RE: PH Origins: Automatic transmissions

RE: PH Origins: Automatic transmissions

Monday 14th May 2018

PH Origins: Automatic transmissions

How simplicity, safety and non-synchromesh manual gearboxes gave rise to the fully automatic transmission



If you were to sling a modern driver into an early automobile, they'd probably struggle to start the thing, let alone make any meaningful progress down the road. Such cars, with their odd pedal layouts, wheel-mounted throttles, heavy clutches, manual advance control and often unforgiving ride, would make smooth and steady forward motion a challenge for those inexperienced in operating them.

Many would also find it difficult to deal with the unsynchronised transmissions of the era, which would require precise throttle and clutch control to avoid jarring, grating shifts. Slip up momentarily on a hill and you could quite easily find yourself with a box full of neutrals, stamping on the pedals and waving the gear stick in terror, as you merrily started coasting backwards into similarly panicking motorists.

Besides requiring skill and care, this posed a plethora of problems for the less practised motorist. The first was the ease with which a driver could lose control; then there was the fact that the attention required to execute slick gear changes could distract from the process of safely getting down the road. Those travelling longer distances over rougher terrain could also tire quickly, again giving manufacturers safety-related cause for concern.

The answer was obvious: do away with the clutch and somehow automate the process of changing gears, so the driver could relax and pay full attention to the road ahead. Fortunately, in the early 1900s, technology was forging ahead - particularly in the areas of industrial and electronic control systems and automation.


During 1883, the Sturtevant Mill Company had been founded in America. It quickly established itself as the manufacturer of advanced materials handling and processing equipment and, as younger family members joined the business, it began using its expertise to branch out into new areas.

Thomas J. Sturtevant, who had graduated from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and joined the company in the late 1800s, saw the potential of the new automotive market. He subsequently set about designing hardware that would help Sturtevant secure a foothold in this burgeoning business, ranging from carburettors through to complete engines. Having then discovered how problematic the process of getting drive from the engine to the wheel was proving, he began to tackle the issue of power transmission.

Sturtevant subsequently designed and patented, in 1904, a two-speed automatic transmission. It was based on independently operating, centrifugally controlled multiple-disk clutches that ran in an oil bath to prevent excess wear and tear. As the engine accelerated, weights controlling the clutches would be flung outwards at predetermined points to engage the friction material with hubs connected to the output shaft; when engine speed rose further, the first clutch would be disengaged and the second would step in - and drive through a different set of gears via its own hub. Sturtevant envisioned it getting more complicated, too, stating 'Additional clutch devices and gearing connections may be employed for... three or more undetermined speeds of rotation.'

This gearbox, along with the company's own engine and brakes, went into a car called the Sturtevant Automatic Automobile in 1905. Alas, it was not to prove a success. The transmission was simply too complicated, and the materials required not yet available, resulting in the centrifugal clutches frequently disintegrating and destroying the transmission.


Several similar efforts followed but, once again, none proved commercially viable. It took until 1933 for another run to be taken at lightening the driver's workload, with the launch of the REO Motor Car Company's 'Self-Shifter'. This semi-automatic arrangement featured a centrifugally operated two-speed automatic, like Sturtevant's, which effectively reduced the driver's input to just controlling a clutch when moving off or coming to a stop. '33 1/3% easier to drive... your hands free for the wheel!' claimed REO's marketing materials proudly.

This approach was echoed by the semi-automatic 'Automatic Safety Transmission', used by Buick and Oldsmobile, which arrived in 1937. It had a conventional clutch arrangement for starting and stopping, or shifting into reverse, but changes were otherwise automatic. This was achieved by a centrifugal governor that controlled hydraulic pistons, which would shift brake bands and clutches within the four-speed gearbox's pair of planetary gear sets.

Using one of these transmissions was less complicated than the likes of the Wilson pre-selector found in Daimler's touring cars, which required drivers to select the desired gear then cycle the transmission with the gear-change pedal. Many of these pre-selector gearboxes, however, had done away with a driver-controlled clutch between the engine and transmission. Instead, they used a fluid coupling that could transmit drive smoothly between its driving and output turbine.

Chrysler introduced a similar semi-automatic arrangement in 1939, called the 'Fluid Drive', which featured a three-speed manual equipped with a fluid coupling and a clutch; the latter only had to be used briefly when engaging first or changing, otherwise the fluid coupling would deal with the smooth transmission of power - regardless of which gear you were in. You could put it in third and simply drive around all day if acceleration wasn't on your list of priorities.


However, since its inception in 1920, the new General Motors Research Corporation had been busying itself with the task of finding a new, straightforward transmission that would do away with the grief of dealing with manual shifting and clutch actuation. All manner of ideas had been explored, ranging from combustion engines coupled to generators that powered electric motors, through to continuously variable transmissions - which were of great interest to GM, although later sidelined due to material problems.

Much time had also been spent exploring the concept of fluid drives and hydraulically shifted transmissions. Given the issues experienced with CVT development, the development team returned to exploring these seemingly more viable types of gearbox in the middle of the 1930s.

At this point, though, with fluid couplings becoming increasingly prominent and available, GM's engineers now had a way around the problem of the clutch pedal: combining the fluid coupling with the company's hydraulically shifted planetary gear and clutch units. Some state this innovation came from a Brazilian engineer called Jose Braz Araripe, who developed a hydraulically operated transmission that was reputedly sold to GM, but no formal reference to this exists.

In any case, by 1939, GM's engineers had developed a production-ready, fully automatic transmission called the Hydra-Matic. This combined the fluid coupling with a hydraulically shifted gearbox, the basis for which came from the Buick and Oldsmobile Automatic Safety Transmission. The result was a four-speed automatic that was described as 'simplicity itself'. It was ultimately announced in October 1939 and was offered by Oldsmobile in 1940, before Cadillac rolled it out in 1941.


The Hydra-Matic design quickly found use in heavy-duty applications, too, as it proved ideal for America's tanks in World War II. They lessened the load on the driver, making it easier for them to keep good control of the tank, and they helped avoid inadvertent stalls. A static tank was, after all, particularly easy to hit - so keeping them moving, particularly when under duress, was of great importance.

'Stands up... in the fiercest battle action! In the toughest wartime driving!', proclaimed GM's advertising material. Suffice it to say that little more was needed to convince the general public of the reliability of the new transmission, while the ease of use was evident from the first time a potential buyer drove a Hydra-Matic car off the lot.

Just prior to the war, GM had also begun developing another fluid coupling that would further improve the performance and behaviour of its automatic transmission. It featured a special bladed assembly, called a stator, which altered the fluid flow between the two halves of the coupling and allowed for torque multiplication - resulting in a 'torque converter' that granted far smoother and stronger off-the-line performance.

This was a development of similar converters that had already been conceived overseas. Swedish engineer Alf Lysholm, for example, had developed several concepts including an efficient multi-stage unit. Similarly, German engineer Hermann Rieseler had proposed a converter featuring adjustable blades for obtaining 'practically serviceable efficiencies' in 1922.


Redesigned GM transmissions equipped with a torque converter were soon made available, in 1948 as the Buick 'Dynaflow' and 1950 as the Chevrolet 'Powerglide'. Europe wasn't far behind in the automatic race, either; Borg-Warner introduced its 'Ford-O-Matic' three-speed automatic in 1950. Though it took ZF, which would later become well regarded for its eight-speed automatics, until 1965 to release its first passenger car automatic.

Back in the US, the more advanced automatics proved an astonishing success, ultimately being the transmission of choice in almost all of GM's individual brands. It remains the case, on a wider scale, even in the modern era; according to a story published in the LA Times, featuring contributions from US automotive specialist Edmunds, fewer than 3% of the new cars sold in American in 2016 featured a manual transmission.

Given the increasing traffic on the road, changes in motoring habits and interests - and the easy integration of advanced driving aids with automatic gearboxes - the decline of the manual transmission is surely set to continue.

Author
Discussion

PHMatt

Original Poster:

608 posts

148 months

Monday 14th May 2018
quotequote all
First one of these that looks educational, rather than pre-school basics aaaaaand it's boring lol

culpz

4,882 posts

112 months

Monday 14th May 2018
quotequote all
We've always bought predominantly manuals here in the UK. I've said this before but i think someone on here did say that this could be the first year that we're opting for the automatic option over the good old manual. I will say again though, i'm really not sure how true that is or the source of this information.

They have got so good over the years, especially with the likes of the ZF 8-speed auto, which almost makes DCT 'boxes slightly redundant for most scenarios. I'm currently thoroughly enjoying my DSG either way biggrin

dbdb

4,326 posts

173 months

Monday 14th May 2018
quotequote all
An interesting article.

Triumph Man

8,690 posts

168 months

Monday 14th May 2018
quotequote all
PHMatt said:
aaaaaand it's boring lol
Not at all! Very interesting to read.

anonymous-user

54 months

Monday 14th May 2018
quotequote all
Never overlook the effectiveness of strapping a sodding great computer to an automatic transmission and engine management system.

The Swiss-watch internals of a modern 8 or 10-speed auto are protected from the idiot at the controls by many layers of clever algorithms, which translate into prudent torque management and no risk of a "wrong gear" situation.

So give a big hand for Porsche, one of the few manufacturers of high power cars that will actually allow the driver to change gears with a gear lever and clutch pedal...

unsprung

5,467 posts

124 months

Monday 14th May 2018
quotequote all


like many on PH, the manual transmission has been the only one I've wanted to talk about

but I must say: the new crop of 8- and 10-speed automatics are impressive; they're not those much-maligned "slushboxes"

also, there's the curious duality... that... although the US market went early and with widespread adoption to automatics, the very same market has successfully campaigned for the continued use of manual transmissions in performance cars



Triumph Man

8,690 posts

168 months

Tuesday 15th May 2018
quotequote all
rockin said:
Never overlook the effectiveness of strapping a sodding great computer to an automatic transmission and engine management system.

The Swiss-watch internals of a modern 8 or 10-speed auto are protected from the idiot at the controls by many layers of clever algorithms, which translate into prudent torque management and no risk of a "wrong gear" situation.
Always wondered, what happens if you stick a modern auto in park (or press "P" now I suppose) at speed? Will it let you? Will it prevent it and bong at you?

thatdude

2,655 posts

127 months

Tuesday 15th May 2018
quotequote all
I find automatic transmissions endlessly fascinating - If I could switch careers, I'd love to train as an automatic transmission engineer.

This is a nice article, but it would be good if the articles / sources of information used to generate these technical articles could be referenced, to allow the reader to go away and read up even more on the subject area.

I like dual-clutch transmissions (they can be classified as automatics in the sense the actions can be automated - I know tere is endless endless debate about it, but essentially an automatic transmission is one that does all the work for you after you delect "drive), but they lack the general finesse of a traditional torque converter in my opinion. Bloody good for performance though.


Perd Hapley

1,750 posts

173 months

Tuesday 15th May 2018
quotequote all
Triumph Man said:
Always wondered, what happens if you stick a modern auto in park (or press "P" now I suppose) at speed? Will it let you? Will it prevent it and bong at you?
Watch someone try: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wug0Ok1OMu4

(spoiler: it doesn't let you put it in reverse or park at speed, although the reversing camera comes on!)

Dale487

1,334 posts

123 months

Tuesday 15th May 2018
quotequote all
unsprung said:
like many on PH, the manual transmission has been the only one I've wanted to talk about

but I must say: the new crop of 8- and 10-speed automatics are impressive; they're not those much-maligned "slushboxes"

also, there's the curious duality... that... although the US market went early and with widespread adoption to automatics, the very same market has successfully campaigned for the continued use of manual transmissions in performance cars
Because their 3% is a large enough minority to pay attention to (c10 million people)

Dale487

1,334 posts

123 months

Tuesday 15th May 2018
quotequote all
rockin said:
Never overlook the effectiveness of strapping a sodding great computer to an automatic transmission and engine management system.

The Swiss-watch internals of a modern 8 or 10-speed auto are protected from the idiot at the controls by many layers of clever algorithms, which translate into prudent torque management and no risk of a "wrong gear" situation.

So give a big hand for Porsche, one of the few manufacturers of high power cars that will actually allow the driver to change gears with a gear lever and clutch pedal...
There aren't may you can buy a proper manual driver's car from - Porsche, BMW (but will the next M3/4 be available as a manual?), Morgan, Lotus - I'm struggling to think of any more.

Triumph Man

8,690 posts

168 months

Tuesday 15th May 2018
quotequote all
Dale487 said:
unsprung said:
like many on PH, the manual transmission has been the only one I've wanted to talk about

but I must say: the new crop of 8- and 10-speed automatics are impressive; they're not those much-maligned "slushboxes"

also, there's the curious duality... that... although the US market went early and with widespread adoption to automatics, the very same market has successfully campaigned for the continued use of manual transmissions in performance cars
Because their 3% is a large enough minority to pay attention to (c10 million people)
The bds even got the F series M6 with a manual option!!

Dale487

1,334 posts

123 months

Tuesday 15th May 2018
quotequote all
Triumph Man said:
Dale487 said:
unsprung said:
like many on PH, the manual transmission has been the only one I've wanted to talk about

but I must say: the new crop of 8- and 10-speed automatics are impressive; they're not those much-maligned "slushboxes"

also, there's the curious duality... that... although the US market went early and with widespread adoption to automatics, the very same market has successfully campaigned for the continued use of manual transmissions in performance cars
Because their 3% is a large enough minority to pay attention to (c10 million people)
The bds even got the F series M6 with a manual option!!
I gather it wasn't that great - but its the principle!

richs2891

897 posts

253 months

Tuesday 15th May 2018
quotequote all
OK as one person has already said the US where early adopters of the automatic gearbox, But why was this ?
Is it because they have more straight roads than say the UK or some other reason?

JakeT

5,427 posts

120 months

Tuesday 15th May 2018
quotequote all
The title of the Dead Kennedys 1987 album summed it up perfectly.

'Give Me Convenience or Give Me Death'

Basically. They also cared less about fuel prices, had terrain that was more hilly in certain areas, and back then the U.S automakers did the vast majority of R&D for the world. Not to mention the car was so prevalent in the U.S, even in the 50s.


I still like a manual, but that's because I buy at the end of the market where an auto tends to cause trouble.

jjwilde

1,904 posts

96 months

Tuesday 15th May 2018
quotequote all
richs2891 said:
OK as one person has already said the US where early adopters of the automatic gearbox, But why was this ?
Is it because they have more straight roads than say the UK or some other reason?
Their giant torquey engines worked well with them, loads of power, smooth, a nice drive, just try driving a 1960s Caddy for example they are so smooth.

However if you strap an auto to the tiny engines we were using back then you noticed big time as the performance was all over the place and a lumpy mess.

It's funny how we're now up at 10 speed autos and the electric motor is about to come alone and do away with the gear box entirely. Oh well.

jjwilde

1,904 posts

96 months

Tuesday 15th May 2018
quotequote all
culpz said:
I've said this before but i think someone on here did say that this could be the first year that we're opting for the automatic option over the good old manual. I will say again though, i'm really not sure how true that is or the source of this information.
It comes from the end of year totals, but if you want to do a quick and dirty comparison go on auto trader, choose 'brand new' and then look at the gearbox option, it shows the ratios of manual to automatic.

You can also do this for, say 2018 to now (brand new and second hand) and it shows that auto does seem to be edging out manual this year, if you go with just new cars in 2018 then automatic has a big lead.

unsprung

5,467 posts

124 months

Tuesday 15th May 2018
quotequote all
Dale487 said:
Because their 3% is a large enough minority to pay attention to (c10 million people)
And yet the population of the EU is larger than that of the US.

On a related note...

I read once that the Attlee government, in the late 1940s, commissioned a plan to switch the UK from keep-left to keep-right (ie: shift to LHD). With low levels of car ownership and none of the sophisticated motorways of today, such a switch would have been not too difficult.

The contemporaneous government in Australia, IIRC, commissioned the same planning. Both plans were shelved.

All these years later, it's interesting to consider what might have been in terms of product cost, product choice, market liquidity.



Dale487

1,334 posts

123 months

Wednesday 16th May 2018
quotequote all
unsprung said:
Dale487 said:
Because their 3% is a large enough minority to pay attention to (c10 million people)
And yet the population of the EU is larger than that of the US.

On a related note...

I read once that the Attlee government, in the late 1940s, commissioned a plan to switch the UK from keep-left to keep-right (ie: shift to LHD). With low levels of car ownership and none of the sophisticated motorways of today, such a switch would have been not too difficult.

The contemporaneous government in Australia, IIRC, commissioned the same planning. Both plans were shelved.

All these years later, it's interesting to consider what might have been in terms of product cost, product choice, market liquidity.
But European car buying habits are very diverse - look at the likes of the Renault Sport models & the Fabia VRS that only sell in any significant numbers in the UK.

And then you have us being awkward by being the only meaningful right hand drive market.

A side note on your side note, there's an interesting Carfection Youtube video in why certain countries have right or left hand drive cars - the section about Sweden having a referendum, ignoring the out come & changing to driving on the right hand side of the road is interesting.

GIYess

1,321 posts

101 months

Thursday 17th May 2018
quotequote all
Interesting read. I could never get my head around how a planetary gear set works. I still can't. I've looked at diagrams, videos, articles and cant work it out.