RE: Jaguar I-Pace wins European Car of the Year

RE: Jaguar I-Pace wins European Car of the Year

Monday 4th March 2019

Jaguar I-Pace wins European Car of the Year

Jag's EV joins an illustrious list in being crowned Europe's best car - and beats out the Alpine A110 in the process



Goodness knows Jaguar needs a bit of good news at present; well today, on the eve of the Geneva show, it has some, the I-Pace being crowned European Car of the Year.

It won by an extremely narrow margin. Tied on 250 points with the Alpine A110 - yes, it really is that good, in case you hadn't heard - the final result came down to how many of the judges placed the Jaguar first ahead of the Alpine. With 18 first places for the I-Pace and 16 for the A110, victory could hardly have been closer - it's the first time in the competition's history that there's ever been a tie.

Furthermore, it's the first time an Alpine has ever been in contention for the award, and only the third time for Jaguar: the XE was fifth in 2016 and, before that, the X-Type finished seventh in the 2002 contest. It was behind cars such as the Citroen C5, Fiat Stilo and Peugeot 307. See, it wasn't always better in the old days...


Ian Callum collected the I-Pace's award, describing it as a "wonderful car for the team to design and work on, because it's a new car on a unique platform. For me, after 40 years in the business, this is the most exciting new car I've ever had the chance to work on."

Things weren't just close at the top, with results remaining a close-run thing throughout. The Kia Ceed finished in third place with 247 points, and the Ford Focus was on 235. Really, though, this is about Jaguar's success in creating something genuinely revolutionary for the sector, and something to shout about for Britain as well; while there was a win for the Vauxhall Ampera in 2012, for a British manufacturer to claim victory with a project entirely of its own you need to look back to 1977, and the Rover SD1.

So well done Jaguar, and well done Alpine as well; both have shown that alternative thinking, executed well, can grab the attention and awards. If recognition like this means more lightweight, driver focussed sports cars and well resolved, desirable EVs, then count us in!


 

Author
Discussion

Roy m

Original Poster:

198 posts

213 months

Monday 4th March 2019
quotequote all
Given I can't buy a Volvo now (speed limiting) I may have a look at one of these. If it had a greater range it would be a no brainer!

NJJ

434 posts

80 months

Monday 4th March 2019
quotequote all
Some much needed good PR for JLR. Well done and more of this genuine innovation please Jaguar!!

Krikkit

26,527 posts

181 months

Monday 4th March 2019
quotequote all
Roy m said:
Given I can't buy a Volvo now (speed limiting) I may have a look at one of these. If it had a greater range it would be a no brainer!
Well the I-Pace only does 124mph, would that extra 12 really be significant?

Roy m

Original Poster:

198 posts

213 months

Monday 4th March 2019
quotequote all
Sorry but not the point - I won't be dictated to by a Nanny car maker - governments are bad enough but I'm stuck with them. I can choose not to spend money with a car maker.

cib24

1,117 posts

153 months

Monday 4th March 2019
quotequote all
How are reliability and software issues on these so far? Given it's JLR and a new car launch, I would guess there are quite a few people battling with issues as early adopters.

GranCab

2,902 posts

146 months

Monday 4th March 2019
quotequote all
cib24 said:
How are reliability and software issues on these so far? Given it's JLR and a new car launch, I would guess there are quite a few people battling with issues as early adopters.
Can't be worse than Tesla .....

cib24

1,117 posts

153 months

Monday 4th March 2019
quotequote all
GranCab said:
Can't be worse than Tesla .....
True. I didn't say that Tesla were any good but JLR are constantly at the bottom of reliability metrics globally (particularly their electrics) so figured they must be having issues with a EV that runs on so much software.

Jasper3.0

652 posts

200 months

Monday 4th March 2019
quotequote all
cib24 said:
How are reliability and software issues on these so far? Given it's JLR and a new car launch, I would guess there are quite a few people battling with issues as early adopters.
Well... the internet of fourms is never a good place to look, but, current issues are:

- 100kw charging not possible / enabled
- infotainment screens go black and come back either randomly or not at all therefore no heating etc. Etc.
- OTA updates not enabled
- no SOC setting possible. So it charges to 100% unless you stop it.


Dealers seem hit and miss,one guy on the I-PACE fourm has been told he will just have to wait a month until JLR issue an update.

Mine hasn’t arrived yet, but I am looking forward to i with joy and terror in equal measures.

B17NNS

18,506 posts

247 months

Monday 4th March 2019
quotequote all
Cracking news for Jaguar. Look what happens when you're brave.

RDMcG

19,142 posts

207 months

Monday 4th March 2019
quotequote all
It’s a very impressive car. Drove one and had a chance to stretch it. Nice design - stellar performance

fernando the frog

298 posts

68 months

Monday 4th March 2019
quotequote all
Roy m said:
Sorry but not the point - I won't be dictated to by a Nanny car maker - governments are bad enough but I'm stuck with them. I can choose not to spend money with a car maker.
lol

Amanitin

421 posts

137 months

Monday 4th March 2019
quotequote all
how many can they make per year?

SOL111

627 posts

132 months

Monday 4th March 2019
quotequote all
Roy m said:
Sorry but not the point - I won't be dictated to by a Nanny car maker - governments are bad enough but I'm stuck with them. I can choose not to spend money with a car maker.
But they are dictating to you lol

Jag could make it go faster but are limiting it to 124mph in the same way my i3s is limited to 100mph.

And don't get me started on ze Germans, who limit their cars to 157 or something

bds biggrin


essayer

9,065 posts

194 months

Monday 4th March 2019
quotequote all
  • runs panting into thread*
...but but but it only moves the pollution OUT OF TOWNS.. something something hydrogen ..


- secretly a bit annoyed I didn’t pick up one of these on the lease deals - I’m sure there’s a few minor issues but they’ll be resolved OTA

CedricN

820 posts

145 months

Monday 4th March 2019
quotequote all
Very impressed by the alpine to rack up a tie, especially in this day and age!

smilo996

2,787 posts

170 months

Monday 4th March 2019
quotequote all
It is a very sharp looking car in the flesh. Well done JLR, they could use a boost😃
Shame it was also going up against the Alpine which is also worthy.

BigBen

11,639 posts

230 months

Monday 4th March 2019
quotequote all
essayer said:
*runs panting into thread*
...but but but it only moves the pollution OUT OF TOWNS.. something something hydrogen ..
Thank goodness I thought that no one was even going to bother.......something something 800 mile daily commute........

I really like the I-Pace, have seen a few and they are good looking cars, Sniffpetrol gave it a good write up.

jack_86

335 posts

92 months

Monday 4th March 2019
quotequote all
Must be rigged, poorly built, dodgy dealerships, expensive and poor sales yet car of the year!

andrewparker

8,014 posts

187 months

Monday 4th March 2019
quotequote all
Remember when Jaguar used to make good looking cars...

bozzy.

780 posts

78 months

Monday 4th March 2019
quotequote all
Roy m said:
Sorry but not the point - I won't be dictated to by a Nanny car maker - governments are bad enough but I'm stuck with them. I can choose not to spend money with a car maker.
But you’re happy for Mercedes to “dictate” the top speed of the CLS you currently own? biggrin