RE: Mitsubishi Evolution IX MR FQ-360: PH Heroes

RE: Mitsubishi Evolution IX MR FQ-360: PH Heroes

Sunday 10th June 2018

Mitsubishi Evolution IX MR FQ-360 | PH Heroes

The Lancer by HKS was a proper mouthful in 2007. It was also the swansong for the peerless Evo...


Twenty years ago this year, Mitsubishi won the World Rally Championship as a constructor. Tommi Makinen won the Driver's Championship, as he had the year before and as he would the year after - in a Lancer Evolution IV, then V, then VI. With help from Richard Burns, he beat out Carlos Sainz and Colin McRae and Juha Kankkunen; meaning that Mitsubishi beat out Toyota, Subaru and Ford.

It was the high watermark for the manufacturer's involvement in motorsport, and it helped make the Group A homologated versions of the otherwise entirely forgettable Lancer hugely famous. The IV and V became a major constituent of a snowballing grey import market; the hitherto obscure JDM drip feed turning into a virtual flood before Mitsubishi UK finally got the message. Buoyed by the cult-like popularity of the nineties tuning market, interest in the subsequent Evo generations didn't wane even as the firm's success in WRC dried up.

By the end of 2001, Tommi had gone and Ralliart's solution to the latest regulations failed to produce consistent results. But investment in the increasingly differentiated road car did not decline. The VII might have been larger and heavier than the car it replaced, but it was enormously sophisticated; the previous model's viscous coupling having made way for the electro-hydraulic clutch-based Active Centre Differential, regulated by the same control unit that housed the manufacturer's renowned Active Yaw Control system.

Much like the Nissan R34 Skyline, the Evo's successful assimilation of what seemed like physics-defying technology only intensified its reputation - and the VIII (alongside Super AYC and a close ratio six-speed manual 'box) doubled down on this notoriety in the UK with the launch of an increasingly outrageous range of FQ-badged cars, culminating in the Ralliart developed, 202.9hp per litre FQ-400. The resulting level of performance - 3.5 seconds to 60mph; 9.1 to 100mph - made the limited-edition, £46,999 model a much celebrated vanquisher of early noughties supercars.

The IX FQ-360, introduced three years later, was in many ways that car's spiritual successor. It capped off a three-model lineup (FQ-300, FQ-320, FQ-340) and shared some trick components with the FQ-400, not to mention the expertise of the Ralliart engineers who helped create it. Most significantly, while its output was plainly lower at 366hp, it produced slightly more torque, and did it a whopping 2200rpm earlier than its predecessor had managed.

Mitsubishi though, saved the best for last. In the final year of IX production, its UK importer announced that 200 examples would be distinguished with the MR FQ-360 by HKS badge. Within this mouthful (which was also a little too much for the boot lid) it was the MR - or Mitsubishi Racing - bit that confirmed this as the variant which wore shortened Eibach springs, lowering the car 10mm at the front and 5mm at the back onto Bilstein dampers and 17-inch Speedline Turini alloys.

Contemporary reports make note of the resulting firmness, but - driven today in immaculate Mitsubishi heritage fleet format - the MR is almost putty-like compared to the current generation of take-no-prisoners chassis configurations. Not once does it feel overdamped or needlessly abrasive; its relative compliance helped along by the three fingers of tyre profile you get alongside the uprated suspension components.

Quiet, of course, it isn't. Not in the running gear, and certainly not at the business end of the angry buzz emerging from the ginormous HKS exhaust either. Nor is it slow. Not by any contemporary measure. That ought to be a given for a 1400kg Evo with 363lb ft available from 3200rpm - and yet somehow its reputation hardly prepares you for the enormous, ever-escalating thrust which appears at middling revs, and barely tapers past 7000rpm.

Ostensibly, there's been a decade of progress between this variant of Mitsubishi's mighty 4G63 twin-scroll turbocharged four-cylinder engine and now - but honestly, in pure performance terms, you'd hardly know it. The venerable unit, reworked multiple times in its life span and specifically tuned in this iteration to be more drivable, still puts most modern alternatives to shame on all the criteria that matter. On song, the throttle response is tremendous, as is its tractability and the motor's capacity for revving well beyond the 6887rpm at which peak power is produced.

There's plenty of turbo lag below 3000rpm, mind - and it's best not to dwell on the amount of super-unleaded being hoovered up the high-pressure fuel pump at pretty much every operational phase above idle - but the MR's growling, unrefined and relentlessly prolific 2.0-litre engine, as well as its snappy six-speed manual gearbox, are so engaging that Hero status would be easy to bestow on the FQ-360 regardless of its other abilities.

Not that the car needs any help, of course. The MR follows in the grand Evo tradition, and is every bit as compelling as the motor that powers it. Anyone accustomed to the current vogue for ultra quick electric steering will likely find the rate of response on the car's hydraulic rack a little slow - but it doesn't take long to appreciate its talkativeness or the subtle build up of resistance that occurs as soon as the Yokohama Advans come under duress.

True enough, there are plenty of like-minded cars around today which might claim superior body control to the IX, yet because you're never left in any doubt about the underlying mechanical grip being generated, the wing-dipping buoyancy just makes the MR seem more animated and involving - particularly at the national limit, where virtually every modern equivalent feels immune to roll - and dismissive of the speed with it.

Beyond the control surfaces and the ever-ready 4G63, it is the ACD and Super AYC doing the heavy lifting. When the steering input is small and the bend long and fast, the drivetrain does no more than is required to make the MR seem neutral and steadfast on its line. But in slower, constant radius corners, the four-wheel-drive system's dynamism isn't far short of breath-taking. Aside from choosing the surface conditions (Tarmac, Gravel, Snow) at the start of your journey, no button pushing is required to have the torque moving around in the most expressive, fun-packed way imaginable.

Very few AWD systems created in the intervening years succeed so intuitively or adapt as spontaneously to the whim of the driver - and for all the boasting about rear-axle bias, adaptive torque vectoring and associated drift mode malarkey, practically none of those produced by mainstream manufacturers treat a sustained loss of traction as such an integral part of the appeal. The MR does, and in a way that makes you appreciate the preceding eight generations of experience used to make it seem so progressive and un-scary.

Certainly the chassis does nothing which isn't fundamentally connected to your right foot. Keep your toe in, and you'll get grip and the gratifying sensation of the power shuffling unmistakably backwards to counteract understeer (to the point where it will cheerfully favour oversteer). Or else lift off, let the weight shift (which it will, virtually in slow motion) and then reapply only when you're sufficiently far sideways to let all those heavy-duty acronyms marshal you straight.

Ten years on and the rest of the industry might have caught up with (and surpassed) the FQ-360's outlandish power output - not to mention the gains made in efficiency, refinement, reliability and quality - but it hasn't come close to replicating its supremely tactile limit or the built-in level of entertainment beyond. From a 2018 perspective, that's rather disheartening - as is the knowledge that the MR FQ-360 by HKS was the Evo's final high note, before the slippery slope of the X and the ignominy of cancellation thereafter.

Today they are predictably hard to find. There is currently just one in the PH Classifieds, priced at £23,995. Alongside the initial outlay there's the car's shameless thirst for 98 octane fuel to consider, as well as the Evo's notoriously frequent servicing schedule. But the MR stands apart from practically everything else built with multiple doors and two driven axles since 2008, just as it stands apart even from its predecessors. For the price of a new Polo GTI you get a proper icon of real-world performance; one that has not lost a single shred of what made it so special a decade ago.


SPECIFICATION - MITSUBISHI LANCER EVOLUTION MR FQ-360 by HKS
Engine:
1,997cc, four-cylinder
Transmission: 6-speed manual, four-wheel drive
Power (hp): 366@6,887rpm
Torque (lb ft): 363@3,200rpm
0-62mph: 4.0secs
Top speed: 165mph
Weight: 1,400kg
MPG: 13mpg
CO2: 334g/km
On sale: 2007 - 2008
Price new: £35,504
Price now: £23,995

 

Author
Discussion

trickywoo

Original Poster:

11,784 posts

230 months

Sunday 10th June 2018
quotequote all
Lost me at ‘beat out’.

Beat out wtf?

mooseracer

1,885 posts

170 months

Sunday 10th June 2018
quotequote all
trickywoo said:
Lost me at ‘beat out’.

Beat out wtf?
I wondered that too, but persevered only to be further annoyed by the lack of proof reading

rtz62

3,366 posts

155 months

Sunday 10th June 2018
quotequote all
“But the MR stands apart from practically everything else built with five doors and two driven axles since 2008, just as it stands apart even from its predecessors.”

Wow, must buy this rarity, a five-door Evo IX

PK0001

347 posts

177 months

Sunday 10th June 2018
quotequote all
Perfect antidote to today's dull point and squirt hot hatches.

belleair302

6,843 posts

207 months

Sunday 10th June 2018
quotequote all
I remember looking at an FQ 320 when new and loved how it drove. What put me off was the very cheap interior that was shameful along with the servicing requirements. every 6,000 miles or six months. Dealers were not exactly local and I walked away to an M BMW. I still would rather buy a Subaru over a Mitsubishi....its a McRae and Burns thing!!

Jazzer

1,674 posts

204 months

Sunday 10th June 2018
quotequote all
These cars are outrageously good down a back road and really shine beyond the limit. There is nothing like them.
I shed tears when I sold my last Evo in 2007 and have not driven one since....but dream about one regularly!

Kosy

99 posts

161 months

Sunday 10th June 2018
quotequote all
Great car and no doubt one of the ultimate versions but is it worth the £8k premium over a 'normal' FQ360?

Mackofthejungle

1,070 posts

195 months

Sunday 10th June 2018
quotequote all
The VII to IX left me pretty cold at the time.. Servicing intervals, fuel consumption in the teens.. And a saloon.. Never quite got that one..

But it's the same for all rally models from this time, and I don't get why they did it. For me, when I see a rally car I see big tyres, amazing long travel and soft suspension, and the ability to hit speed bumps at speeds which would put a fiestas springs through its bonnet. That's what I want. It's actually probably what we need with the state our roads are in.. But instead we get painted on tyres - what the fk?

But still quite fancy one.. But only as a toy.

donkmeister

8,155 posts

100 months

Sunday 10th June 2018
quotequote all
Weren't the service intervals 4,500 miles rather than 6,000? I remember my dad shopping for one, and being a 20+k mile/year driver that was the deal breaker as he would never be more than a couple of months away from a service.
He ended up buying a much more frugal, sensible car for the high miles: a Focus ST225.

helix402

7,859 posts

182 months

Sunday 10th June 2018
quotequote all
The pictured car seems to have terrible orange peel paint on the tailgate.

DamnKraut

458 posts

99 months

Sunday 10th June 2018
quotequote all
PK0001 said:
Perfect antidote to today's dull point and squirt hot hatches.
Additional benefit: whilst driving it you can’t see it from the outside so won’t be bothered that it’s ugly as sin.

SidewaysSi

10,742 posts

234 months

Sunday 10th June 2018
quotequote all
I do love these...so much more exciting than any hot hatch

Evolved

3,565 posts

187 months

Sunday 10th June 2018
quotequote all
LOVE Evo’s, having had five to date, I’ve experienced all model variations and not one has left me cold.

They are supremely agile, stupidly quick, even by today’s standards, and that’s 20 years after they were at their peak of popularity, and will put a smile on your face every time.

They’re not refined, the interior is terrible (all 90’s jap cars were) and will eat money in petrol for fun - but FUN is the operative word here.
I have an Evo V now as a weekend toy, and for that purpose, it really is hard to beat! I’ve owned numerous German cars in between my last Evo IX and the current one, and none of them have given me that feeling I wanted from a toy.

The huge surge of torque, the pops and bangs and the amount of attention the car gets when out is unreal. For something created 20 years ago, and sold relatively cheaply, they are an icon on the road!

PK0001

347 posts

177 months

Sunday 10th June 2018
quotequote all
DamnKraut said:
PK0001 said:
Perfect antidote to today's dull point and squirt hot hatches.
Additional benefit: whilst driving it you can’t see it from the outside so won’t be bothered that it’s ugly as sin.
Remember,,,beauty is in the eye of the beholder,,,,,plus any EVO is far better looking than any of the cars from your garage past or present. Really what an odd comment

DAVEVO9

3,469 posts

267 months

Sunday 10th June 2018
quotequote all
DamnKraut said:
Additional benefit: whilst driving it you can’t see it from the outside so won’t be bothered that it’s ugly as sin.
Says the man who owned a pig ugly alfa rofl

markcoznottz

7,155 posts

224 months

Sunday 10th June 2018
quotequote all
Evolved said:
LOVE Evo’s, having had five to date, I’ve experienced all model variations and not one has left me cold.

They are supremely agile, stupidly quick, even by today’s standards, and that’s 20 years after they were at their peak of popularity, and will put a smile on your face every time.

They’re not refined, the interior is terrible (all 90’s jap cars were) and will eat money in petrol for fun - but FUN is the operative word here.
I have an Evo V now as a weekend toy, and for that purpose, it really is hard to beat! I’ve owned numerous German cars in between my last Evo IX and the current one, and none of them have given me that feeling I wanted from a toy.

The huge surge of torque, the pops and bangs and the amount of attention the car gets when out is unreal. For something created 20 years ago, and sold relatively cheaply, they are an icon on the road!
The five is the pick of the crop imho, although I might be biased. The five speed gearbox fitted up to and including the evo 6 is much more precise and well, better than the later six speeder in the featured car. Massively powerful braking set up, which barely breaks into a sweat under hard use. Fun is an accurate description and it's one that is dissapearing tbh, I think character sums it up. Not many vehicles have it.

BarryGibb

335 posts

147 months

Sunday 10th June 2018
quotequote all
PK0001 said:
Perfect antidote to today's dull point and squirt hot hatches.
Some would argue the Type R is moderately interesting to drive

big_rob_sydney

3,402 posts

194 months

Sunday 10th June 2018
quotequote all
Massive fan of the rally cars, and love the EVO's along with the Subarus.

Never had a chance to jump ship from Subaru though, but have heard the Tommi Mak is the one to get?

Evolved

3,565 posts

187 months

Sunday 10th June 2018
quotequote all
big_rob_sydney said:
Massive fan of the rally cars, and love the EVO's along with the Subarus.

Never had a chance to jump ship from Subaru though, but have heard the Tommi Mak is the one to get?
I’ll be honest, they’re all pretty much of a muchness. Sure each one has been tweaked, but overall, they all drive pretty much the same. Sharp and quick.

You’ll pay for a Tommi. The ones to watch price wise will be the V’s and VI’s, simply because they’re seen as the ones he rallied.

rossub

4,442 posts

190 months

Sunday 10th June 2018
quotequote all
These are as cheap as they’re ever going to be. The best Evos ever made means they’re not going to be hanging about in the low 20s for too long.

That Grey colour does nothing for them, but I have much want for a red HKS model. There was one for sale recently with 37k miles and about £25k.... was sorely tempted!