RE: Northampton powerhouse: Cosworth at 60

RE: Northampton powerhouse: Cosworth at 60

Thursday 4th October 2018

Northampton powerhouse: Cosworth at 60

While much of the British engineering firm's iconic fame is owed to the past, 2018 finds Cosworth in rude health



Cosworth. A name lodged into the brains of enthusiasts like us for producing the groundbreaking DFV V8 of the Lotus 49, creating the Group A homologated engine of the Ford Sierra Cosworth or developing the most powerful road going V12 in the world for the Aston Martin Valkyrie. Or, more than likely, all of the above and more. Yet, unless you're a stakeholder or industry insider, it's unlikely that your perception of the company is accurate anymore. To most of us, Cosworth is synonymous with motorsport, yet in reality, in 2018, motor racing forms only a tiny portion of what this great British company is about.

In the past five years, Cosworth has transitioned from primarily a high performance engine builder into a diverse, multifaceted engineering operation. Attempting to future proof itself against changes in the automotive world has inevitably meant that it has fingers in the world of autonomous cars, but it is also still doing some frankly mind blowing things with road car engines; something its Managing Director Powertrain, Bruce Wood believes is pivotal to the company's longevity. He thinks combustion technology is yet to pass through several more major breakthroughs. More on those shortly.

So Cosworth in 2018, its 60th year - what does it look like? It's still headquartered in Northamptonshire, a location its founders, Mike Costin and Keith Duckworth, chose to move to from London due to its location smack bang between the capital and Birmingham, where most of the brand's earliest customers and suppliers came from. But now this original site (the first acre of which was bought for £6,000 back in the early '60s) is joined by one in Cambridge, which focuses on electronics, and, as of this summer, a North American production site in Michigan that makes motors for US clients including General Motors and Cadillac. Cossie is very much a global brand now.


But it's still Cosworth. That's very clear as PH is shown around its Northants home, allowed through doors Wood says have not been opened to outsiders for over 15 years and shown the sort of futuristic tech Cosworth has been growing its portfolio on without making too much noise about it. In the first section we visit, there are some engineers who've been with the company since its pure motorsport days and others who have recently graduated from university and landed themselves a dream job from the get go. There are cutting edge components, including 12 beautifully machined pistons for the Valkyrie's 6.5-litre V12, laid out on a bench next to a TAG-Porsche turbo F1 engine that was used by McLaren in the mid-80s. We're told this motor is being integrated into a "modern" 911 road car, can you believe? The crossover of past and future is immediately obvious.

"We need diversity to survive," is how Wood - a proper car enthusiast and, naturally, a reader of PH - explains the increasing mixture of projects. "We realised years ago that focusing entirely on motorsport wasn't cost effective for us to grow. Focusing on one thing is risky business nowadays; having a wide portfolio means if demand for one thing goes, we've still got a business left." That explains why Cosworth has been so enthusiastic to take its motorsport data gathering technology, for example, and use it to create Alivedrive, a system that OEMs can buy to integrate into a car's infotainment architecture. It displays live journey data on the screen and can also capture video. If you saw such a system in a car would you have ever thought it'd come from Cosworth's Cambridge electronics site? Us neither. The same goes for the Lidar it is currently co-developing for autonomous cars, which it claims will be smaller and lighter than its rivals, as well as brought to market more quickly.

"One thing we can take from motorsport and apply across all our work is methodology," explains Wood. "While our involvement in motor racing doesn't have any relevance to the autonomous side of things, the pace of development, the hard-set deadline making, is something we find natural and understand. This gives us an advantage in bringing things to market."


There's also lots of impressive work being done in the world of wireless technology to replace wire looms in cars. Cosworth first developed it to monitor battery cells in an electric or hybrid vehicle, but Wood says that there's no reason it couldn't be made to work for more components. Cosworth reckons it saves around 10kg per car from the ditching of wiring within battery cells. Imagine what sort of weight saving it could achieve in a sports car if all the components were wirelessly connected...

From a PH perspective, however, the most exciting area of investment at this fast-growing company comes in its combustion engine technology. The Valkyrie serves as a halo car for the work Cosworth is doing, what with it being - as the engine test engineers say - "around 200 to 300hp more powerful than the current most powerful road V12", which we know is the 800hp 6.5-litre heart of the Ferrari 812 Superfast. Such a figure would fit with the one mentioned in a tweet that was put out (and subsequently deleted) by Cosworth recently, claiming the naturally aspirated Valkyrie would have "1130bhp" (1146hp). But Cosworth is most proud not just of that phenomenal claim for maximum output, but the fact the car conforms to the very latest emissions limits as well.

That's some achievement - even for a firm with pedigree like this one - without the use of turbocharging. Cosworth had to turn the way it develops an engine on its head to make it possible. Wood reveals that engineers developed the combustion process first, digitally simulating 20 different processes before choosing the optimum one and designing the engine case around it. "This is the opposite way of what is traditionally done in engine design," he says. The motor sounds phenomenal, by the way, with a bench demonstration of the V12 confirming to PH that a Valkyrie will have the vocals of a slightly muted mid-90s F1 car. It's shivers down the spine sort of stuff.


Lesser known is Cosworth's role in producing the engine blocks for the turbocharged V6 of the Honda NSX. These aluminium cases feature cutting-edge and tracing paper-thin plasma ion coatings in their cylinders, instead of a thicker and heavier layer of steel, which is the common option for aluminium blocks. This saves weight, is tougher and also lowers friction because the coating is slightly porous, so oil particles can embed into it. That means higher efficiency running, which is very useful in a hybrid supercar like the NSX, but also entirely relevant for pretty much every combustion engine car out there. Cosworth is already an expert in this brand spanking new tech, so expect to see its name attached to many more examples soon.

"I think there's also still much progress to be made in variable compression," adds Wood, "and engine cooling to enhance thermal efficiency." He explains that Cosworth recently developed a system with three different cooling circuits in it to make the most thermally-efficient 2.0-litre engine in the world (it's rated at 38%) for a Thai client that's producing 250,000 units a year. Who said the combustion engine was done?

Cosworth doesn't have its fingers in all pies, of course. One largely untapped area is the aftermarket business, Wood notes. Cosworth's most recent venture into this world was with a supercharger kit for the Toyota GT86, the one offering up to 280hp that PH drove and loved, but Wood concedes that its success was limited by business. "Customers expect the parts to be immediately available, but that requires us to put money forward to build up a stockpile of components," he says. "Then we also need the customer support, so it's risky for us and making money is hard. But the customer aftermarket is something we're certainly thinking about. We've got a lot to offer there."


A safer - financially speaking - customer-facing area that Cosworth is attempting to grow into relates to bespoke, classic car builds. It's already worked with Singer to produce ultra-potent air-cooled flat sixes, but Wood recognises there's an opportunity for more Cosworth involvement in individual projects, with the brand's pedigree a major component in generating demand. "This sort of project plays perfectly to our skill set," he says. It's got the potential to be a considerable cash generator as well. Just ask Aston Martin, which you might remember is charging £2.75 million for those DB5 Goldfinger Recreations.

There's a lot going on and still plenty of potential for future growth at Cosworth, then. And we didn't even mention the two-stroke engines for US Navy drones it's producing that can run so efficiently they stay airborne for 36 hours. Or Cosworth's continued interest in providing a manufacturer with support for engine development in F1. Or its growing Formula E tech involvement. You get the point.

This is a company with an unrivalled history but, in its 60th year, one that is very clearly still going to many, many more places. The investment in the US certainly represents its biggest opportunity for growing its client base, which, in business terms, is very exciting. For us, the enthusiasts, Cosworth looks set to remain a household name. Admittedly, some of that will come from the hardware fitted to autonomous cars of the future, but thankfully, it'll also be because of the parts and technology featured in our petrol-drinking sports and supercars. That's good news for both the business and us. And should ensure the survival of one of Britain's best-loved motoring brands long into the future.





Author
Discussion

ducnick

Original Poster:

1,779 posts

243 months

Thursday 4th October 2018
quotequote all
With Cosworth doing the development work on the TVR ford Coyote, how long before we see Cosworth doing aftermarket tunes and oil cooling systems for the Mustang as Tickford are doing?

HumanSteamroller

114 posts

77 months

Thursday 4th October 2018
quotequote all
Very enjoyable read.

coppice

8,599 posts

144 months

Thursday 4th October 2018
quotequote all
Hmm - a bit heavy on some random Aston Martin and rather light on the firm's history .

Nothing about MAE - all conquering F3 engine (Modified Anglia Engine )
Nothing about FVA - all conquering F2 and sports car engine (Four Valve Type A) and its family - FVC etc
Not enough about DFV and its legacy - turbo DFX etc

And whilst I never pass up the opportunity to admire the F1 Connew . only 17 other people have ever heard of it. Why not a Lotus 49 ? Or 72 ?

CanAm

9,178 posts

272 months

Thursday 4th October 2018
quotequote all
I suggested a few years ago that McLaren would probably love to be able to use a nice big all alloy V8 rather than the Honda hybrid, and got shouted down, but wouldn't that 1140bhp V12 Valkyrie engine be great for the smaller F1 teams?

Equivalence formulas have been used before, and rarely worked, but this engine meets all emission standards for road cars and would be cheaper for the small teams. Cost cutting and green credentials in one package - what's not to like? And it would be noisy too! biggrin

MclaesLaren

123 posts

93 months

Thursday 4th October 2018
quotequote all
Very interesting article. The Companys name is well choosed, I am happy they did not use the other parts of their surnames. Keith Duckworth and Mike Costin could be DuckTin, whick probably not would be as successful.

havoc

30,038 posts

235 months

Thursday 4th October 2018
quotequote all
CanAm said:
I suggested a few years ago that McLaren would probably love to be able to use a nice big all alloy V8 rather than the Honda hybrid, and got shouted down, but wouldn't that 1140bhp V12 Valkyrie engine be great for the smaller F1 teams?

Equivalence formulas have been used before, and rarely worked, but this engine meets all emission standards for road cars and would be cheaper for the small teams. Cost cutting and green credentials in one package - what's not to like? And it would be noisy too! biggrin
Weight and packaging would likely go against it...and fuel economy possibly...

MclaesLaren said:
Very interesting article. The Companys name is well choosed, I am happy they did not use the other parts of their surnames. Keith Duckworth and Mike Costin could be DuckTin, whick probably not would be as successful.
TinDuck, surely? biggrin

BRR

1,846 posts

172 months

Thursday 4th October 2018
quotequote all
really enjoyed that article smile

hughcam

418 posts

165 months

Thursday 4th October 2018
quotequote all
Great read!

griffdude

1,823 posts

248 months

Thursday 4th October 2018
quotequote all
At least 1 PHer works at Cosworth..

anonymous-user

54 months

Thursday 4th October 2018
quotequote all
griffdude said:
At least 1 PHer works at Cosworth..
I worked there between 1997 and 2001, when it really was still "Cos" and "Worth".....


BTW, this bit:

BW said:
There's also lots of impressive work being done in the world of wireless technology to replace wire looms in cars. Cosworth first developed it to monitor battery cells in an electric or hybrid vehicle, but Wood says that there's no reason it couldn't be made to work for more components. Cosworth reckons it saves around 10kg per car from the ditching of wiring within battery cells. Imagine what sort of weight saving it could achieve in a sports car if all the components were wirelessly connected...
is total pie in the sky for a real passenger car manufacturer! As you have to get power to any electronic control module (that isn't a battery monitor that sits across a handy, er, battery, to power it) then you HAVE to physically wire that device up, and once you have two wire necessary for power, then for free you can use those self same two wires for data as well! (data is AC coupled at a suitably high frequency on top of the DC voltage level used to transmit the power). Added to which, no car manufacturer i could name is going to take the risk of having any safety critical network over wireless on a product that could be driven anywhere on earth, in any environment. Just the validation program would run to hundreds of millions of pounds, and that's before you get to thorny issues with EMC certification etc

In a specific high node count battery monitor, you can run your network within the farady cage of the battery housing itself, which is immediately going to help matters with interference (And these days, hacking too...) but there really isn't much advantage, and the 10kg weight saving number seems rather high for a pair of data cables to me (iirc, the entire BMS for a 100kWh Tesla weighs just 6.5kg)




smilo996

2,783 posts

170 months

Thursday 4th October 2018
quotequote all
Interesting article and great photos.
I wonder what will happen now that Red Bull F1 changed direction.
Anyway, they seem to be as busy as usual. Good news then.

dinkel

26,934 posts

258 months

Friday 5th October 2018
quotequote all
There's a future in the combustion engine: yeah.

SpudLink

5,749 posts

192 months

Friday 5th October 2018
quotequote all
Enjoyed reading that.
The thought of hearing a road car engine that sounds like a 90s F1 V12 makes the hairs on the back of my neck stand on end. (Although I doubt I will ever hear a Valkyrie at full chat.)
When can we expect a Cosworth Sunday Service? I live in Northampton, so wouldn’t even have to get out of bed early.

MKnight702

3,108 posts

214 months

Friday 5th October 2018
quotequote all
MclaesLaren said:
Very interesting article. The Companys name is well choosed, I am happy they did not use the other parts of their surnames. Keith Duckworth and Mike Costin could be DuckTin, whick probably not would be as successful.
TinDuck would have been a good name for a racing team!

Good to hear the firm are doing well, they went through some very lean times not too long ago. I worked for Cosworth when it was, then got moved to Cosworth Technology when it got sold to Audi and split up, then Mahle Powertrain when Audi sold it. I used to love opening my window in the summer when the F1 engines were on the test beds, proper noise that was!

donteatpeople

831 posts

274 months

Friday 5th October 2018
quotequote all
SpudLink said:
Enjoyed reading that.
Although I doubt I will ever hear a Valkyrie at full chat.
I'm quite hopeful about hearing one. I remember the Vulcan doing demo laps at Spa before the Blancpain GT3 race a couple of years ago. It probably wasn't lapping at 100% pace but it was going hard enough down the straights to let plenty of noise out. It's entirely possible the Valkyrie will shown to the public at similar events.

roland82

257 posts

215 months

Sunday 7th October 2018
quotequote all
Great to see a British engineering company doing so well.

gazza285

9,806 posts

208 months

Sunday 7th October 2018
quotequote all
coppice said:
Hmm - a bit heavy on some random Aston Martin and rather light on the firm's history .

Nothing about MAE - all conquering F3 engine (Modified Anglia Engine )
Nothing about FVA - all conquering F2 and sports car engine (Four Valve Type A) and its family - FVC etc
Not enough about DFV and its legacy - turbo DFX etc

And whilst I never pass up the opportunity to admire the F1 Connew . only 17 other people have ever heard of it. Why not a Lotus 49 ? Or 72 ?
I doubt there’s enough room for a full history, but there is a photo with both the MAE and the DFV together...