RE: Volkswagen T-Roc R goes on sale in UK

RE: Volkswagen T-Roc R goes on sale in UK

Friday 13th September 2019

Volkswagen T-Roc R goes on sale in UK

Volkswagen hasn't sold two R-badged models side-by-side since the Scirocco R. Expect this one to be wildly popular



Having flown under the PH radar for the past few months, the T-Roc R has suddenly returned to our screens in the form of a production model that, from today, can now be ordered in the UK. The starting price? £38,450 to you - a sum that (predictably) makes it more expensive than the outgoing Golf R, a car it has a great deal in common with.

Volkswagen makes no mention of the hatchback in its press release, preferring instead to get itself into all sorts of trouble by drawing a non-existent line between the quickest T-Roc and the Touareg R50 of 2008 vintage. That was the last go-faster SUV the firm made, of course - but in reality its new compact crossover has precisely nothing to do with the decidedly left-field, V10-toting monster truck that VW failed to shift a decade ago.

The T-Roc R is as middle-of-the-road as New Labour, and very much intended to give the people exactly what they want. It is also exceedingly familiar - not just for its connection to the soon-to-depart Golf, but also the Cupra Ateca, with which it shares practically everything of note. That means you get 300hp and 295lb ft of torque from the ubiquitous 2.0-litre EA888 unit, a seven-speed DSG 'box, 4Motion all-wheel drive and a 0-62mph time of 4.9 seconds.

UK customers get a 19-inch Pretoria alloys as standard; which is a nice touch, until you learn that the (virtually non-negotiable) adaptive dampers are on the option list and priced at £695 - pushing the car beyond £39k before you've even got to the colour choice. The Ateca, meanwhile, starts at £36,695. Or £32,990 if you're prepared to accept 500 miles on the clock.


Search for a Volkswagen Golf R here

Author
Discussion

fernando the frog

Original Poster:

298 posts

68 months

Friday 13th September 2019
quotequote all
love the T-Roc and this is even more attractive in my eyes, the one detail that bugs me is the door handle on the rear arch though...feel like they could have gone for a hidden handle like a Civic etc

Escort Si-130

3,272 posts

180 months

Friday 13th September 2019
quotequote all
I would rather the Golf R, even though they are on every street corner with remapped prapping exhaust sounds.
Only thing I like about the T-roc is the name.

MDMA .

8,884 posts

101 months

Friday 13th September 2019
quotequote all
fernando the frog said:
love the T-Roc and this is even more attractive in my eyes, the one detail that bugs me is the door handle on the rear arch though...feel like they could have gone for a hidden handle like a Civic etc
What's up with it?


flight147z

970 posts

129 months

Friday 13th September 2019
quotequote all
MDMA . said:
fernando the frog said:
love the T-Roc and this is even more attractive in my eyes, the one detail that bugs me is the door handle on the rear arch though...feel like they could have gone for a hidden handle like a Civic etc
What's up with it?

Yes of all the things to pick out that don't look quite right that isn't the first thing I would spot!

SidewaysSi

10,742 posts

234 months

Friday 13th September 2019
quotequote all
Daft name for a daft car.

Baldchap

7,578 posts

92 months

Saturday 14th September 2019
quotequote all
They'll sell squillioans, however I just don't get the attraction of a car made a bit worse than the one it's based on.

Same with all these sorts of things. We all know estates are cool and the Golf R Estate has a huge boot, drives fantastically and goes like a stabbed rat (I had one and it was an excellent dogbus). This has a smaller boot, no doubt handles worse due to the COG being eight feet in the air and is slower. Estates look cool too. cool

simonbamg

767 posts

123 months

Saturday 14th September 2019
quotequote all
Baldchap said:
They'll sell squillioans, however I just don't get the attraction of a car made a bit worse than the one it's based on.

Same with all these sorts of things. We all know estates are cool and the Golf R Estate has a huge boot, drives fantastically and goes like a stabbed rat (I had one and it was an excellent dogbus). This has a smaller boot, no doubt handles worse due to the COG being eight feet in the air and is slower. Estates look cool too. cool
It’s better than a golf estate in every way

eftiem64

117 posts

79 months

Saturday 14th September 2019
quotequote all
Pointless but no doubt popular.
rolleyes

J4CKO

41,459 posts

200 months

Saturday 14th September 2019
quotequote all
eftiem64 said:
Pointless but no doubt popular.
rolleyes
Not sure why its pointless ?

Its a car, for moving people and stuff, and this is like a slightly bigger Golf so it can move a bit more stuff.

It looks quite funky, should go well and should be fairly good to own.

Now I am not keen on SUV's and Crossovers but can see how they cover a lot of bases for a lot of people, its what the saloon and hatch have evolved into.

anonymous-user

54 months

Saturday 14th September 2019
quotequote all
simonbamg said:
It’s better than a golf estate in every way
Well, except for the quantifiable facts that it has a small boot, is more expensive, is fractionally slower and has a lower quality interior.

Don’t get me wrong, I like it, I think it looks great but that statement doesn’t really hold up. I’ll be surprised if it’s as good to drive too, given the compromises of the crossover layout - higher CoG etc.

J4CKO

41,459 posts

200 months

Saturday 14th September 2019
quotequote all
charltjr said:
simonbamg said:
It’s better than a golf estate in every way
Well, except for the quantifiable facts that it has a small boot, is more expensive, is fractionally slower and has a lower quality interior.

Don’t get me wrong, I like it, I think it looks great but that statement doesn’t really hold up. I’ll be surprised if it’s as good to drive too, given the compromises of the crossover layout - higher CoG etc.
Thing is, for most people, the last bit of handling capability isnt an issue, if it were we would be driving round in race cars with our backsides 2cm of the road, and the trade off of a higher driving position means you can see more, people like driving from a higher vantage point.

It will corner way, way faster than most owners will ever dare, even car enthusiasts rarely get near the limits on the road.

MDMA .

8,884 posts

101 months

Saturday 14th September 2019
quotequote all
J4CKO said:
charltjr said:
simonbamg said:
It’s better than a golf estate in every way
Well, except for the quantifiable facts that it has a small boot, is more expensive, is fractionally slower and has a lower quality interior.

Don’t get me wrong, I like it, I think it looks great but that statement doesn’t really hold up. I’ll be surprised if it’s as good to drive too, given the compromises of the crossover layout - higher CoG etc.
Thing is, for most people, the last bit of handling capability isnt an issue, if it were we would be driving round in race cars with our backsides 2cm of the road, and the trade off of a higher driving position means you can see more, people like driving from a higher vantage point.

It will corner way, way faster than most owners will ever dare, even car enthusiasts rarely get near the limits on the road.
Agree. With a few little changes it'll be a B road hooligan. I like it.

anonymous-user

54 months

Saturday 14th September 2019
quotequote all
Absolutely, I think it will be a great choice for a lot of people, just saying it’s “better in every way” doesn’t really stack up objectively.

I’m sure for people who don’t want the space and like higher driving positions it’s a more attractive prospect. “Better in every way for what I personally want” - sure, no problem.

SmoothCriminal

5,052 posts

199 months

Saturday 14th September 2019
quotequote all
Horrid interior on these cheap plastic rubbish

Patch1875

4,894 posts

132 months

Saturday 14th September 2019
quotequote all
I like it but it’s far too expensive.

R Estate may be a better option but it just doesn’t look right.

blank

3,452 posts

188 months

Saturday 14th September 2019
quotequote all
Looking forward to some cheap lease deals on these. Perfect car for the wife as she likes a high up driving position.


Sporky

6,193 posts

64 months

Saturday 14th September 2019
quotequote all
I quite like this - smaller than a Golf Alltrack, more ground clearance than a Golf R.

For some reason though those wheels look absolutely tiny - whereas the normal T-Roc looks fine. I assume that's the black alloys.

simonbamg

767 posts

123 months

Saturday 14th September 2019
quotequote all
charltjr said:
Well, except for the quantifiable facts that it has a small boot, is more expensive, is fractionally slower and has a lower quality interior.

Don’t get me wrong, I like it, I think it looks great but that statement doesn’t really hold up. I’ll be surprised if it’s as good to drive too, given the compromises of the crossover layout - higher CoG etc.
I’ll put you blind folded in two cars with a small difference in COG, and you do a down the shops and back route, if you can tell which is which I’ll give you 10 grand

Dave Hedgehog

14,545 posts

204 months

Saturday 14th September 2019
quotequote all
My merc dealer was jam packed this morning, they told me they are moving to a 4 times bigger site next month with 22 ramps as they can cope

Baldchap

7,578 posts

92 months

Saturday 14th September 2019
quotequote all
simonbamg said:
Baldchap said:
They'll sell squillioans, however I just don't get the attraction of a car made a bit worse than the one it's based on.

Same with all these sorts of things. We all know estates are cool and the Golf R Estate has a huge boot, drives fantastically and goes like a stabbed rat (I had one and it was an excellent dogbus). This has a smaller boot, no doubt handles worse due to the COG being eight feet in the air and is slower. Estates look cool too. cool
It’s better than a golf estate in every way
Except for all the measurable ways. smile