RE: Mercedes-AMG GLE 53 Coupe | Driven

RE: Mercedes-AMG GLE 53 Coupe | Driven

Friday 6th December 2019

2020 Mercedes-AMG GLE 53 Coupe | PH Review

Yes, it claims to be both a coupe and a performance car. Does AMG now stand for Always More Gopping?



Too many performance SUV reviews on PH? We share your frustration, trust us - even as we bring you another. But this is the bit of the car market that posh manufacturers are throwing the most development spend at, plus one that an increasing number of buyers and lease form tickers seem to find irresistible. This is one review that is going to require an even more flame-retardant fireproof suit than usual, seeing as it is about a 1.7-metre tall car that claims to be a coupe as well...

Beyond the contentious sporty suffix, the rest of the Mercedes-AMG GLE 53 Coupe's name indicates that it is powered by the 3.0-litre twin-turbo engine that understudies for the V8 powered 63 version, this making 429hp and 384lb ft by itself and working in conjunction with a 48V mild hybrid assistance system that can add 21hp and 184lb/ft for brief periods. As such it is effectively a higher-riding version of the existing E53. It carries a substantial 305kg weight penalty over the already-substantial estate, but it does offer it's driver the ability to better see over hedges. Despite being one down from the top of the GLE tree the 53 is still stormingly fast for anything this size and shape: it's not many years since the claimed 5.3-second 0-62mph time would have made it one of the fastest SUVs on the market.

Let's skip past the coupe-ness quickly. There might be an elegant way to combine the blunt frontal aspect and ground clearance of an SUV with a lowered roofline, but Mercedes hasn't found it here. The nicest thing I can say about the GLE Coupe is that from some angles it looks less ridiculous than others; the rake of the rear tailgate is particularly egregious given the sheer quantity of boot and bumper that is stacked beneath it. During the launch in Austria I saw one parked next to a regular GLE, which suddenly seemed to be a spectacularly harmonious piece of design. But as coupe-SUVs since the original X6 onwards have proved, munting or even outright gopping isn't a barrier to success in this part of the automotive world.


The good news is that, once inside it, you don't have to look at the GLE Coupe's exterior - although large, reflective shop windows are still a risk. The cabin is vastly better. From the driver's seat only a lowered roofline and more restricted view from the rear mirror serves to distinguish the GLE Coupe from the GLE Normal. Architecture is identical: the same dashboard, the same twin-screen layout (with one 12.3-inch digital instrument pack and another joining it as a main display) plus centre console and switchgear. AMG-ness is indicated by some nicely executed carbon trim and a sports steering wheel incorporating two rotary controls with tiny integrated screens for the various dynamic modes; there are also some unique performance display screens. Seats are well-padded buckets, which are supportive without being too grabby. Beyond the usual grumble about Merc's over-sensitive central touchpad and somewhat confusing UX system, it's a seriously nice place to spend time.

The driving experience is similarly impressive, with the AMG requiring a minimal number of the "for an SUV" caveats that frequently litter tests of cars like this. The engine is as impressive here as it is in the E-Class, with brawn everywhere and an electric compressor working in conjunction with the twin turbochargers to effectively eliminate throttle lag at low speeds. The 53 delivers forceful levels of acceleration well before the throttle pedal is half way down, and with the gearbox upshifting before 3000rpm. The nine-speed autobox shifts seamlessly under gentle use, but with AMG-appropriate haste at higher commitment levels. Full credit to Merc for the beautifully weighted metal gear selectors behind the steering wheel, a detail that many rivals seem to struggle with.


Although fast, the GLE 53 doesn't have the ludicrous sensation of added speed that comes from the truly nutty performance SUVs. The engine revs willingly to its 6500rpm redline, and it makes a nice, hard-edged sound while it does so - especially with the exhaust switched to its louder mode - but it's not got the savagery or charisma of a 63 AMG. A result which the marketing department are presumably entirely happy with. More to the point it feels subjectively slower than the E53 wagon - because of Newtonian physics - which remains a considerably more athletic way to combine utility with this powerplant.

The rest of the dynamic package is good, though. The 53 Coupe rides on standard air suspension which gives it the ability to vary its height, lowering automatically at speed. The ride felt pliant on mostly smooth Austrian mountain roads - and despite wearing 21-inch wheels (with 22s an option.) An active anti-roll system fights cornering lean and keeps the body impressively flat under big lateral loads. My test car was wearing REF winter tyres and was mostly driven on below-freezing road surfaces, which was likely responsible for a marked lack of steering sensation compared to the AMG norm. But even on the sensible rubber handling was accurate and grip levels still strong, the GLE holding on gamely in slower turns to an eventual graceful transition to understeer. Mercedes claims a natural rearward bias to the all-wheel drive system, but you'll only get any sense of this on very slippery surfaces. Most of the time it just hooks up and goes.


Refinement is another strength, the ultra-tall ninth gear and snug cabin insulation making for quiet cruising at the sorts of speeds that were probably more appropriate to a German autobahn than the Austrian one I found myself on. The GLE 53 feels like it would be particularly well suited to long journeys at high average speeds. Only the coupeness really knocks the practicality, with a much more cramped rear seat than the regular GLE with limited knee room for adults and the need to duck to get beneath the low roof rail. Although still short on rationality, the normal GLE 53 is a far more practical choice.

It's not hard to take the mick out of cars like this one. You're welcome. Some of the details do seem pretty ludicrous, none more so than the fact this sod-offish off-roader gets the same data-logging Track Pace system as the rest of the senior AMG range, presumably intended to help owners really hone their way to that perfect lap time. (This only works on circuits, attempting to activate it in the Austrian Alps produced the stern warning "no racetracks found in vicinity!") If they add the roads around Harrods it might get a few users.

Yet the GLE 53 AMG is clearly not the answer to an unasked question, more like fingers reaching to squeeze a ripe, unpopped zit. People want cars like this, especially in parts of the world where wagons and conventional coupes do nothing. Mercedes wants to make money by selling them; it's hard to fault that commercial logic. You can dislike the idea and hate the styling, but the execution has been done with AMG's usual precision.


SPECIFICATION - MERCEDES-AMG GLE 53 COUPE

Engine: 2999cc, six-cylinder, twin-turbocharged, hybrid assistance
Transmission: nine-speed automatic, all-wheel drive
Power (hp): 429 @ 6100rpm (with 21hp electric)
Torque (lb ft): 384 @ 1800rpm - 5800rpm (with 184lb ft electric)
0-62mph: 5.3-second
Top speed: 155mph (limited)
Weight: 2325kg EU
MPG: TBC
CO2: TBC
Price: TBC

Search for a Mercedes-AMG GLE here











Author
Discussion

griffdude

Original Poster:

1,823 posts

248 months

Wednesday 4th December 2019
quotequote all
Awful.

biggbn

23,208 posts

220 months

Wednesday 4th December 2019
quotequote all
Like it.

anonymous-user

54 months

Wednesday 4th December 2019
quotequote all
”Too many performance SUV reviews on PH? We share your frustration, trust us - even as we bring you another.”

Then stop covering them/ stop covering them so heavily/ share with us the feedback you give to the manufacturers.

Just because they are very popular in China/with those awaiting corrective eye surgery, doesn’t mean they need the attention here. What does PH stand for these days? Genuine question.

Plate spinner

17,688 posts

200 months

Wednesday 4th December 2019
quotequote all
RelentlessForwardProgress said:
What does PH stand for these days? Genuine question.
Driving traffic and selling ads?

flukey5

404 posts

60 months

Thursday 5th December 2019
quotequote all
Some of the most vomit inducing styling on any production model.

Anyone who knowingly purchases these, X4s, X6s etc. should seriously be checked out for brain damage.

sledge68

749 posts

197 months

Thursday 5th December 2019
quotequote all
I saw a version of this the other day and actually had to look back 3 times at how awful it looks, I wondered who sees this and thinks phwoar that's the motor for me?
All out of proportion and shouting look at me I am insecure.

Tcooc168

44 posts

56 months

Thursday 5th December 2019
quotequote all
RelentlessForwardProgress said:
”Too many performance SUV reviews on PH? We share your frustration, trust us - even as we bring you another.”

Then stop covering them/ stop covering them so heavily/ share with us the feedback you give to the manufacturers.

Just because they are very popular in China/with those awaiting corrective eye surgery, doesn’t mean they need the attention here. What does PH stand for these days? Genuine question.
I agree with you... but not on the slightly play on racist comment.
I’ve seem more non Chinese driving these in London, I think they also need their eye tested... or maybe just badge snobbery smile

CrossMember

2,982 posts

139 months

Thursday 5th December 2019
quotequote all
Heavier, less powerful, slower and quite a bit uglier than a Cayenne Coupe S, which also has a far nicer interior and is almost guaranteed to handle better.

I don't expect to see many on the road, unless it's significantly cheaper than the competition.

whytheory

750 posts

146 months

Thursday 5th December 2019
quotequote all
Not very PH opinion but I think the original X6 the Urus and the Cayenne Coupe look alright, the more recent efforts from BMW & Merc really aren't good.

Ahonen

5,016 posts

279 months

Thursday 5th December 2019
quotequote all
Tcooc168 said:
RelentlessForwardProgress said:
”Too many performance SUV reviews on PH? We share your frustration, trust us - even as we bring you another.”

Then stop covering them/ stop covering them so heavily/ share with us the feedback you give to the manufacturers.

Just because they are very popular in China/with those awaiting corrective eye surgery, doesn’t mean they need the attention here. What does PH stand for these days? Genuine question.
I agree with you... but not on the slightly play on racist comment.
I’ve seem more non Chinese driving these in London, I think they also need their eye tested... or maybe just badge snobbery smile
Why is it racist to say that the Chinese like them? The whole massive grille and OTT styling thing is very clearly aimed at the Chinese market.

Wills2

22,785 posts

175 months

Thursday 5th December 2019
quotequote all
They have diesel hybrid of this as well, weighs 2.7 tonnes with a 4 pot diesel in it, 2.7 tonnes!


CrossMember

2,982 posts

139 months

Thursday 5th December 2019
quotequote all
Ahonen said:
Why is it racist to say that the Chinese like them? The whole massive grille and OTT styling thing is very clearly aimed at the Chinese market.
Correct. It's not racist to say different markets have different tastes, and that sales volumes in different regions dictate the styling. We have to accept that we don't buy enough cars in the UK to get to influence what they look like, and we'd better get used to this trend.

Greg the Fish

1,410 posts

66 months

Thursday 5th December 2019
quotequote all
Not sure what's worse. This or the vile X things?

Absolutely horrible.

playalistic

2,269 posts

164 months

Thursday 5th December 2019
quotequote all
At least you can’t see the exterior while you’re driving it.

Tcooc168

44 posts

56 months

Thursday 5th December 2019
quotequote all
Ahonen said:
Why is it racist to say that the Chinese like them? The whole massive grille and OTT styling thing is very clearly aimed at the Chinese market.
I didn’t say it was racist to say that Chinese like them. I was referring to the eye surgery part. Please read the post again and if you don’t understand.

untakenname

4,966 posts

192 months

Thursday 5th December 2019
quotequote all
The Mercedes roundel is so large on these and tacky looking (it's larger than the drivers head in the photos!), I guess if you removed it you wouldn't be able to tell it's a Mercedes from the silhouette.

Taaaaang

6,596 posts

186 months

Thursday 5th December 2019
quotequote all
I think it looks great.

I like Ugly SUVs though...

tinnitusjosh

328 posts

72 months

Thursday 5th December 2019
quotequote all
Strongly suspect I will get the normal / estate version of this when I can no longer stomach the fuel bills on the GLE63

I get the performance SUV thing (the noise of my 63 is hilarious) - but these MB coupes are too much for me.

Without re-living the nightmare of the "Why we love Range Rovers" thread, my sense is that people buy premium SUVs for a combination of reasons including practicality/space and perceived luxury/expense. The shape of these coupe things with their sloping rooflines means practicality/space is heavily compromised – it even has a pretty substantial lip around the boot entry (at least the normal one has a flat ingress). That basically leaves the projection of wealth as the only reason I can imagine why anyone would buy this

irocfan

40,389 posts

190 months

Thursday 5th December 2019
quotequote all
playalistic said:
At least you can’t see the exterior while you’re driving it.
TBH I'm not convinced about the interior either

Plate spinner

17,688 posts

200 months

Thursday 5th December 2019
quotequote all
Tcooc168 said:
Ahonen said:
Why is it racist to say that the Chinese like them? The whole massive grille and OTT styling thing is very clearly aimed at the Chinese market.
I didn’t say it was racist to say that Chinese like them. I was referring to the eye surgery part. Please read the post again and if you don’t understand.
Yeah I’ve read it again and it’s you that clearly didn’t understand the post you were quoting, there was nothing racist I could see.

The post said ‘...Popular in China/with those awaiting corrective eye surgery...’ which clearly reads as “popular in China” (not racist at all, the tastes of the China market are heavily influencing global car design due to the size of the market) slash “with those awaiting corrective eye surgery” suggesting it could only be liked by someone who does not have good eyesight. Slightly crass joke on par with ‘should have gone to spec savers’ adverts, but again, it’s not racist.

Sorry to pick a point with this, but using the term racist incorrectly signifies you don’t understand what the world actually means.