RE: Lotus Evora 400 :Driven

RE: Lotus Evora 400 :Driven

Monday 27th July 2015

Lotus Evora 400: Driven

Less weight, more power but more cost as well for the Evora - time to drive it!



Poor Lotus Evora. It is literally impossible to discuss it without attempting to put it into context against Porsches of similar money and purpose. Is it a step up from a Cayman or a more affordable alternative to a Carrera S? Damn, see, it just happened again...

Ingress/egress improved by new sills
Ingress/egress improved by new sills
With its £72K pricetag and 406hp power output this new Evora 400 appears even more difficult to pin down. It's £10K more than the most hardcore Cayman you can buy (actually, you can't...) but a similar amount less than an equivalently powerful 911 Carrera S. So is it a mid-level sports car with ideas - and a price - above its station? Or a true junior supercar for half the cost?

Lotus will tell you the latter. The numbers suggest they might be onto something, the fact a development car slashed six seconds off the Hethel test track time of the Evora S it replaces underlining how much of a step up this is in performance terms. Six? Make that seven, Lotus development guru Gavan Kershaw casually slicing another second out of the time the other day in one of the production cars assembled for the press launch.

Some numbers, quickly. It's about £10K more than the Evora S it replaces, is apparently two thirds new and now weighs 42kg less despite gaining a bunch of new kit including a chargecooler circuit for the supercharger. There's a standard limited-slip differential, a new interior more easily accessed via lower, thinner sills and a bunch of other upgrades aimed at saving weight, reducing production time and improving quality while saving costs. The looks have lost some of the delicacy of the original car but add some visual weight to the promise of significantly more potent performance.

New design, same quality concerns though
New design, same quality concerns though
New era
This, then, is the first really significant Gales-era Lotus, the brand's new CEO combining hard-headed pragmatism about the Evora's need for headline grabbing punch aligned with core Lotus values like saving weight and managing cost. Portrayed as the bean counter Hethel desperately needed, Lotus insiders are keen to underline his long-held passion for the brand too.

First experience of the 400 is on the Hethel test track. The Evora has a much wider operating brief than the Exige S, which can get away with a degree of harshness in pursuit of hardcore track thrills. The Evora has to be able to channel that spirit but also have daily usability and compliance enough for the traditional Sunday morning B-road blast.

The Evora's dirty secret is that it's not actually that light, the 1,395kg unladen weight merely 20kg or so less than Cayman or a Carre- oh, there we go again... Its trick is in making it feel from the wheel like it is a sub-tonne Elise or Exige, the flickable sense of agility immediately evident in Hethel's opening corners.

Likewise the compliance that has always been a Lotus hallmark. You can take huge bites of kerb, the springing firm but compliant and perfectly matched with the revalved Bilstein dampers. Rates have been stiffened at the back to cope with the extra power while negative camber has been increased up front to give the front end extra bite, offsetting the push from the limited-slip diff - the reason Lotus has traditionally resisted fitting them. The power is such it's now required say the engineers.

Limited-slip diff makes this easier!
Limited-slip diff makes this easier!
No rival can match the Evora's delicacy and feedback, the lovely wriggle of the wheel in your hands and fluidity of the passive damping a rare treat in the modern age. The brake pedal feel is bang-on too, bigger discs all round clamped by AP calipers giving huge confidence into the corners. Kershaw is a big fan, this and the stabilising influence of the diff under braking meaning he's happy to lean on full ABS intervention into the tight chicane after the squeaky-cheeks Windsock corner. We'll take his word on that but even at a more modest pace it's clear the Evora is absolutely planted under braking.

Comfort blanket
There's a little comfort blanket of understeer on turn-in but if you want things a little more exciting a nip and tuck lift to back the car into the turn gives you a host more options, dictated by four levels of stability control. Open-diffed Evoras did this too but with the extra power and the Quaife there's more throttle adjustability to play with. Helped by a new lighter flywheel the Toyota V6 fairly zings its way round the rev counter and has a lovely linear power delivery and instant, precise throttle response. The sight of the by-wire throttle servo isn't quite as evocative as visible linkages opening individual throttle bodies but nice to see all the same, the only downer being a rev limit that cuts in about 500rpm before you'd want.

No complaints about the pace though - this is one rapid car and able to pull hard from low revs and then sing all the way to the redline. The new three-inch exhaust sounds ace with the button-controlled flap open, there being the option for a quiet mode for noise-restricted track days or when you simply want to keep a lower profile.

Still little to match a Lotus on a British road
Still little to match a Lotus on a British road
Only the occasionally baulky gearbox spoils what is an otherwise rich sensory experience and an impressive plucking of the heartstrings by this significantly faster and more accomplished Evora.

Even the automatic option - disappointing in the Exige and previous 'IPS' guise in earlier Evoras - seems much improved. Hand on heart it's still no patch on the PDK or ZF eight-speed gearboxes used by many rivals. But shift speeds are quicker, reactions to the paddles are less hesitant and it does a passable job of keeping up with the pace when you take over via the paddles.

Sounding good, isn't it?

And it is. But while you can rationalise that increase in price with the extra performance and generous standard kit it still brings with it a level of expectation the cabin struggles to satisfy. There's a new dash and heater controls and it looks stylish enough. But whether driven by cost or weight saving (likely both) there's a flimsiness to the switchgear those accustomed to the German rivals will simply find laughable, the visible tremors in the new centre console over bumps and track kerbs an unfortunate visual reminder. Likewise the Alpine infotainment unit, the aftermarket vibe an inevitable compromise smaller manufacturers face compared with the economies of scale available to bigger manufacturers.

Now much quicker on track - is that enough?
Now much quicker on track - is that enough?
Wait of expectation
It seems harsh to mark down the Evora on what are really superficial points when the more substantial ones like the driving experience are a cut above. But, sadly, day to day these things matter. Given the resources available and the need to keep to the Gales script of increasing sales but reducing costs you couldn't expect more from the Evora 400. And as a driving machine it has purity and feedback unmatched at any price, combining raw pace with a delicacy overtyred and overgeared Porsches can only dream of.

Whether that's enough to gloss over some lack of polish in the final details will depend on your personal priorities. It's got the traditional Lotus dynamic polish, now emboldened with some serious pace too. But it's apparently become more expensive while ending up feeling a bit cheaper, which is worrying given the increased expectations the pricetag brings. Gales has put his limited stake behind raw performance being enough to win over new buyers to the Evora. You can't argue with the logic and if the Elise and Exige are unlikely to bring in conquest sales that puts a heavy burden on the shoulders of the Evora 400. It's a brave punt and one you have to hope pays off.

Hethel track vid here.



LOTUS EVORA 400
Engine: 3,456cc V6, supercharged
Transmission: 6-speed manual/6-speed auto, rear-wheel drive
Power (hp): 406@7,000rpm
Torque (lb ft): 302@3,500rpm-6,500rpm
0-62mph:  4.1sec
Top speed: 186mph
Weight: 1,415kg ('unladen')
MPG: N/A
CO2: 225g/km
Price: £72,000 (£74,000)









 

Author
Discussion

cerb4.5lee

Original Poster:

9,644 posts

108 months

Monday 27th July 2015
quotequote all
The numbers seem impressive enough but Lotus and lightness don't seem to go hand in hand anymore.

kambites

53,925 posts

149 months

Monday 27th July 2015
quotequote all
So a car from Lotus which drives better than the Germans but is worse in every other way... there's a surprise. hehe

The new sills do look like an enormous improvement. Hopefully that'll broaden the appeal a bit.

MrBarry123

4,630 posts

49 months

Monday 27th July 2015
quotequote all
The front of that looks fking awful.

NotNormal

2,071 posts

142 months

Monday 27th July 2015
quotequote all
It's a shame they didn't decide to use the GTE styling for this car going forward as IMO the wider stance makes the Evora look awesome whereby the standard car does look a tad awkward from certain angles.

Either way, fingers are crossed that Lotus come out the mire one way or another...

The Crack Fox

12,758 posts

120 months

Monday 27th July 2015
quotequote all
They've built (another) drivers car with proud heritage, fresh styling and fantastic performance and keep lots of Brits in work. I wish folks would spend less time wking over German switchgear and more about the important things that matter. Opening the review with "Poor Lotus Evora" doesn't help, now, does it?
Advertisement

Impasse

15,099 posts

169 months

Monday 27th July 2015
quotequote all
19. Just nineteen words until Porsche was mentioned in an article about Lotus. Is this a new record?

Banned Member

180 posts

183 months

Monday 27th July 2015
quotequote all
As mentioned "Poor Evora" is a negative way to start a review for such a nice car. Maybe it's the mentality that it's British so there must be something wrong with it. I'm sure if the Evora had had a Porsche badge on the front, the review may have been slightly more positive.

StottyEvo

6,673 posts

91 months

Monday 27th July 2015
quotequote all
I thought these were about 1140kg confused Lots of steps in the right direction but still a distance to go.

drgoatboy

784 posts

135 months

Monday 27th July 2015
quotequote all
Can you comment on Driving position Dan? Is there room for the larger driver (height and width)?

Its much easier to forgive slightly wonky interior if its actually a comfortable place to be.

zebra

4,481 posts

142 months

Monday 27th July 2015
quotequote all
Banned Member said:
As mentioned "Poor Evora" is a negative way to start a review for such a nice car. Maybe it's the mentality that it's British so there must be something wrong with it. I'm sure if the Evora had had a Porsche badge on the front, the review may have been slightly more positive.
Exactly.

I gave up caring what PH or Evo or others who don't own Lotus's write about their car ages ago.

I buy them, have recently purchased another one and you know what, they are utterly brilliant.

unsprung

1,658 posts

52 months

Monday 27th July 2015
quotequote all

It's about organisational culture, isn't it. Lotus had become complacent or sclerotic. They seemed not to be getting ahead of the customer and how performance car segments have evolved.

This and other recent news are evidence of progress. I do believe that there remains a legitimate complaint about pricing and value-for-money, particularly outside the UK. But let's see if / how that may change over time.

kambites

53,925 posts

149 months

Monday 27th July 2015
quotequote all
StottyEvo said:
I thought these were about 1140kg confused Lots of steps in the right direction but still a distance to go.
The V6 Exige is about that, the Evora has always been around 1400kg.

Dblue

2,790 posts

128 months

Monday 27th July 2015
quotequote all
The Crack Fox said:
They've built (another) drivers car with proud heritage, fresh styling and fantastic performance and keep lots of Brits in work. I wish folks would spend less time wking over German switchgear and more about the important things that matter. Opening the review with "Poor Lotus Evora" doesn't help, now, does it?
Agree 100%. But it would be an easier sell if lotus was a little more concerned with the basics, like getting in and out for example. But its a great car and deserves to be bought in larger numbers. We should all be totally positive about the company as they warrant our support.

Like this new fellow in charge, signs he understands what is required.


Ryvita

434 posts

138 months

Monday 27th July 2015
quotequote all
You know, just for variety, it would be lovely to see the Evora compared to something other than a Porsche.

"...compared to the Robin Reliant, the Evora has 33% more wheels, and significantly, 100% less Del Boy"

"...compared to the word 'vulva' the Evora finds itself at a significant disadvantage in the v-stakes, but makes up for this with the increased vowel count and variety."

"...compared to the average member of the House of Lord's entertainments, the Evora offers excellent value for money, with a slightly lower chance of getting yourself in trouble with the cops! Nudge nudge wink wink."

c8rks

19 posts

51 months

Monday 27th July 2015
quotequote all
I like it a lot - and as for the front looking "xxxxx" awful well I still think it looks much better than the Cayman / Boxster. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder after all....

Lotus is definitely going in the right direction - the inherent weight of the car is probably down to the original design and not a lot Gales and the team could do for a revamp, but let's wait for the first new model before we discount them on a "lightness" philosophy.

kambites

53,925 posts

149 months

Monday 27th July 2015
quotequote all
c8rks said:
I like it a lot - and as for the front looking "xxxxx" awful well I still think it looks much better than the Cayman / Boxster.
Ever heard the term "damning with faint praise"? hehe

zebra

4,481 posts

142 months

Monday 27th July 2015
quotequote all
unsprung said:
I do believe that there remains a legitimate complaint about pricing and value-for-money, particularly outside the UK. But let's see if / how that may change over time.
I disagree. In view of comparable cars they are priced competitively and you are not paying for mas production here either.

Impasse

15,099 posts

169 months

Monday 27th July 2015
quotequote all
Dblue said:
Agree 100%. But it would be an easier sell if lotus was a little more concerned with the basics, like getting in and out for example. But its a great car and deserves to be bought in larger numbers. We should all be totally positive about the company as they warrant our support.

Like this new fellow in charge, signs he understands what is required.
Getting in and out? That would be why the sills are lower and thinner and why the car is no more difficult to sit in than a Cayman Aston Martin Vantage.

Impasse

15,099 posts

169 months

Monday 27th July 2015
quotequote all
zebra said:
unsprung said:
I do believe that there remains a legitimate complaint about pricing and value-for-money, particularly outside the UK. But let's see if / how that may change over time.
I disagree. In view of comparable cars they are priced competitively and you are not paying for mas production here either.
Residuals have proven to be strong too.

unsprung

1,658 posts

52 months

Monday 27th July 2015
quotequote all
Banned Member said:
Maybe it's the mentality that it's British so there must be something wrong with it.
Surely this is a matter of perspective. From where I sit, outside the UK, I'm more likely to hear Britons crow about British motors as if everybody else is still on horseback.

At times, said crowing becomes deliciously absurd: waxing poetic about a short production run of British cars that almost nobody will be able to purchase. Or even see.

"Ooooh... They're making eleven units and each costs £380,000. Add another £90,000 for carbon ceramic brakes, natch."

The ne plus ultra of British pride, for me, has come when former UK colleagues -- petrolheads, the lot of them -- popped in, while visiting the US.

"Fancy a go behind the wheel in my C6 Corvette? Here's the fob" I say. Five of them by now.

Each has said no. One or two snickered like school boys in response. And one of them told me, "You're still driving that thing?"

Everybody else -- the Australian, the Frenchman, the German, the Pole, etc. -- did not need to hear my offer a second time.