remarkably well thought through; it drives effortlessly. Yes, it’s still a welly boot at heart, but it’s one that’s made of calf leather with a sheepskin lining, and at the moment, there’s none that’s quite as satisfying to wear.


SPECIFICATION | 2013 JAGUAR XF SPORTBRAKE DIESEL S LUXURY
Engine:
2,993cc V6, twin-turbo diesl
Transmission: 8-speed automatic
Power (hp): 275@4,000rpm
Torque (lb ft): 442@2,000rpm
0-62mph: 6.6 sec
Top speed: 155mph
Weight: 1,880kg
MPG: 46.3mpg (combined)
CO2: 163g/km
Price: £44,355 (base)


Author
Discussion

toppstuff

Original Poster:

13,698 posts

247 months

Thursday 21st March 2013
quotequote all
What a lovely car.

More desirable as any of the Germans. And probably more reliable too if the surveys are anything to go by.

Well done Jaguar.

I do wish they would do it with a rip roaring 550 Bhp V8 though. They could if they wanted to.

XFR-S Sportbrake would really take the fight to AMG IMO. I know I would rather have one to a Merc.


Shifty Bloke

187 posts

162 months

Thursday 21st March 2013
quotequote all
Great looking estate

lewisf182

2,089 posts

188 months

Thursday 21st March 2013
quotequote all
Jesus thats a heavy car! to say it reaches 0-60 so fast with 'only' 275 hp is quite an acheivement though I guess! would love a diesel S some point in the future and this looks great as an estate!

avm1987

2 posts

133 months

Thursday 21st March 2013
quotequote all
Esthetics are of course subjective but it looks like a cross between something the Americans and Koreans would do, and the interior is even further away from what the Germans are doing (inc VW). It looks a decade old car already and not a "rakishly handsome" one at that.

Oh but it's a Jaguar and this is a British website. Journalists abroad appreciate its handling but it falls well short everywhere else.

Elroy Blue

8,687 posts

192 months

Thursday 21st March 2013
quotequote all
I love the look of the XFs. I like the way they drive. I just can't get past the unreliability of the cars we have on our fleet. They do seem to break down a awful lot more than the BMWs.

toppstuff

Original Poster:

13,698 posts

247 months

Thursday 21st March 2013
quotequote all
Elroy Blue said:
I love the look of the XFs. I like the way they drive. I just can't get past the unreliability of the cars we have on our fleet. They do seem to break down a awful lot more than the BMWs.
Thats interesting. Jaguar have been doing well in the JD Power surveys here and especially in the US - better than the Germans in many cases. Sorry to hear of a different experience.

What do you think of the dealers, if I may ask? I've had a positive experience of my local one. This can make a big difference.

RichTBiscuit

430 posts

151 months

Thursday 21st March 2013
quotequote all
avm1987 said:
Esthetics are of course subjective but it looks like a cross between something the Americans and Koreans would do, and the interior is even further away from what the Germans are doing (inc VW). It looks a decade old car already and not a "rakishly handsome" one at that.

Oh but it's a Jaguar and this is a British website. Journalists abroad appreciate its handling but it falls well short everywhere else.
I dont think PH has a history of geographical bias - in fact they usually provide a very considered opinion.

I think most people will agree it is a very handsome car. The interior is (IMO) much nicer than one from Mercedes (for example)..... Have you sat in a modern Mercedes E Class? The climate control plastic dials feel like they're about to fall off, and the interior overall has a cost cutting feel to it. The only models that go far enough in terms of quality are those from AMG.

0000

13,812 posts

191 months

Thursday 21st March 2013
quotequote all
avm1987 said:
and the interior is even further away from what the Germans are doing
Thankfully.

Elroy Blue

8,687 posts

192 months

Thursday 21st March 2013
quotequote all
toppstuff said:
Thats interesting. Jaguar have been doing well in the JD Power surveys here and especially in the US - better than the Germans in many cases. Sorry to hear of a different experience.

What do you think of the dealers, if I may ask? I've had a positive experience of my local one. This can make a big difference.
Never been in a Dealership. They arrive with a blue light on them smile

The facelifted versions seem to be doing better, but the original shape's reliability was pretty woeful. They do get driven pretty hard and are on the go 24hrs a day. They just seem to have issues that the BMWs don't.

toppstuff

Original Poster:

13,698 posts

247 months

Thursday 21st March 2013
quotequote all
Elroy Blue said:
They arrive with a blue light on them smile

So the Rozzers are in Jags ! Awesome. I bet this estate would make an excellent bit of kit for their purposes. A lot of room for kit and guns !

Garlick

40,601 posts

240 months

Thursday 21st March 2013
quotequote all
avm1987 said:
Oh but it's a Jaguar and this is a British website.
Makes a change from the usual 'PH is biased towards Porsche' comments I suppose, despite neither being true.

Elroy Blue

8,687 posts

192 months

Thursday 21st March 2013
quotequote all
toppstuff said:
So the Rozzers are in Jags ! Awesome. I bet this estate would make an excellent bit of kit for their purposes. A lot of room for kit and guns !
We've had them for about three years now. (We get them VERY cheap before the usual 'taxpayers money wasted' comments start appearing). The first one we had on trial had a TV in it. It was very nice eating my sarnies at 3am watching the boxing. Sadly, this function was removed when the actual job cars appeared.

RichTBiscuit

430 posts

151 months

Thursday 21st March 2013
quotequote all
Elroy Blue said:
We've had them for about three years now. (We get them VERY cheap before the usual 'taxpayers money wasted' comments start appearing). The first one we had on trial had a TV in it. It was very nice eating my sarnies at 3am watching the boxing. Sadly, this function was removed when the actual job cars appeared.
It's a great idea by Jag to sell them very cheaply to the cops. They look awesome fully liveried up smile

Always thought British police should be driving Jags as opposed to BMWs.

toppstuff

Original Poster:

13,698 posts

247 months

Thursday 21st March 2013
quotequote all
Elroy Blue said:
We've had them for about three years now. (We get them VERY cheap before the usual 'taxpayers money wasted' comments start appearing). The first one we had on trial had a TV in it. It was very nice eating my sarnies at 3am watching the boxing. Sadly, this function was removed when the actual job cars appeared.
You would not see me complaining about tax payers money being spent on good kit for the BiB. You'd have XFR's if I had my way. With a union flag on the roof.

O/T, but I saw a Citroen C4 police car the other day. Who on earth thought that was a good idea?

RichTBiscuit

430 posts

151 months

Thursday 21st March 2013
quotequote all
toppstuff said:
You would not see me complaining about tax payers money being spent on good kit for the BiB. You'd have XFR's if I had my way. With a union flag on the roof.

O/T, but I saw a Citroen C4 police car the other day. Who on earth thought that was a good idea?
I almost wouldn't mind being pulled over if the Cop was driving an XFR

Almost.

Amirhussain

11,488 posts

163 months

Thursday 21st March 2013
quotequote all
Looks pretty mean. Saloon only for me, not a fan of estates. Interior doesn't look all that, could just be the crap picture. Heavy car though, everyone slates the German motors for being heavy.

Krikkit

26,515 posts

181 months

Thursday 21st March 2013
quotequote all
lewisf182 said:
Jesus thats a heavy car! to say it reaches 0-60 so fast with 'only' 275 hp is quite an acheivement though I guess! would love a diesel S some point in the future and this looks great as an estate!
It is heavy, but have a look at the rivals- the F10 530/535 is 1900kg, the E350CDI is 1960. Both heavier.

The engine and 8-speed box are a fantastic combo - the saloon is a very decently quick car, obviously not up to the mad AMG brigade etc, but not much short of them (in this type of car) will be faster. 20-100 times are very impressive.

I said it on the other thread and I'll say it here too - the infotainment system is the worst bit about the car. It's clunky and slow to use, the screen feels too small for the layouts, and it doesn't have simple features that the Germans have (e.g. It doesn't automatically reconnect a bluetoothed phone that's been out of range). Given how easy it is to find powerful SoC solutions seen in tablets etc it's shockingly poor to have a system like this stay in the car.

ETA: I reckon this still looks good in this spec, the wheels make it a very striking car in person, yet the ride is still excellent (perhaps a little firm for ultimate waft).

Edited by Krikkit on Thursday 21st March 15:48

toppstuff

Original Poster:

13,698 posts

247 months

Thursday 21st March 2013
quotequote all
Krikkit said:
I said it on the other thread and I'll say it here too - the infotainment system is the worst bit about the car. It's clunky and slow to use, the screen feels too small for the layouts, and it doesn't have simple features that the Germans have (e.g. It doesn't automatically reconnect a bluetoothed phone that's been out of range). .
I know that Chris Harris had a similar grumble when he was running an XF. I was hoping/ thinking this had been fixed with some new firmware by now? Is it still a problem even with new cars? Having your phone bluetooth connect automatically when you get in the car should surely just be a firmware thing?

soad

32,882 posts

176 months

Thursday 21st March 2013
quotequote all
lewisf182 said:
Jesus thats a heavy car! to say it reaches 0-60 so fast with 'only' 275 hp is quite an acheivement though I guess! would love a diesel S some point in the future and this looks great as an estate!
It looks big in the flesh too, but most modern cars are. wink

snickb

3 posts

153 months

Thursday 21st March 2013
quotequote all
I've had a face lifted Diesel S for 15 months now and I enjoy every single minute. It does seem odd to drive an oil burning Jag but it will do 50mpg as opposed to the 17mpg I used to get out of the supercharged V8 that I used to have. The phone system isn't as good as my previous car which was an Audi and there has been an issue with brake pad warning lights and a dodgy fuel filler flap as well as the actual fuel cap falling to bits! Doesn't put me off though and I reckon the shooting brake will likely be my next purchase later in the year when the two year interest free deal runs out.