RE: Porsche Boxster GTS: Review

RE: Porsche Boxster GTS: Review

Friday 16th May 2014

Porsche Boxster GTS: Review

Surprise of the century - turns out the GTS upgrades make for an excellent Boxster as well!



On models like the Cayenne and Panamera, around 15 per cent of Porsche's sales are GTS models. That's its initial prediction for the Cayman/Boxster duo as well, but already that seems a little conservative. Given both are outright sports cars, why not plump for the fastest, most overtly dynamic model in the range? Furthermore, without turbocharged or GT models either, the case is even stronger for the GTS.

Boxster GTS like Cayman, minus 10hp and roof
Boxster GTS like Cayman, minus 10hp and roof
To all intents and purposes, the Boxster's GTS treatment is the same as that found on the Cayman; the only difference being the additional 15hp makes a total of 330hp rather than 340.

However, it would take a far more astute senses than mine to detect any accelerative difference. The figures show a couple of tenths here or there but the Boxster remains a very fast car. Five seconds to 62mph and over 170mph was 911 pace not that long ago, just in case that fire needs stoking once more.

The gearing is a little too long with the manual, which is a real frustration given how glorious that flat six is in the upper reaches of its rev range. Of course with the roof lowered the occupants are treated to an even more intense aural treat too. Occasionally it seems a little overexuberant but most of the time that flat six shriek is the perfect accompaniment to some spirited open driving. The exhaust can be turned off for slightly more discreet progess too.

Probably good on track; Porsche didn't let us find out
Probably good on track; Porsche didn't let us find out
Dynamically, the differences between the GTS pair are small yet tangible. The Boxster's steering loses a little weight compared to the coupe and the overall composure down a testing road is ever so slightly less. The Boxster is still a superb handling car and the differences are minor but driving the pair back to back does highlight the Cayman's slight superiority.

Overall, the conclusion on the Boxster GTS is much the same as the Cayman. For those considering a few options on an S (and according to Porsche, they typically leave the showroom with options worth 10 per cent of the RRP), a GTS could easily be justified. Those after an S bereft of options will of course not be disappointed either, apart from perhaps at trade-in time.

Dynamic differences between GTS pair slight
Dynamic differences between GTS pair slight
What's more interesting to discuss with the Boxster than the Cayman are the rivals. To drive, the Cayman makes the base F-Type V6 feel a little cumbersome, even if the Jag remains arguably a more covetable thing. A comparison with the Exige V6 S would surely prove fascinating as well.

But there's one more contender, one that isn't available just yet; the Alfa 4C Spider. With open cars typically more occasional than hard tops, could the Alfa's compromises be more easily tolerated? And with more development time, hopefully some of the dynamic foibles can be addressed as well. Now there could be a twin test worth waiting for.


PORSCHE BOXSTER GTS
Engine:
 3,436cc flat-six
Transmission: Six-speed manual, rear-wheel drive (seven-speed PDK optional)
Power (hp): 330@6,700rpm
Torque (lb ft): 272@4,500-5,800rpm
0-62mph: 5.0 seconds (4.7 with PDK and Sport Chrono)
Top speed: 175mph (173mph)
Kerbweight: 1,345kg (1,375kg)
MPG: 31.4 NEDC combined (34.4)
CO2: 211g/km (190g/km)
Price: £52,879





Author
Discussion

andrewparker

Original Poster:

8,014 posts

187 months

Friday 16th May 2014
quotequote all
Looks absolutely stunning in that colour. Want!

HoHoHo

14,987 posts

250 months

Friday 16th May 2014
quotequote all
What a piece of engineering and as fast as my last 911!

Lovely car, lovely colour and it may just be on my bucket list now yes

LordHaveMurci

12,042 posts

169 months

Friday 16th May 2014
quotequote all
Possibly the only car I'd choose over the tin top version, just looks so right.

Maybe a car for the OH when the kids fly the nest idea

Mermaid

21,492 posts

171 months

Friday 16th May 2014
quotequote all
Affordable "CGT" for me. Image has moved up a few notches.

RichardR

2,892 posts

268 months

Friday 16th May 2014
quotequote all
The Article said:
The exhaust can be turned off for slightly more discreet process too.
Like a 918 Spyder? wink

Dale487

1,334 posts

123 months

Friday 16th May 2014
quotequote all
I still would have the Cayman over the Boxster - Manual please.

But the new Boxster looks amazing - there a brand new one parked in front of my house, an S in black with dark alloys, I could help but stare at it (& dream).

red997

1,304 posts

209 months

Friday 16th May 2014
quotequote all
I glad its not just me;
I drove a new manual Cayman S for a few days and thought it was too long geared. Shame.

Agree the Box looks better though - to my eyes anyway.

ajh38

876 posts

150 months

Friday 16th May 2014
quotequote all
The wheels are getting too big. I think they detract from the overall appearance of the car.

corcoran

536 posts

274 months

Friday 16th May 2014
quotequote all
Bit of a Ferrari Face, that bird, eh?

Bonefish Blues

26,674 posts

223 months

Friday 16th May 2014
quotequote all
ajh38 said:
The wheels are getting too big. I think they detract from the overall appearance of the car.
Fair point.

Henry Fiddleton

1,581 posts

177 months

Friday 16th May 2014
quotequote all
That really is a slam dunk car IMHO.

Could this be the Boxster that takes sales away from the 991/911?


hornbaek

3,675 posts

235 months

Friday 16th May 2014
quotequote all
I might just sell my 993 cabrio for one of those.

Lost soul

8,712 posts

182 months

Friday 16th May 2014
quotequote all
Mermaid said:
Affordable "CGT" for me. Image has moved up a few notches.
It does look a little CGT doesn't it

Love the look of it

Dave Hedgehog

14,549 posts

204 months

Friday 16th May 2014
quotequote all
slower than a golf R and twice the cost with the necessary options ticked


kambites

67,554 posts

221 months

Friday 16th May 2014
quotequote all
Dave Hedgehog said:
slower than a golf R and twice the cost with the necessary options ticked
Yup. And this matters why, exactly? If the Boxster had half the power this does, it would still be infinite more fun than the Golf, IMO.

Burnham

3,668 posts

259 months

Friday 16th May 2014
quotequote all
kambites said:
Dave Hedgehog said:
slower than a golf R and twice the cost with the necessary options ticked
Yup. And this matters why, exactly? If the Boxster had half the power this does, it would still be infinite more fun than the Golf, IMO.
Yeah, I'll take the Boxster. Its very good value for money considering the package.

Actus Reus

4,234 posts

155 months

Friday 16th May 2014
quotequote all
A GTS will be quicker to 100 than a Golf R, and probably not a lot in it to 60. I've just sold a Cayman S to buy a Golf R, but only coz I need 4 seats - the GTS is my pick of the range apart from the GT3 - lovely looking and sounding. For a couple or a singleton its more or less all the car you'll ever need.

hondansx

4,569 posts

225 months

Friday 16th May 2014
quotequote all
Have a new Boxster S and ran a Mk6 Golf R. The Golf is quicker in the real world.

The Boxster however sounds AMAZING with the PSE. The only issue is you either have to be in first gear, or going well above the speed limit as it makes the noise in the upper echelons of the rev range.

Also have a 997.2 with PSE and the Boxster is much louder; which is nice. Also rides better on 20s than a 997 on 18s...

Flashmurder

38 posts

145 months

Friday 16th May 2014
quotequote all
In that colour it really is just stunning.. Want x1000

Gonna go get my lottery ticket.. Brb

DoubleSix

11,714 posts

176 months

Friday 16th May 2014
quotequote all
I've only ever bought black cars but that is lovely and would be a real possibility.

Do we know which it is? Cobalt? Wakeboard?