RE: Horst von Saurma: PH Meets

RE: Horst von Saurma: PH Meets

Thursday 29th May 2014

Horst von Saurma: PH Meets

Sport Auto's 'ring lap specialist on why lap times matter



In a perfect world numbers and stats are the definitive factual answer to any dispute. If only it were so simple in the world of cars and, specifically in this instance, Nurburgring lap times. Who was driving, where the clock stopped and started, whether the car was standard or prepped, the time of day ... where there are variables there are arguments.

Never mind the whole question of whether or not such things matter in the first place.

They do to the readers of German mag Sport Auto and in its stat-heavy pages Horst von Saurma's lap times around the Nordschleife and Hockenheim loom large. Compiled in the mag's Super Test from 1997 onwards, von Saurma's lap times make for fascinating and occasionally surprising reading. See here for the archive. Whether perfect or not his system for compiling them - a single flying lap timed from the T13 industry pool exit and missing out the short straight before it - is consistent and his ability to extract a benchmark time on demand undoubted.

A chance to bend his ear on the subject on the Nurburgring-based launch for the Jaguar XFR-S Sportbrake (lap time not disclosed...) where he was one of the instructors/chaperones for our Nordschleife laps was too good to miss though. Fresh out of driving the new BMW M4 for a forthcoming Super Test we grabbed a few minutes to chat...


Ducks and drakes following a 'ring legend - erk!
Ducks and drakes following a 'ring legend - erk!
When did you first lap the Nordschleife and how did the whole Super Test thing come about?
"My first laps here on a motorbike were in 1977. I started as a motorbike racer here on the Nordschleife as a participant in the eight-hour endurance world championship and then I started to be a journalist for the German motorcycle magazine Motorrad. I stayed there five years and then changed 1986 to the car magazine Autobild in Hamburg.

"In 1990 I started at Sport Auto in Stuttgart and our racetrack first was Hockenheim; we did not use it for lap times we just used it for measuring acceleration and braking and so on. After one year we started with the lap times at Hockenheim - it was too dangerous to do the vmax runs on the Autobahn with these fast cars and then I started the Super Test in 1997."

What was the first car you tested?
"It was an M3 SMG [E36] - I compared it with the 911 Turbo and the most recent in the last issue we have had the Porsche 918 Spyder. [It's scored 100 out of 100 points with a lap time of 7min 13sec - Ed.] This was the 200th super test so every month I have to produce this format between middle of March until the end of October. The M4 I have just tested, I did it just the way I do it in every case. I have just one 100 per cent lap and that's the difference to all the others; I have just one lap to learn the car behind then the timed one. This is the difference.

"The same with the Porsche 918 - I drove in the industry pool but you can't measure the time. They get angry because there are several cars on the track, you can't push there so I can go 80 per cent perhaps but the difference between 80 per cent and 100 per cent is 300 per cent! The rule is it's me the driver, it's this track, the surface must be dry, 2 degrees Celsius and above and you can go."

Horst: 'This Harris bloke, any good?' Walter: 'Dunno...'
Horst: 'This Harris bloke, any good?' Walter: 'Dunno...'
Does the car have to be stock?
"Yes. It has to, in theory. The only thing we do is modify is the air pressure in the tyres, this is the only thing we can arrange."

So how fast was that M3 in 1997 and what do you think of the performance gains since then?
I think it was 8min 35sec. [By the same measure the E30 Sport Evo did 8min 50sec, the E46 CSL 7min 50sec and the E92 M3 GTS 7min 49sec] The increasing performance is wonderful to see! We made a story some years ago with the Porsche 911 with the 993, the 997 and the 991 and you see the acceleration going up and the lap times going down. And this is the only test where you can compare it because it's only me doing it! When you have a test driver he is driving there for a whole week, a whole month, with new tyres every lap..."

As a journalist how do you feel about manufacturers claiming their own lap times for marketing purposes?
"It's interesting because I started with this lap time here in 1997 and they all do it now. Wolfgang Durheimer [former head of development at Porsche, now at Bentley] told me 'Your times are more interesting than what my test drivers or race drivers are doing because it says something about the driveability.' And this is key, the driveability of the car. I sit in the car at T13 and the two curves - the first left and the first right into Hatzenbach - I know the car and I either trust the car or I don't."

Anyone who can do 7:24 in this has brass ones
Anyone who can do 7:24 in this has brass ones
Critics of the Nurburgring mania say a Nordschleife lap time is an irrelevant measure of a car's performance; your chance to put the case for the defence!
"Of course it is relevant because it tests the whole car and when you have this number it is a comparison. You can have 0-100km/h and maybe it's five seconds and you say 'oh wow' but is there anyone who tests this in their daily driving? No. But with the lap time you have a number, whether it's eight minutes or whatever, and you can see what it does. Maybe 90 per cent of owners will never drive their cars in this way but they know and it is important. It is testing the whole part of the car, the brakes, the suspension, the engine. Everything."

Does the pressure to score a 'ring lap time ruin road cars?
"Not necessarily because we are testing the whole car and maybe here it can do a fast lap but it is not so nice to drive home. But some of the best cars are the ones that you can drive here and then you drive on the road and it is still good. For sure there are cars that are developed just for the Nordschleife but the best ones can do it all."

Have you a favourite car?
"Yes I think it would have to be the Porsche GT3, not the current one but the last one, not the 4.0, the 3.8 RS. That would be my dream, if I could have that car here in a garage with some tyres this would be ... OK!" [Horst raced a 3.8 RS in street trim to 13th place overall in the 2010 Nurburgring 24-hour, sharing driving duties with Roland Asch, German TV commentator Patrick Simon and some bloke called Chris Harris...]

You say you've never crashed a car on a Super Test but are there sections of the track that scare you?
"Yes of course. The faster sections of the track so when I am going up Kesselchen or Schwedenkreuz; these are the frightening pieces of the track. You are coming to Schwedenkreuz and you see 300km/h and you think yes that is fast..."

And the most frightening car you've had for a Super Test?
"I would rather not say but it was very light at the back end and after the jump it was landing with the nose down and ... yes, this was not so good."


How fast? Sport Auto's top 10 'ring lap times:
Porsche 918 Spyder* - 7min 13sec (May 2014)
Gumpert Apollo Sport* - 7min 24sec (Nov 2011)
Porsche 911 GT2 RS* (997) - 7min 24sec (Nov 2010)
Lamborghini Aventador LP 700-4* - 7min 25sec (Aug 2012)
McLaren MP4-12C* - 7min 28sec (Nov 2011)
Porsche 911 GT3 RS 4.0* (997) - 7min 30sec (Aug 2011)
Porsche 911 GT3* (991) - 7min 32sec (Nov 2013)
Porsche Carrera GT - 7min 32sec (Jan 2004)
Pagani Zonda F - 7min 33sec (May 2006)
Porsche 911 GT2* (997) - 7min 33sec (Nov 2007)

Then and now - key comparisons compiled from Sport Auto's 200th Super Test special issue (June 2014)
BMW M3 SMG (E36) - 8min 35sec (Mar 1997)
BMW M3 GTS* (E92) - 7min 49sec (Sept 2010)

Ferrari F355 - 8min 18sec (June 1997)
Ferrari 458 Italia - 7min 38sec (Oct 2010)

Porsche 911 GT3 (996) - 8min 3sec (Aug 1999)
Porsche 911 GT3 (991) - 7min 32 sec (Nov 2013)

VW Golf GTI (Mk4) - 8min 54sec (Jan 2002)
VW Golf GTI Performance (Mk7) - 8min 29sec (Aug 2013)

*Time with 'sport' or 'Cup' tyre

[Sources: Sport Auto]

 

 

   
   
   
   
Author
Discussion

mrclav

Original Poster:

1,287 posts

223 months

Thursday 29th May 2014
quotequote all
Very interesting perspective; to be honest, I would take this man's opinion over anyone on here regarding a cars drivability.

PPPPPP

1,140 posts

231 months

Thursday 29th May 2014
quotequote all
Great interview Dan thumbup

isleofthorns

475 posts

170 months

Thursday 29th May 2014
quotequote all
8.35 for the first generation SMG e36 m3 is pretty impressive.. it takes almost that long to change gears!

oldtimer2

728 posts

133 months

Thursday 29th May 2014
quotequote all
Interesting and the most convincing case for Ring times yet. His then and now comparisons would be even more informative if the latest cars were not on the so-called "cup" tyres. These, I imagine, will boost performance - but by how much?

DodoRacing

539 posts

207 months

Thursday 29th May 2014
quotequote all
Great interview. Nice to hear from the horse's mouth.
I believe his skills and Nordschleife expertise is also improving over the years which affect lap times. Nevertheless, his Super Test laps are the most consistent basis of any car testing.

monthefish

20,441 posts

231 months

Thursday 29th May 2014
quotequote all
isleofthorns said:
8.35 for the first generation SMG e36 m3 is pretty impressive.. it takes almost that long to change gears!
...and perhaps explains why Jethro Bovingdon was unable to achieve his target of creating a sub 8 mins E36 M3.

Evo article said:
Another, marginally quicker M3 has been making the headlines at the Ring recently. A few days after Pagani’s production-car lap record run (see issue 112), a modified E46 M3 CSL, supercharged to generate over 600bhp, lapped the full circuit in 7:22.9 – or almost exactly one minute quicker than my M3 managed on its first run!
Intesresting that the unfettled car did an 8:22. Does that show the SMG was a big handicap?

Dan Trent

1,866 posts

168 months

Thursday 29th May 2014
quotequote all
oldtimer2 said:
Interesting and the most convincing case for Ring times yet. His then and now comparisons would be even more informative if the latest cars were not on the so-called "cup" tyres. These, I imagine, will boost performance - but by how much?
I was skimming through the special issue with the celebration of the 200th Super Test on the plane home from Germany yesterday and though my language skills are probably at the slightly rusty GCSE level I could understand enough to see that the influence of Cup style tyres on lap times was much discussed in their retrospective. Indeed, they kept coming back to the CSL as the kind of line in the sand for that. That 7:50 time is pretty impressive now but in the context of a road car 11 years ago is astonishing - the headline in the BMW section of the Super Test round up is pretty clear even if you're not fluent in German: "Der M3 CSL mit 360ps ist fur viele der beste BMW aller zeiten."

As you'll see from their own site, they do make a point of saying if the car was equipped with Cup/Corsa/etc type tyres when it set the time.

Cheers,

Dan

Debaser

5,760 posts

261 months

Thursday 29th May 2014
quotequote all
monthefish said:
isleofthorns said:
8.35 for the first generation SMG e36 m3 is pretty impressive.. it takes almost that long to change gears!
...and perhaps explains why Jethro Bovingdon was unable to achieve his target of creating a sub 8 mins E36 M3.

Evo article said:
Another, marginally quicker M3 has been making the headlines at the Ring recently. A few days after Pagani’s production-car lap record run (see issue 112), a modified E46 M3 CSL, supercharged to generate over 600bhp, lapped the full circuit in 7:22.9 – or almost exactly one minute quicker than my M3 managed on its first run!
Intesresting that the unfettled car did an 8:22. Does that show the SMG was a big handicap?
Was it a different driver?

ewenm

28,506 posts

245 months

Thursday 29th May 2014
quotequote all
mrclav said:
Very interesting perspective; to be honest, I would take this man's opinion over anyone on here regarding a cars drivability.
I'd say this is the only way that 'Ring times are useful. The manufacturer times are just marketing guff with everything optimised for them, but with the same driver, same familiarisation and minimum standards for the track condition, von Saurma's times are meaningful.

VF7

3,139 posts

215 months

Thursday 29th May 2014
quotequote all
Debaser said:
monthefish said:
isleofthorns said:
8.35 for the first generation SMG e36 m3 is pretty impressive.. it takes almost that long to change gears!
...and perhaps explains why Jethro Bovingdon was unable to achieve his target of creating a sub 8 mins E36 M3.

Evo article said:
Another, marginally quicker M3 has been making the headlines at the Ring recently. A few days after Pagani’s production-car lap record run (see issue 112), a modified E46 M3 CSL, supercharged to generate over 600bhp, lapped the full circuit in 7:22.9 – or almost exactly one minute quicker than my M3 managed on its first run!
Intesresting that the unfettled car did an 8:22. Does that show the SMG was a big handicap?
Was it a different driver?
According to the Sport Auto website, the stock E46 M3 CSL with sport tyres managed a lap in 7:50. This was back in 2003.
I think you are confusing the E36 with the E36 in you comparison.

leon9191

752 posts

193 months

Thursday 29th May 2014
quotequote all
"the difference between 80 per cent and 100 per cent is 300 per cent!"

Legend!

monthefish

20,441 posts

231 months

Thursday 29th May 2014
quotequote all
Debaser said:
monthefish said:
isleofthorns said:
8.35 for the first generation SMG e36 m3 is pretty impressive.. it takes almost that long to change gears!
...and perhaps explains why Jethro Bovingdon was unable to achieve his target of creating a sub 8 mins E36 M3.

Evo article said:
Another, marginally quicker M3 has been making the headlines at the Ring recently. A few days after Pagani’s production-car lap record run (see issue 112), a modified E46 M3 CSL, supercharged to generate over 600bhp, lapped the full circuit in 7:22.9 – or almost exactly one minute quicker than my M3 managed on its first run!
Intesresting that the unfettled car did an 8:22. Does that show the SMG was a big handicap?
Was it a different driver?
Yes, but I think it's safe to say that if Horst von Saurma achieved an 8:35 in a SMG e36 m3, then there's not much more to be had from it.
Whereas some other driver (JB) managed an 8:22 in a manual car, then the gap between the two cars is at least 13 seconds (and almost certainly more if it were HvS driving that manual)

monthefish

20,441 posts

231 months

Thursday 29th May 2014
quotequote all
VF7 said:
I think you are confusing the E36 with the E36 in you comparison.
wobble




Both E36
Horst von Saurma said:
It was an M3 SMG (E36)
....
....I think it was 8min 35sec.
Evo article on JBs E36 M3 8 minute project car said:
a modified E46 M3 CSL, supercharged to generate over 600bhp, lapped the full circuit in 7:22.9 – or almost exactly one minute quicker than my [E36] M3 managed on its first run!
link

zeppelin101

724 posts

192 months

Thursday 29th May 2014
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
Personally, without laps and vehicles being independently verified then the lap time is bks.

When manufacturers go to a track and set a time and then have a song and dance about it, who gives a st? See the Leon debacle as a prime example. Those times don't mean anything. There is a reason that science and medical journals etc are independently verified by peers in their field and it's to avoid bullst claims getting anywhere.

What this guy does is, at least, somewhat representative. Although whether he can vouch for the vehicles in terms of how "fettled" they have been is probably impossible to say.

Christoffer

472 posts

197 months

Thursday 29th May 2014
quotequote all
Highly enjoyable article - thank you smile

I think the Carrera GTs time is the most impressive because it was done such a long time ago, in january, and with normal tires.

Dan Trent

1,866 posts

168 months

Thursday 29th May 2014
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
I've got it in my notes somewhere from a chat I had with the project leader on the 918 Spyder who also worked on the CGT but I have in my head it was a pretty significant margin, in the order of c. 20 seconds or so.

Off to see if I can get the exact number but it was that kind of ballpark.

Cheers,

Dan

wtdoom

3,742 posts

208 months

Thursday 29th May 2014
quotequote all
Dan , I've just come back from spa in the Cgt . I've run the gt on supersports and now the new cup 2 ( in corvette zr1 sizes ).
Some on the prosche forum may know my gt has around 15000 track miles on her from her . I have met michael hoelscher ( head of Cgt project ) on a couple of 918 events and my understanding is a modern tyre on the Cgt with a little modification geo to suit is worth around 15/20 seconds at the ring depending on compound . There are a couple of 458 challenge cars that were at the RMA event that can testify to the ferocity of the Cgt on a decent set of rubber wink


Dan Trent

1,866 posts

168 months

Thursday 29th May 2014
quotequote all
Same chap and, it seems, a similar conversation to the one we had. Good on you for putting that into practice! clap He's a nice guy isn't he - very into his old motorbikes seemingly.

Thanks!

Dan

wtdoom

3,742 posts

208 months

Thursday 29th May 2014
quotequote all
Dan Trent said:
Same chap and, it seems, a similar conversation to the one we had. Good on you for putting that into practice! clap He's a nice guy isn't he - very into his old motorbikes seemingly.

Thanks!

Dan
Thats the one , top man is Michael .
Micheal ( as Im sure you know ) is a legend . He was in charge of the carrera gt , RS2 and the 500E projects etc .
If anyones interested the Cup 2 is a great tyre . Not as ultimately sticky as the old school cups but they stay "on" for longer and are much better in the wet .

Dan , Im a little saddened by the lack of CGT love on here . If you guys want to experience a proper one , set up well , give me a shout ...

hunter 66

3,904 posts

220 months

Thursday 29th May 2014
quotequote all
wtdoom and good thing I was not in your passenger seat !!!! good stuff.