RE: BMW M2 Competition: Driven

RE: BMW M2 Competition: Driven

Monday 30th July 2018

2020 BMW M2 Competition | PH Review

The M2 has been specifically remade to surpass the Porsche 718 Cayman. Well, guess what...



Since the launch of the Porsche Cayman 12 years ago this moment has been unthinkable. A sports car from a manufacturer which isn't Porsche, offering a car for similar money, that makes us think: perhaps, just perhaps, this is the better car. Yarp. Really.

The M2 Competition, then. It's BMW's current-smallest M car, turned more hardcore than the regular M2, as befits the 'competition' tag the manufacturer applies to cars one-rung higher than regular M cars. But such, BMW thinks, is the appeal of this car, that it simply replaces the current M2, rather than both versions being available - though maybe there's cost factor here, too.

Because the changes run pretty deep. Too deep, perhaps, to keep two different M2s available. Most notably the M2's single, twin-scroll turbo straight-six has been replaced with a detuned M3/M4 engine, which has two single-scroll turbos, each boosting three cylinders. Power is up by a healthy 40hp and 62lb ft to 410hp and 405lb ft, which is the start of things. The M3/M4 wishbone-shaped engine-bay strut brace makes its way over, too, as does this engine's additional cooling needs - which explains the bigger vents out front.


This all pushes the weight up by a not inconsiderable 55kg to 1625kg inc driver, fuel and that. (When we road tested an M2 in 2016 it was 1575kg on MIRA's scales, while a 718 Cayman S was 1430kg, and we'd be naïve to think these things don't matter.) So to counter that - and because it feels like BMW has just been inclined to throw quite a lot of effort at this small coupe - the brakes are bigger and the suspension has been revised.

There's not so much in the spring and damper rates or anti-roll bars, but the steering has been recalibrated, as has the stability control, while at the rear there's some rose jointing too. The idea is simple - make it more precise at the front, make the back follow better, and make it easier to drive at the limit. Make it more sports car, less hot rod. Make it so that the engine isn't the main reason you'd pick one over a 718.

You kinda get the vibe that, with the adoption of that wheezy four-cylinder engine, Porsche revealed a bit of vulnerable flesh between its panels, and BMW has gone at it.


It already had the 718's engine nailed, to be honest, and this only extends the gap. There's a new exhaust (obvs) with opening flaps, plus an incoming petrol particulate filter, and an inline six is so smooth, so zingy, and here, so urgent, only a bit boosty. It's also so biddable that I'd choose a manual over a twin-clutch box, not just because it's a manual and is therefore more engaging but, because, if you can't be bothered to shift that much, it's enjoyable to just let the engine lug things out anyway, such is the spread of torque.

The handling stops short of being transformed, but it's double-digit per cent better than it was, everywhere. (Except, perhaps, in ride quality, which is still a bit insistent on bad roads.) But it steers better, with less communication and slickness than a 718, I suspect, but with really good accuracy and response, which is way better just off straight than it was, and a good enough approximation of feel. Such is the precision, and such is the response in the chassis, that although a Porsche is ultimately more agile (with its weight by the centre rather than the ends, it'll turn more quickly), the BMW is not far away as a sports car.

On the road it's incisive, fast, engaging. Less fluid and oily than a Cayman, I'm sure. But closer than it has ever been, because it's keyed-in, alert, balanced. Closer to a Porsche than an M has been since ... cripes. The 1M Coupe? Earlier? Not entirely sure. A question for another day, but know that it's great fun.


And on track it's great. In higher speed turns there's a bit of steady-state understeer, as there should be. You can quell it using the traditional front-engined, rear drive methods: lift the throttle or trail the brakes, whereupon the M2 Competition reveals its adjustability, and the tight body control on its passive dampers. It's like a miniature Aston V12 Vantage S, in that the cornering line is largely your choice. Safe and secure, wild and hilarious, or anything in between.

The stability control has two stages of off. MDM is half off, and is really good, allowing up to around a quarter turn of 'oppo' on a circuit. All off is all off, after which the M2 is a hoot.

So. We like it. A lot. Is it better, overall, than a 718 Cayman? This being PH I'm spared the indignity of putting a star rating to it and there'll be a chance, I hope, to get them together on the right road and circuit at the same time. But if I were signing off on my monthly payments, right here, right now: for the first time since the Cayman's introduction, I wouldn't make them to Porsche.


SPECIFICATION | 2020 BMW M2 COMPETITION
Engine:
2936cc 6cyl, twin-turbo petrol
Transmission: Six-speed manual
Power: 410hp at 5250-7000rpm
Torque: 405lb ft at 2350-5200rpm
0-62mph 4.4sec
Top speed: 155mph
Weight: 1625kg
MPG: 30.7mpg
CO2: 227g/km
Price: £49,805









Author
Discussion

Carl_Manchester

Original Poster:

12,196 posts

262 months

Monday 30th July 2018
quotequote all
As a Porsche man I am intrigued by this new car. I trawled the specs and created a sheet to compare it to the 718 Cayman S PDK.

Long story short: this is as close to the Cayman that BMW have ever gotten, the only criticism I can make is that the M Performance brakes should have been standard however, even with extra caliper boost, the surface area of the discs does not increase, which I find strange.

Thumbs up from me.

Wow, well done BMW for delivering a car, on paper at least, beats the 718 Cayman S. The writing is on the wall for the Porsche in the head-to-head tests and its all down to that bloomin engine change, are you reading this Porsche ?


WokkaWokka

699 posts

139 months

Monday 30th July 2018
quotequote all
The M2 is the only car that is getting me excited at the moment. I’m 100% set on one for my next car and what’s more I intend to keep it for a long time and will run it up to high mileage, I look after my cars so this shouldn’t be an issue.

Depending on prices of the competition when I am ready I might go for one of those but I’d say my talent will reach to controlling the standard M2 so I’m not sure whether I’d need or want the extra power. What is it that they say about power and control etc!

This new one does look like an excellent package though and hats off to the people over at BMW. Keep making cars like this!

Nerdherder

1,773 posts

97 months

Monday 30th July 2018
quotequote all
I find the aggressive styling of the front excessive. Other than that very tasty package and I'd hang that engine bay brace on a wall as artpiece.

P.s. Not Matt's greatest article ever, stopped reading halfway through.

Edited by Nerdherder on Monday 30th July 05:05

blearyeyedboy

6,289 posts

179 months

Monday 30th July 2018
quotequote all
Sounds intriguing. Was the engine change emissions-driven, do we think? There are a lot of spec changes recently, though an engine change is rather extreme a measure.

Oh, and "insistent" ride quality?
Pistonheads: Proofreading Matters. wink

n4aat

458 posts

212 months

Monday 30th July 2018
quotequote all
I’m sorry, but it’s a saloon car. It’s never going to be a sports car.

It’s front engined, it’s never going to be a sports car.

It has a turbo, it’s never going to be a sports car.

Plus it still looks bloated, bruising and chavtastic.

stuckmojo

2,979 posts

188 months

Monday 30th July 2018
quotequote all
The only new BMW I really want. And I prefer this to any 4 pot Porsche by a long stretch.

gstubbs010893

22 posts

101 months

Monday 30th July 2018
quotequote all
The car that has me most excited right now, would look to get one next after a couple years depreciation

Yes it's a bit heavy but it's also a good size, correct wheel drive, available in a manual and by the sounds of things, a proper drivers car. Factor in a decent boot and 4 seats and it's just about perfect.

Bravo BMW!

Helicopter123

8,831 posts

156 months

Monday 30th July 2018
quotequote all
Need to see one in the flesh because on paper that looks awesome!

Pictures do look a little 'chavvy'

moonigan

2,137 posts

241 months

Monday 30th July 2018
quotequote all
Its 1625KG !! that's almost as heavy as the E90 M3 I had many years ago and agile is not a word I would use to describe it. On track it would eat tyres and brakes. An M2 pulled alongside me a few weeks ago. Its the first time I have seen one on the road. Its looked really nice in the metallic blue but the difference in driver position between my car and that was huge. I had to look up in the same way you do when a FFRR pulls alongside a standard road car.

Alex_6n2

328 posts

199 months

Monday 30th July 2018
quotequote all
That, is a lot, of commas, in an article, making it really, hard to read.

forester2945

32 posts

157 months

Monday 30th July 2018
quotequote all
And people talk about modern Jaguars being heavy!!!

daveco

4,125 posts

207 months

Monday 30th July 2018
quotequote all
moonigan said:
Its 1625KG !! that's almost as heavy as the E90 M3 I had many years ago and agile is not a word I would use to describe it. On track it would eat tyres and brakes. An M2 pulled alongside me a few weeks ago. Its the first time I have seen one on the road. Its looked really nice in the metallic blue but the difference in driver position between my car and that was huge. I had to look up in the same way you do when a FFRR pulls alongside a standard road car.
It would be fantastic if BMW released an NA version using the 3.0 litre 270hp engine from the E9x series. By getting rid of the turbo and all the associated extra weight/engineering that goes with it, you'd probably be looking at a 100kg less weight.


They were going to do this with the 1 series about ten years ago iirc; release a 125i with the 216hp engine that was c. 1200kg and targeted at the younger track enthusiast, but it got shelved.

Helicopter123

8,831 posts

156 months

Monday 30th July 2018
quotequote all
forester2945 said:
And people talk about modern Jaguars being heavy!!!
I'm sure a 4-pot turbo would have been lighter

rolleyes

beanoir

1,327 posts

195 months

Monday 30th July 2018
quotequote all
Some dreadful journalism on PH these days...


spikyone

1,451 posts

100 months

Monday 30th July 2018
quotequote all
n4aat said:
I’m sorry, but it’s a saloon car. It’s never going to be a sports car.

It’s front engined, it’s never going to be a sports car.

It has a turbo, it’s never going to be a sports car.

Plus it still looks bloated, bruising and chavtastic.
I disagree with your last two criteria for being a sports car; there are plenty of FR and/or blown sports cars out there - and by your turbo criteria, the new Boxster/Cayman aren't sports cars either.

But I do agree with the fact that this is not, in any way, a sports car. It is a very fast saloon-based coupe, but it's definitely not a sports car. FWIW my criteria for whether something is a sports car is whether you can buy the same body shape with a diesel engine. If you can, it's definitely not a sports car. Anything over 1500kg probably isn't a sports car either.

Genuine question here as I'm not in the position to do so: are people genuinely cross-shopping an M2 against a Cayman? Seems to me like they're aimed at people looking for fairly different things.

GroundEffect

13,836 posts

156 months

Monday 30th July 2018
quotequote all
n4aat said:
It’s front engined, it’s never going to be a sports car.
So the MX5 isn't a sportscar? Or the Lotus Elan isn't a sportscar? Nonsense.

cerb4.5lee

30,560 posts

180 months

Monday 30th July 2018
quotequote all
moonigan said:
Its 1625KG !! that's almost as heavy as the E90 M3 I had many years ago and agile is not a word I would use to describe it.
I was always quick to moan about the weight of my E92 M3 at 1650kg, this M2 is heavy but at least with the extra torque it has over the E9x M3 it won't feel like its carrying the weight as much.

Its incredible how heavy cars are nowadays, and you will always feel that amount of weight in the bends and under braking.

Frimley111R

15,652 posts

234 months

Monday 30th July 2018
quotequote all
moonigan said:
Its 1625KG !! .
Bloody hell, I though there was a big push on lightening cars unless there will be lightweight version along after this.....

sidesauce

2,475 posts

218 months

Monday 30th July 2018
quotequote all
GroundEffect said:
n4aat said:
It’s front engined, it’s never going to be a sports car.
So the MX5 isn't a sportscar? Or the Lotus Elan isn't a sportscar? Nonsense.
n4aat said:
It has a turbo, it’s never going to be a sports car.
So is a 488 not a sportscar? Or a 570s? Or an AMG GT-R?? More nonsense.

Rawwr

22,722 posts

234 months

Monday 30th July 2018
quotequote all
sidesauce said:
So is a 488 not a sportscar? Or a 570s? Or an AMG GT-R?? More nonsense.
I wouldn't class any of those as sports cars, myself smile