RE: Shed Of The Week: Volvo V50

RE: Shed Of The Week: Volvo V50

Friday 23rd June 2017

Shed Of The Week: Volvo V50

What, a Volvo estate Shed that isn't a V70? It's happened!



Gruntier 200hp-plus versions of the faithful old Volvo V70 estate have long been beloved by the PH massive. There's still no shortage of these incredibly useful and generally reliable buses around, but properly desirable ones are getting a bit harder to find.


It's OK though, because riding bravely into the Shed of the Week spotlight comes our first Volvo V50 estate. Described by Volvo on its 2003 launch as perfect for 'young, dynamic and demanding families', this elegantly downsized sportswagon is a much more modern-looking beast than the wardrobe-on-wheels V70.

Powered by a Ford/PSA-developed 2.0-litre turbodiesel, built on a Focus platform and assembled in the land of mayonnaised chips (Belgium), the V50 could hardly be described a classic Swedish motor. But it was extremely practical in the best Swedish style with a completely flat load floor when the back seats were folded down, and you could fold the front passenger seat down too.

The V50 wasn't super-light, at between 1,450 and 1,520kg, but it did have a good feeling of solidity about it which, when combined with the lag-free motor and lovely high gearing (38mph per 1,000rpm in sixth), made it a fine motorway cruiser. The electro-hydraulic steering was a bit dumb but the suspension was quite well judged. More than one contemporary road tester preferred the Volvo's general demeanour over that of the £1,500 more expensive Audi A4 TDI PD 130, even if it was down on the German car's load-carrying capacity.


Peter Horbury's styling has managed to stay remarkably fresh for a 14-year-old design, and you do get that rather cool 'floating' centre stack dashboard thingy behind which you can hide many things, often forever. There were also 'discreet lighting points to create a theatre-like effect', something Mrs Shed might have liked to add a little spice to her '2 for 1' specials at the local dogging lay-by.

Another neat V50 design feature was the ability it gave to its owners to easily remove the complete front lamp assembly for bulb replacement, something VW never wanted us to have as they preferred owners to pay them to do that.

The V50 wasn't perfect, of course. It wasn't massively economical, reflections in the floating panel made it hard to use, and the knuckle-skinningly slender door pockets were about as useful as an accordion player on a deer hunt.


A decade or so on, what should you look out for? The 2.0-litre D2 is arguably a better bet than the 1.6 DrivE, which suffered from turbo difficulties, but its designer electronic ignition key had a habit of getting stuck in its slot, leading to a scandal in 2006 when there was a five-month backlog for replacements. Other than that, fill in your own list of (by no means Volvo-unique) usual suspects: electrical glitches, EGR valve failure, wheel bearings, brakes.

The ad creation technique for this particular V50 seems to involve driving the car onto a turntable, switching the turntable on and then pressing the camera's shutter release eight times at 45-degree intervals. Unfortunately it doesn't appear to include opening the doors, photographing the insides or giving much in the way of detail on the car.

We can tell you that the MoT history is not frightening, though it looks like a new brake disc, exhaust and rear ARB might be required to get it through the next one, which will take place in eight months' time.


The nice thing about modern cars like this is that, in finest 'mapped 335d' tradition, you can easily up the performance ante. A £200 chip will boost this car's power and torque by 25 per cent and deliver an appreciable improvement in fuel economy to boot. Failing that you could dig up a rather more expensive T5 AWD version, or try to find a Volvo V50 SV, which had 340hp. Good luck with that though, as they only built one.

Here's the ad.

Silver, 5+ owners, Climate Control, Alarm, Electric Windows (Front/Rear). 5 seats, SOME IMAGES ARE TAKEN BEFORE VEHICLES ARE VALETED ..OVER 120 CARS IN STOCK, £795


Author
Discussion

lowflyingcat

Original Poster:

5 posts

151 months

Friday 23rd June 2017
quotequote all
Nice shed. Like the styling of these. A solid, practical, runabout.

Barchettaman

6,307 posts

132 months

Friday 23rd June 2017
quotequote all
A lot of metal for the money, but it´ll get hammered as a SOTW as it´s not RWD, V8, a potential money pit, a bit dull, and it´s a Diesel.

Always interesting to see just how much motor you get for so little outlay in the UK, though. A worthy shed.

Dafuq

371 posts

170 months

Friday 23rd June 2017
quotequote all
Me likey, as stated in the article, still looks really fresh styling wise.

Bargain for the dog chariot or tip-dragster.


salguod

60 posts

122 months

Friday 23rd June 2017
quotequote all
Always liked these, in particular the pre-facelift.

My dad had one (just an S though not an SE) when I was 17 and learning to drive and for a few years after I drove it a lot!

Ryvita

713 posts

210 months

Friday 23rd June 2017
quotequote all
A quintessential modern shed. Very good.

It's always so easy to fall into the trap of thinking that shed motoring is a static field. I struggle to shift my personal mental calibration for sheds off of Sierras, Mk. 1 Golf and Vauxhall Novas; but new models fall under the threshold every day. Vive la depreciation!

Dion20vt

252 posts

162 months

Friday 23rd June 2017
quotequote all
A Volvo shed, I approve! biggrin

Owned it's little brother a while back, the S40 T5 - basically a Focus ST in drag!

gareth29

41 posts

125 months

Friday 23rd June 2017
quotequote all
Does the 2.0D suffer from the same wet toothed belt failure as the Ford engine then?

Love the dogging ref

sjabrown

1,913 posts

160 months

Friday 23rd June 2017
quotequote all
Yep that design is still remarkably fresh. Ageing rather well.

Richard-390a0

2,253 posts

91 months

Friday 23rd June 2017
quotequote all
That's tickled my fancy, I didn't realise they were now that cheap & as others have said the design is still looking fresh too.

rastapasta

1,861 posts

138 months

Friday 23rd June 2017
quotequote all
Nice this. is it the same diesel out of Citroen C5?? if so its quite a decent motor if service intervals are kept up religiously. The design seems quite fresh too. it looks like something much younger. at the same time its not as practical as something like a subaru legacy.


duncs

226 posts

267 months

Friday 23rd June 2017
quotequote all
Not really in the 'speed matters' category but still a worthy shed. What I like about it is stick a cheap non-ageing plate on it and it wouldn't look out of place amongst much newer and more expensive machinery.

cdrx

598 posts

188 months

Friday 23rd June 2017
quotequote all
£750? That has got to be broken in some horrible way

Super Slo Mo

5,368 posts

198 months

Friday 23rd June 2017
quotequote all
rastapasta said:
Nice this. is it the same diesel out of Citroen C5?? if so its quite a decent motor if service intervals are kept up religiously. The design seems quite fresh too. it looks like something much younger. at the same time its not as practical as something like a subaru legacy.
No, it's the Ford engine. IIRC, the 1.6d engine was the PSA engine.

Ed69

4 posts

82 months

Friday 23rd June 2017
quotequote all
I had a T5 one of these for four months in 2016. I hated it. It was nice to look at but the steering was rubbish and it didn't feel particularly quick. I swapped it for a 2.5 AWD X-Type estate which is worse in almost every way, but I much prefer it for no obvious reason.

CharlesdeGaulle

26,261 posts

180 months

Friday 23rd June 2017
quotequote all
lowflyingcat said:
Nice shed. Like the styling of these. A solid, practical, runabout.
Great lurking; flushed-out by a Volvo!

daemon

35,813 posts

197 months

Friday 23rd June 2017
quotequote all
Dafuq said:
Me likey, as stated in the article, still looks really fresh styling wise.

Bargain for the dog chariot or tip-dragster.
+1

And they made that shape up to 2012 with little revisions.

MorganP104

2,605 posts

130 months

Friday 23rd June 2017
quotequote all
The wording of the advert may as well be the dictionary definition of "disinterested dealer". No doubt he writes better adverts for £30k cars, but shed buyers are people too! laugh

Capped off with a warning that the schmuck with the camera may have got to the car before the schmuck with the chamois leather.

I'm surprised they actually put a price against it. I was expecting "can't be bothered to value the car... It must be worth something to someone".

It might be a good car, but I'm not getting warm vibes from the dealer.

sinbaddio

2,370 posts

176 months

Friday 23rd June 2017
quotequote all
Decent price but what an appalling ad - mileage? MOT? Or have I missed something?

clonmult

10,529 posts

209 months

Friday 23rd June 2017
quotequote all
Super Slo Mo said:
rastapasta said:
Nice this. is it the same diesel out of Citroen C5?? if so its quite a decent motor if service intervals are kept up religiously. The design seems quite fresh too. it looks like something much younger. at the same time its not as practical as something like a subaru legacy.
No, it's the Ford engine. IIRC, the 1.6d engine was the PSA engine.
I thought the Ford engine was based on the PSA engine. Had one in my 407; reasonably refined, pulled okay, but economy was not a strong point. It was (thankfully) relatively reliable.

The wikipedia page claims that the 2.0 16v was used in the Focus, galaxy, Mondeo, Kiga, C30, C70, S40, V50, 307, 407, 607

sinbaddio

2,370 posts

176 months

Friday 23rd June 2017
quotequote all
sinbaddio said:
Decent price but what an appalling ad - mileage? MOT? Or have I missed something?
Seen the mileage now doh....