RE: Renault Sport Clio 220 Trophy: Driven

RE: Renault Sport Clio 220 Trophy: Driven

Tuesday 14th March 2017

Renault Sport Clio 220 Trophy: Driven

So we're not getting an R.S.16, but there remains plenty to recommend the plain old Trophy



Oh Renault, you horrible tease. Having got as far as allowing media to drive working R.S.16 prototypes, the project was cancelled. It looked to have addressed the biggest criticisms of this fourth generation Clio R.S. - namely the lack of both a manual gearbox and some visual aggression - with a pugnacious, pumped up pocket rocket, ready to show the rest of the world that Renault Sport still had it. Now it's never going to happen.


Frankly, the standard car would have required a price drop to somewhere around £12K for prospective buyers to really see a silver lining, and that wasn't going to happen. To have got so close and then be denied such a creation will probably only increase resentment to the standard car. And that fire didn't need any more stoking, did it? Imagine as a child your parents suggested a holiday to sunny Spain, showed you the brochure and told you about the plane, but you ended up in the same caravan as usual on cost grounds; whether you liked the caravan or not before, it's hard not to feel a little hard done by.

Alright, this isn't quite the same caravan, and that's harsh on what remains a very good hot hatch. Yes, despite what The Internet tells you. Even that Chris Harris off the TV liked it, remember. For its Phase 2 generation the Clio 220 Trophy gets an R.S.16 look (that car again) with new headlights and DRLs, plus some nattier wheel designs too. An Akrapovic exhaust, said to build on the lessons learnt from the Clio Who Must Not Be Named, is also optionally available and fitted here.


Play it again, Sam
By and large it's the same Trophy though, which is a good thing. Alright, the gearbox still frustrates on occasion. Quelle surprise. Essentially you want to leave it in Race, which gives you decent manual control (it won't kickdown, and you can crash into the limiter as you please) with rapid shifts too. The auto modes are odd, the regular auto quite lazy and the Sport setting just too urgent, unnecessarily holding or seeking low gears even on relatively light throttle inputs. Weirdly the old Trophy didn't seem so awkward, though perhaps it shows how good alternative automatics have become.

However - and it is a significant however - this Clio remains properly good fun. Sat low in some excellent seats, guiding it with some light but accurate steering and flicking up and down the gears with those big metal pedals, the Trophy is very enjoyable. Indeed, and as has been discussed before, the Clio's chassis feels a bit smarter than the Fiesta ST; even as a firmer Trophy, the damping here always avoids the jarring nature of the Fiesta while controlling the body perhaps even more convincingly.

That £900 Akrapovic system makes a difference too. Predictable though it may sound, there's a distinct Megane impression to the noise, blaring through the revs, parping profusely on full throttle upshifts and even allowing for the odd overrun pop and crackle. Furthermore, the exhaust is only at its loudest with the gearbox in its Race mode, so there's all the more reason to keep it there. Otherwise the noise is a little dour. Turns all the driver aids off too...


Drive the Trophy hard on a decent road and it's really hard to see where the criticism is coming from though. Sure, it no longer screams way past seven thousand anymore but then neither does a Fiesta, or a 208, or any of its rivals - this is the brave new turbo hot hatch world that we must face. The brakes are really strong, the gearbox will (mostly) give you last minute downchanges through its close ratios and the chassis is agile and tweakable. Whether you like the paddles or not, this Trophy remains a hoot in the right situation.

Trouble is, so are its rivals. The Peugeot Sport 208 brings a limited-slip diff that the Renault sometimes feels it needs, while the Fiesta of course offers such a lot of fun for so little money. It should be about to get even better too. Speaking of cost our test Clio came with a list price of £26,420, which is ridiculous.

However, as is often the way with these things, the list price only tells part of the story. Delivery mileage Trophys - albeit pre-facelift cars - are available at less than £17,000, which makes it far more competitive. The Peugeot and Ford remain more exciting hot hatches to us, though that doesn't leave the Clio a distant third - it's a genuine competitor for two great hot hatches. If you're looking at a new one then seek an example out with the Akrapovic, as it feels a worthwhile option, otherwise it's more than good enough. No really, it is.


RENAULT SPORT CLIO 220 TROPHY EDC
Engine
: 1,618cc 4-cyl turbo
Transmission: 6-speed dual-clutch auto, front-wheel drive
Power (hp): 220@6,050rpm
Torque (lb ft):207 @2,000rpm
0-62mph: 6.6sec
Top speed: 146mph
Weight: 1,204kg
MPG: 47.9mpg (NEDC combined)
CO2: 135g/km
Price: £22,425 (As tested £26,420 comprised of £900 for Akrapovic exhaust, £250 for heated front seat, £1,300 for Liquid Yellow metallic paint, £295 for Renault Sport Monitor v2 and £1,250 for Dark carbon part leather, part synthetic, part cloth upholstery with R.S logo on front)

 

 

 

 

 

 

[Photos: Ben Lowden]

Author
Discussion

HardMiles

Original Poster:

317 posts

86 months

Monday 13th March 2017
quotequote all
Total guff. Loads of money, for not a lot. Only just beats GT cars from the 80's to 60, in less style & will depreciate like it's on fire...

Who buys this st!?????

HJMS123

988 posts

133 months

Monday 13th March 2017
quotequote all
I see a white one (pre-facelift .. not sure if it's a trophy) some mornings on the way into work and they really are quite understated. I don't think it helps that with a quick glance they can look like the 'dynamique' models.

nickfrog

21,095 posts

217 months

Monday 13th March 2017
quotequote all
If you don't mind the box, a pre-FL at £17k seems excellent VFM. Shouldn't depreciate too much either at the money, £150/month tops for a couple of years. Bargain for someone.

FN2TypeR

7,091 posts

93 months

Monday 13th March 2017
quotequote all
I couldn't walk past a 208gti Peugeot Sport for this under any circumstances frankly.

SarGara

365 posts

176 months

Monday 13th March 2017
quotequote all
It uses the same engine as the Juke which Nissan offer with a manual option so why do Renault insist on this auto only approach? Is it just about not admitting they were wrong at this point?


Alucidnation

16,810 posts

170 months

Monday 13th March 2017
quotequote all
1200 quid for funky paint seems a bit mad.

Still, looks like a blast!

SlowStig

839 posts

171 months

Monday 13th March 2017
quotequote all
Going against the usual grain, but I really like how these look, esp in the liquid yellow paint. Not had chance to drive one, so cannot comment on the gearbox but £17k seems ridiculous VFM for something like this.

neil1jnr

1,462 posts

155 months

Monday 13th March 2017
quotequote all
HardMiles said:
Total guff. Loads of money, for not a lot. Only just beats GT cars from the 80's to 60, in less style & will depreciate like it's on fire...

Who buys this st!?????
Troll with the 0-60 chat.

If you read the article it looks to be a good drive, however is far from flawless.

dazzaturbo

27 posts

191 months

Monday 13th March 2017
quotequote all
My Mrs has got the standard 200 EDC in liquid yellow as our family car (I have got a dc5 integral that's a bit too much for us traveling any real distance) I had a mk7 fiesta st before that

It's pretty much perfect for what we want
Quick
Auto
4 doors
Big boot
Comfortable

It is a good fun car in race mode and handles really well you do miss the manual gearbox when on a decent road but the auto and paddles makes up for it the rest of the time.

Suppose it shows it's decent because every time I have to go out and the Mrs is at home I take the Clio (or I could just like the easy comfy life these days laugh

great_kahn

83 posts

86 months

Monday 13th March 2017
quotequote all
HardMiles said:
Who buys this st!?????
Nobody, they have sold few trophys, less than 300. I doubt many were cars actually ordered by a customer.

Striple

168 posts

141 months

Monday 13th March 2017
quotequote all
its so ugly. the red one in the pic is so much neater, less random curves and creases. i know they never will but I don't get why they cant just put the good oily bits in the old shell and sell that instead?

Krikkit

26,515 posts

181 months

Monday 13th March 2017
quotequote all
FN2TypeR said:
I couldn't walk past a 208gti Peugeot Sport for this under any circumstances frankly.
I think that's a convincing prospect at this price level, some great discounts available on the Peugeot as well.

philmots

4,631 posts

260 months

Monday 13th March 2017
quotequote all
I think it looks great. Better than any rival I can think of.

I'd be all over one if there was a cheap lease.

Pobster

1 posts

85 months

Monday 13th March 2017
quotequote all
These negative comments are fine if you have driven the car but I have and it is a very under rated car - it is very quick and sticks to the road like glue. The gearbox does take some getting used to but it does adapt to your driving too and once you get used to it and have some miles on it it is a brilliant gear box. As for rapid depreciation trophy models hold their value well, they always have. I would not pay the list price but there are pre-reg cars around for around £17 to £18k. It is leagues ahead of a Fiesta ST. The bland VW Polo GTi is just that - bland. Seat Ibiza is bland too, Vauxhall Corsa VXR is not as quick nor does it handle as well, Peugeot is a bit boring too, Suzuki Swift is not as fast, you have to get a John Cooper Works Mini to equal the Clio 220 Trophy and that is about your lot. Unless you want to spend £30k on a Focus RS or a Civic Type R there is nothing as good.

Kenny Powers

2,618 posts

127 months

Monday 13th March 2017
quotequote all
Do these still share some switchgear with a 2002 Clio? biggrin

Alex_225

6,250 posts

201 months

Monday 13th March 2017
quotequote all
I think so many people have heard that the semi-auto box is an achilles heel for the car that even when we hear that it's been revised the car is damned.

This generation of Clio is far more than all rounder than previous iterations so it's four doors and larger than the 172/182s that many are fond of.

I've not driven this but would bet money on it being very quick and capable. The question would be, is it as fun with the paddles (assuming the gearbox is as quick as you'd want!).

I still stand by the fact that I think an RS should be a manual but I think this is probably a very underrated and capable car.

FN2TypeR

7,091 posts

93 months

Monday 13th March 2017
quotequote all
Krikkit said:
FN2TypeR said:
I couldn't walk past a 208gti Peugeot Sport for this under any circumstances frankly.
I think that's a convincing prospect at this price level, some great discounts available on the Peugeot as well.
I haven't driven this but I have driven the Peugeot and it's ace frankly - I imagine this thing is a bit of alright too but the gearbox, in a small fun car, would be an automatic no no for me, perhaps that attitude is a colossal mistake but I'd likely never find out as I'd be too busy trying to convince myself that the Cup Franche red and black paint combo is an acceptable option box to tick on the Pug instead hehe

skidskid

283 posts

141 months

Monday 13th March 2017
quotequote all
Pobster said:
These negative comments are fine if you have driven the car but I have and it is a very under rated car
People wont drive it when all the reviews say its gearbox is rubbish and needs to be replaced with an manual box. People prob still wouldnt buy it even if the gearbox was good because most people who'd buy one want a manual for driver interaction.

It was a silly choice from the start.

howardhughes

999 posts

204 months

Monday 13th March 2017
quotequote all
Totally soulless. It does nothing for me whatsoever.
As are the majority of hot hatches these days unfortunately.

Bring back the 90's !!!!! driving

Iceicebaby1980

101 posts

98 months

Monday 13th March 2017
quotequote all
£26000 who in there right mind would pay that lol lol lol