RE: Volkswagen Golf GTI (Mk6) | PH Used Review

RE: Volkswagen Golf GTI (Mk6) | PH Used Review

Sunday 13th October 2019

2009-2012 Volkswagen Golf GTI (Mk6) | Used Review

A continuation of strong form or flat-line follow-up to the brilliant Mk5? How about the best value GTI money can buy...



Volkswagen’s Golf GTI has been a defining addition to the hot hatch genre since the ground-breaking Mk1 arrived in 1976, although the lineage has not been without its hiccups. When the Mk3 GTI debuted in 1992 it was a stark contrast to what came before. Its 2.0-litre 8v motor felt overworked when encased within the larger, heavier hatch’s shell and the handling was similarly affected. Things didn’t get much better with the Mk4; even a somewhat exciting 180hp 20v turbo run-out unable to fix the reputational damage. The Golf GTI was good, but it failed to recapture the buzziness that made the first two generations so famous.

Praise the Mk5 Golf GTI for putting things right. With former VW chairman Bernd Pischetsrieder slating the Mk4 as “a good example of marketing getting it wrong”, the car to follow it needed to represent a revolution for the model. It grew larger, yes, and heavier again as a result, but the turbocharged 2.0-litre it came with was quick out of the box and the chassis was back to offering what we all loved so much about the original. It mixed comfort, poise and security with a dose of agility and playfulness. The RS Megane and EP3 Civic Type R provided the hair on fire thrills, but the Golf willingly took one small step down from that to add a large portion of maturity.

For the Mk6 Golf GTI to continue the upward trend was always going to be a tough ask, what with it making do with the same PQ35 underpinnings as its predecessor – a return to the evolutionary philosophy of decades past.. When it was launched in 2009 it was about the same size and weight as the Mk5, but now had 210hp from the EA888 2.0-litre up front and VW’s then brand spanking new XDS electronic differential tech to dispatch it. The exterior looked smart, too, with VW design boss Klaus Bischoff opting for continued subtlety over any sort of response to Honda’s spaceship-like FN2 Civic. The Golf GTI’s form was well and truly re-established.


Nowadays

Some might argue that the Mk5 does pretty much as good a job for less, or that the earlier car, with its more dramatic and shapely details, is the better looker. There’s no questioning the improvements made beneath the Mk6’s body, however, with that aforementioned power output and XDS technology making for the most compelling performance offering to hail from the ranks of GTI. Sit inside a Mk6 GTI and you’re faced with a refreshing mix of analogue and digital; there’s a small infotainment screen with satnav on top of conventional dials and buttons. It’s all brilliantly functional.

Maybe a bit too much, actually. With only the tartan cloth on the seats to signal its ranking (the Mk6 manual doesn’t even get a golf ball gear knob!), this GTI feels fairly bland from inside. It’s a trend that continues on the move, the EA888 motor up front quiet and pulling with the clutch-lifted torque of a diesel. It’s all deliberate, of course, as it gives the GTI the remarkably easy-to-drive characteristics it’s now famous for. In town you can drive like a cabbie and shortcut your way to higher gears, leaving the four-pot trundling along. It’ll happily oblige, with combined fuel economy in the mid to high thirties in easy reach as a result – efficiency being among the motor’s biggest improvements from Mk5 to Mk6. In fact, the whole car feels like a more polished Mk5; the steering is light and direct and the seats themselves are supportive so the quality of the product is immediately clear. It’s hard to not instantly like the Mk6 GTI.


Our test car – VW’s 7,800-mile heritage GTI – has passive dampers rather than the optional adaptive setup, so its ride does remain busy and sometimes jiggly over high frequency surface variations. But it glides over speed bumps and drain covers, so definitely classifies as comfortable; compared to more focussed hot hatch equivalents, such as the RS Megane and especially the FN2 Civic, it’s downright plush. And with no drive modes (remember those days?) it feels honest from the get-go, although there’s plenty of energy held higher up the rev range to emphasise what a broadly talented package this is.

Let that 2.0-litre spin up and it gains a second wind that lasts right until the 6,000rpm redline, shifting the 1.3-tonne Golf with real gusto. You can really feel that this is an EA888 at the tail end of years of development. The gearbox is good, too, with a direct, rubberised action through the gate to make this Golf feel every bit as capable today as it did when new. It’s only four tenths and 10hp down on the Mk7, after all. The Mk6 retains all of its predecessor’s best handling traits, too, with a quick to react front end, actual steering feel when that front end is loaded up, and even some mid-corner adjustability, should you trail the brakes on entry. It’s all tidied up by decent traction, although the XDS system isn’t as fool proof as today’s VAQ, with the earlier GTI occasionally letting its inside wheel over rotate by miniscule amounts.

It’s during those close-to-the-limit moments that the Mk6 GTI’s lower peaks are visible. While body control is very good, the Golf is never as dialled in as Renault’s hot Megane, nor is it as hunkered down as Honda’s hard-riding Civic. And although in isolation the electronic steering feels good, the Megane’s rack is in another world for feedback. The Golf also never fully relaxes its electronic stability control, so the fun is somewhat hindered by VW’s pre-set parameters. But these are all traits familiar to the best GTIs of late, and come somewhat inevitably as a result of the Golf’s more rounded personality. A B-road blast will leave you smiling rather than giddy on adrenaline, but there’s no question which car from this segment would be preferable on the drive home. Once you’re settled in it doesn’t even feel dated, helped in part by an infotainment system with satnav, a USB port and Bluetooth.


Should you?

Those final components are key in justifying the Mk6 GTI’s premium over a Mk5. This is a car that in 2019 feels perfectly adequate for daily use, both in terms of capability and functionality. And with performance not far off the Mk7 GTI, you’re barely taking a hit in terms of outright enjoyment, too – with the obvious exclusion of (much, much pricier) special editions, such as the Mk7’s Clubsport and TCR. Ten grand will buy you a well-kept Mk6 with around 50,000 miles on the clock, which is around a couple of grand more than the equivalent Mk5 and seems like a good deal. That is until you consider the price of equivalent Meganes, which can be had for Mk5 GTI money.

The Golf GTI is pricier for a reason, though. It’s the more mature, better rounded offering, the importance of which should not be underestimated in a model that’s likely to be used as an owner’s main car. The Mk6 is barely more than a successful update to the impressive Mk5. But that’s exactly what makes it so brilliant as a used offering today.


SPECIFICATION | 2009-2012 VOLKSWAGEN GOLF GTI (MK6)

Engine: 1,984cc, inline-4
Transmission: 6-speed manual, front-wheel drive
Power (hp): 210@5,300rpm
Torque (lb ft): 207@1,700rpm
0-62mph: 6.9 secs
Top speed: 146mph
Weight: 1,318kg
MPG: 38.6
CO2: 170g/km
Price new: £22,995
Price now: c £10,000

Search for a Mk6 Golf GTI here









Author
Discussion

lee_erm

Original Poster:

1,091 posts

193 months

Sunday 13th October 2019
quotequote all
I wouldn't have one of these due to the issues with these early EA888 engines. High oil consumption, sludging, chain tensioner issues due to low quality plastic parts.

https://metropolitan.fi/entry/magazine-uncovers-re...




Triple Six

1,075 posts

122 months

Sunday 13th October 2019
quotequote all
lee_erm said:
I wouldn't have one of these due to the issues with these early EA888 engines. High oil consumption, sludging, chain tensioner issues due to low quality plastic parts.

https://metropolitan.fi/entry/magazine-uncovers-re...
I would - I’ve had 2 Mk6 Golf R’s and covered 4+ years/30k miles and neither ever missed a beat.

10k of those miles were covered running 370bhp and still no issues.

Martyn76

630 posts

117 months

Sunday 13th October 2019
quotequote all
Triple Six said:
I would - I’ve had 2 Mk6 Golf R’s and covered 4+ years/30k miles and neither ever missed a beat.

10k of those miles were covered running 370bhp and still no issues.
I'm intrigued by the Mk6 R, didn't get the kudos that the current R does but reviews were positive from what I can remember?

Nicely understated and also one remap away from the current version.

John-skoe0

58 posts

69 months

Sunday 13th October 2019
quotequote all
Only yesterday I sold my MkVI R after 4 years ownership. It was a perfect stablemate to the GTi and hard to find fault. I think the MkVI range was a great improvement to the Golf GTi story and remains the best looking to date IMO

Dr G

15,172 posts

242 months

Sunday 13th October 2019
quotequote all
Triple Six said:
I would - I’ve had 2 Mk6 Golf R’s and covered 4+ years/30k miles and neither ever missed a beat.

10k of those miles were covered running 370bhp and still no issues.
EA113 in those; high power 888 not here until 2013 in the S3.

Later (2010?) Mk6 Golf fairly well sorted and earlier ones not too bad to fix pre-emptively.

Carl_Manchester

12,195 posts

262 months

Sunday 13th October 2019
quotequote all

I know this is a GTI article but I have at least two blue, MK6 Golf R's knocking around my manor, one is totally stock and is polished to within an inch of its life and a lad at my local gym runs another blue R with an APR full stage 2 conversion with bodykit, wheels, brakes and engine upgrades. It is a purposeful looking car to say the least.

Whilst I think the MK7 GTI will rightly take its place in hot-hatch history once the run finishes, I think the MK6 GTI is a bit of a damp flannel when parked next to a MK7 and I need to ask, what are the benefits of sticking with a MK6 GTI over a MK6 R ?

MDMA .

8,895 posts

101 months

Sunday 13th October 2019
quotequote all
Dr G said:
Triple Six said:
I would - I’ve had 2 Mk6 Golf R’s and covered 4+ years/30k miles and neither ever missed a beat.

10k of those miles were covered running 370bhp and still no issues.
EA113 in those; high power 888 not here until 2013 in the S3.

Later (2010?) Mk6 Golf fairly well sorted and earlier ones not too bad to fix pre-emptively.
The ED35 also used the EA113 instead of the EA888.

Lukas239

454 posts

96 months

Sunday 13th October 2019
quotequote all
Dr G said:
EA113 in those; high power 888 not here until 2013 in the S3.

Later (2010?) Mk6 Golf fairly well sorted and earlier ones not too bad to fix pre-emptively.
When did they sort the tensioner issues on the EA888? How much is a pre-emptive replacement on the older ones?

Pistonheader101

2,206 posts

107 months

Sunday 13th October 2019
quotequote all
MK6 gti’s are cracking little motors


https://youtu.be/AvGEQ34Fw1w

Pistonheader101

2,206 posts

107 months

Sunday 13th October 2019
quotequote all
Lukas239 said:
Dr G said:
EA113 in those; high power 888 not here until 2013 in the S3.

Later (2010?) Mk6 Golf fairly well sorted and earlier ones not too bad to fix pre-emptively.
When did they sort the tensioner issues on the EA888? How much is a pre-emptive replacement on the older ones?
Tensioner isn’t much of an issue - tbf sorting it costs less than doing a cam belt change on a tdi.

NGK210

2,923 posts

145 months

Sunday 13th October 2019
quotequote all
The tensioner / cam chain issue can rear its rattling head at any time, even when a car has done 77k and is 8 years old with a fVWsh.
If it does let go, you’ll need a new engine, which will cost £4.5k+.
And don’t expect any sympathy or goodwill from VW. (The same issue also affects all VAG cars with the 210bhp TSI engine.)
It’s worth having a look a honestjohn.co.uk, whose owners’-based verdict rates the Golf Mk6 as follows:
“ More complaints about Golf VI than about any other car.”

Edited by NGK210 on Sunday 13th October 19:34

Fun Bus

17,911 posts

218 months

Sunday 13th October 2019
quotequote all
NGK210 said:
“ More complaints about Golf VI than about any other car.”
Not GTi specific though. That’s the Mk6 and all it’s variants.

NGK210

2,923 posts

145 months

Sunday 13th October 2019
quotequote all
Fun Bus said:
NGK210 said:
“ More complaints about Golf VI than about any other car.”
Not GTi specific though. That’s the Mk6 and all it’s variants.
Indeed, but there’re *many* shared components across all Mk6s that are flakey, which is a consequence of cost cutting.

GTEYE

2,096 posts

210 months

Monday 14th October 2019
quotequote all
NGK210 said:
Fun Bus said:
NGK210 said:
“ More complaints about Golf VI than about any other car.”
Not GTi specific though. That’s the Mk6 and all it’s variants.
Indeed, but there’re *many* shared components across all Mk6s that are flakey, which is a consequence of cost cutting.
Which makes sense was the Mk6 was introduced to address the fact that the Mk5 was costly to manufacture.

SidewaysSi

10,742 posts

234 months

Monday 14th October 2019
quotequote all
I thought of getting a Golf GTI recently. But no way was I putting up with crap reliability and expense. So I forgot that daft idea very quickly.

thecremeegg

1,964 posts

203 months

Monday 14th October 2019
quotequote all
SidewaysSi said:
I thought of getting a Golf GTI recently. But no way was I putting up with crap reliability and expense. So I forgot that daft idea very quickly.
What do you mean?
Missus has a Mk5 GTI which she got on 65k or so miles, it's now well over 100k and only the aircon compressor has failed (touch wood!).
It's been a beast of a car, plus quick with a remap.

GTiWILL

780 posts

78 months

Monday 14th October 2019
quotequote all
thecremeegg said:
What do you mean?
Missus has a Mk5 GTI which she got on 65k or so miles, it's now well over 100k and only the aircon compressor has failed (touch wood!).
It's been a beast of a car, plus quick with a remap.
Mine’s done 152,000. It doesn’t feel any worse for it than a car with 52,000. It has admittedly required spend, but this has been things like cam belt, engine mount, lower arm bushes etc.



Drekly

754 posts

58 months

Monday 14th October 2019
quotequote all
MDMA . said:
The ED35 also used the EA113 instead of the EA888.
I did look at Mk6 GTis a while back until I read up about the cam chain problems and other issues. The Edition 35 with the EA113 (like the R) is definitely the one to go for, more reliable, more tunable. But they were still strong money several months back, in the mid to high teens for a good one. So not all that much cheaper than a Mk7.

MDMA .

8,895 posts

101 months

Monday 14th October 2019
quotequote all
Drekly said:
MDMA . said:
The ED35 also used the EA113 instead of the EA888.
I did look at Mk6 GTis a while back until I read up about the cam chain problems and other issues. The Edition 35 with the EA113 (like the R) is definitely the one to go for, more reliable, more tunable. But they were still strong money several months back, in the mid to high teens for a good one. So not all that much cheaper than a Mk7.
The special editions will always command more than the standard ones. A stage 1/2 ED35 makes a good road car.

GregorFuk

563 posts

200 months

Monday 14th October 2019
quotequote all
I run a manual 4dr Mk6 as a daily. It's a cracking thing which has been completely faultless in my ownership.