RE: Lotus Esprit GT3 | Spotted

RE: Lotus Esprit GT3 | Spotted

Sunday 23rd June 2019

Lotus Esprit GT3 | Spotted

An orange Porsche 911 with 'GT3' up the side is over £100k; an orange Esprit with 'GT3' up the side is £30k...



Five years is a long time in the recent history of Lotus; five years ago was when we last featured an Esprit GT3. It was just before the Jean-Marc Gales era, before the vast expansion of available models and special editions. Now there's a new CEO at the helm in the wake of the Geely takeover, bigger projects imminent and, in theory at least, a brighter future on the horizon. 2014 seems quite a while ago.

Time has done no harm, however, to the appeal of the Esprit GT3. All of the Esprits will seem like classics now, what with the very last cars being made 15 years ago, and yet there remains something timelessly appealing about the stripped out four-cylinder special. Debate will rage forever more about its pros and cons of versus the V8s, but we can surely all agree on the most desirable Lotuses being the ones where yet more weight was removed - which is exactly what the GT3 did.


Indeed at 1,240kg, the GT3 was a staggering 150kg lighter than an S4S, meaning its fairly ordinary 240hp was enough for potent performance - 0-100mph was timed at 12.5 seconds in the Autocar road test. The handling was, as expected, stellar.

All of which was known before. Perhaps the discussion to have now on Lotuses like the GT3 is one of drivability and usability in a modern context. This Esprit is now more than 20 years old, and is approaching a point - given the scarcity of GT3s - where they might start being holed up to preserve condition and value. Opportunities to own them will only become more rarified (and more expensive to access) as the years pass by. Expect an intensification of both if a new Esprit ever emerges, and the chronic cheapness of the originals to be addressed.


This GT3, a beautifully preserved example, is £30k. In fact, beautifully preserved sells it short, the level of care and affection seemingly lavished on this Esprit over the past 16 years quite extraordinary. And although £30k is more than the GT3 we featured five years ago, try and find a performance car of any significance, especially those that were perhaps undervalued, that hasn't appreciated a little since 2014. Given that £30k can be paid for a 996-era 911 C4S with not many miles less on it, the GT3 looks even more tempting. Heck, you can pay £35k for an M3 Imola Individual.

While the Esprit won't provide quite the delicate thrills of an Elise, or the bombastic performance of the current V6 cars, there's a reason why the recipe continued for so long. By combining stunning good looks with great performance and the kind of dynamic prowess few could match, the Esprit always held a special place in the hearts of enthusiasts; with examples like this GT3 still available for reasonable money, hopefully that can continue for a little longer. We live in a world of £60k Sport 350s, don't forget, so they won't stay this way for ever...


SPECIFICATION - LOTUS ESPRIT GT3
Engine:
1,973cc 4-cyl turbo
Transmission: 5-speed manual, rear-wheel drive
Power (hp): 243@6,250rpm
Torque (lb ft): 216@3,750rpm
MPG: 22.5 (official claimed combined)
CO2: N/A
First registered: 1998
Recorded mileage: 52,000
Price new: £39,450
Yours for: £32,000

See the original advert here

Inspired? Search for a Lotus Esprit here

Author
Discussion

sidesauce

Original Poster:

2,472 posts

218 months

Sunday 23rd June 2019
quotequote all
"But it's a 2 litre, 4-cylinder turbo so I'm out..."

Say the critics of the 718 Porsche and AMG45 etc.

As well as this car has aged aesthetically, I seem to recall that reliability, build quality and ergonomics weren't its strongest suits?

SidewaysSi

10,742 posts

234 months

Sunday 23rd June 2019
quotequote all
Absolute bargain. A stunning driver's car.

j3gme

885 posts

194 months

Sunday 23rd June 2019
quotequote all
Will we ever see the re-birth of the Esprit ?..... I do hope so.

DevonPaul

1,177 posts

137 months

Sunday 23rd June 2019
quotequote all
sidesauce said:
As well as this car has aged aesthetically, I seem to recall that reliability, build quality and ergonomics weren't its strongest suits?
What??? This is a 1990s car - build quality of these cars was as good as it had always been from Lotus.

Paul

anonymous-user

54 months

Sunday 23rd June 2019
quotequote all
What the article doesn't mention is "why" the traditional 2.2 litre engine, used since in 1980, was reduced to 2.0 litres for this mid-1990s GT3.

Around that time the Italian car market had an aggressive tax increase for any car over 2 litres. Lotus developed the 2-litre 920 version of its usual engine to take advantage of that tax break. Fewer than 200 of these engines were built but still Lotus needed to find somewhere to put them! Subsequently the engine was used for a final outing of Lotus' 4-cylinder cars running alongside the V8, introduced in 1996 and selling around 1,500 cars.

I owned an Esprit for almost 10 years - wonderful car.

Augustus Windsock

3,360 posts

155 months

Sunday 23rd June 2019
quotequote all
A guy who used to own a (now closed) performance car specialist near me was a serial owner of Esprits
He had pretty much every model from memory with the exception of the V8
I remember being stunned by the S4S when he let me have a drive and upon returning to the garage he threw me the keys to his gt3.
Not expecting it to be as ‘good’ due to being a 2litre, the difference was amazing
The only disappointment I had, then and now, was the relatively poor quality of the interior and finish (from memory it was almost new but the black mastic around the windscreen looked like it had been applied by Mr S Wonder.
Oh, and I made the huge mistake of trying to drive them in my Police-issue riot boots (having finished work and called in on my way home) which appeared many sizes too big to effectively work the pedals.
Having sat in one recently I was immediately reminded how small these are compared to current stuff and how dainty it felt.
Windscreen sealant was still crap mind but I could forgive the ‘designed by kids visiting ikea’ interior.
In fact the only thing I could really find fault with was the seats, and if I were to own one I’d examine the possibility of fitting Probax seats or similar.
And I definitely would. Own one that is.

Edited by Augustus Windsock on Sunday 23 June 10:37

anonymous-user

54 months

Sunday 23rd June 2019
quotequote all
Augustus Windsock said:
Oh, and I made the huge mistake of trying to drive them in my Police-issue riot boots (having finished work and called in on my way home) which appeared many sizes too big to effectively work the pedals.
Having sat in one recently I was immediately reminded how small these are compared to current stuff and how dainty it felt.
Yup, as with many mid-engine cars the front wheels intrude into the footwell, squeezing the pedals together. I used to drive "shoes off", which perfectly matched the characteristics of a finely balanced car with great feedback.

snuffy

9,710 posts

284 months

Sunday 23rd June 2019
quotequote all
I owned a GT3 for 6 years (also an orange one), from 4,700 miles to 69,000 miles. It was my only car and for about 3 years I did a 30 mile round trip to work in it and then an 80 mile round trip for about 6 months.

I only had two major failures; once the throttle got stuck on the motorway but I managed to bring it to a stop on the hard shoulder okay. And the other one was that the turbo blew itself up.

I really like Espirts (having owned 4, S3->Turbo->GT3->Sport 350).

sidesauce

Original Poster:

2,472 posts

218 months

Sunday 23rd June 2019
quotequote all
snuffy said:
I only had two major failures; once the throttle got stuck on the motorway but I managed to bring it to a stop on the hard shoulder okay. And the other one was that the turbo blew itself up.
Yikes. Particuarly the first one - that's what I call a potential death trap!

sidesauce

Original Poster:

2,472 posts

218 months

Sunday 23rd June 2019
quotequote all
DevonPaul said:
What??? This is a 1990s car - build quality of these cars was as good as it had always been from Lotus.

Paul
Which is to say...
Augustus Windsock said:
The only disappointment I had, then and now, was the relatively poor quality of the interior and finish (from memory it was almost new but the black mastic around the windscreen looked like it had been applied by Mr S Wonder.
...being exactly the kind of thing I remember reading about...

Augustus Windsock said:
Windscreen sealant was still crap mind but I could forgive the ‘designed by kids visiting ikea’ interior.
... and maybe I've become too used to a certain (modern) standard of fit and finish but to me this would be unacceptable from an ownership point of view.

rs mexico

473 posts

216 months

Sunday 23rd June 2019
quotequote all
rockin said:
What the article doesn't mention is "why" the traditional 2.2 litre engine, used since in 1980, was reduced to 2.0 litres for this mid-1990s GT3.

Around that time the Italian car market had an aggressive tax increase for any car over 2 litres. Lotus developed the 2-litre 920 version of its usual engine to take advantage of that tax break. Fewer than 200 of these engines were built but still Lotus needed to find somewhere to put them! Subsequently the engine was used for a final outing of Lotus' 4-cylinder cars running alongside the V8, introduced in 1996 and selling around 1,500 cars.

I owned an Esprit for almost 10 years - wonderful car.
That brings back memories when I was at TVR we sent maybe a dozen V8 s to Italy that where converted to 2 litre then super charged.Not the most reliable unit.Dave Bateman had to drive the works astra van to Italy to do some running repairs on them .It was a mad place to work at but I loved every minute of the 23 years I worked there.

andy_s

19,400 posts

259 months

Sunday 23rd June 2019
quotequote all
sidesauce said:
.. and maybe I've become too used to a certain (modern) standard of fit and finish but to me this would be unacceptable from an ownership point of view.
Yes, maybe decades old cars aren't for you if you want modern fit and finish.

SpudLink

5,748 posts

192 months

Sunday 23rd June 2019
quotequote all
sidesauce said:
snuffy said:
I only had two major failures; once the throttle got stuck on the motorway but I managed to bring it to a stop on the hard shoulder okay. And the other one was that the turbo blew itself up.
Yikes. Particuarly the first one - that's what I call a potential death trap!
It would certainly grab your attention.
But it’s a problem that can afflict other cars, not just Lotus. I had the throttle stick open in a 4 year old Mk1 Ford KA.

sidesauce

Original Poster:

2,472 posts

218 months

Sunday 23rd June 2019
quotequote all
andy_s said:
sidesauce said:
.. and maybe I've become too used to a certain (modern) standard of fit and finish but to me this would be unacceptable from an ownership point of view.
Yes, maybe decades old cars aren't for you if you want modern fit and finish.
From that era of car I'd happily drive a 993.

Olivera

7,122 posts

239 months

Sunday 23rd June 2019
quotequote all
Would like to give one a go to see if the feedback and chassis is as good as they say, even if for ultimate pace it might struggle to keep up with a plethora of current hot hatches.

AshD

216 posts

249 months

Sunday 23rd June 2019
quotequote all
I had a yellow v8 for about 4 years (bought it 18months old from a dealer) and cost a small fortune to keep on the road. BUT I miss it so much more than the 997 C2S that i had afterwards.

I still look at used ones now, but mortgage and kids get in the way. In fact i’ve seen an ad for my old one up for sale recently at £50k... which i think is a bit hopeful.

Specialist I knew had a Sport 300 (4cyl too) and reckoned that it was the best Esprit followed by the GT3.

blade7

11,311 posts

216 months

Sunday 23rd June 2019
quotequote all
There's a couple of V8's in the PH classifieds for not much more.

marcom44

45 posts

104 months

Sunday 23rd June 2019
quotequote all
James May took one on the TG rod trip to S America it performed amazingly well, I could not believe how durable it was.

ianwayne

6,283 posts

268 months

Sunday 23rd June 2019
quotequote all
The one May had was a V8 version.

No mention of the headroom. It's chronic. I'm 6 ft 2 and driving a friend's 1990 SE a few years ago, left me a bit gutted that I just couldn't comfortably drive one. And yes, the pedals are too close together. Can be removed, heated up and bent a little bit though!

crankedup

25,764 posts

243 months

Sunday 23rd June 2019
quotequote all
sidesauce said:
ikes. Particuarly the first one - that's what I call a potential death trap!
I had exactly the same issue many years ago whilst driving my then brand new Ford Sapphire.
Potential death trap?