RE: Venturi Antartica polar explorer nears completion

RE: Venturi Antartica polar explorer nears completion

Wednesday 6th February 2019

Venturi Antartica polar explorer nears completion

Want to spy on Penguins without hindering mating season? They're making just the vehicle in Monaco...



Long gone are the days when Venturi produced V6-powered performance cars like the pretty Atlantique coupe and Transcup roadster. Since the turn of the millennium, the focus for the Monegasque company has turned to electric power, as evidenced by its Formula E team and current line-up, which is comprised of EVs. They're not all boring ecoboxes, however, with three being compact sports cars and the next arrival taking the shape of an ultra-rugged vehicle called the Antartica.

As its name suggests, this pod-cum-snowmobile is designed to work in some of the world's coldest climates as a zero-emission polar exploration vehicle. If that sends alarm bells ringing in your head because, well, freezing air temperatures aren't exactly a battery's favourite thing, Venturi assures us that its latest project, which was initiated by Monaco's Prince Albert II via his foundation and is backed by an astronaut and explorer no less, has overcome such problems.


As pre-production testing nears completion, the company says the Antartica has run in temperatures as low as -40 degrees Celsius and is capable of travelling for up to 28 miles, thanks to its use of a twin-motor setup producing 80hp. While its range might seem miniscule compared to the latest 200-mile EVs set to arrive on the car market, it's impressive for a vehicle that'll work in such inhospitable conditions. Plus, scientists located near to the Earth's poles tend to stick close to their base, for obvious reasons.

The extensive use of glass means Antartica can provide its driver with an uninterupted 180-degree view of the landscape ahead. There are two side doors and two windows at the front and rear, to make it easy for scientists wrapped in multiple layers of thermals to hop in and out onto the snow.

Looking more like something that would emerge from Thunderbird 2 than a scientific tool, Antartica can be forgiven for its rather sluggish 12.5mph top speed, then. Besides, Prince Albert II's idea to bring near silent, zero-emission transport to some of the most fragile regions of the Earth is an admirable one. Quite the forethought for a man who also loves his supercars and motorsport.


Author
Discussion

steveb8189

Original Poster:

473 posts

191 months

Wednesday 6th February 2019
quotequote all
looks pretty cool but a 28 mile range means you can probably only travel 10 miles somewhere and back without too much range anxiety. Doesn't that mean you're ship or base with a diesel generator to power recharge the thing still pollutes pretty locally? Are any of these polar exploration ships nuclear?

1781cc

575 posts

94 months

Wednesday 6th February 2019
quotequote all
Just don't rescue any lone huskies or we are all in the sh*t!

cookie1600

2,109 posts

161 months

Wednesday 6th February 2019
quotequote all
Looks like William Towns was way ahead of things on the 'all round vision' front many years ago:



Couple of tracks on the evolution of this, the Elswick Envoy, add a 'leccy motor and jobs a good 'un


Du1point8

21,606 posts

192 months

Wednesday 6th February 2019
quotequote all
Wonder if the crap range is due to the batteries keeping the cab warm?

What they need is a Radioisotope thermoelectric generator, then they can remove the batteries and keep warm too.

GranCab

2,902 posts

146 months

Wednesday 6th February 2019
quotequote all
All you need is .....



poo at Paul's

14,143 posts

175 months

Wednesday 6th February 2019
quotequote all
"Prince Albert II's idea to bring near silent, zero-emission transport to some of the most fragile regions of the Earth is an admirable one. Quite the forethought for a man who also loves his supercars and motorsport."


Sounds pretty hypocritical, does it not?
Must not harm the penguins, but the rest of you can go whistle, i'll have my fun, whatever the local environmental cost.

Edited by poo at Paul's on Wednesday 6th February 16:30

B17NNS

18,506 posts

247 months

Wednesday 6th February 2019
quotequote all
steveb8189 said:
looks pretty cool but a 28 mile range means you can probably only travel 10 miles somewhere and back without too much range anxiety. Doesn't that mean you're ship or base with a diesel generator to power recharge the thing still pollutes pretty locally?
EV owners don't like to talk about how their electricity is generated wink

Agree, the range is woeful when you consider what's achievable these days. The thought of running out of charge in one of the worlds most inhospitable places doesn't bare thinking about. That's a big glasshouse to keep mist and ice free too - I hope 28 miles is with the heaters on full blast. Bit of an oddity really. I'll stick to doing my polar exploring with a diesel Hilux and some jerry cans.

wst

3,494 posts

161 months

Thursday 7th February 2019
quotequote all
Scientific research stations on Antarctica use solar and wind power extensively. You can collect more solar energy on the continent than in London, and it's the windiest place on Earth. Australia's Mawson base has had 2 300MW wind turbines since 2003. Ross Island wind farm reduced the fuel consumption of Scott and McMurdo stations by 463,000 litres of diesel annually.

So let's wind up the weird virtue signalling about EVs in this thread. The case for them on Antarctica is huge.

Charybdis

73 posts

284 months

Thursday 7th February 2019
quotequote all
Look at the wheelbase! eek

Doesn´t look like it could go very steep up or downhill without tumbling. confused

Overhaul

248 posts

170 months

Thursday 7th February 2019
quotequote all
Clearly someone had been watching this biblically epic masterpiece !

https://youtu.be/29u543fIX5g




tuscy

52 posts

241 months

Thursday 7th February 2019
quotequote all
Why the misspelling of "Antarctica"? It's spelt correctly on the side of the vehicle but not in the article.

Lorne

543 posts

102 months

Thursday 7th February 2019
quotequote all
Du1point8 said:
Wonder if the crap range is due to the batteries keeping the cab warm?

What they need is a Radioisotope thermoelectric generator, then they can remove the batteries and keep warm too.
The freezing cold arctic would appear to be the ideal place for an ICE and not an EV as the heat generated by a combustion engine is quite useful and cold weather isn't great for battery storage.

FourWheelDrift

88,486 posts

284 months

Thursday 7th February 2019
quotequote all



SpudLink

5,743 posts

192 months

Thursday 7th February 2019
quotequote all
FourWheelDrift said:


Yes! Brilliant! Used to see those as a kid. It’s what I thought of when I looked at the EV.

SpudLink

5,743 posts

192 months

Thursday 7th February 2019
quotequote all
1781cc said:
Just don't rescue any lone huskies or we are all in the sh*t!
Very good. Took me a few seconds to get that reference.

DaveEvs

280 posts

102 months

Friday 8th February 2019
quotequote all
An interesting idea, but needs further work, particularly on the “real world” range and occupant heating. Having spare fuel is essential when a vehicle may have to wait out snowstorms, and keep those onboard alive.

I could see a smaller version, perhaps open cabbed or pick-up style, being ideal to replace 2-Stoke skidoos as transport around bases where most vehicle movements happen. This would also remove the worst polluters from the ice.

The polar world is very slow to change. We were still using Primis stoves in 2007!