RE: Volkswagen ID. Buggy: Geneva 2019

RE: Volkswagen ID. Buggy: Geneva 2019

Monday 4th March 2019

Volkswagen ID. Buggy: Geneva 2019

All-electric beach car pays homage to the Beetle-based original - and could inspire a road-going model



So often are quirky versions of production cars shown at motor shows the idealistic dreams of designers, that it'd be easy to label Volkswagen's just-revealed ID Buggy as a case of pie in the sky. But, rather excitingly, this EV beach buggy concept is one that could actually go on sale according to its maker. How cool is that?

Ok, so Volkswagen has no plans to officially produce the model itself, but instead has categorically said that the underlying MEB platform - a skateboard chassis made up of the car's lithium-ion batteries and motor - would be available for purchase sans body, so an independent firm could build said buggy on top of it. This is the process that created the original Beetle-based buggy, which was first conceived as the Meyers Manx in 1964, after all.


Volkswagen's Geneva concept is therefore more of a pitch of what it believes possible - and appropriate - for such a vehicle. The MEB platform is modular, so the ID Buggy can come in rear or all-wheel drive, with the latter possible when a prop shaft is added. With this, the ID Buggy and its 204hp and 236lb ft of instantaneous torque can accelerate from zero to 62mph in 7.2 seconds. Not bad. Range is rated at 155 miles and it takes half an hour of plug time to get 80 per cent of that.

This being a buggy, Volkswagen's not bothered to equip the car with a roof or doors - although there is a roll-over hoop for noggin-protection - and has instead given the car a simple, tub-like body that takes inspiration from the ID hatch and also the Manx. And while the concept car is a two-seater, VW reckons it'd be easy to produce a four-seat version, emphasising just how flexible these underpinnings could be.

The concept is a car for the 2020s, so naturally the ID Buggy has digital infotainment inside - hopefully with some form of waterproofing - with phone connectivity and the usual media functions. VW's decision to include this is probably to emphasise that its MEB base can extend beyond the bits that underpin and power a car. Will that be enough to tempt an aftermarket firm into producing a buggy or something similar? Hopefully. The beach fronts of California must be crying out for something like this.









Author
Discussion

Big Robbo

Original Poster:

319 posts

146 months

Monday 4th March 2019
quotequote all
Just what everyone needs ... another niche model in a niche nobody needs or wants..bravo VW get back to cooking the books!

andrewparker

8,014 posts

187 months

Monday 4th March 2019
quotequote all
Big Robbo said:
Just what everyone needs ... another niche model in a niche nobody needs or wants..bravo VW get back to cooking the books!
You didn’t read the article did you...

RobDickinson

31,343 posts

254 months

Monday 4th March 2019
quotequote all
Ev platforms like the MEB are going to enable a much wider variety of vehicles and make them more accessible and cheaper.

Cars that wouldnt have been made before will get made.

B17NNS

18,506 posts

247 months

Monday 4th March 2019
quotequote all
A welcome return to coach building then. Great concept. I’ll take mine in purple metal flake hippy

Love to see a modern take on the Karmann Ghia.

Edited by B17NNS on Monday 4th March 21:25

Caddyshack

10,771 posts

206 months

Monday 4th March 2019
quotequote all
I think the 80% time to charge the battery also needs to be regulated to explain how long that last 20% takes. I suspect that this takes a long time if the cells need to balance and if they do then they need doing quite often for optimum battery health. Ideally the ecu should log the type of charges so you know how they have been looked after in 2nd hand market.

Will the second hand market be the same for elec or will it be like mobile phones and laptops?

anonymous-user

54 months

Monday 4th March 2019
quotequote all
Love the idea.

anonymous-user

54 months

Monday 4th March 2019
quotequote all
If VW build it I'll buy it.

Unfortunately VW have a habit of showing Buggy concepts which never come to fruition.... https://www.autocar.co.uk/car-news/concept-cars/vw...



anonymous-user

54 months

Monday 4th March 2019
quotequote all
rockin said:
If VW build it I'll buy it.

Unfortunately VW have a habit of showing Buggy concepts which never come to fruition.... https://www.autocar.co.uk/car-news/concept-cars/vw...
Don’t forget the microbus!

B17NNS

18,506 posts

247 months

Monday 4th March 2019
quotequote all
garyhun said:
Don’t forget the microbus!
I thought they were going to build that. Fully Charged drove one IIRC.

ducnick

1,781 posts

243 months

Tuesday 5th March 2019
quotequote all
How much does it weigh? The original works because it’s light and the mass is over the driven wheels.

PeterGadsby

1,307 posts

163 months

Tuesday 5th March 2019
quotequote all
Could the "skateboard structure" bring back the old coach-works companies that make bespoke bodies?

I think that would be fabulous, imagine what kinds of different bodies could be created for this. Would be amazing.

- Pete

sr.guiri

478 posts

89 months

Tuesday 5th March 2019
quotequote all
B17NNS said:
Love to see a modern take on the Karmann Ghia
Me too.

But still with an aircooled flat 4 smile



smilo996

2,783 posts

170 months

Tuesday 5th March 2019
quotequote all
Change the shape of the lights, it is not a Beetle and just make it as is.
Nice work VW.

B17NNS

18,506 posts

247 months

Tuesday 5th March 2019
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
Yes, four individually controlled motors is the best option for proper off roading.

300bhp/ton

41,030 posts

190 months

Tuesday 5th March 2019
quotequote all
B17NNS said:
anonymous said:
[redacted]
Yes, four individually controlled motors is the best option for proper off roading.
Depends on how it is configured, packaged, priced and intended purpose.

crofty1984

15,856 posts

204 months

Tuesday 5th March 2019
quotequote all
I like it!

ChawenHalo

68 posts

129 months

Thursday 7th March 2019
quotequote all
Sorry but VAG always make fantastic almost production concept (remember that Ur Quattro or that little VW roadster) and never ever makes any of them. Pointless clickbaiting from that stbox production company.

300bhp/ton

41,030 posts

190 months

Thursday 7th March 2019
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
Not sure I follow.

A single motor may weigh less, be more efficient and occupy far less space than 4 individual motors. Making for better packaging, less weight and a smaller vehicle with better range. However it depends on a lot of factors.

anonymous-user

54 months

Thursday 7th March 2019
quotequote all
300bhp/ton said:
A single motor may weigh less.....
.... but unless you're happy with only one driven wheel you'll need (i) a big heavy motor, and (ii) some more heavy bits to connect wheels together.

Single motor makes sense where it's used to supplement ICE in a hybrid installation where the car already has a heavy driveline. Latest Porsche 911 PDK transmission is said to have been built allowing space for an electric motor.
Others, such as mid-engine Corvette C8, may add a couple of front motors to a RWD car.

300bhp/ton

41,030 posts

190 months

Thursday 7th March 2019
quotequote all
rockin said:
.... but unless you're happy with only one driven wheel you'll need (i) a big heavy motor, and (ii) some more heavy bits to connect wheels together.

Single motor makes sense where it's used to supplement ICE in a hybrid installation where the car already has a heavy driveline. Latest Porsche 911 PDK transmission is said to have been built allowing space for an electric motor.
Others, such as mid-engine Corvette C8, may add a couple of front motors to a RWD car.
But as said, it all depends on the packaging and goals. One larger motor might easily fit in the car and routing prop or driveshafts may not be all that difficult.

Having 4 motors means either mounting them in a hub, which would mean very small motors, which would be more vulnerable in an off road machine and increase unsprung weight. Or you need to remote mount them and connect to the wheels via driveshafts. But you'd need room in the vehicle to do this, which this buggy probably doesn't have.

4 motors will also need more sophisticated synchronization to make it driveable. Not a major issue with today's computer control, but is again another layer of complexity. It also has less redundancy, because if one motor fails (more likely on an off road vehicle), then it may make the vehicle largely undrivable.