RE: Showpiece of the Week: Spectre Jaguar C-X75

RE: Showpiece of the Week: Spectre Jaguar C-X75

Monday 5th November 2018

Showpiece of the Week: Spectre Jaguar C-X75

This specially developed C-X75 is the first of four that starred in Spectre. Yours for £1.25m



Every once in a while Jaguar likes to remind the world that it knows a thing or two about cutting edge engineering. Back in the 1960s it produced the innovative E-Type, which brought racing technology from the D-Type to the road in a timeless and gorgeous drop-top body. In the 1990s it created the XJ220, a supercar that blew pretty much everything else out of the water with a 213mph top speed and the Nurburgring lap record. But Jaguar's most recent reminder was arguably even more impressive.

When it first showed the design of its C-X75 concept in 2010, it garnered widespread attention for its clever mix of modernity and tradition. As a design concept alone it was a winner, but it was the powertrain proposed underneath which turned out to be the really ambitious part of the project - so much so that there were doubts as to whether or not its performance targets were actually feasible.


The brief was clear enough: build a hybrid supercar that has the performance of a Bugatti Veyron, the electric range of a Chevrolet Volt and the CO2 output of a Toyota Prius. Simples. Well, not really, because that meant creating a machine with bullet-like straight-line performance that could also do 38 miles - the range of the Volt at the time - in pure electric mode and puff out an average of 89g/km - to at least match the Prius. It had never been done before. Not even close.

These are the days before the McLaren P1, LaFerrari and Porsche 918 Spyder, so claims of such a broad sweep of performance must have seemed even more spectacular than they still do now. How could Jaguar make something so broadly talented that doesn't end up being far too complex to operate reliably? Jaguar, as confident as the brand is, knew it needed to seek help from the best in the business, and brought on Williams Advanced Engineering and Cosworth, to provide input and ensure the C-X75 project got going.


Over the course of two years a select group of engineers created the C-X75 using almost all-new components in a ground-up fashion. The car used a carbon composite monocoque chassis to keep weight to a minimum - vital if the weight of batteries were to be offset - with a Cosworth-developed 1.6-litre four-cylinder engine that was force fed air via a turbocharger and supercharger. The unit produced 502hp at 10,300rpm, giving it 313hp per litre and generally making every other engine in production seem bloody tame by comparison. It drove all four wheels through a seven-speed automated manual gearbox.

Then two electric motors were added, powered by a 300kW battery and combining to add 390hp to total output. When all power sources were driving together, power peaked at more than 800hp. Even now, to reliably produce that number from such a compact powertrain seems unbelievable. Formula 1 cars, with their similarly advanced 1.6 V6 powerplants, have illustrated just how difficult managing such a system is. So for Jaguar and its partners to successfully reach these heights in a car originally destined to become a road model deserves the highest commendation.


The rest of the car was no slough on the technological front either. There were active aerodynamic features including a deployable rear spoiler, which all worked together to produce 200kg of downforce at 200mph. This was tested on circuit, where Jaguar engineers claim that the C-X75 ran out of space but showed that it could do much higher speeds. Theoretically, more than 220mph would have been possible, making this the fastest Jaguar ever produced. It was also capable of sprinting from zero to 100mph in under six seconds, and nailed its targets of having 37 miles of pure electric range and emitting fewer than 89g/km of CO2.

So why didn't this car make production? Well, it was mostly to do with timing - or rather the clash of the C-X75 project's pivotal point and the economic crisis. Jaguar took a view on the hypercar market and believed the purses of millionaires had closed in the face of unpredictable financial times. Not even the most advanced road car to make production would tempt them to spend.


So the C-X75 went to that special place in the sky reserved for interesting concepts that the world wasn't quite ready for. In ten years you can bet your bottom dollar that no-one outside the PH echo chamber will even remember Jaguar's bright idea from 2010 - although they might just recognise the car James Bond didn't drive in 2015's Spectre. Keen (as ever) to hog the spotlight, the manufacturer agreed to produce four working models for the film - albeit with some fairly comprehensive alterations. The C-X75s that SVO built were based on a tubular spaceframe chassis and swapped a hybrid powertrain for JLR's supercharged 5.0-litre V8. Each example was built to FIA World Rally Championship safety specification for stunt work.

Today's Showpiece is one of the four movie cars, chassis 001. It's therefore doubly special, being the main car featured in the film and therefore the most famous of the lot. True, it's a world apart from the ultra advanced actual C-X75, but it's a Bond villain's car for crying out loud, built to the highest specification and powered by no slouch of a V8. And most importantly, it gets a Stunt Brake! Whatever such a feature does, it probably helps to explain why this car is up for £1.25 million. Ok, so unlike an example of the real C-X75, as a sum of parts, this Bond car is worth considerably less than that. To a Bond fanatic, however...

See the original advert here.


Author
Discussion

sidesauce

Original Poster:

2,475 posts

218 months

Monday 5th November 2018
quotequote all
Oof. Not so keen keen on the interior but as for the exterior... wow.

howardhughes

1,007 posts

204 months

Monday 5th November 2018
quotequote all
This was my favourite (Exterior wise) over Bond's Aston one- - 77

peteA

2,681 posts

234 months

Monday 5th November 2018
quotequote all
You got a pic of bonds one77?...thought it was a DB10 in that film

fathomfive

9,918 posts

190 months

Monday 5th November 2018
quotequote all
This is a seriously good looking car.

tsp

65 posts

105 months

Monday 5th November 2018
quotequote all
But in the movie the cars were orange.

And if its made to WRC specification does that mean it potentially road legal?

Lazadude

1,732 posts

161 months

Monday 5th November 2018
quotequote all
Wasn't the CX75 originally designed for and powered by Gas Turbines?

Fully electric (Motor at each wheel), making 700+ bhp with a range of 600 miles?

Why isnt that mentioned, its why its a much more interesting car design than just a charged 4 pot.



Edited by Lazadude on Monday 5th November 08:01

Civpilot

6,235 posts

240 months

Monday 5th November 2018
quotequote all
peteA said:
You got a pic of bonds one77?...thought it was a DB10 in that film
Your correct, the Bond Aston was the DB10 concept not a one77

Maldini35

2,913 posts

188 months

Monday 5th November 2018
quotequote all
"stunt brake" switch!!!

For that reason alone I want it.

.....it also looks pretty sensational

wab172uk

2,005 posts

227 months

Monday 5th November 2018
quotequote all
So Jaguar decided that the Millionaires / Billionaires wouldn't spend that kind of money on cars anymore?

Yet they have kept spending their fortunes on £1m+ Hypercars ever since. Another great decision by Jaguar.

Surely, it wouldn't take a great deal of effort to shove a V6 or V8 in there, and still keep the Hybrid powertrain?

In a world where the more expensive something is, the more people want it. Jaguar could still punt this thing out and make a profit?

forzaminardi

2,290 posts

187 months

Monday 5th November 2018
quotequote all
Forgive me, but the financial crisis, assuming we're taking about the same financial crisis, was already happening in 2010, so I suspect the real reason for the actual car never arriving was more to do with either it not working or it being mainly a PR piece all along rather than the market for such vehicles suddenly drying up.

indapendentlee

401 posts

99 months

Monday 5th November 2018
quotequote all
If I remember correctly this has only got 2 x 10 litre fuel tanks!

Equus

16,884 posts

101 months

Monday 5th November 2018
quotequote all
forzaminardi said:
Forgive me, but the financial crisis, assuming we're taking about the same financial crisis, was already happening in 2010....
Perhaps it was recognition that the recovery was going to take a hell of a lot longer, and the downturn a hell of a lot deeper, than anyone originally anticipated?

Plus the fact that if it debuted at the 2010 Paris show, design and development would obviously have started several years earlier.

anniesdad

14,589 posts

238 months

Monday 5th November 2018
quotequote all
Gorgeous. Anybody else thinking this is kinda what the Speedtail should have looked like?

cayman-black

12,644 posts

216 months

Monday 5th November 2018
quotequote all
Now that is one good looking car.

NJJ

435 posts

80 months

Monday 5th November 2018
quotequote all
Jaguar really would have benefited from putting this into production acting as a swansong for the 5.0 V8 S/C engine and sold it via SVO with production limited to something like 300 units. Would have been loss-making but as a halo car it would have been ideal. The future XK could then have pinched some of its styling to carry on the design language.

I would also suggest it was the accountants at Jag and not the HNWs that were the ones actually closing their purses. A real shame.

anniesdad

14,589 posts

238 months

Monday 5th November 2018
quotequote all
Paddy_N_Murphy said:
anniesdad said:
Gorgeous. Anybody else thinking this is kinda what the Speedtail should have looked like?
Exactly what I was going to post....
For me, all McLaren needed to do with the Speedtail was make it stunning to look at. The power and aero would have probably got them to any speed targets they set themselves, if that's infact the case. They weren't chasing Agera RS speeds so why not just make the thing beautiful to look at? It has some interesting lines, sure, but as a whole it's not a looker really. Real shame.

edited to add: also they needed to make it small in length and width. Funnily enough just like the F1!!

Edited by anniesdad on Monday 5th November 11:05

myhandle

1,187 posts

174 months

Monday 5th November 2018
quotequote all
tsp said:
But in the movie the cars were orange.
I am not 100% sure about this, but I believe it is a wrap on top of the orange paint. There are at least two in this colour, last year one was on display at the Hampton Court Concours and another at Salon Prive, on the same weekend , both blue.

Shakermaker

11,317 posts

100 months

Monday 5th November 2018
quotequote all
I thought Jaguar made this car with some kind of turbine engine, but clearly, I was mistaken

moneymakestheworldgoaround

4,079 posts

175 months

Monday 5th November 2018
quotequote all
myhandle said:
There are at least two in this colour, last year one was on display at the Hampton Court Concours and another at Salon Prive, on the same weekend , both blue.
That was the same car shown at both shows

chunder

735 posts

246 months

Monday 5th November 2018
quotequote all
moneymakestheworldgoaround said:
myhandle said:
There are at least two in this colour, last year one was on display at the Hampton Court Concours and another at Salon Prive, on the same weekend , both blue.
That was the same car shown at both shows
and it looked awesome in the flesh at Blenheim, sounded good as well !