RE: Toyota MR2 Supercharged: Spotted

RE: Toyota MR2 Supercharged: Spotted

Monday 18th September 2017

Toyota MR2 Supercharged: Spotted

At just under £5,000 this JDM supercharged MR2 is surely worth a punt...



It's a wonder really that eighties-era Toyota deigned to build the original MR2 in the first place. At launch the Honda CR-X and the long-forgotten Nissan EXA were contemporaries - built along the same youth orientated, fun-to-drive, cheap to run ethos. But where their two-door, CAD-themed bodies and small-capacity engines were prudently welded to generic front-drive platforms, the bespoke, featherweight MR2 had its high-revving 1.6-litre inline-four in the middle, its driven axle at the back and a suspension setup fettled by one Mr R. Becker.


The supercharged version though - the subject of today's Spotted - achieved an even higher rank of nonconformity. By 1986, forced induction certainly wasn't unheard of in more affordable faire: the EXA could already be had with a turbocharger and so too of course could the Renault 5 GT Turbo. But a supercharger was decidedly novel; so much so that when it reached America in 1988, it was the first supercharged production model introduced there in more than twenty years.

This being Toyota, things were done properly, too. The compact, Roots-type blower was made in-house and though it was fused to essentially the same 4A-GE unit, the new four-pot received forged pistons and a cylinder head gasket designed for better sealing at higher pressures. There was a new camshaft as well (the variable intake system having gone) alongside a recalibrated Denso fuel injection system. The same firm provided the car's new intercooler, too.


The result might not have been quite as sweet as the tuneful NA version (and the extra 95kg it added to the kerbweight reputedly demanded some sacrifice of the car's deft handling) but the 4A-GZE produced nearly 50 per cent more torque at 4,000rpm and increased output to 145hp at 6,400rpm. That resulted in a 0-60mph time of 6.5 seconds - sufficient to see off a contemporaneous Porsche 944S when Car and Driver tested it back in the day. Flat out, it was also capable of 130mph; fairly dazzling for a 1,600cc motor then, and respectable even now.

Toyota hadn't completely forgotten about the MR2's economy either. Under light throttle loads, when the ECU deemed the supercharger's involvement unnecessary, an electromagnetic clutch disengaged it from the engine completely; an air-bypass valve allowing the intake air to flow around it. And just in case you missed the sound of the belt-driven blower spooling up, there's a friendly green light situated on the dash to let you know she's a spinnin'.


Said bulb is clearly visible on the '89 example in question. Like all original Supercharged MR2's in the UK, it's an import - the manufacturer having deemed Europe unworthy of the model (although DIY transplants do exist). There was a four-speed automatic available, but happily this one has the five-speed manual you really want and a comparatively modest 130k on the clock. Throw in a new clutch and rebuilt head courtesy of the current owner, and it feels like there might be some considerable charisma left in Toyota's tiny maverick.


TOYOTA MR2 SUPERCHARGED
Engine
: 1,587cc 4-cyl, supercharged
Transmission: 5-speed manual, rear-wheel drive
Power (hp): 145@6,400rpm
Torque (lb ft): 140@4000rpm
MPG: 23
CO2: N/A
First registered: 1989
Recorded mileage: 130,000 miles
Price new: N/A
Yours for: £4,995

See the original advert here.

 

 

 

 

 

Author
Discussion

danllama

Original Poster:

5,728 posts

142 months

Monday 18th September 2017
quotequote all
Ohhh I want this car so much. Been looking at MK1's all weekend, toying with the idea of replacing my MK2 Turbo with one for a little (or long) while. And of course the SC was also on my radar.

But at the end of the day, I kept on thinking how much I'd love to put my 3sgte into a MK1. Best of both worlds. But I don't have the time or money for that so until I have the balls to sell my Turbo i'll just have to put up with it. First world problems.

Escy

3,931 posts

149 months

Monday 18th September 2017
quotequote all
If memory serves me correctly these were the fastest accelerating production cars in the world for 0-30mph in 1987 (which includes the Ferrari F40).

CoolHands

18,625 posts

195 months

Monday 18th September 2017
quotequote all
Rustbucket

V8RX7

26,850 posts

263 months

Monday 18th September 2017
quotequote all
Having owned one (about 20 years ago) I can only say that mine was a bit of a disappointment

I'm sure that it was faster than a std one when accelerating to overtake and was certainly more flexible but in a straight 0-90ish it wasn't appreciably quicker than my mate's standard car - needless to say I wasn't impressed.

I doubt 20 years of aging has improved them


s m

23,223 posts

203 months

Monday 18th September 2017
quotequote all
Escy said:
If memory serves me correctly these were the fastest accelerating production cars in the world for 0-30mph in 1987 (which includes the Ferrari F40).
There might be some qualification needed round that! The 959 was out in 1987

DaveCWK

1,989 posts

174 months

Monday 18th September 2017
quotequote all
A mk1 with functioning air con! Got to be worth it just for that.

J4CKO

41,531 posts

200 months

Monday 18th September 2017
quotequote all
If you can see rust on these then be ready for more that you cant.


Cambs_Stuart

2,868 posts

84 months

Tuesday 19th September 2017
quotequote all
If I has the money, a garage to store it in and welding/painting skills to deal with the inevitable rust (or funds to pay someone else to do it for me). I'd have it in a heartbeat.

Futse

183 posts

185 months

Tuesday 19th September 2017
quotequote all
Cambs_Stuart said:
If I has the money, a garage to store it in and welding/painting skills to deal with the inevitable rust (or funds to pay someone else to do it for me). I'd have it in a heartbeat.
That was a close one then ;-)

Wayoftheflower

1,327 posts

235 months

Tuesday 19th September 2017
quotequote all
V8RX7 said:
I'm sure that it was faster than a std one when accelerating to overtake and was certainly more flexible but in a straight 0-90ish it wasn't appreciably quicker than my mate's standard car - needless to say I wasn't impressed.
I'm sorry you must've had the most colossally broken 4A GZE. NA Adub doesn't stand a chance against the SC. Loved mine it was a TLGP weapon and very handy at hillclimbs too. Only sold it to get a MK1.5 3SGTE conversion...

s m

23,223 posts

203 months

Tuesday 19th September 2017
quotequote all
US mags usually seem to get faster times than European ones down to test methods



Worzey

31 posts

137 months

Tuesday 19th September 2017
quotequote all
Great engines just a shame there are so few left frown I had a 4AGE 20v with a Rotrex supercharger conversion in a kitcar a few years back. It made 260 bhp on the dyno and I believe the new owner has squeezed out closer to 350bhp with a few (expensive) mods. Would love one of these back in my garage.

xjay1337

15,966 posts

118 months

Tuesday 19th September 2017
quotequote all
s m said:
US mags usually seem to get faster times than European ones down to test methods
I wish magazines still did technical breakdowns like this.

s m

23,223 posts

203 months

Tuesday 19th September 2017
quotequote all
xjay1337 said:
I wish magazines still did technical breakdowns like this.
They do

sege

558 posts

222 months

Tuesday 19th September 2017
quotequote all
My second ever car was one of these. Absolutely loved it. The first car I eve took on track, and span. So may great times.
One of my favorite looking cars ever too. Like an X19 but better.
A bigger SC pulley wheel gave 14psi.
With soft sidewall tyres you really knew it was mid-engined too.
One thing I never fixed was that the SC had no rear arb, because toyota presumably felt it was such a widowmaker beast they had to tame the handling to save owners from themselves haha! The most important mod would have been to get some struts from an N/A car and fit the arb to balance out the handling again.
The 4age is one of the greatest engines ever too, and the 4agze suited this car so well.
The only car I've ever owned with pop-up headlights! Imagine being a child of the eighties and never getting to own a wedge shaped car with popup headlights. That would be tragic.

anonymous-user

54 months

Tuesday 19th September 2017
quotequote all
xjay1337 said:
I wish magazines still did technical breakdowns like this.
'Minimal' understeer and 0.78g around a skidpan. I think that's about as informative as telling people the make of the battery personally.

cvega

404 posts

159 months

Tuesday 19th September 2017
quotequote all
nope, you will be in a loosing battle against rust. Sadface.

Dr G

15,170 posts

242 months

Tuesday 19th September 2017
quotequote all
cvega said:
nope, you will be in a loosing battle against rust. Sadface.
I agree but also suggest that it's a fight worth picking for a rare, usable, and really interesting little car.

As to whether £5k is fair I think is going to come down to exactly what state the body is in. Would want it on a ramp with someone that knows the model standing next to me.

Major T

1,046 posts

195 months

Tuesday 19th September 2017
quotequote all
danllama said:
But at the end of the day, I kept on thinking how much I'd love to put my 3sgte into a MK1. Best of both worlds. But I don't have the time or money for that so until I have the balls to sell my Turbo i'll just have to put up with it. First world problems.
I've previously owned a mk1 with 3SGTE (mk1.5). It was a beast and incredibly fun in a straight line. But it totally upset the handling. added weight + not much grip + short wheelbase + LSD + turbo lag and wall of torque = snap oversteer!

ETA: Best MR2 I've owned was a clean original mk1.

V8RX7

26,850 posts

263 months

Tuesday 19th September 2017
quotequote all
Major T said:
ETA: Best MR2 I've owned was a clean original mk1.
Best one I've owned was a much modified & stripped out, V6 MK2