RE: Mercedes-AMG S63 Cabriolet: Review

RE: Mercedes-AMG S63 Cabriolet: Review

Tuesday 12th April 2016

Mercedes-AMG S63 Cabriolet: Review

Well of course we went straight for the AMG version



It's been so long since Mercedes-Benz killed off the W111/112 Cabriolet even it can't quite remember the reason it never replaced one of the world's more glamorous drop-tops. It might have been the oil crisis, or perhaps it was the general recession around the same time that did it in. Rumours of 'dangerous' convertibles being outlawed in the US certainly can't have helped. Whatever the reason, five decades is a long time to wait.

Quietly cruising a boulevard on the French Riviera on a chilly April day as the heated steering wheel lightly grills my fingers, the centre armrest roasts my left elbow and the driver's seat fans my buttocks I'm willing to forgive and forget. Stylish, classy, quiet and sophisticated; I am none of these. But the S-Class Cabriolet is all of the above and, among the Ferraris, Rollers and Lamborghinis, looks right at home.

I've never felt more of a fraud behind the wheel. But, as Airscarf breathes warm air down my neck, first impressions are that Mercedes has absolutely nailed it.


Big top
Featuring what's claimed to be the largest fabric roof ever fitted to a production car, the S-Class Cabriolet switches from drop-down poseur to cosseting roof-up recluse in just 20 seconds. It'll do it at speeds of up to 31mph too. All as expected. But what about those V8 BiTurbo badges on the wings and the liberal smattering of AMG logos?

Surely even Affalterbach's finest can't make a sports car out of what is, by any stretch, a whale of a machine? Expecting a thousand-yard stare when I meet the man in charge of the AMG S-Class project, Oliver Wiech isn't the nervous chain-smoking wreck you might imagine. Asking him if both the S63 and S65 has been his toughest gig yet he laughs.

"Absolutely not, not even close. The S-Class Cabriolet was actually pretty straightforward," he says. "For sure, early on we were very worried when we heard it might be a four-door convertible, but as soon as we saw the final plans we knew we could make a pretty good car."

The work began with the engine. The standard S500 has a surprisingly powerful 455hp twin-turbo 4.6-litre V8 but AMG junked it for its own 585hp twin-turbo 5.5-litre V8. If that's not enough the structure is also beefy enough to cope with the 630hp 6.0-litre twin-turbo V12.

The S63 shrugs off any ounce of respectability and launches itself to 62mph in an exceedingly rapid 4.2 seconds. The monstrous S65 is, unsurprisingly, quicker still but by just a tenth, the engineers admitting it is "traction limited" by the 737lb ft of torque.


Weighting game
To help tame weight - all things relative - engineers ditched the S500's lead acid battery and replaced it with a lithium ion pack - this alone shaves around 23kg off the kerbweight. Lightweight forged wheels and 20 per cent lighter ceramic brakes (optional) also help but in the scheme of things the changes are only modest and the S63 weighs in at 2,170kg, 55kg heavier than the S500.

So the chassis has its work cut out, Oliver and his team increasing camber stiffness, fitting chunkier suspension knuckles and adding thicker anti-roll bars and firmer bushings. The steering rack is also quicker. The subsequent increase in cornering speeds meant a redesigned lower A-arm, while at the back there's a stiffer subframe carrier. All S-Class cabs come with Mercedes adaptive Airmatic suspension but the S63 gets burlier pistons and AMG specific calibration.

The S500's new 9G-Tronic gearbox is also left on the shelf, AMG sticking with the tried and tested seven-speeder with its lock-up clutch. For left-hand drive markets almost all S63 versions will be all-wheel drive. Rear-driven right-hand drive markets aside almost 90 per cent of all AMGs now sold are all-wheel drive, suggesting the end of another era will come when this car is replaced.


Run for the hills
Wafting about on the seafront the V8 burbles a low, bassy tone ideal for posing. But it still doesn't suggest a sports car. Leaving town, Sport mode unlocks its full vocal range but it still sounds a little grown-up and mature for a full-fat AMG. The pace certainly meets expectations though. This 4Matic version is faster than the rear-driven one we'll get, taking just 3.9 seconds for 0-62 - two-tenths faster than the range-topping S65.

In normal conditions the system is rear-biased, shuffling 33 per cent of available torque to the front axle and the remaining 67 per cent to the rear. By now it's raining but not a single horsepower is wasted. This has the unusual effect of actually making the 585hp feel quite sedate.

When the long straights give way to sweeping bends it's easy to feel the benefits of the suspension updates. The safety understeer and roll in the S500 is notably reduced, the steering is sharper and - yes - the S63 feels smaller than its intimidating dimensions suggest.


Hauling iron
A special mention must also go to the optional ceramic brakes. Quite why you'd want, or need, them on your S-Class cab I'll never know - but at low speeds they're progressive with plenty of initial bite and, even with severe abuse, never show any signs of strain. As the road slows and the corners tighten, the inevitable weight of the S-Class cab catches up with us. Any hopes of traditional AMG hooliganism are dashed by the amount of traffic and traction of the 4Matic powertrain - there's a degree of slip but a born entertainer it is not.

That said, it easily edges the equivalent and 310kg heavier Bentley Continental GT Convertible. The S63 also rides better, even on its optional 20-inch rims, and steers and goes harder. Don't kid yourself though; it still lacks an important component for a true sports car (namely a roof) and is simply too hefty to hustle.

Our man Weich accepts the point but reckons the target audience will be more than satisfied. Better for us, he reckons the rear-driven ones we will get in the UK will be a little more engaging to drive.

So he's happy. But having said this car was relatively easy to develop, the temptation to ask him what was his most difficult project is impossible to resist. He replies without hesitation before staring into the middle distance. "Oh my god, it's the E-Class!" he laughs. "It's a car that has to be comfortable for business but be capable of being driven very fast on track."

The tension in his face relaxes into a grin though. "You will absolutely love the new one!"


MERCEDES-AMG S63 CABRIOLET 4MATIC
Engine
: 5,461cc, V8 biturbo
Transmission: 7-speed auto, four-wheel drive
Power (hp): 585@5,500rpm
Torque (lb ft): 664@2,250-3,750rpm
0-62mph: 3.9sec
Top speed: 155mph
Weight: 2,185kg (EU, with driver)
MPG: 27.2 (NEDC combined)
CO2: 244g/km
Price: £135,765*
*Pricing for rear-wheel drive S63

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Author
Discussion

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

54 months

Monday 11th April 2016
quotequote all
Oh I like this, a reminder of what Mercedes used to be before they started chasing the money with tasteless, chintzy, poorly made FWD dross for social climbers.

Come on depreciation, do your work.

scenario8

6,561 posts

179 months

Monday 11th April 2016
quotequote all
Batteries weigh how much?!

djneils98

301 posts

150 months

Tuesday 12th April 2016
quotequote all
scenario8 said:
Batteries weigh how much?!
over 23kg does sound large for a battery (!)

sidesauce

2,475 posts

218 months

Tuesday 12th April 2016
quotequote all
What a car. I love it!

Selmer Mk6

245 posts

127 months

Tuesday 12th April 2016
quotequote all
Diesel version coming soon to the UK!

swisstoni

16,985 posts

279 months

Tuesday 12th April 2016
quotequote all
That face - surely we have reached peak ugly with this current Merc corporate front end.

Numeric

1,396 posts

151 months

Tuesday 12th April 2016
quotequote all
It does have what looks a lovely interior and I'm sure it is lovely to drive - especially the softer more languid non-amg version, but surely a car like this should be so stupidly elegant that just sitting in it makes even someone as inelegant as me feel suave and sophisticated.

This is hardly a timeless classic even if an amazing endeavour!

E65Ross

35,071 posts

212 months

Tuesday 12th April 2016
quotequote all
djneils98 said:
scenario8 said:
Batteries weigh how much?!
over 23kg does sound large for a battery (!)
I wouldn't say so. The battery in my 7 series is over 20kgs

kambites

67,556 posts

221 months

Tuesday 12th April 2016
quotequote all
djneils98 said:
scenario8 said:
Batteries weigh how much?!
over 23kg does sound large for a battery (!)
I think battery acid is roughly the same density as water so that'd be about 20 litres plus the weight of the electrodes, case, etc. That sounds about right for a battery on a big car like this; say 20x25x40cm?

The battery in my Elise is about 12kg and that has a lot less to power!

MDMA .

8,895 posts

101 months

Tuesday 12th April 2016
quotequote all
Selmer Mk6 said:
Diesel version coming soon to the UK!

Charlie Michael

2,750 posts

184 months

Tuesday 12th April 2016
quotequote all
I'm sorry but the following photo made me giggle, Devvo is obviously doing well for himself:



hehe

dbdb

4,326 posts

173 months

Tuesday 12th April 2016
quotequote all
I'm sure it is an excellent thing to drive but I can't get past the ultra brash styling which hobbles the desirability of modern Mercedes for me. The front is genuinely grim.

It may well have the longest fabric roof on sale right now, but I find it unlikely that its roof is the longest one ever fitted to a production car. Surely any one of the full-size American 4 door convertibles will have a bigger roof? Such cars as the Lincoln Continental convertible?

Edited to add:

The styling is actually growing on me. It looks quite nice from the side and rear. But the front... Is it one of these Mercs where the star lights up? smile



Edited by dbdb on Tuesday 12th April 10:37

AH33

2,066 posts

135 months

Tuesday 12th April 2016
quotequote all
Charlie Michael said:
I'm sorry but the following photo made me giggle, Devvo is obviously doing well for himself:



hehe
Wow, a machine to transform you into a pinhead!

Ares

11,000 posts

120 months

Tuesday 12th April 2016
quotequote all
swisstoni said:
That face - surely we have reached peak ugly with this current Merc corporate front end.
Specsavers?

sealtt

3,091 posts

158 months

Tuesday 12th April 2016
quotequote all
The big question Mr. Reviewer... would you take one of these over a Bentley GTC?

British Beef

2,213 posts

165 months

Tuesday 12th April 2016
quotequote all

What happened in the end with the Porsche Cayenene S thread ?????

I left off where Billy, had claimed to piss all over the door handles of said owners Porsche (if a fit of rage - he did it 6 or 7 times), as the Porsche driver drove like a d!ck in a residential area. Now the Pistonheads moderators have closed down the thread.

I was wanting to hear what the Porsche owner had to say about this revelation, what was said in that thread, anyone know?

Such a shame, as was shaping up to be the most entertaining thread of the year.

kambites

67,556 posts

221 months

Tuesday 12th April 2016
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
It is particularly special, isn't it? BMW seem to have started the trend with the F10, presumably for pedestrian impact reasons, but Mercedes seem to be taking it to a new level of incohesiveness.

If I was going to buy a modern German car I think it would have to be black just to hide the awful shut-lines. hehe

greghm

440 posts

101 months

Tuesday 12th April 2016
quotequote all
The rear side is horrible, even though I say that very often.

scenario8

6,561 posts

179 months

Tuesday 12th April 2016
quotequote all
kambites said:
djneils98 said:
scenario8 said:
Batteries weigh how much?!
over 23kg does sound large for a battery (!)
I think battery acid is roughly the same density as water so that'd be about 20 litres plus the weight of the electrodes, case, etc. That sounds about right for a battery on a big car like this; say 20x25x40cm?

The battery in my Elise is about 12kg and that has a lot less to power!
The article claims replacing one battery option (lead acid) for another (lithium ion) has lead to a net weight loss of 23kg. A net weight drop. The original lead acid variety must have weighed a ton.

Google suggests however there's a bit of sloppy reporting involved as the standard S class limousine battery weighs 23kg. I doubt that's a coincidence.

Edited by scenario8 on Tuesday 12th April 17:03

alross1212

28 posts

98 months

Tuesday 12th April 2016
quotequote all
swisstoni said:
That face - surely we have reached peak ugly with this current Merc corporate front end.
I have to agree! I am a huge Mercedes fan and I have always liked the understated styling of earlier models. The CL's and SEC's are my favorite in general but this new generation has lost its class. The back of the car is nice but the front looks very unresolved. The W215 and W216 are much nicer in my opinion.