RE: Mercedes SL63 AMG: Spotted

RE: Mercedes SL63 AMG: Spotted

Tuesday 24th April 2018

Mercedes SL63 AMG: Spotted

Perhaps not the prettiest SL ever, but there's a lot to recommend an R231 AMG at just over £40k



So it would seem that the sun has taken its hat off in the UK already. Dreams of summer drop tops and endless days spent roof down must be postponed yet again. But when that proper fortnight of summer turns up, by gum are we going to be prepared...

However, what if you want a convertible for more than just the five days of summer? It might just be worth trying a Mercedes SL. And don't scoff, either. For a while now the SL has aimed to be all cars to all people: part roadster, part luxury car, part AMG hot rod, part GT. It's typically done this with varying degrees of success, but the R231 generation - the car you see here, introduced in 2012 - did a damn convincing job.


The two key contributors to its appeal were a new chassis (that saved more than 100kg) and the switch back to forced induction for the AMG flagship. While it was nice to have the 6.2-litre V8 in the SL for a period, using the twin-turbo 5.5-litre - which, of course, delivered a torrent more torque - suited the '63 AMG more. Combine it with the substantial saving in kerbweight and performance was back in the downright naughty category, as it had been when the supercharged R230 SL55 arrived in 2001.

When this generation of SL63 was first reviewed on PH, the praise was unequivocal: "a compelling package" was how Chris Harris summed it up, describing it as "fundamentally more talented" than the old one, "startlingly fast" and with a "superb" gearbox. So there.


But while the way the R231 drove may have felt unfamiliar to those with old SL experience, the way it has subsequently depreciated is recognisable from many big, fast Mercs. Just half a dozen years ago this black SL63 would have cost £112,000 without a single option on it - let's call it £120k with the extras described in the ad. Now it's for sale at £42,950 with 60,000 miles; certainly more catastrophic falls will have happened, but that's still not far off just a third of its new price.

While some may covet a more adventurous specification - and will note the lack of a Performance Pack - there's a lot to admire about this particular '63. The last owner was just the second and purchased it as an Approved Used Mercedes, it's only ever been serviced at Benz dealers and, well, it looks pristine.


As such a complete package with really broad appeal, it can be tricky to pitch a rival against the SL. You'll get an M6 with fewer miles for similar money, but this video will explain how the SL is better. A 911 won't feel anywhere near as luxurious, even if you can now get into drop-top 991s for less than £60k. And yes, of course an SLS is a sharper, more exciting Mercedes convertible, but good luck getting into one of those for less than £130k...

So yes, there's a heck of a lot to be said for a used SL63. Of course it won't be affordable to run, though neither will any of its contemporaries. And, no, it probably won't be remembered as one of Merc's most beautiful designs, but then you're not that shallow - are you?


SPECIFICATION - MERCEDES SL63 AMG

Engine: 5,461cc, twin-turbo V8
Transmission: 7-speed auto, rear-wheel drive
Power (hp): 537@5,500rpm
Torque (lb ft): 590@2.000rpm
MPG: 28.5
CO2: 231g/km
First registered: 2012
Recorded mileage: 64,000
Price new: £112,000 (without options)
Yours for: £42,950

See the original advert here.

Author
Discussion

CaptainRAVE

Original Poster:

360 posts

112 months

Tuesday 24th April 2018
quotequote all
Wouldn't mine swapping my SLK55 for one of these. Certainly tempting prices now for a lot of car. I don't think it will cure my R8 V10 itch though.

WCZ

10,517 posts

194 months

Tuesday 24th April 2018
quotequote all
still looks new, still has new looking interior in relation to current models, 540bhp /540ft is still absolutely rapid
crazy value for money tbh when you can spec an a3 tdi to £40k these days

British Beef

2,210 posts

165 months

Tuesday 24th April 2018
quotequote all
OVERHANG - front and rear makes these things look absolutely ill proportioned for what should be a good looking sports car.

Might go fast as stink and make great noises and be comfortable, reliable etc but to my eyes so ugly, especially after the 2001 version got the looks and proportions so much better.

BIRMA

3,808 posts

194 months

Tuesday 24th April 2018
quotequote all
I owned the SL63 N/A but I had the pleasure of thrashing on of these later models around the MB World circuits for about 4 hours on a very, very wet day.
You couldn't unsettle it cornering at speeds way beyond what you would do on the roads. Fabulous car that with the hood up you could do hundreds of miles in a day in quiet luxury, then at the press of a few buttons have a real lunatic of a car that brings out the lunatic in you.

Helicopter123

8,831 posts

156 months

Tuesday 24th April 2018
quotequote all
parkwaysc said:
That looks enough money with the miles??
+1

What's it worth in three years time pushing 100k miles?

andy43

9,687 posts

254 months

Tuesday 24th April 2018
quotequote all
Gopping.
Earlier SL55 R230 (and full AA cover) for me please.

Gameface

16,565 posts

77 months

Tuesday 24th April 2018
quotequote all
At that money I'd rather have a newer V8 F-Type convertible with a lot less miles.

Oulton

4 posts

124 months

Tuesday 24th April 2018
quotequote all
Just coming up to two years and 26k miles from new, running a SL63 with a few more extras than t(e featured car.

That engine!!

The 5.5 turbo engine is just sublime. The rumble, the grunt, the torque. Vastly more than you would ever need and better in my opinion than the newer 4.0 litre AMG engine. Previously I had a CLS63 AMG Shooting Brake with the same engine Again, it was just sublime.....

What price a 3/4 year old CLS63???

My SL63 has the Dynamic Seats option - they are a reassuring (expensive) luxury but they proved problematic and it was a big (warranty) job to fix them. It also has a tendency to attract flying stones for some reason - I have just had National Windscreens fit a second replacement screen.

The facelift a couple of years ago did the car no favours. I agree with the comments about the looks. An SL should above all be beautiful.

GT3hopeful

246 posts

117 months

Tuesday 24th April 2018
quotequote all
In my experience very easy to get 20-25% discount off new SL and looking on the web new SL 63 can be had for £94,000 or a new SL 500 can be had for £63,000. At over £40,000 for a six year old car that has done 60,000 miles with no manufacturers warranty doesn’t look much of a bargain to me ??

swisstoni

16,957 posts

279 months

Tuesday 24th April 2018
quotequote all
andy43 said:
Gopping.
Earlier SL55 R230 (and full AA cover) for me please.
That’s what I thought ...

paulw76

11 posts

93 months

Tuesday 24th April 2018
quotequote all
Hell of a lot of car for £43k, especially considering the original price, but a hell of a lot of cash for a 6 year old car too. Tough one to weigh up if its good value or not?

AC43

11,474 posts

208 months

Tuesday 24th April 2018
quotequote all
swisstoni said:
andy43 said:
Gopping.
Earlier SL55 R230 (and full AA cover) for me please.
That’s what I thought ...
Yes. If I had £40k sloshing around I'd buy the best 55 I could find, making sure it was on those rims, and have a £20k bork fund.

I love the look of a pre-facelift.



Bradgate

2,821 posts

147 months

Tuesday 24th April 2018
quotequote all
swisstoni said:
andy43 said:
Gopping.
Earlier SL55 R230 (and full AA cover) for me please.
That’s what I thought ...
Now that’s a handsome car, so much better looking than the R231.


Remagel2507

1,456 posts

192 months

Tuesday 24th April 2018
quotequote all
AC43 said:
swisstoni said:
andy43 said:
Gopping.
Earlier SL55 R230 (and full AA cover) for me please.
That’s what I thought ...
Yes. If I had £40k sloshing around I'd buy the best 55 I could find, making sure it was on those rims, and have a £20k bork fund.

I love the look of a pre-facelift.
Agreed, one of my favourite cars ever since it came out, has to be one of the later cars with the better wheels and interior though. That being said I think the facelift 63 cars have grown on me a bit now bar the factory wheels





daytona111r

764 posts

204 months

Wednesday 25th April 2018
quotequote all
Why is it just so . . . UGLY ????

SL generations through the years have generally been such beautiful cohesive designs, this just sts on all that !

epom

11,491 posts

161 months

Wednesday 25th April 2018
quotequote all
The sound though, that has to be worth 10k alone.

court

1,486 posts

216 months

Wednesday 25th April 2018
quotequote all
I never hear much about the '65. Being 50% more to buy new is it 50% more car and therefore 50% more to run?

Vocht

1,631 posts

164 months

Wednesday 25th April 2018
quotequote all
Very nice but is it really worth double a clean R230 SL63? At 40k there are a lot of nice V8 convertibles to be had with less mileage. My money would go on some delicious British beef F type/ XKR/ Vantage ...

only1ian

688 posts

194 months

Wednesday 25th April 2018
quotequote all
Performance pack is on my SL63. The LSD it brings is an Absolute must

!

only1ian

688 posts

194 months

Wednesday 25th April 2018
quotequote all