Lexus RC F Track Pack vs Ford Mustang GT
The naturally-aspirated V8 is headed for the scrap heap. We grade the final salute...
Although not without its foibles, the Lexus RC F Track Pack is a car that really gets under your skin. Forever muscular and purposeful, though never shouty or ostentatious, it falls happily into the role of effortless cruiser while secretly ready to explode into petrol-burning rumble at a moment's notice. It's secret? The oldest in the book: 5.0-litres of atmospheric V8. Little wonder then that it feels like a muscle car done the Japanese way. Little wonder it made us think of Ford's latest - possibly, objectively, greatest - Mustang.
America's muscle car also has a 5.0-litre V8. It also delivers the goods without resorting to forced induction. It is also unusual in that respect. Europe, by virtue of its increasingly stringent environmental legislation, has essentially outlawed the deployment of big capacity, naturally-aspirated engines in any segment shy of the supercar. Even there, it is a vanishingly rare presence.
Admirably, Lexus (Toyota) and Ford have rowed against the tide. They have done so for business reasons, yes - but also because each feels that there is good reason for the fitment of eight cylinders unencumbered by the breathy intrusion of downstream turbochargers. Even better, they haven't gone about the application in precisely the same way; one is unashamedly loud and brash and addictive, the other is buttoned-down and tightly-wound and thoroughly underrated.
Because they punctuate the approaching end of an era, both are brilliant in their own inimitable way. You'd need a heart of stone to think otherwise. Which is why we sent Dan P along to run the rule over proceedings. The rest of us refused to hold a tape measure to either unicorn. We drove and day-dreamed. It was enough. It had to be.
Hankies out...
I'm curious what you mean by the Performance Pack as all cars come with it in Europe. I think the largest difference you feel is that the GT you drove in this video did not have the adaptive Magneride suspension option like the Bullitt did. It makes a huge difference in how it tightens up the damping and overall feel of the car.
I completely agree with you that the standard seats are not good enough for performance driving and the Recaros are really a level above which is what you would have sat in during your Bullitt drive. They hold you in so much better and give you the confidence to push on.
I also completely agree with you on the LSD though in the Mustang. Over here we get stuck with Ford's forever used since the 90s base level Trac-lok clutch-based LSD and super long 3.55 gearing. The US market gets the 3.73 Torsen diff in its performance pack cars which they also use in the GT350 and GT500. It is a true mechanical LSD that would likely get rid of the twitchiness.
The RCF is beautiful but hard to justify at it's price point. Used ones are a bargain however. Granted, the Mustang aftermarket is limitless
Instead spend your money on one of the excellent switchable aftermarket exhausts and it sounds right too. I did try the Mustang and the usual suspects in this bracket but bought the RCF for exactly the reason it's a bit left field, you hardly ever see one, build quality and warranty is in a class of it's own.
It does need an aftermarket exhaust though as the Mustang wins the soundtrack.
Finished the year as 3rd overall on a pretty much stock setup. I can only imagine the RC-F would fare even better.
Mustang is the girl you can't stop thinking about. All about Saturday night or that free-wheeling road trip.
Six-speed manual transmission? Don't bother asking. You know the answer.
Gotta spec the GT performance package along with adaptive damping. Set the exhaust to Track? Go on, Darling. Let's have some fun:
https://youtu.be/0LwI7McnoW0
I'd be delighted with the Lexus as well, but it's more of an executive conveyance. At an executive's price.
My last car a CL65 had in excess of 620 BHP from it's V12 twin turbo engine and although cartoon like in the way it gained speed I found there were only the odd moments you could use it apart from that event where they go flat out on a straight bit of track.
My last car a CL65 had in excess of 620 BHP from it's V12 twin turbo engine and although cartoon like in the way it gained speed I found there were only the odd moments you could use it apart from that event where they go flat out on a straight bit of track.
So I tried an M4, an Alfa Quad and the Mustang each was a good car then I tried the RCF after watching the Chris Harris video and decided I liked the two distinct driving characteristic of the RCF, the later cars have the active suspension and can almost rival the CL65 in long distance comfort. Then at the selection of a few simple controls including manual/paddles which most owners on the forum use you have a decent A road blaster, you can feel the active suspension tightening the whole car up.
I know a few owners do track their RCF's particularly over in the USA but after owning an RX7 track/road car and a highly tuned VX220 Turbo and had great fun with them on track. I just felt the RCF was a bit too heavy and ponderous compared to what I've had so have been of the personal opinion that if you want to do track days it's a far better idea to buy a car like a Caterham or VX220 Turbo.
I also think that for the price of the new 'track edition' you could buy (if you can find one) a late model RCF with all the toys AVS, TVD for say £45K and have well over £20K left for a more track oriented car and afford to run both for some time.
I know the RCF is not to everyones taste but if you test drive one and like it you'll like it even more after a year.
Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff