RE: Ford Mustang Mach-E leaks online

RE: Ford Mustang Mach-E leaks online

Friday 15th November 2019

Ford Mustang Mach-E leaks online

Electric SUV gets controversial Mustang styling cues as it bids to take on the Tesla Model Y



Ford is clearly playing the marketing game by slapping the Mustang’s nameplate and styling cues onto its upcoming Tesla Model Y rival, images of which have leaked online. The Ford Mustang Mach-E (yep, seriously) configurator was accidentally put live early, revealing the car’s full name and showing that its lights and lengthy bonnet will take inspiration from those of the iconic Pony car. It’s thought that the controversial decision to tie these two contrasting models together has been made to enhance the EV’s appeal in China (where the Mustang’s history is much briefer) while riding the wave of global success felt by the V8 and four-cylinder two-door coupe.

Ford will no doubt have factored in the inevitable backlash such a decision is going to face, with longstanding ‘Stang fans in the US set to be particularly offended by the Mach-E’s arrival. Think of the dissatisfaction in Europe over the reintroduction of the Puma as a crossover - and then times that by a billion. In contrast to the Puma, however, the Mach-E will at least come with the straight-line performance of something actually sporting. While it’s set to come in a variety of power outputs, the quickest will be capable of hitting 60mph in a “mid-three second” time and even the slowest will only take about 6.5 seconds, which ought to appease those who care most about the numbers.


To compete with Tesla’s broadly-capable Model Y, the Mach-E’s electric powertrain will be available in both rear-wheel and all-wheel drive forms. Its range is set to be between 230 and 300 miles depending on the specification (according to the US’s EPA), too, meaning the Mustang Mach-E will rank right alongside its Tesla rival. The Blue Oval’s EV is expected to reach roads in early 2020, with orders to be taken immediately after the car’s mid-November launch, so the real-world battle is right around the corner – and Ford’s contender should have a decent head start over the likes of Audi’s Q4-sized e-tron and Polestar’s 2.

Back in the world of proper performance machines, the Mach-E’s arrival likely signals the broader use of the Mustang name in Ford’s range. It’s thought the coupe will get an EV version as well – albeit further into the future – as hinted by the 900hp Mustang EV shown at SEMA. That seems somewhat inevitable, given the direction of the industry. But let’s just hope such a variant will ensure the survival of a thumping V8 model at the line-up’s other end, rather than spell the death of it.




Search for a Mustang here.

Author
Discussion

flowman

Original Poster:

103 posts

209 months

Friday 15th November 2019
quotequote all
You can push a brand so far, but that’s too far. 🙄

Dave Hedgehog

14,550 posts

204 months

Friday 15th November 2019
quotequote all
that looks bloody fantastic

sign me up

J4CKO

41,555 posts

200 months

Friday 15th November 2019
quotequote all
Will be weird with the EV version being faster than the actual Mustang GT.

looks alright, but paint the grille area black.

DanielSan

18,787 posts

167 months

Friday 15th November 2019
quotequote all
It looks like someone has tried to put Mustang lights on a Model X. And that's not a good thing.

Hitch

6,106 posts

194 months

Friday 15th November 2019
quotequote all
There were some lovely Jensen Interceptor style concepts of this online.





Reality looks like a supersized version of the new Ford Puma. That's not a good thing!

Edited by Hitch on Friday 15th November 11:32

Clivey

5,110 posts

204 months

Friday 15th November 2019
quotequote all


Just about sums-up my thoughts on the matter...and I'm only 31. The future of cars looks grim. frown

Baileyk

195 posts

64 months

Friday 15th November 2019
quotequote all
I can see why they've used the mustang name to flog this car but I don't agree / see much point with the use of the mustang name and I don't think many ford fans will either.

Just call if the Ford MACH E. There is nothing 'mustang' about this apart from the rear lights (ish) and the long bonnet (which is redundant as there is no engine).

NDNDNDND

2,018 posts

183 months

Friday 15th November 2019
quotequote all
I read on Jalopnik that the 'Falcon' and 'Thunderbird' had been mooted for this - both names have a lot of Ford heritage and cachet, and both are disused. Falcon particularly would have been a perfect fit, being a family car.

I can only think they've chosen 'Mustang' because they don't think the actual Mustang has long left, and so they're trying to transfer that cachet to something else in case they lose it entirely when the proper mustang is phased out.

Sad really.

ETA: I actually think it looks pretty good from the front. The back is rank, though.

Edited by NDNDNDND on Friday 15th November 12:09

Hatson

2,034 posts

122 months

Friday 15th November 2019
quotequote all
They appear to be taking a big risk here. I think they’re going to get away with it. Looks distinctive and has the historic connection. The Mustang is dead. Long live the Mustang.

Sport220

635 posts

75 months

Friday 15th November 2019
quotequote all
What a load of ste

Fetchez la vache

5,572 posts

214 months

Friday 15th November 2019
quotequote all
I don't think people will have issues with the car, just the name they have given it.
I can imagine plenty of people will be absolutely fuming.

Imagine if the Jag I-Pace had been named the E-type...

Dr Interceptor

7,786 posts

196 months

Friday 15th November 2019
quotequote all
I have two Mustangs, and I have no issue with Ford using the Mustang name on this car.

Mustang is probably the most iconic global name in the Ford arsenal, and to turn it into a sub brand isn't a bad move.

Nobody is going to confuse this for a 5.0 V8 Muscle Car.

CaptainSensib1e

1,434 posts

221 months

Friday 15th November 2019
quotequote all
As a Mustang owner, I have no issue with this. Although I'm really not a fan of the styling.

But I recogisethat brands sometimes need to evolve into new areas. A bit like when Porsche launched the Cayenne, the purists were up in arms but it was the right commercial decision for the company.

dxg

8,201 posts

260 months

Friday 15th November 2019
quotequote all
They should be pushing this more heavily:

https://www.autocar.co.uk/car-news/new-cars/ford-u...

David87

6,656 posts

212 months

Friday 15th November 2019
quotequote all
Very much like the look of that. Great job, Ford.

GTEYE

2,096 posts

210 months

Friday 15th November 2019
quotequote all
CaptainSensib1e said:
As a Mustang owner, I have no issue with this. Although I'm really not a fan of the styling.

But I recogisethat brands sometimes need to evolve into new areas. A bit like when Porsche launched the Cayenne, the purists were up in arms but it was the right commercial decision for the company.
But Porsche weren't daft enough to brand the Cayenne as part of the 911 family. That's the issue here.

monarodom

1,264 posts

146 months

Friday 15th November 2019
quotequote all
Why on earth is it going to be called a Mustang? Looks like a mini-SUV! Bad enough they chucked a 4-pot in the actual Mustang and now this.

mgbond

6,749 posts

232 months

Friday 15th November 2019
quotequote all

Gandahar

9,600 posts

128 months

Friday 15th November 2019
quotequote all
I don't think they should have used Mustang in the name in the same way I don't think Toyota should have used Supra for their new coupe. A new name would have been better for both.

I'm not a great SUV person so won't comment on the looks, they all look poor to me, but the stats so far look pretty good.

RushDom

230 posts

94 months

Friday 15th November 2019
quotequote all
Deary me. What a mess.

Blobby, doughy, underwheeled...yuck.