RE: Ford Focus RS: Review

RE: Ford Focus RS: Review

Wednesday 20th January 2016

2016 Ford Focus RS (Mk3) | Review

A hot hatch that drifts? Time to see if the Focus RS really lives up to the hype



"The death of every interesting corner is understeer," says Ford Performance Vehicle Engineering Manager Tyrone Johnson. This is a promising start to the story behind the new Ford Focus RS. Tyrone really, really hates understeer. His eyes blaze every time he uses the word. If Tyrone is in the room then understeer had best exit, sharpish.

So Ford has done the seemingly impossible and created a hot hatch based on a front-driven, transverse-engined platform that absolutely, positively will never push on in a corner? Well, towards the end of our track session at Valencia circuit and with tyres past their best, yes, the Focus RS does understeer where previously it had rotated into nice, predictable drifts.

But, for the most part, the Focus RS lives up to the hype. We are officially in the age of the power-oversteering hot hatch. With a driver selectable Drift Mode. This is either a stroke of genius. Or the greatest contribution to the panel beating industry and suppliers of roadside furniture since the French discovered lift-off oversteer in a previous hot hatch era.


Because, let's face it, when you've been raised on Ken Block, watched videos of idiots on press launches doing doughnuts around cones and are sitting in your new Focus RS are you really going to wait until you reach the mandated closed course or racetrack only environment before trying it out? Of course not. Ford says a cap of 4,000 RS models for the UK market is deliberate to protect residuals; natural selection and the nation's hedgerows will no doubt help the cause too.

Is the Focus RS the wildly oversteering monster we've all been led to believe? No. But, especially at this price point, it does rather embarrass everything else in the sector. Others will have softer plastics in the cabin, a more aspirational image and, perhaps, fancier infotainment systems. But dynamically this is one of the more significant moments in the evolution of the affordable performance car.

The most important thing to understand about the Focus RS is why it handles differently. The Haldex-derived all-wheel drive systems used by rivals can only manage torque split front to back, and even then reactively. The Focus's GKN Twinster set-up has drive permanently going from the front power transfer unit and to the rear differential. It's the clutches either side of it that dictate how much, if any, drive torque is going to the rear wheels. If they're fully open it's front-wheel drive. When they are fully closed it's a 30:70 front to rear split, with the ability to send all of that rear allocation to one wheel or the other. This and a 1.8 per cent overspeed of the rear axle means the ability to give proper torque vectoring. Correctly serviced, Ford is confident the hardware will last the lifetime of the car, despite the conflicting forces and apparent strain on the drivetrain.


On the throttle the Focus can send more power to the outside wheel to push the nose into the turn and neutralise understeer. Off the throttle engine braking can be used on the inside wheel to the same end. This explains the smile on Tyrone's face when he talks about it and why a Haldex type system was never going to cut it.

On the road and in the default Normal mode the Focus RS feels more agile than its burly 1,599kg kerb weight would suggest. The steering is fast - just two turns lock to lock - and has a predictable, linear rack. Weight and feedback is decent if not, perhaps, as meaningful as that in a Megane or Civic. In the Normal suspension mode it feels keen to lean on its outside front wheel and cock the opposing back one but you don't really sense this through the wheel.

The beauty of the all-wheel drive system is, even if that inside rear tyre is off the ground, it can still send all of the available power to the outside wheel, altering that traditional hot hatch cornering stance into something previously the preserve of Japanese rally reps like the Mitsubishi Evo. Keep your foot in and there's just a delicious rotation into the apex quite unlike anything you'll have experienced before in a car like this. We're not talking Block-esque armfuls of opposite lock here. Just a determined dive for the inside that bleeds out on corner exit into a lovely sense of four-wheel drift.


Ride that seems a little brittle at lower speeds opens out, there being decent damper travel and excellent body control to manage the various weight transfers going on around the car. The Spanish test route is mainly super smooth but the few bumps along the way suggest a car that'll monster any given B-road and promises entertainment galore if it's slippy under tyre.

Six parameters - AWD, dampers, steering, engine, stability control and exhaust noise - are managed by the driver mode switch and going one step to Sport ups the noise and aggression while maintaining the standard damping. Now you start getting the more extrovert bangs and pops from the exhaust, which is fun, and a little more springiness to the steering's self-centring, which is less so. Track only (honest guv) Track turns everything up to Sport, though you can decouple the dampers via the column stalk if you want. And then you have Drift. If you prefer to drive with ESC fully off - and you will - you need to hold it down every time you swap modes.

On the road Drift would seem the best all-round mix, given it has the aggressive turn-in but Normal steering and dampers for a more natural feel. In reality it's a bit odd, the unnatural, torque vectored tug into the turn making you feel you have to wind a degree or two of lock off to compensate.


For all-round use Normal feels the most linear and predictable. If you never drove it in any other mode you'd be entirely happy. Tellingly this is the setting they use at the 'ring and, no, they're not discussing lap times.

The engine feels strong too, but again it needs to be when you look at that kerbweight. The extra 300cc over most rivals is telling, that and the twin-scroll turbo unique to the RS (the Mustang version of the same motor has a conventional one) meaning it doesn't have the binary, boosty feeling found in the VW group rivals. Reviness was a design goal and sufficiently convincing for the limiter to arrive all too early; in-gear grunt is sufficient that you find yourself leaning on the torque more than chasing the redline.

This RS is more of an all-rounder than any that has gone before and if there's one thing missing it's the expected tarmac spitting ferocity found in rivals like the A45 or Civic. It's incredibly quick but, just perhaps, a little more cultured than diehards may like. Or looks suggest.


On track that ability to dictate cornering line on the throttle becomes even more entertaining. Amusing as it sounds Drift mode still feels a bit weird but, well, it's there for one thing and one thing only. In Track and with stability control off it's plenty keen to tighten its line with the throttle and even power through that into sustained four-wheel drifts. These aren't traditional dab of oppo, on the lock stops rear-wheel drive ones; more an early apex, rally-style, all four wheels straight through to the exit stance that'll be counter-intuitive for track traditionalists. But huge, huge fun. Again that weight is a factor though, the RS feeling a little blunt at the limit.

Track regulars are probably still best served by the likes of the Megane; the Focus has a much broader range of talents but is more naturally inclined to fast road use with the occasional circuit foray. Given the driving style it encourages it might start getting a bit expensive in tyres too - there is a Cup 2 option available as a dealer accessory but at around a grand a set (to be confirmed) it's going to cost you.


Negatives? The lack of a dual-clutch option may put some off but Johnson - predictably - didn't want the additional weight over the front axle. From the outside the car sounds ace, with a wicked crackle even in the Normal mode. Why the need for fake, synthesised noise over the speakers then? It's not as bad as some but still fairly loathsome in practice and principle. And while the optional shell-backed Recaros look brilliant, grip you firmly and are way better than the over-bolstered standard ones they're still set too high - a recurring Focus RS theme many will be familiar with from the previous car. Some will still sneer about the image of hot Fords too but, frankly, they are probably people you'd want to avoid in daily life anyway.

In conclusion, yes, the Focus RS is a triumph, albeit a qualified one. Everything comes at a cost and, while the oversteer antics are amusing, the hardware required to achieve them blunts the RS's edge compared with lighter, more agile rivals. For the money, for the entertainment value and all-round ability though, yes, it's the real deal. If you want one you'll be needing to get in there quickly.

Take a look at Dan's full lap at Valencia here.

 

Watch the Focus RS drift here.

 


SPECIFICATION | 2016 FORD FOCUS RS (Mk3)
Engine
: 2,261cc 4-cyl turbo
Transmission: 6-speed manual, four-wheel drive
Power (hp): 350@6,000rpm
Torque (lb ft): 324@2,000-4,500rpm (347lb ft with 'transient' overboost)
0-62mph: 4.7sec
Top speed: 165mph
Weight: 1,599kg (inc. 75kg driver)
MPG: 36.7mpg
CO2: 175g/km
Price: £29,995

[Photos: Stuart Price]









Author
Discussion

M1C

Original Poster:

1,833 posts

111 months

Tuesday 19th January 2016
quotequote all
1st!!!!!

big_rob_sydney

3,400 posts

194 months

Tuesday 19th January 2016
quotequote all
Hmm. Not as enthusiastic as the second coming would have you believe then?

Maybe a demo a45 is a better bet.

RamboLambo

4,843 posts

170 months

Tuesday 19th January 2016
quotequote all
Mk II is still King and confirmed classic now

macky17

2,212 posts

189 months

Tuesday 19th January 2016
quotequote all
"Some will still sneer about the image of hot Fords too but, frankly, they are probably people you'd want to avoid in daily life anyway"

clap I wonder who will be first to mention soft plastics.

KTF

9,802 posts

150 months

Tuesday 19th January 2016
quotequote all
M1C said:
1st!!!!!
Is it half term already?

Krikkit

26,513 posts

181 months

Tuesday 19th January 2016
quotequote all
I'd take one of these over the A45 - the 4WD system and philosophy behind it sounds fantastic.

macky17

2,212 posts

189 months

Tuesday 19th January 2016
quotequote all
RamboLambo said:
Mk II is still King and confirmed classic now
Classic yes. But this will run rings around it and actually put its power down without needing uprated mounts and a dry road.

M1C

Original Poster:

1,833 posts

111 months

Tuesday 19th January 2016
quotequote all
KTF said:
Is it half term already?
Just a bit of fun..i've never been first poster or anything before.

The review is not quite as gushing with praise as i thought it might be......

is1

188 posts

148 months

Tuesday 19th January 2016
quotequote all
Mmmm ... that doesn't sound quite as compelling as we'd been led to believe :-(

TameRacingDriver

18,065 posts

272 months

Tuesday 19th January 2016
quotequote all
RamboLambo said:
Mk II is still King and confirmed classic now
That overpriced FWD car that was slower than a remapped ST ?

(I jest, but the point stands).

murphy968

24 posts

189 months

Tuesday 19th January 2016
quotequote all
Down the years I have been a real enthusiast of the RS Fords, owning a few and wanting many others. I think it's a shame that the legacy of this marque is diminished by this car. I'm sure it's a great car and excellent VFM, but IMHO Ford should keep the RS badge for real homologation cars or at least those intended for competition. This is clearly designed as a fast road car for the family man.

Baryonyx

17,995 posts

159 months

Tuesday 19th January 2016
quotequote all
RamboLambo said:
Mk II is still King and confirmed classic now
Nah, it was never good enough after the first generation. Nice engine, but that was about it.

I look forward to plenty of stories of pretend road-drifting with the new Focus RS though. Great pub talk.

Hitch78

6,105 posts

194 months

Tuesday 19th January 2016
quotequote all
White, Black, Grey, Other Grey, Blue. Shame on you Ford - where are the colours?

MajorMantra

1,290 posts

112 months

Tuesday 19th January 2016
quotequote all
Interesting review, it sounds like great fun and I *love* the colour.

This might be a very silly question, but with so much trickery required to produce oversteer, wouldn't it have been easier (and not necessarily heavier) just to make this pure RWD? Or does the market just not want that?

Oh, and the full stop in the middle of the this sentence is jarring and does not belong:

Dan Trent said:
This is either a stroke of genius. Or the greatest contribution to the panel beating industry and suppliers of roadside furniture since the French discovered lift-off oversteer in a previous hot hatch era.

urquattroGus

1,847 posts

190 months

Tuesday 19th January 2016
quotequote all
Effective and a good steer - but lacking presence?

Looks inside and outside seem watered down.

Every time I see MK2 it always has such great impact. The wide arches and wide boy from Essex were part of the appeal in my opinion.

s m

23,218 posts

203 months

Tuesday 19th January 2016
quotequote all
murphy968 said:
This is clearly designed as a fast road car for the family man.
Like the 2wd Sierra Cosworth 4-door

Chunkychucky

5,954 posts

169 months

Tuesday 19th January 2016
quotequote all
Still want one of these! The Recaro wingbacks and comfort pack on standard 19s would be my spec cloud9

Baryonyx

17,995 posts

159 months

Tuesday 19th January 2016
quotequote all
MajorMantra said:
This might be a very silly question, but with so much trickery required to produce oversteer, wouldn't it have been easier (and not necessarily heavier) just to make this pure RWD? Or does the market just not want that?
I expect the need to make a new longitudinal engine, or find one somewhere else in the GM range and get it to Focus RS spec, would have been an issue. At least by keeping it in the current format, they can keep everything cheap and transverse, and modify the car lightly to drive the back wheels when needed.

GreatPretender

26,140 posts

214 months

Tuesday 19th January 2016
quotequote all
RamboLambo said:
Mk II is still King and confirmed classic now
Behave!

The MK1 was THE Focus RS.

Terror Factor

127 posts

170 months

Tuesday 19th January 2016
quotequote all
Good stuff, very interesting car imo, and I'm not much for new stuff generally speaking smile

As for the 4wd, how does an EVO do it? they also have a transverse engine, and don't seem to have much problems doing impressive drifts!