RE: Mercedes-AMG CLS 53: Driven

RE: Mercedes-AMG CLS 53: Driven

Saturday 15th September 2018

2020 Mercedes-AMG CLS 53 | UK Review

This is our first taste of Affalterbach's electrically assisted straight-six limo on UK roads



Old school AMG fans - you know, the ones who believe Affalterbach products should only be of the eight-cylinder variety - must be shuddering at the sight of the new CLS 53. "An AMG with a six-cylinder engine AND an electric motor?" they must gasp, before running away in floods of tears. "What's next, an all-electric AMG?!". Well, yes, probably.

But that won't be for some time. For now, the CLS 53 lands as the first of a new wave of electrically assisted AMGs that will each slot beneath the more hardcore V8 63-series models of their line-ups. Well, actually the CLS 53 won't, because in order not to tread on the toes of the new V8-engined GT four-door (another AMG with, erm, four doors), the 53 is to remain the top dog AMG CLS. Pressure's even higher then.

Not that the 53 is lacking firepower. It's driven by Mercedes' new straight-six 3.0-litre engine and comes supported by two forms of forced induction. The first is a big-bore twin-scroll turbocharger that provides the majority of power, but in order to eradicate as much low-rev lag as possible, the six-cylinder's inlet port is also force fed air by an electric compressor before the real boost kicks in.


This double blower setup is constantly varying its inputs depending on demand (aka your throttle angle) and helps this 3.0-litre produce up to 435hp and 389lb ft of torque. But there's more to come. The first AMG to feature some form of electric drive uses 48-volt architecture to power an integrated starter/generator (ISG), which adds a further 22hp and 194lb ft through the car's nine-speed automatic gearbox. We all know how much effect such a system can have on performance and how instantaneous the responses of electrified powertrains often are. Question is, can such a setup be made to behave in the way an AMG should?

First, let's consider the rest of the car. It's a CLS, so it's humungous and laughably longer than your average British parking space. But it's also ultra-luxurious inside with bits of S-Class including that wide, twin-screen infotainment system that can be controlled via a touch pad on the centre console, a rotary dial or mini touch buttons on the steering wheel. Oh, and you're not short of theatre inside a CLS either, with subtle but stylish ambient lighting that includes ultra-cool jet engine-esque air vents illuminated with a glow that changes colour as your adjust the climate control (red for hotter and blue for cooler). Gimmicky? Perhaps, but it certainly adds to the aura of luxury, like those mood lights under a sauna bench.


That's all good then, but an AMG should feel like an AMG when you press the start button. AMG's V8s growl into life and even its outgoing V6 engine says good morning with a bark. In the CL3 53, this new straight-six does neither, instead settling into a low-volume, slightly rattly idle. Things improve vastly once you're moving, however, because there's a new sense of urgency not familiar to AMG models before this. That is, of course, the result of that new electric injection of torque, which gives the car the sort of lateral off-the-line acceleration you'd expect from a proper EV but thankfully comes accompanied by a silky six-cylinder tone. Admittedly, it remains fairly hushed in all modes apart from Sport and Sport+, when it becomes louder and is augmented through the speakers by a high-pitched gravelly hum. The exhaust also now snorts with upshifts - which are very quick in both auto and manual modes, by the way - and you can just about make out crackles from the tailpipes on the overrun, which is fun.

There's no doubt about it, the CLS 53 is rapid, picking up pace like a sports car half a tonne lighter and responding to steering inputs like one half its size. Where the car feels large and long in the city, it somehow manages to shrink around you when you crank it up, such is the chassis' reactivity. In isolation, the 53 feels more eager to follow your steering inputs than the BMW M5. There's little in the way of feel through the wheel's rim but weighting reassuringly increases with speed. That being said, the CLS 53 can't be made to change directions in the lairy manner of an M5 because its AMG driveline can't be switched into pure rear-drive mode. There's a clear rear bias - it's 100 per cent rear driven in normal scenarios - but the front axle always comes into play when there's slippage, making it almost impossible to initiate any gentle corner exit slides - unless, of course, the steering angle is great and starting speed low.


Worth noting is the effectiveness of the standard-fit air suspension, which does a fine job of keeping the body in check and in Sport mode feels well suited to British surfaces when moving at pace. Sport+ tightens the damping effect further to eradicate almost all body roll, but in turn this can make the car follow the crests and troughs of rolling roads too closely for comfort. On that subject, in Comfort mode the car feels very refined, even on broken city roads, with only subtle hints of the increased harshness over the regular CLS over rough ridges or drain covers. Not even 20-inch AMG alloys with tyres of up to 275mm width (rear) can cause any significant hindrance to ride or road noise.

The faults? The engine's soft-limiter cuts power for too long so you jolt forward in the seat when it kicks in. The adjustable suspension, gearbox and traction control buttons are tucked behind the touchpad on the wrong side of the centre console for a right-hooker, so you need to fiddle for out of sight buttons to find them. Plus, for some people, the car may also appear a little too restrained, what with it lacking any significant external or internal design feature to emphasise the power on offer. Although that could also be a major pull factor for buyers after discreet performance.


This, therefore, is a very good car in all senses of the word. Without a thumping soundtrack it doesn't get the pulse racing like the old CLS 63, obviously - in fact the character of its powertrain never really feels all that AMG-like at all. But that's because we're not used to this new wave of electrified Affalterbach machinery yet. This is a car that will beguile its occupants with rapid pace and ultra-luxury in a way no other AMG has done yet. So long as each 53 model doesn't kill off the option of a burly V8 alternative (in this case the GT four-door ensures that), having such an effective form of new AMG is surely no bad thing at all.


SPECIFICATION - MERCEDES-AMG CLS 53

Engine: 2,999cc 6-cyl turbo
Transmission: 9-speed automatic, four-wheel drive
Power (hp): 435@6,100rpm, plus 22hp electric motor
Torque (lb ft): 384@1,800-5,800rpm, plus 184lb ft electric motor
0-62mph: 4.5sec
Top speed: 155mph (electrically limited)
Weight: 1,980kg
MPG: 31.7
CO2: 203g/km
Price: £74,050 (as standard; price as tested £78,615, comprised of Comfort package (Air Balance and Energizing comfort control) for £395, Driving Assistance plus package (Active blind spot and active lane keeping assist, Active braking assist with cross-traffic function, Evasive steering assist, Active distance assist, Active lane-change assist, Pre-Safe Plus and Impulse Side, Route-based speed adaptation) for £1,695, Privacy glass for £345, Wireless charging for £150, Cavansite blue metallic paint for £685, 20-inch five-twin spoke AMG allow wheels painted in black for £1,295)



















Author
Discussion

Chamon_Lee

Original Poster:

3,794 posts

147 months

Saturday 15th September 2018
quotequote all
I really like this EXCEPT the rear, that design is shocking.

sidesauce

2,475 posts

218 months

Saturday 15th September 2018
quotequote all
Funnily enough this new model reminds me of the mk1 model in its proportions much more than the previous one.

Amanitin

421 posts

137 months

Saturday 15th September 2018
quotequote all
'slightly rattly idle'

hm
coffee

snake_oil

2,039 posts

75 months

Saturday 15th September 2018
quotequote all
I think it looks great.

Amirhussain

11,489 posts

163 months

Saturday 15th September 2018
quotequote all
Handsome looking car IMO. Glad it’s got round exhausts rather than triangular/square shape.

NJJ

435 posts

80 months

Saturday 15th September 2018
quotequote all
It looks a little soft at the rear and it would look nicer if the rear 'diffuser' area was body coloured not what looks to be black/grey plastic. It seems like the new engine is effective but not necessarily evocative, which is a hallmark of any AMG unit (bar their 4-cylinder motor).



gigglebug

2,611 posts

122 months

Saturday 15th September 2018
quotequote all
It's definitely gone back to being a good looking car, didn't particularly like the last iteration. Too big for me though but might have a look when the tech is in the smaller cars.

Seems like a bizarrely small amount spent on optional extra's for this particular car. Used to seeing five figure sums on this type of thing now, which is in no shape or form a good thing mind.

J4CKO

41,553 posts

200 months

Saturday 15th September 2018
quotequote all
sidesauce said:
Funnily enough this new model reminds me of the mk1 model in its proportions much more than the previous one.
Indeed, seems more of a logical styling progression than the mk2 did, not a bad looking car in isolation but seemed half hearted.

ZX10R NIN

27,598 posts

125 months

Saturday 15th September 2018
quotequote all
I have to say that this new model looks good (hints of the MK1) in the flesh the powertrain seems like a good one but I'm not sure I'd want one out of warranty though.

Krikkit

26,527 posts

181 months

Saturday 15th September 2018
quotequote all
Not a fan of most modern Mercedes, but good gracious I like that.

It sounds like a kind of every day AMG for the kinds of people who have a Ferrari tucked away for the weekend. Quiet, refined, quick, not too shouty.

E65Ross

35,076 posts

212 months

Saturday 15th September 2018
quotequote all
humungous and laughably longer than a parking space? I've had 2 cars longer than this and never found it much of a problem.

vee5

81 posts

196 months

Saturday 15th September 2018
quotequote all
As usual, can't help but be impressed by the new technology but in a few years time how does this stack up as a second hand, out of warranty proposition?
Does anyone know how much an integrated starter/generator (ISG) would cost when it needs replacing?
Or even how much a replacement battery is for a 48v system?
I'm also guessing a set of replacement air suspension would be eye watering. Not fixing a fault would presumably mean running around in a safe mode, as would fitting passive aftermarket (cheaper) replacement suspenders.


E65Ross

35,076 posts

212 months

Saturday 15th September 2018
quotequote all
vee5 said:
As usual, can't help but be impressed by the new technology but in a few years time how does this stack up as a second hand, out of warranty proposition?
Does anyone know how much an integrated starter/generator (ISG) would cost when it needs replacing?
Or even how much a replacement battery is for a 48v system?
I'm also guessing a set of replacement air suspension would be eye watering. Not fixing a fault would presumably mean running around in a safe mode, as would fitting passive aftermarket (cheaper) replacement suspenders.
It is pointless to ask how much replacement parts cost now to see what it'd be like IF those parts fail out of warranty, because that'll be years down the line by which time replacement parts will be cheaper and the tech won't be so new (and thus not as expensive or as difficult to fix)

mwstewart

7,600 posts

188 months

Saturday 15th September 2018
quotequote all
Well, at least they have gone back to straight 6's. The M272 was really very good but still not quite an I6.

I think the hybrid power-train makes sense in this size of car. It's never going to be a sports car so it plays nicely into the quick GT theme.

Mike335i

5,004 posts

102 months

Saturday 15th September 2018
quotequote all
There is a lot to like about this. Not sure the interior is going to age that well, screens are better than the old stuck on the dash approach, but like the Audi A7 there is a lot of black LCD in the cabin. I guess at least this has real buttons instead of only a touch screen, bravo for that.

Like the idea of electrified straight sixes.

Gandahar

9,600 posts

128 months

Saturday 15th September 2018
quotequote all
AMG go ghey / gay / something that is gay but not the original meaning or the word which meant

HAPPY

I used to have a C43. Not as good as the M3 dynamically but it had a V8 4.3 litre engine with 24 valves or 3 per cylinder. Who knows why, but it sounded brilliant and when you pressed the throttle down it rocked the car at a standstill.

Neither M3 or C43 from that age are now judged quick, but the C43 has kept its lineage and character due to that engine.

The engine that peaked with a 6.2l NA engine in the C63.

Mercedes went wrong with the supercharged 6 cylinder C32 which lasted almost as long as a Dragonfly in summer, before AMG realised it was a mistake.

AMG C55 or AMG C32 with supercharger? The answer is simple.

666 cylinders is the number of the beast for AMG, is now, always has been.


Gandahar

9,600 posts

128 months

Saturday 15th September 2018
quotequote all
Amanitin said:
'slightly rattly idle'

hm
coffee
Not exactly rocking the car when you blip the throttle is is? This the Dale Winton of AMG engines.


redcard


playalistic

2,269 posts

164 months

Saturday 15th September 2018
quotequote all
You’d have to really want one of these to justify it over the similarly priced C63 saloon.

gigglebug

2,611 posts

122 months

Saturday 15th September 2018
quotequote all
playalistic said:
You’d have to really want one of these to justify it over the similarly priced C63 saloon.
Bit of an obvious statement. You would have to really want any of the many other alternatives to a C63 saloon to justify buying something different but here is a little heads up for you, many folks really would want something different to a C63 saloon. Crazy isn't it!!?

playalistic

2,269 posts

164 months

Saturday 15th September 2018
quotequote all
gigglebug said:
playalistic said:
You’d have to really want one of these to justify it over the similarly priced C63 saloon.
Bit of an obvious statement. You would have to really want any of the many other alternatives to a C63 saloon to justify buying something different but here is a little heads up for you, many folks really would want something different to a C63 saloon. Crazy isn't it!!?
Thanks for the heads up.