RE: Porsche 944: Spotted

RE: Porsche 944: Spotted

Saturday 18th August 2018

Porsche 944: Spotted

Roll up, roll up. This could be the last 'cheap' 944 you'll see - and it looks like a good'un, too.



It might be tempting to think the time to buy a good Porsche 944 has been and gone. Where once you could get a decent early example for a few grand, prices have been steadily on the rise for the last few years and now 944s don't feel as cheap as they once were.

For example, back in 2012 we discussed the 944 at length. And, it would seem, £5,750 for a 2.5 Lux with a whopper of a history and low mileage was 'pricey'. These days it'd be anything but, of course - expect to pay anywhere between £8,000 and £10,000 for a car like this.


Even so, the 944 remains tempting. After all, as erudite PH readers will be aware, as much as the 944 was maligned for not being a 911 in its day, it's still tremendously good fun to drive, with incredible balance and exceptional agility. Even the least powerful 2.5 still feels fast and light enough to be exciting.

Nevertheless, there are still bargains out there to be had - and this example is a case in point (as is this unfinished project 944). Confusingly, it's listed as a 2.6-litre, but the reg date suggests it's actually a rare 2.7 - no more powerful than the early 2.5s (yes, anoraks, with the exception of those produced in 1988), but torquier and more responsive. It comes in rather fetching Baltic Blue with a smart leather interior, and the advert boasts of all the handbooks and a good - albeit not full - history.


The ad is rather sparse in further detail, save to mention that there's 'no rust' and it 'drives perfect'. An MOT history check reveals it failed its last test on rust before being repaired, mind you, so we'd take that with a pinch of salt. Also worth noting is that the MOT's up in October - so there's good reason to haggle on that price so you've some budget in hand for potential remedial work if it doesn't get through the first time.

This is not the perfect 944, then. But it is the cheapest going concern in the classifieds - there's one that costs less, but is described as a restoration job by the vendor - and that makes it worthy of a closer look. It certainly has the potential to be one of the last, good 944s around going for sensible money. And while a cheap 944 can be a world of pain, a good one might just be the accessible - and genuinely desirable - 1980s classic you've been looking for.


SPECIFICATION: PORSCHE 944

Engine: 2,681cc 4-cyl
Transmission: 5-speed manual, rear-wheel drive
Power (hp): 165@5,800rpm
Torque (lb ft): 166@4,200rpm
MPG: 24.8
CO2: N/A
First registered: 1989
Recorded mileage: 108,000
Price new: £25,991
Yours for: £4,995

See the full ad here.

Author
Discussion

jakesmith

Original Poster:

9,461 posts

171 months

Saturday 18th August 2018
quotequote all

Is there any benefit to buying one of these over say a 986 or even 987 Booster? The rear seats are let's say cramped having been in one and I can't believe a turbo is faster than a 3.4 Cayman which is probably similar price and what 15 years newer?

beanoir

1,327 posts

195 months

Saturday 18th August 2018
quotequote all
Better Pork available for this kind of money.

_Sorted_

331 posts

77 months

Saturday 18th August 2018
quotequote all
jakesmith said:
Is there any benefit to buying one of these over say a 986 or even 987 Booster? The rear seats are let's say cramped having been in one and I can't believe a turbo is faster than a 3.4 Cayman which is probably similar price and what 15 years newer?
A very good question. Have owned a few versions of both a while ago, and although on balance would go for an early 986 manual as would perceive now to be a safer choice, will always remember the 944 (in all versions) as being a terrific GT car. Both the Boxster and 944 were fast and competent A to B. The 944 was more fun and involving IMO.

The article mentions "light". In a different sense all 944, as I remember, had quite weighted and quality feeling controls, but my early 944 had a very heavy throttle feel. Someone will probably be along in a minute to say there is a fix for that or my car was faulty etc.

Overall, both 944 and 986 are great cars and it seems really good value.


Edited by _Sorted_ on Saturday 18th August 08:37

J4CKO

41,499 posts

200 months

Saturday 18th August 2018
quotequote all
I think we are used to 944s being cheap, but everything has gone up over the last few years, I sold my S2 cab for £4500 five years ago, they are now 10k plus.

In a world where sheddy old Mk1 and 2 Escorts needing restoration are that kind of money, a tidy 944 seems good value.

I think a Lux is probably an easier proposition than the sixteen valve cars, just check the sills for rust, and then check some more.

BricktopST205

896 posts

134 months

Saturday 18th August 2018
quotequote all
One of the most overated cars ever. If it didn't have a porsche badge on it would be worth 50 pence now. With the exception of the turbo/S2 that is a fantastic car but the engines in the original lineup were nothing but dire.

J4CKO

41,499 posts

200 months

Saturday 18th August 2018
quotequote all
BricktopST205 said:
One of the most overated cars ever. If it didn't have a porsche badge on it would be worth 50 pence now. With the exception of the turbo/S2 that is a fantastic car but the engines in the original lineup were nothing but dire.
To be fair, it came out in the early eighties, 165 bhp wasnt huge even then but there werent many really powerful cars out there, Capri injection was 150 bhp for example.

As a package they work well, they handle nicely and to be honest, they have never been expensive, the aforementioned Capri with no Porsche badge goes for more than this is up for, so I dont think it would be worth 50p otherwise, anything from that era that is a RWD coupe is fairly expensive nowadays.

If its any good, its worth that much, there are cheaper once but having had to spend a lot of time and money on mine, a sorted one is worth having as bills can soon rack up, the 8 valve NA engine is much simpler than the S2 and turbo engines, not that powerful nowadays but need to look past that, will still move quite well but dont race a 320D, just need to enjoy it for what it is.

MalcolmSmith

1,714 posts

75 months

Saturday 18th August 2018
quotequote all
The 924 and 944 were always dissapointing even back in the day, but its an old car now, so I suppose youre buying a ever rarer classic look whereas the Boxster/ Cayman are still just used cars and will depreciate further before they become rarer and gain classic status and their values rise as well?

I would quite like a 968CS though, I like the looks of it, never even sat in one though.

BigChiefmuffinAgain

1,062 posts

98 months

Saturday 18th August 2018
quotequote all
I had an S2 back in the day. It was a good but definitely not a great car.
Has a simple 2.5 boxster a few years later which was a lot better.
If one was deciding between the two ( and prices are now similar ) then it would be no contest. Some will argue that the price of the 944 is on the rise and the other yet to settle but if you buy cars for that reason, good luck to you...

sideways man

1,314 posts

137 months

Saturday 18th August 2018
quotequote all
People moan about the power output of these,but the top escort of this era - an RS 2000-only had 110 bhp. Ok it was much cheaper, but does give a little perspective.

alfabadass

1,852 posts

199 months

Saturday 18th August 2018
quotequote all
Regret not picking one of these up when they were going for peanuts.

blade7

11,311 posts

216 months

Saturday 18th August 2018
quotequote all
Never really seen the attraction of any 944 other than the turbo, and I wouldn't buy a turbo at todays money. Maintenance/repair costs can be excessive if you don't work on the car yourself. And a hot hatch or Audi TTS for the same money would run rings around a normally aspirated 944. Having said all that if you have to buy one, the 2.7 is a better engine than the 2.5.

roy928tt

60 posts

138 months

Saturday 18th August 2018
quotequote all
Light, balanced, Porsche.

Not a common combination.

The engine is half a 928 V8 ...again, no bad thing

blade7

11,311 posts

216 months

Saturday 18th August 2018
quotequote all
sideways man said:
People moan about the power output of these,but the top escort of this era - an RS 2000-only had 110 bhp. Ok it was much cheaper, but does give a little perspective.
The MK2 RS2000 was done and dusted by 1980, and obviously it had a smaller engine.

BricktopST205

896 posts

134 months

Saturday 18th August 2018
quotequote all
sideways man said:
People moan about the power output of these,but the top escort of this era - an RS 2000-only had 110 bhp. Ok it was much cheaper, but does give a little perspective.
4AGE was a measly 1.6 yet pushed out 130HP in the MK1 MR2/AE86.

TonyRPH

12,968 posts

168 months

Saturday 18th August 2018
quotequote all
I had a 944 back in the late 90's.

One thing I remember well was the linear power delivery, no peaks or anything, it just pulled all the way to the red line in a linear fashion.

But I always thought the car was waiting to catch me out when driving enthusiastically trhough twisty bits.

And then of course there are the weak transaxles on these - mine would whine like anything...

But it was a satisfying car to drive, and when sat in it, seeing those wide rear arches in the mirror was nice too.

But I wouldn't buy another, not least of all because I probably wouldn't be able to get in and out of it these days lol!

Johnny5hoods

510 posts

119 months

Saturday 18th August 2018
quotequote all
I always liked the 944. I wish they'd have a go at making a junior sports car with front engined, RWD layout, very short, very narrow, sub 1000KG a la MX5, only rust proofed soapbox

Porsche should start a sub brand and do it

mikey P 500

1,239 posts

187 months

Saturday 18th August 2018
quotequote all
Thought was my old 2.7 944 for a while as same colour exterior and the 2.7s are fairly rare as only made for about a year. Mine had a cream interior.
Sold about 4 years ago for about £2500 similar miles good history and no rust.
As said the driving experience wasn't that special compared to more modern stuff (even a 2.5 boxster is miles better).,


Debaser

5,774 posts

261 months

Saturday 18th August 2018
quotequote all
I had a 944, completely loved it. Such a great handling car!

redsq01

19 posts

171 months

Saturday 18th August 2018
quotequote all
i took one of these for a spin last year; a bit so what? what would i do with it? look at it? it wasn't as dull as an mx5 but then nothing is and they are silly money now and unlikely to get much sillier. Old cars are old cars unless very special or fun and these are niether.

rodericb

6,712 posts

126 months

Sunday 19th August 2018
quotequote all
BricktopST205 said:
sideways man said:
People moan about the power output of these,but the top escort of this era - an RS 2000-only had 110 bhp. Ok it was much cheaper, but does give a little perspective.
4AGE was a measly 1.6 yet pushed out 130HP in the MK1 MR2/AE86.
4AGE redtop 125ps, 110lb-ft.

This Porsche 165ps, 166lb-ft.

There is the torque factor too.