RE: £29k BMW M2 | Spotted

RE: £29k BMW M2 | Spotted

Tuesday 22nd October 2019

£29k BMW M2 | Spotted

The highest mileage M2 on the classifieds can be had for hot hatch money



Unless they’ve come from a rental fleet on the Costa del Sol, cars with higher than average mileages aren’t necessarily the worn-out rattle boxes your average punter might believe them to be. Most PHers will know that regular care and maintenance rank far higher than keeping use to a minimum, and in some cases, a bigger number on the odometer can earn a car hero status. Take this BMW M2, for example, which has acquired 41,000 miles in just three years, making it not only the most-driven M2 on the classifieds but also of higher mileage than the average three-year-old UK car from any category.

All of those miles have been accumulated by one owner, though, suggesting that rather than being the village bicycle, this M2 has been lovingly appreciated by an enthusiast not interested in leaving a 370hp Bavarian parked up until a sunny Sunday. And who could blame them? The M2 is arguably the most charming car to come from BMW’s performance arm in this generation, mixing straight-six character with a compact (for 2019) package focussed on driver engagement.


Back when the M2 was new in 2016 we had little reason to highlight the car’s use of rear-wheel drive as, barring the 2 Series Active Tourer, this was the default layout of a BMW. But today, with xDrive spreading across the firm’s performance range like a traction-boosting virus, the M2 looks more thoroughbred than ever. Its two-door body, draped over front-engined, pure rear-drive organs could soon become an extinct formula. The M135i now has a front-biased version of xDrive, and even the next M3/M4 are going to use part-time all-wheel drive to keep up the fight with AMG and Audi Sport.

To some, labelling a sports car that weighs 1,570kg as traditional might seem a little far-fetched, but the M2 has always done a remarkable job of hiding its weight. Sure, the engine never quite feels let off the leash thanks to the mass, nor can the chassis hunker down like a Porsche Cayman’s. But as a fairly small-scale car – its wheelbase is 6mm shorter than the Honda Civic Type R’s – there’s a fluidity over uneven surfaces and sense of freedom to explore a road’s full width that’s not achievable in BMW’s bigger, heavier M cars. It’s a cliché to draw comparison between the M2 and original M3, but it’s a totally appropriate one. Hence many British M2’s remits as weekend toys and garage queens.


The extensive use of today’s Spotted, however, suggests its owner has put it into full time use, as does the fact it’s an auto. Yet as you’d expect for a car of this youth, it’s been serviced exclusively at main BMW dealerships and comes with the added bonus of a five-year service pack, so there’s little reason to doubt that such a lifestyle could be continued. Although we also suspect there’ll be some buyers eyeing the investment potential should they keep the miles down, particularly because this M2 is up for under £29k. It’s officially the cheapest M2 on PH’s classifieds, and cheaper than each of the hot hatches to feature in Matt’s recent group test. By anyone’s measure, that’s a lot of car for the money.


SPECIFICATION – BMW M2 DCT

Engine: 3.0-litre turbocharged straight six
Power (hp): 370@6,500rpm
Torque (lb ft): 343@1,400-4,750rpm
MPG: 35.8
CO2: 185g/km
First registered: 2016
Recorded mileage: 41,000
Price new: £44,070
Yours for: £28,950

Click here to see the original ad.


Author
Discussion

scottygib553

Original Poster:

530 posts

95 months

Tuesday 22nd October 2019
quotequote all
/Looks crossly at new born child/

Not practical enough...

Court_S

12,932 posts

177 months

Tuesday 22nd October 2019
quotequote all
I’m semi keeping an eye on these because they seem like the logical step from my M140i especially be a it’s replacement does nothing for me.

Nano2nd

3,426 posts

256 months

Tuesday 22nd October 2019
quotequote all
looks expensive compared to AUC cars of similar spec/miles.

Arsecati

2,309 posts

117 months

Tuesday 22nd October 2019
quotequote all
C'mon now....... who's gonna be the first to bemoan the fact that it isn't a manual, and for that single reason they are not going to buy it? wink

Fiesta1.0L

97 posts

98 months

Tuesday 22nd October 2019
quotequote all
scottygib553 said:
/Looks crossly at new born child/

Not practical enough...
Car seat fits just fine in the back, took my 3 yo nephew for a drive. The Audi TT? He was cross-legged in the same seat in the front.

My M2 was removed from my drive by some scallwags - have my own little one on the way so the TT has morphed into a Qashqai and will be joined by something like this or an E46.

MOBB

3,609 posts

127 months

Tuesday 22nd October 2019
quotequote all
My 2018 M2 was the best car I have owned by some distance - I had to get rid due to the firm suspension just not agreeing with a neck injury I sustained a year ago. The suspension isn't that bad but it just disagreed with me :-(

Gutted I had to sell it.

I think these are somewhat overlooked due to the M2 Competition being "the car the M2 should have always been". I agree that the engine isn't quite "M" enough compared to other M cars but it is still a wonderful car. And sounds outrageous for a standard car.

Reavenger

129 posts

133 months

Tuesday 22nd October 2019
quotequote all
41,000 miles over 3 years isn't that much at all. That's only 13.6k a year! Forgetting the price, the fact it's one owner and serviced at BMW dealerships would make this a good buy for someone.

Terminator X

15,070 posts

204 months

Tuesday 22nd October 2019
quotequote all
Given the M2C has the "proper" engine I'm surprised that the M2 isn't given away free with a box of cereal.

TX.

Mike335i

5,004 posts

102 months

Tuesday 22nd October 2019
quotequote all
MOBB said:
I think these are somewhat overlooked due to the M2 Competition being "the car the M2 should have always been". I agree that the engine isn't quite "M" enough compared to other M cars but it is still a wonderful car. And sounds outrageous for a standard car.
Bingo!
Terminator X said:
Given the M2C has the "proper" engine I'm surprised that the M2 isn't given away free with a box of cereal.

TX.
Hilarious

Chestrockwell

2,627 posts

157 months

Tuesday 22nd October 2019
quotequote all
I like the look of the M2 but don’t agree with the price over the M140i’s/M240i’s, they don’t feel that much quicker, Theyre probably just as quick considering the M140i puts out more power than suggested and the gearbox could me a pain to use as a daily compared to the M140i’s slick 8ZF.

If I was in the market, I’d save 10k, get an m240i, put an LSD on it and be done with it!



thelostboy

4,569 posts

225 months

Tuesday 22nd October 2019
quotequote all
My issue is familiarity breeds contempt. I see them every single day thanks to the PCP deals and they have lost all their specialness as a result. In comparison, think I may have only seen one 1M on the roads!

They seem practical enough - my 5 foot 11 son got in the back of one OK in the BMW showroom; I was pretty surprised.

acme

2,971 posts

198 months

Tuesday 22nd October 2019
quotequote all
Anyone had both an original N55 engined one like this and the Competition one and care to compare and contrast the two?

I recall Henry Catchpole stating that the N55 was revvier and the S55 wasn't all that much better? Not typically what I've read in other reviews of the M2C.

Thoughts from anyone who's had both?

Cheers

Court_S

12,932 posts

177 months

Tuesday 22nd October 2019
quotequote all
Chestrockwell said:
I like the look of the M2 but don’t agree with the price over the M140i’s/M240i’s, they don’t feel that much quicker, Theyre probably just as quick considering the M140i puts out more power than suggested and the gearbox could me a pain to use as a daily compared to the M140i’s slick 8ZF.

If I was in the market, I’d save 10k, get an m240i, put an LSD on it and be done with it!
I would hope (having not driven an M2 but do own an M140i) that the big difference is not in the straight line speed but in the way that it handles. Bang for buck, the M135i/M140i are hard to beat but they’re not the most dynamically adept cars (no where near as bad as the internet would have you believe but they’re not a real M car).

MOBB

3,609 posts

127 months

Tuesday 22nd October 2019
quotequote all
Court_S said:
Chestrockwell said:
I like the look of the M2 but don’t agree with the price over the M140i’s/M240i’s, they don’t feel that much quicker, Theyre probably just as quick considering the M140i puts out more power than suggested and the gearbox could me a pain to use as a daily compared to the M140i’s slick 8ZF.

If I was in the market, I’d save 10k, get an m240i, put an LSD on it and be done with it!
I would hope (having not driven an M2 but do own an M140i) that the big difference is not in the straight line speed but in the way that it handles. Bang for buck, the M135i/M140i are hard to beat but they’re not the most dynamically adept cars (no where near as bad as the internet would have you believe but they’re not a real M car).
I've owned a M235i and an M2 (N55)

The M2 was a bit quicker in a straight line, and the M240i probably matches it from what I've seen.

But they are VERY different cars to drive, the M2 just feels like a special car, the M235i did not comparatively.


flukey5

404 posts

60 months

Tuesday 22nd October 2019
quotequote all
Arsecati said:
C'mon now....... who's gonna be the first to bemoan the fact that it isn't a manual, and for that single reason they are not going to buy it? wink
It's not a manual, and for that reason - I'm out.

neutral 3

6,472 posts

170 months

Tuesday 22nd October 2019
quotequote all
An aquatintance bought one new. He is very pleased with it. Would love one too if I had the ££.
But 1570 KGs, is crazy for a car of its size. From memory that is about 30 kgs heavier than my old E46 M3 ( before I stripped out the rear seats and trim etc etc ) Surely BMW could have made it lighter.

Chestrockwell

2,627 posts

157 months

Tuesday 22nd October 2019
quotequote all
MOBB said:
Court_S said:
Chestrockwell said:
I like the look of the M2 but don’t agree with the price over the M140i’s/M240i’s, they don’t feel that much quicker, Theyre probably just as quick considering the M140i puts out more power than suggested and the gearbox could me a pain to use as a daily compared to the M140i’s slick 8ZF.

If I was in the market, I’d save 10k, get an m240i, put an LSD on it and be done with it!
I would hope (having not driven an M2 but do own an M140i) that the big difference is not in the straight line speed but in the way that it handles. Bang for buck, the M135i/M140i are hard to beat but they’re not the most dynamically adept cars (no where near as bad as the internet would have you believe but they’re not a real M car).
I've owned a M235i and an M2 (N55)

The M2 was a bit quicker in a straight line, and the M240i probably matches it from what I've seen.

But they are VERY different cars to drive, the M2 just feels like a special car, the M235i did not comparatively.
That’s the thing, from what I’ve heard about the M lites is that they’re brilliant daily drivers but not very good on track or on the limit compared to an M car. Fair enough but after following Joe Achilles on YT and IG for a while, he says they’re an LSD and a decent suspension set up away from being even ‘better’ than an M2.

I’m not discrediting the M2 as it is a good car but I’d rather buy a 68 plate M240i with 5k ish miles for 25 and keep the rest. If I was to go on track days or drive it hard, i’d spend the change on an LSD and suspension.

The M2C is a different story as it’s USP is the S55 engine and that itself is worth the extra.

Looking at the spotted M2, despite the criticism and lack of proper M seats and driver modes, they’ve held their value very well, 29k for a 2016 model is very good.

nickfrog

21,140 posts

217 months

Tuesday 22nd October 2019
quotequote all
neutral 3 said:
An aquatintance bought one new. He is very pleased with it. Would love one too if I had the ££.
But 1570 KGs, is crazy for a car of its size. From memory that is about 30 kgs heavier than my old E46 M3 ( before I stripped out the rear seats and trim etc etc ) Surely BMW could have made it lighter.
It's the same size as the E46 M3 give or take 30mm. Which explains why it's almost the same weight. Actually I am surprised the gap is so small as modern cars have more safety, airbags, equipment etc... Making it lighter would have been great but would have been very expensive.

GT119

6,554 posts

172 months

Tuesday 22nd October 2019
quotequote all
neutral 3 said:
An aquatintance bought one new. He is very pleased with it. Would love one too if I had the ££.
But 1570 KGs, is crazy for a car of its size. From memory that is about 30 kgs heavier than my old E46 M3 ( before I stripped out the rear seats and trim etc etc ) Surely BMW could have made it lighter.
Yes, they were all tooled up to produce the wheels, brakes, chassis, body, gearbox and engine casings from composites but suddenly realised no-one would buy is at £150,000.

And I like you description of the colour of the one above, aqua-tintance smile

Europa1

10,923 posts

188 months

Tuesday 22nd October 2019
quotequote all
scottygib553 said:
/Looks crossly at new born child/

Not practical enough...
Teach your baby to drive - the driver's seat is set for a new born child.