RE: Megane 275 Trophy vs Leon Cupra 280

RE: Megane 275 Trophy vs Leon Cupra 280

Wednesday 30th July 2014

Megane 275 Trophy vs Leon Cupra 280

Enough about the 'ring already; PH pits Megane Trophy against Leon Cupra on UK soil



Lord be praised; an opportunity has arisen to compare the Megane 275 Trophy and LeonCupra 280 without reference to lap times around That German Racetrack. Other than the one just made there.

A bit of Bedfordshire B-road included in test
A bit of Bedfordshire B-road included in test
It's quite liberating actually. For all those reckoning the 'ring laps were an irrelevance obscured by marketing smoke and mirrors (and possibly a bit of cheeky engineering'prep'on the side) we've got a chance to drive the two back to back somewhere owners may well do the same. So we've got Bedford Autodrome - your classic track day venue - and the conveniently close-by B660 for the essential B-road blast.

In the Spanish corner we've got Matt's PH Fleet SEAT, a three-door 280 with a manual gearbox and the standard electronically adjustable dampers and active VAQ 'diff'. You can also get the three-door in 265hp form - matching the non-Trophy Megane's baseline horsepower figure - while five-door Cupras are all 280s. Unlike the Renault there's the option of an automated dual-clutch too on all 280s. Base price of a manual Leon like this is £26,945, Matt's car coming in at £29,965 thanks to a bunch of adaptive this and assist that fripperies. See his PH Fleet intro for the full breakdown but none of the extras applied actually have any bearing on the way the car drives. Once you turn them all off at least.

Summer downpour made track 'interesting'
Summer downpour made track 'interesting'
Not quite the same can be said of the Megane. Philosophically fromage to the SEAT's chalk, it's the (whisper it) analogue alternative to the SEAT's digitally enhanced delights with its mechanical limited-slip diff and passive dampers. Much of the fuss about the Trophy's dynamic ability centres on the optional Ohlins dampers and Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 tyres ... neither of which are fitted to our test car.

Before options the Trophy costs nearly two grand more than the SEAT at £28,930 and as tested it's a burly £31,325, though after options the gap closes to just £60. Opt for the full package of 5kg lighter Speedline Turini 19-inch wheels (£1,000), Ohlins package (£2,000) and the Cup 2 tyres (£1,000) and the Megane is well into Golf R and Audi S3 territory. Cue forum outrage at the temerity of Renault to charge more than £30K for a Megane... In fairness the Trophy spec does include most of the goodies you'd want, including a standard Akrapovic exhaust, the desirable Recaro seats and the stiffer Cup chassis with the LSD.

It's a battle for hot hatch heart and soul!
It's a battle for hot hatch heart and soul!
Even in that context the SEAT is looking like something of a bargain but, of course, to unlock its full track potential you'll need the as-yet unconfirmed performance pack with the bigger Brembo brakes and Cup 2 tyres. Add DSG and the Leon will be well over £30K too. But as it stands the comparison between these two particular cars - effectively in their 'base' mechanical specs without the extras required to achieve those lap times - is a fair one.

Stage set it's time to drive them and see how they really compare...


SEAT LEON CUPRA SC 280
Engine:
1,984cc 4-cyl turbo
Transmission: 6-speed manual (6-speed DSG optional), front-wheel drive
Power (hp): 280@ 5,700-6,200rpm (265@5,350-6,600rpm)*
Torque (lb ft): 258@1,750-5,600rpm (258@1,750-5,300rpm)*
0-62mph: 5.8 (5.9)*
Top speed: 155mph
Weight: 1,375kg
MPG: 44.1 (NEDC combined)
CO2: 149g/km
Price: £26,940 (£29,650 as tested, comprising Leather Pack with Winter Pack £755, Driver Assist Pack including high beam and lane assist £295, Safety Pack £115, SEAT Sound System £250, Adaptive Cruise Control and front assist £500, space saver £95 and Dynamic Custom paint £695).

*Figures for the 265, where different, in brackets. DSG only available on the 280 - 0-62mph reduced by a tenth and MPG to 42.2 as well as adding 20kg, 6g/km and £1,285.

MEGANE RENAULTSPORT 275 TROPHY
Engine: 1,998cc 4-cyl turbo
Transmission: 6-speed manual, mechanical limited-slip differential, front-wheel drive
Power (hp): 275@5,500rpm
Torque (lb ft): 265@3,000-5,000rpm
0-62mph: 6.0 sec
Top speed: 158mph
Weight: 1,376kg
MPG: 37.7mpg (NEDC combined)
CO2: 174g/km
Price: £28,930 (£31,325 as tested, comprising 19-inch Speedline Turini wheels/Bridgestone RE050A tyres £1,000, Liquid Yellow paint £1,300 and emergency spare wheel £95)


Introduction and comments
Megane Renaultsport 275 Trophy
SEAT Leon Cupra 280
Verdict






   

Photos: Tom Begley

Author
Discussion

Dan Trent

Original Poster:

1,866 posts

168 months

Wednesday 30th July 2014
quotequote all
Before we get into the '£30K for a Megane?!!!!' or 'You could have an M135 for that...' stuff if you've got a view on how we present these multi-car tests I've set up a poll in website feedback - click here and let us know your views.

Cheers!

Dan

ST150HB

446 posts

149 months

Wednesday 30th July 2014
quotequote all
I really like where Seat have gone with the new Leon, looks like a really decent car. Not sure if i'd ever get the opportunity to compare the two though frown

PunterCam

1,069 posts

195 months

Wednesday 30th July 2014
quotequote all
While £30k is a lot of money, £30k for the best front wheel drive performance car you can buy is hardly unreasonable, considering that the best four wheel drive or rear wheel drive performance car might be £700k-£1million depending on your definition of "best".

I think Renault continue to make mini 911 GT3 style cars (although it's sad the engines are now bland), with focussed styling, proper seats and properly thought out and developed chassis.

Personally I think the current "best" level is not expensive enough though (I mean, I like the price, but the format is hardly being maxed here). A hatchback is a wonderfully practical shape of car. Why isn't there a carbon tubbed, exotic (or at least highly tuned) engined, precision machined, 1100kg, ultra desirable hatch on the market? £50k, or £60k. But it's the absolute best hatchback, unequivocally, that you can buy. Something that actually felt special.

The reason is snobbery, obviously, but I wish someone would do it. They wouldn't be able to make enough.

WCZ

10,517 posts

194 months

Wednesday 30th July 2014
quotequote all
you tested the megane trophy without the trophy dampers? :/

it's beyond me why anyone would buy that car without speccing them

GTEYE

2,094 posts

210 months

Wednesday 30th July 2014
quotequote all
Truth be told, £30k would not be wisely invested in either of this pair.

Doesn't make them bad cars though, but perhaps better leased, or wait until someone else has taken some of the initial hit.

It would be a Golf R for me.

Axionknight

8,505 posts

135 months

Wednesday 30th July 2014
quotequote all
They needed the cash to push it towards a spare wheel.

Guvernator

13,144 posts

165 months

Wednesday 30th July 2014
quotequote all
PunterCam said:
Why isn't there a carbon tubbed, exotic (or at least highly tuned) engined, precision machined, 1100kg, ultra desirable hatch on the market? £50k, or £60k. But it's the absolute best hatchback, unequivocally, that you can buy. Something that actually felt special.
There already is in the form of the Audi RS3 or the A class A45 AMG, both approach £50k with options and are arguably the top of the current hot hatch tree (in terms of price and outright pace at least). However you'll never get a £50k, ultra light, hatchback. To achieve that weight it would have to forego all the toys, be too hardcore and just wouldn't sell. See Renaults previous R26.R to see how well that approach went down with real paying punters.

Personally I'd want something with all the toys but was a decent drivers car as well as retaining the practicality of a hatchback and then I'd be interested. VAG cars have the build quality and toys but are often boring to look at and drive and this new Leon is no different. Renault get the driving aspects right but build quality and materials are still poor as well as the fact that it's not offered in a 5 door. The A class is way to small inside and bootwise to be much use as a practical hatchback as well as not driving as well as expected and the Audi RS3 was a disappointment too so I'm still waiting for someone to make the ultimate hot hatch.

Dale487

1,334 posts

123 months

Wednesday 30th July 2014
quotequote all
The ultimate spec Megane is £33K & imagine on the track or an empty B road would be the best front wheel drive car you could choose and proberbly better than many rear wheel drive cars at the same price point or more.

But the other 360 days of the year I imagine the SEAT like the Golf GTI would be better to live with.

I know its from the class below but I think the Audi S1 looks awesome, particulary of you leave off the quattro packs and have body coloured wing mirrors - for the ultimate Q-car.

Vee12V

1,332 posts

160 months

Wednesday 30th July 2014
quotequote all
WCZ said:
you tested the megane trophy without the trophy dampers? :/

it's beyond me why anyone would buy that car without speccing them
Exactly.

Dan Trent

Original Poster:

1,866 posts

168 months

Wednesday 30th July 2014
quotequote all
Vee12V said:
WCZ said:
you tested the megane trophy without the trophy dampers? :/

it's beyond me why anyone would buy that car without speccing them
Exactly.
It was surprising and a disappointment that the press car turned up without them to be honest but apparently they won't actually be on cars before October. The car we drove at the 'ring on the launch event did have them though and they felt mega - I think I described them as 'pillowy' and they have a much more controlled feel to them. Stock items are very good but the Ohlins are in a different league, which is why they cost as much as they do.

Soon as we can get one to test in the UK we'll book it in of course...

Cheers!

Dan

rtz62

3,360 posts

155 months

Wednesday 30th July 2014
quotequote all
[quote=Dale487]The ultimate spec Megane is £33K & imagine on the track or an empty B road would be the best front wheel drive car you could choose and proberbly better than many rear wheel drive cars at the same price point or more.

But the other 360 days of the year I imagine the SEAT like the Golf GTI would be better to live with.

Exactly.
And also, some of us have children who are rather larger than the 'unemployed Japanese midgets' they obviously use at Renault to ensure the rear seats are the right size....
Not only that, but the majority of us, for the majority of the time, aren't able to drive either car like this on HM Highways, so the subtle nuances between them are largely academic....

rb5er

11,657 posts

172 months

Wednesday 30th July 2014
quotequote all
I`m sure they are capable and quick but they are a really boring looking pair of cars.

bakerstreet

4,762 posts

165 months

Wednesday 30th July 2014
quotequote all
rb5er said:
I`m sure they are capable and quick but they are a really boring looking pair of cars.
This was my thought. The Seat just looks dull compared to the previous model. At least you could tell the old FR model from a distance. This hot seat could be the base model diesel judging by its looks. All IMO of course smile

ahenners

597 posts

126 months

Wednesday 30th July 2014
quotequote all
Is it just me that likes the subtle, understated looks of the Leon? I actually like that it doesn't shout about it's pace and that it looks very similar, but subtly different, to the standard car. Glad they didn't go with the 4 exhausts as per the Golf R either.


TimS2000

452 posts

207 months

Wednesday 30th July 2014
quotequote all
ahenners said:
Is it just me that likes the subtle, understated looks of the Leon? I actually like that it doesn't shout about it's pace and that it looks very similar, but subtly different, to the standard car. Glad they didn't go with the 4 exhausts as per the Golf R either.
You're not alone, I like it too. Huge improvement over the ugly MPV styling of the previous version. I personally like understated handsome cars, rather than the showy "look at me" (and resultant often ugly) stuff that a lot of manufacturers produce.

The Renault looks great too, though not keen on the new oversized badge on the nose.

Hoygo 2

46 posts

124 months

Wednesday 30th July 2014
quotequote all
The price of the Megane justifies itself,what a car to go for a drive,with the Trophy-R dampers will be even more amazing,shame about the looks ,looks as boring as the Seat,the pre-facelift 250 looked way better.

PunterCam

1,069 posts

195 months

Wednesday 30th July 2014
quotequote all
Guvernator said:
There already is in the form of the Audi RS3 or the A class A45 AMG, both approach £50k with options and are arguably the top of the current hot hatch tree (in terms of price and outright pace at least). However you'll never get a £50k, ultra light, hatchback. To achieve that weight it would have to forego all the toys, be too hardcore and just wouldn't sell. See Renaults previous R26.R to see how well that approach went down with real paying punters.
That's thinking about it in the wrong way. Why start with a basic 1.6l hatch at all? Why is no one making a "proper" desirable fast hatch? The rs3 is just an a3. The a45 is just an a-class. Of course people aren't wanting to pay huge money for them (although note - a good few still do).

A Ferrari 458 isn't a suped-up mr2 is it? (hopefully you get that point, stretched I know). These hatch backs are heavy because, at heart, they have to be sold for sub £20k to the masses. My point is, if someone developed from scratch a £60k, or even more, hatchback, which was actually special (not just hatchback special - the only class of car where the only measurable unit of quality is dashboard plastic), it would sell.

Someone should do it.

Dblue

3,252 posts

200 months

Wednesday 30th July 2014
quotequote all
Every car is a compromise. That is just a fact of life.
IME the Renault is pretty refined, very comfortable place to do big miles in. I can personally attest to at least 80,000 miles of trouble free and rattle and squeak free running in 2 Megane RSs (One of them the previous Trophy)
Its build quality is much maligned and the new Trophy is fully smothered in rather fetching alcantara.

Personally i think the Renault looks great in Liquid Yellow and its certainly a colour that gets lots of positive comment from the public at large. I think I prefer the new nose too.


Bear in mind that both of these will attract substantial discounts so the headline prices compared to , say, a Golf R are rather misleading.

I get that not everyone can ignore the 3 dr's or wants such a firm ride 24/7, or wants a more prestigious badge and I understand why PH,CAR and EVO all plump for the Golf R (Or this SEAT )because its close enough on a track or B road and better at the mundane.
But that being said, the fact its one of THE greatest drivers cars ever made easily swings it for me.

Mine due in October smile

Liquid Yellow, Ohlins, Turinis (But not Cups) + R Link + DAB

Could have got an R instead in the end but I honestly think this is the best compromise

aka_kerrly

12,417 posts

210 months

Wednesday 30th July 2014
quotequote all
Amazing isn't it, some people think that both cars are too dull and boring looking whilst some say they prefer the subtlety of having a hot hatch compared to something far more outlandish.

There are so so many reasons why hot hatches are brilliant and deserve to be discussed among cars that were designed to be sports cars and nothing else. If it means using the example from another poster then for 360 days a year transporting adults/kids, shopping, camping equipment, mountain bikes, a new TV, a tonne of garden waste whilst delivering fun at 7/10ths on the road plus 5 days a year at 9/10ths or on a track doesn't that make it a brilliant car more so than 99% of so called sports cars that for 360 days a year are too small to have adults in, offer a boot suitable for a rucksack, less security etc?

Genuinely keen to find out what the view of these cars is, especially the traditional diff versus E-diff since that has got so many people getting their knickers in a twist already!

Dan Trent

Original Poster:

1,866 posts

168 months

Wednesday 30th July 2014
quotequote all
Dblue said:
I understand why PH,CAR and EVO all plump for the Golf R (Or this SEAT )because its close enough on a track or B road and better at the mundane.
Not sure we do!

Your car sounds like it'll be great too, great spec.

Cheers,

Dan