RE: Harley-Davidson Street Rod XG750A: PH2

RE: Harley-Davidson Street Rod XG750A: PH2

Sunday 7th May 2017

Harley-Davidson Street Rod XG750A: PH2

Harley's latest Street model turns a corner in more ways than one



Anytime you mention Harley's Street 750 range the instant reaction from a few quarters is 'they aren't proper Harley models as they are built in India.' While this is technically true - all European Street 750s are built in India while American ones are built in America - that's not the issue I have with the Street 750. I don't care that the Street is built in India, that it's water- and not air-cooled and has cam chains instead of push rods; what annoys me about the Street 750 is the fact it doesn't feel like a quality Harley product. When I tested it a few years ago for PH2 I thought it felt like a cheap imitation of a Harley that was in danger of devaluing the brand, not attracting a new generation of customers as it was trying to do. The Street's forks are spindly, the brakes poor, the finish leaves a lot to be desired and overall it lacks the ability to do justice to the famous Harley name. Sorry, but I'd buy an 883 over the Street every single day of the week as it sounds, looks and feels like an authentic Harley. That said, globally Harley have sold over 35,000 Street 750s in the last three years, so maybe I'm being a touch too critical. Anyway, with all this in mind, when I was invited to ride the new Street Rod my expectations were low. I am genuinely delighted to have been proven wrong.


What's new, pussycat?
The most important thing to know about the new Street Rod is the fact it's basically a whole new machine, not just a restyled Street 750 - that's why it is so improved. While it has the same basic Revolution X 750 motor as the Street, the Rod part means the engine has been breathed upon and gets new cams (only one per head) with increased lift and duration, high flow heads and dual throttle bodies, all of which boost the power by 20 per cent to 67hp and the torque by 10 per cent to 48lb ft. The chassis is also new with sharper geometry, twin piggyback dampers (that are only pre-load adjustable), inverted forks (non-adjustable), 17-inch wheels and twin discs at the front. As a Harley man said "it's now badass", which I think translates from American to British as 'it performs far better than before.' And the look is also altered with a more muscle bike attitude thanks to drag bars, a new seat unit and a screen. And it works, not only looking so much more substantial than the Street 750 but also appearing a far higher quality machine with lovely paint finish and neat details such as the laser etching on the new mirrors and the Harley logo on the peg's rubbers. Overall, where on the Street I felt the firm skimped to meet a financial target point, on the Street Rod it certainly hasn't. And yet the price is still keen - you get all this for £6,745 for a black bike (or £6,995 if you want a grey or olive one), which is just £750 more than the Street 750 and £1,250 less than an 883 Iron. And PCP deals can make this just £89 a month. In my book, that's very good value as the Street Rod not only looks like a proper Harley, it rides like one. However, there is one major irritation...


Peg placement predicament
In a truly remarkable move, Harley has given the Street Rod one of the most ridiculous footpeg positions I have ever seen. Worse even than the Ducati Monster 821, and that takes some doing. Located mid instead of forward as on the Street, you can't actually put your foot on the Rod's peg without resting your heel on the exhaust. Harley knows this and has added a neat little pad - perhaps an afterthought - for your heel, but it's so annoying that you end up riding with your foot half off the peg to compensate. I spoke to Harley's PR people about it and they told me the odd positioning is down to the exhaust downpipes, which are straight from the Street 750 to save costs and don't have the required bend to allow the mid-pegs to sit correctly. To be fair the majority of Rod owners will swap the pipes for aftermarket items pretty much straight away, eliminating the issue, but it is still really annoying. If you take a Street Rod for a test ride, be prepared to be irritated by this - but spend a bit longer on the bike and you will soon forgive it.


More lean, more fun, more proper
Having not expected a lot from the Street Rod, I was genuinely surprised just how well it handled. The new wheels and chassis geometry make it agile in bends and the suspension is set on the firm side to give it a sporty attitude, which I like - you can actually hurl this Harley around and not feel like you are riding a pogo stick. Where the Street 750 would be throwing in the towel, the Street Rod is happy to play ball. And it even has a decent amount of ground clearance to allow you to have some fun.

With 40-degrees of lean angle before things scrape (the most on any Harley model) the pegs aren't always on the floor, which is a unique experience on a Harley. Add to this the twin disc set-up, which it has to be said is a bit on/off in their feel due to the braided lines and lacks lever span adjustment, and the Rod is a decent handling bike that can be enjoyed in the bends. And yet it remains a relaxed city bike with a light clutch, a low centre of gravity giving it a nice balanced feel at slow speed, a decent turning circle and a seat height of just 765mm. Having spent a day riding the Street Rod at quite an enthusiastic pace, I thoroughly enjoyed it and left impressed rather than disappointed as I did when I rode the Street 750 in the UK. And the engine is also improved.

The alterations to the Revolution X lump are fairly minor, but Harley has added a bit more poke and a nice crackle on over-run with a slightly louder exhaust note, which was necessary. The power boost is welcome, but for me it is these small details that now make the water-cooled engine feel far more 'Harley' and less 'Japanese' and sterile than before, one of my main gripes about the Street 750. It's still smooth and far more refined than the air-cooled lump, but it now has a bit more character, which was needed.


A genuine alternative
Unlike the Street 750, the Street Rod is a genuine alternative to the 883 rather than a poor imitation of a Harley. Its water-cooled engine offers a different experience that is less agricultural than the air-cooled lump, its aggressive styling is more modern than the classical Iron and it is an easier bike to ride and I'd also say better handling. To some the 'made in India' sticker on the frame will be a turn off but, unlike the Street 750, the Street Rod doesn't feel, look or ride like a cheap product despite its budget price tag. To me the Street Rod feels like Harley's design team have at last built the Street model they wanted to, with little compromises, but still kept within their price target. It's a new generation of Street machine and one that is now worthy of carrying the famous Harley-Davidson logo. Just get over the fact it is built in India - I'm sure Triumph modern classic range riders don't get as much grief about the fact every Triumph parallel twin is built in Thailand!



   

 

Author
Discussion

Spannerski

Original Poster:

127 posts

111 months

Tuesday 2nd May 2017
quotequote all
Wow!
A Harley I actually quite like the look of. And with some more modern-ish engineering.
If it's quality, where it is built doesn't bother me.

andburg

7,288 posts

169 months

Tuesday 2nd May 2017
quotequote all
Interested in this for my other half if she eventually does her test.
Still pretty heavy, but a nice low seat height for her.

The "new" suspension and brakes are very familiar as they seem to be carry overs from the XR1200.
Be intersting to see how much extra power is available in the 67bhp engine as the XR1200 only made about 80 in the real world.


GrumpyTwig

3,354 posts

157 months

Tuesday 2nd May 2017
quotequote all
£1200 cheaper than the iron 883, maybe they should start building the Sportsters in India. It's probably the kind of bike they needed to start building and developing on top of decades ago rather than the occasional flurry outside of the cruiser market.

Looks 100% better than the street, but..... ya know I'd probably still rather get a Sportster for some reason. Maybe Harleys just need to be a bit crap? biggrin

BigMacDaddy

963 posts

181 months

Wednesday 3rd May 2017
quotequote all
This is one of those weird bikes where I think it looks better with the rider on than on its own - most of the time it's the other way around smile


Jazoli

9,100 posts

250 months

Wednesday 3rd May 2017
quotequote all
How much does it weigh?

edit, about 240kg wet, ste......

Pothole

34,367 posts

282 months

Wednesday 3rd May 2017
quotequote all
" I'm sure Triumph modern classic range riders don't get as much grief about the fact every Triumph parallel twin is built in Thailand!"

You're sure about that are you?

Apart from that certainty based on bugger all, this is hardly a glowing review, is it? You went in with very low expectations and the bike exceeded them...slightly.

Odd that they should bother with twin front discs when Triumph have swapped to single items for the US market, but perhaps a reflection of this bike being targeted at Europe, or that Harley seem incapable of making a bike stop properly out of the box.

Edited by Pothole on Wednesday 3rd May 09:58

black-k1

11,924 posts

229 months

Wednesday 3rd May 2017
quotequote all
Is this bike really going to attract "new" riders to Harley? By new, I mean riders who would not have bought a Harley had this bike never existed rather than those who already planned to buy a Harley and just chose this one instead of some other model. I doubt it! While it's better than (or is that not as bad as?) the previous model, it still has little going for it other than the Harley name.

Dakkon

7,826 posts

253 months

Wednesday 3rd May 2017
quotequote all
68bhp? it would struggle to pull the skin off custard....

kurt535

3,559 posts

117 months

Wednesday 3rd May 2017
quotequote all
They really aren't worth the hype....

crofty1984

15,858 posts

204 months

Wednesday 3rd May 2017
quotequote all
Dakkon said:
68bhp? it would struggle to pull the skin off custard....
My '79 Bonneville has about 40bhp and will still crack a ton. That's fast enough for this type of bike, isn't it?

Pothole

34,367 posts

282 months

Wednesday 3rd May 2017
quotequote all
Dakkon said:
68bhp? it would struggle to pull the skin off custard....
Triumph's Street Twin "only" has 54, but 59 lb/ft of torque. Similar target market? (£7300)


Edited by Pothole on Wednesday 3rd May 16:49

Dakkon

7,826 posts

253 months

Wednesday 3rd May 2017
quotequote all
Pothole said:
Dakkon said:
68bhp? it would struggle to pull the skin off custard....
Triumph's Street Twin "only" has 54, but 59 lb/ft of torque. Similar target market? (£7300)


Edited by Pothole on Wednesday 3rd May 16:49
And weighs a lot less than the Harley?

Hammerhead

2,701 posts

254 months

Wednesday 3rd May 2017
quotequote all
BigMacDaddy said:
This is one of those weird bikes where I think it looks better with the rider on than on its own - most of the time it's the other way around smile
The rider being the equivalent of a brown paper bag, in this case.


jorders500

139 posts

89 months

Monday 8th May 2017
quotequote all
All Harley's are horrible. I'd rather get the bus.

Spannerski

Original Poster:

127 posts

111 months

Monday 8th May 2017
quotequote all
Dakkon said:
68bhp? it would struggle to pull the skin off custard....
My 87 Honda VF500 is rated at that and can do an indicated 135mph.
People forget how little power you need on a bike to have fun.

Cadaver

32 posts

83 months

Monday 8th May 2017
quotequote all
I wonder if you still have to wash it after every use to avoid it turning to rust before your eyes.