RE: Honda CR-X: Spotted

RE: Honda CR-X: Spotted

Saturday 11th August 2018

Honda CR-X: Spotted

As angular as Kryten's head and just as entertaining, this first-generation CRX 1.6i-16 looks a peach



When thoughts turn to fun Hondas, we'd wager you'll have to go pretty far down the list before you remember the existence of the CRX 1.6i-16. Certainly, you'd be forgiven if NSXs, Type-Rs, and perhaps even VTis popped up before you got to the hottest version of the first generation of this angular little coupe, launched in 1986.

Still, it's deserving of more than a moment of your attention. Despite only packing a 1.6-litre motor, some clever engine design and a 16-valve head - a portent of Honda's wizardry to come - meant it nevertheless kicked out 137hp. That might sound paltry now, but we can't think of anything else around at the time that could match its specific power output.


So for its time, the CRX was pumped. It was light, too, tipping the scales at 900kg, and as a result, it was quick. 0-60mph came up in a fraction more than seven seconds, and as you'd expect, the performance was served up at the top end of the rev range, to a gloriously hard-edged four-cylinder soundtrack, perhaps not quite as aggressive as later Hondas', but just as characterful.

It handled, too. Autocar praised its front-end grip and neutrality, the feelsome steering and the way a mid-corner lift would bring the front end into line and move the rear without tipping you into snap oversteer. In fact, it went as far as to describe the way the CRX got down the road as "sheer driving pleasure".


All of which makes you wonder why it's still so far down the pecking order of performance Hondas today. Well, the answer lies perhaps in the time it was released; coupes were old hat, and the hot hatch was about to reach the height of its popularity. Despite this, Honda soldiered on with the CRX, winning the hearts of those who wanted a halfway house between hot hatch practicality and the rakish looks of its chief coupe rival, the Toyota MR2 - which, incidentally, was down on power even after its 1987 facelift.

Today, its comparative obscurity means the CRX has escaped the ludicrous price rises of some 1980s classics. Having said that, you won't find any in the bargain bins where they resided just a few years ago. Given current prices, £6,500 for this low-mileage, clean-looking, two-owner example with a long MOT sounds sensible; indeed, it's quite tempting if you're still seeking an exciting 1980s classic at a reasonable price. Perhaps, then, it's time to venture a little further down your list of fast Honda wants - or to add to it.


SPECIFICATION - HONDA CRX 1.6I-16

Engine: 1590cc 4-cyl, naturally aspirated
Transmission: Five-speed manual, front-wheel-drive
Power (hp): 127@6,500rpm
Torque (lb ft): 103@5,500rpm
MPG: 30.0
CO2: N/A
First registered: 1986
Recorded mileage: 57,635
Price new: £7,950
Yours for: £6,500

See the full ad here.

Author
Discussion

Trickytimes

Original Poster:

32 posts

188 months

Saturday 11th August 2018
quotequote all
My dream car as a teenager. I would snap this up if I had the garage space!

Mr2Mike

20,143 posts

255 months

Saturday 11th August 2018
quotequote all
No hyphen in CRX! Lovely little cars but they rot badly and at over £6k for a nice one I don't think they have escaped silly prices.

JMF894

5,501 posts

155 months

Saturday 11th August 2018
quotequote all
Love these, but is it 137bhp or 127bhp?

mp3manager

4,254 posts

196 months

Saturday 11th August 2018
quotequote all
125bhp

The owner of the one in the ad is a numptie and has the wheels on the wrong way round.

My old Mk1 from 1987, with the wheels on properly.


Butter Face

30,298 posts

160 months

Saturday 11th August 2018
quotequote all
JMF894 said:
Love these, but is it 137bhp or 127bhp?
Or 125? hehe

Great little car, would be in my lottery win garage to park up and keep nice.

832ark

1,226 posts

156 months

Saturday 11th August 2018
quotequote all
Mr2Mike said:
No hyphen in CRX
Depends, Honda display it both ways.


anonymous-user

54 months

Saturday 11th August 2018
quotequote all
As mentioned above, rust will have seen a lot of these off.

My mum had a similar-age Civic GTI. 1.5 12v I think it was. Externally it looked perfect but underneath it corroding very badly, to the point I think it failed an MOT. It was sold on to a guy who wanted to restore it and his blog online commented on the amount of rust he he found.

Mr2Mike

20,143 posts

255 months

Saturday 11th August 2018
quotequote all
832ark said:
Depends, Honda display it both ways.
Where do they use a hyphen? Not on the back of the car, like they do with e.g. a CR-V.

rallycross

12,790 posts

237 months

Saturday 11th August 2018
quotequote all
I had a couple of these early 16v Crx mk1 loved the fact it has such a punchy engine in a tiny little car, steering and suspension let these down they don’t drive like you’d expect - quite soft and bouncy and steering feels disconnect to what front wheels are telling you.
Can’t believe how prices have gone, my one was a one owner less than 40,000 miles example in rust free condition - sold it for £1250 in 2007.

MissChief

7,105 posts

168 months

Saturday 11th August 2018
quotequote all
Badly wanted a Mk 2 VTEC version in my youth.

aka_kerrly

12,418 posts

210 months

Saturday 11th August 2018
quotequote all
Love these little things!

I've never owned one but a few mates have had them an I've had a few blasts. The chassis is a great little setup & there are plenty of tuning goodies to make them even better.

One fitted with a B16 1.6 160hp lump & LSD gearbox is absolute perfection, a b18 or K20 Civic type R engine would create a bonkers ground missile but that could be considered overkill on a road car, for track car it would be astonishingly fast. see THIS - k20 CRX at Oulton park - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Cl56bpY2-k

Even the standard engine provides enough razzzle to have fun in the 30-90mph area and low weight help it keep more powerful cars at bay .. this Best Motoring vid shows the CRX versus the Civic VTI, Toyota AE86 , Mazda MX5 and a few others - - the CRX was 2.5 seconds a lap faster than a MX5 around Tsukuba!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cYdU-xso3c0

Mr2Mike

20,143 posts

255 months

Saturday 11th August 2018
quotequote all
Nanook said:
On the back of the car. Like they do with a CR-V



And, yes, I know that's the later model, there was no hyphen on the Mk1.
That would explain is; a friend has a Mk1 and I was damn sure there was no hyphen! smile

howardhughes

1,005 posts

204 months

Saturday 11th August 2018
quotequote all
"Honda's wizardry to come - meant it nevertheless kicked out 137hp. That might sound paltry now"

Why does the editor always need to write an older car's power out with comments like this?
We know that every new hot hatch that pushes out less than 600 bhp is now sniffed upon but come on, give it a rest.


howardhughes

1,005 posts

204 months

Saturday 11th August 2018
quotequote all
Always had a soft spot for these cars. There used to be a big following in Bradford back in the day.
They called it the 'Toller lane cruise' Toyota corolla 16v, BMW 325i Sports and of course the Honda CRX V-TEC.

Happy Days


Whistle

1,404 posts

133 months

Saturday 11th August 2018
quotequote all
Had 2 of these back in the day one was a Vtec and the other was the later one, was it a V-Vtec it had 187 bhp

Loved both of them.

This is early Vtec one I had.


mooseracer

1,885 posts

170 months

Saturday 11th August 2018
quotequote all
Whistle said:
Had 2 of these back in the day one was a Vtec and the other was the later one, was it a V-Vtec it had 187 bhp

Loved both of them.

This is early Vtec one I had.

Pretty sure 158 ( or very close to that) was the most that UK ones came with, and don't think even JDM models were even close to 187 - that's Integra power.

Whistle

1,404 posts

133 months

Saturday 11th August 2018
quotequote all
Can’t really remember it was the early 90s smile the photo was of the 1st one I had. The 2nd one was some what faster and seemed to rev even higher.

832ark

1,226 posts

156 months

Saturday 11th August 2018
quotequote all
This is from the Mugen catalogue for the mk1 :


dromond

689 posts

220 months

Saturday 11th August 2018
quotequote all
mooseracer said:
Whistle said:
Had 2 of these back in the day one was a Vtec and the other was the later one, was it a V-Vtec it had 187 bhp

Loved both of them.

This is early Vtec one I had.

Pretty sure 158 ( or very close to that) was the most that UK ones came with, and don't think even JDM models were even close to 187.
Correct, and also...unless the front bumper and the rear spoiler have been swapped back to the older 16i16v style that red crx
isn't a VTEC.

Mr2Mike

20,143 posts

255 months

Saturday 11th August 2018
quotequote all
832ark said:
This is from the Mugen catalogue for the mk1 :

We haven't bad a "worst wheels ever" thread for a while, but that's surely a contender.