RE: Shed Of The Week: Renaultsport Clio 172

RE: Shed Of The Week: Renaultsport Clio 172

Friday 27th January 2017

Shed Of The Week: Renaultsport Clio 172

A perennial pocket rocket favourite for Shed this week, but with a rather bemusing advert



You do sometimes wonder how people get into the businesses they end up in.

Take the used car business. When putting a used car up for sale, it's customary to provide some information on the car. The more information the better, some might say. That way your potential buyer will be able to make an initial assessment of the motor, and have some sort of idea as to whether or not to take the matter any further.

Let's hope exhaust is in one piece. Or replaced
Let's hope exhaust is in one piece. Or replaced
This week's trade seller of a Renaultsport Clio is taking a different approach. One that involves minimal information. The idea here seems to be that a picture is worth a thousand words. On that basis we have a small novel's worth of pictures from which we can make a preliminary and actually quite favourable visual judgment on the car. The headlight lenses look a bit dim but the sheet metal, bodykit bits and interior all seem to be in pukka original order. The steering wheel hasn't turned to jelly by the looks of it and the vulnerable seat bolsters look firm.

So we're starting to get a bit excited about this £990 car that, when new, was a recognised jewel among hot hatches. But then we're left gasping for more info. We can't tell you anything about the MOT history, as there isn't a reg plate number to go on. We're not even sure whether it has an MOT. To suit our purpose we're assuming it does.

By scratching around the ad and the vendor's website like a hungry hen pecking desperately on stony ground we can tell you that this is a two-owner car with 80,000 miles. And that's pretty much it.

Steering wheel not melted at least
Steering wheel not melted at least
On one level it's quite refreshing not to have to wade through the usual BARGIN, LOOKS AND DRIVES EXCELLENT NO KNOCKS OR BANGS THE ODD SUPERMARKET DINK AS YOU WOULD EXPECT DRIVES EXCELLENT PS ITS CAT D BUT DRIVES EXCELLENT YOUD NEVER KNOW IT AD DONE THIS MILEAGE FIRST TO SEE WILL BUY claptrap. Ooh, look what's happened! Without even trying we've come around from hating the information shortage to thinking that this ad might be a stroke of genius and the future of car advertising.

Leaving all that aside, in the absence of specifics we can look at the generics. As any self-respecting PHer should know, a 2002 Renaultsport Clio can be a fantastic little tool or a costly lesson in bangernomics, depending on the usual caveats of condition and service history.

This 172 is a facelift Phase 2 model, which is good. That means great handling and a 0-60 time of 7.2sec, only a whisker slower than the later 182's time of 7.1sec. The 172's peak power was delivered 1,000rpm lower than the 182's, giving it a nicely useable feel on the road.

Things you will definitely need to establish on this one? Well, the status of the cambelt and auxiliary belts and tensioners for a start. As with all these things, replacement schedules can be as long as a piece of string, but if you don't want your belts to turn into pieces of string you'd be well advised to change them at least every 72,000 miles or five years. Obviously our Shed's mileage of 80K could be significant. Renault dealers will charge the earth for this job, well into four figures, but there are plenty of marque experts who will turn it around for you for considerably less money.

It would be nice to know that the fragile exhaust system has been replaced with a lighter aftermarket setup. Gearbox mounts come in for a beating: knocking in the first two gears is the giveaway. The 'box itself is pretty robust, but clutches can crumble after just 30K miles. Driveshafts split and aren't an easy fix. Keep an ear out for noisy power steering too, if you can hear it above the creaking of the interior that is.

Well it *could* be a hot hatch bargain...
Well it *could* be a hot hatch bargain...
Front wings are plastic. Any rust showing on the body may be an indicator of dodgy crash damage repairs. If the car details sticker on the driver's door isn't there, suspect a repaint at the very least. Check that the recall work for the catch on the aluminium bonnet has been carried out.

These are the things you'd like to see marked as sorted on the service history. It's a shame that a potential buyer will have to find out all this important stuff over the phone. Apart from being a pain in the Harris, in that it puts the onus on you to scribble down what the chap is saying, the call may also turn out to be a total waste of time if it transpires that (say) there is zero paperwork with the car or, worse, the wrong kind of paperwork.

In the vendor's defence, when you go to his website he does give us an insight into one of the often-ignored factors of Shed ownership, such as road tax rates. This is the sort of info many Shed sellers accidentally forget to include in their ads as, thanks to the punitive rates levied on older cars, the amounts involved can be a bit frightening.

That's true here. The Renaultsport Clio may look all cute and little and nippy, and it is, but it's still a 2002 car with a 2.0-litre engine. That means the tax will cost you £270 a year. You can pay on the drip these days, which softens the blow, but it's still a big chunk of the purchase price.

Anyway, here is the ad. Or here's where it would be if there was one.


Author
Discussion

Barchettaman

Original Poster:

6,303 posts

132 months

Friday 27th January 2017
quotequote all
No extra info on the dealer website either.

Bit of a disappointment as SOTW as the lack of details means we can't discuss its particular merits. Pity.

Maybe someone in the UK can give Lancashire Sports a ring?

nikaiyo2

4,710 posts

195 months

Friday 27th January 2017
quotequote all
Used to LOVE my ph1 Clio 172, but it was starting to feel very fragile at 4 years old, the bills were starting to get noticeable. At 15 years old I would be worried lol.

benjijames28

1,702 posts

92 months

Friday 27th January 2017
quotequote all
Insurance write off?

No thanks.

Richard-390a0

2,249 posts

91 months

Friday 27th January 2017
quotequote all
Shame the tax is so high other than that looks like it could be worth a punt.

shaun442k

262 posts

196 months

Friday 27th January 2017
quotequote all
benjijames28 said:
Insurance write off?

No thanks.
It doesn't say that.

Anyway, great car for the money. Buy it for £800, spend £400 on a cambelt/service, then for £1200 all in you have a great track car.

Bowen86

239 posts

111 months

Friday 27th January 2017
quotequote all
shaun442k said:
It doesn't say that.

Anyway, great car for the money. Buy it for £800, spend £400 on a cambelt/service, then for £1200 all in you have a great track car.
Was just about to ask the same thing? I cant see insurance write off...

Also echo the above, track car appeal with this!

ayman82

1,465 posts

181 months

Friday 27th January 2017
quotequote all
Is the belt not 36k/3 years?

eastsider

1,101 posts

223 months

Friday 27th January 2017
quotequote all
Offside front wing looks a different colour to the rest of the car - or is that the plastic wing thing.

Kosy

99 posts

161 months

Friday 27th January 2017
quotequote all
No, 72k / 5 years is correct.

As has been said, it actually doesn't matter about history, paperwork or belts. Even if it has none of the above it is a good price especially if you can haggle a little off. Bodywork and interior look decent and support the mileage.

You will not have as much fun in anything near the price. Trust me, I bought a straight and original 172 Cup for £1k. It's been my daily for 2 years.

Edited by Kosy on Friday 27th January 09:35

Krikkit

26,514 posts

181 months

Friday 27th January 2017
quotequote all
ayman82 said:
Is the belt not 36k/3 years?
That's the awkward aux belt, cambelt is 72/6 years.

Can't believe a good one would be sub-£1k... Usually you pick up high-miles tatty ones for that!

Evilex

512 posts

104 months

Friday 27th January 2017
quotequote all
Surely the lack of verifiable MOT excludes this from being a SOTW?

anonymous-user

54 months

Friday 27th January 2017
quotequote all
If it's as good as it looks condition wise in the pics (rare) then snap it up if it all checks out.

The cars I went to view at dealers were all a little more price wise and complete dogs.

I picked up a cup in vgc at almost twice the price. (private sale)

I'm skeptical though. I reckon there must be something a miss at this price, looking as nice as it does...

tomic

720 posts

145 months

Friday 27th January 2017
quotequote all
shaun442k said:
benjijames28 said:
Insurance write off?

No thanks.
It doesn't say that.

Anyway, great car for the money. Buy it for £800, spend £400 on a cambelt/service, then for £1200 all in you have a great track car.
Does CAT D not mean it's a write off?

ianwayne

6,283 posts

268 months

Friday 27th January 2017
quotequote all
I think the fact that a year's VED on this is £270 is not as bad as outlined. If the car was a year older and registered before March 2001, it still would be £235. A difference of less than £3 per month.

However, I agree car tax rates will be the killer of cars as they get older unless they are very valuable. £295 per year for any car over 200g registered between 2001 and 2006 which will cross a sort of threshhold of £300 at the next budget probably.


J4CKO

41,499 posts

200 months

Friday 27th January 2017
quotequote all
Give it a once over, starts, goes and stops, no complete howlers, haggle down to £900, get it home then make a list of what needs doing.

Cat D matters not one iota at this age and price, I would take a straight looking body and interior over a scruffy one without the marker.

These are going to start going back up I reckon as they dwindle and then folk get nostalgic for old school hatches that arent 400 bhp, 4wd and weigh 1500 kilos plus.

I always think these were better than the 205 which I do like but feel really old, these are still modern enough to be safe, still fairly light and go well, nearly bought one but ended up with another Saab, the engines feel a bit weedy when you are used to turbo or big capacity stuff, plus the driving position is a bit weird, but I still kind of think I missed out and would have grown to appreciate it more than the Saab 9-3 Aero I did buy.


ianwayne

6,283 posts

268 months

Friday 27th January 2017
quotequote all
tomic said:
Does CAT D not mean it's a write off?
You speed read it didn't you? That bit is about the usual twaddle on adverts for old cars.

Blackpuddin

16,483 posts

205 months

Friday 27th January 2017
quotequote all
Where does it say it's CAT D? The only mention of that in the story is in the made-up ad mickey take.

Rsdop

458 posts

117 months

Friday 27th January 2017
quotequote all
eastsider said:
Offside front wing looks a different colour to the rest of the car - or is that the plastic wing thing.
Plastic wing does cause this especially in silver. Always looks worse in photos too I find.

mikeyr

3,118 posts

193 months

Friday 27th January 2017
quotequote all
Enjoyed my 182 variant even though it was on huge miles and needed some work (although 4 new tyres and a number plate light fitting were enough for it to scrape through an MOT).

Only cost me £820 a couple of years ago. I'd wholeheartedly recommend a little Clio RenaultSport but if, like me, you buy a cheap 'un be aware that it's a cheap, ageing car that does like to throw up a series of niggles. Plenty of owners out there that do lavish attention on their Clios (just not me!) so sure one day the good 'uns will be worth a fair few bob. That time isn't now though...


Gribs

469 posts

136 months

Friday 27th January 2017
quotequote all
Richard-390a0 said:
Shame the tax is so high other than that looks like it could be worth a punt.
£300 a year on tax is expensive? It's an insignificant cost overall in running a performance car, pay it monthly at £25 and it's not noticeable. If it is then you really shouldn't be looking at anything other than something very basic.