Peugeot 407 2.7 V6 | Shed of the Week

Peugeot 407 2.7 V6 | Shed of the Week

Friday 3rd January 2020

Peugeot 407 2.7 V6 | Shed of the Week

Easy-on-the-eye coupes used to be a thing at Peugeot. Then came the 407



French coupés. An evocative phrase. You can almost taste the fag butts on the floor of a filthy Parisian café. Peugeot has done a few coupés in its time. Interestingly, however, the two most memorable ones of recent-ish times weren’t really French. They were Italian. First there was the effortlessly elegant Pininfarina-penned 504 Coupé from the 1970s and early 1980s. They’re now well into the five-figure price bracket, or twice that for Convertible versions. 

Then there’s the one that most Shed readers will remember, if only because it has appeared more than once in this column – the 1997 406 Coupé, another sharp-suited Pininfarina effort that graced European boulevards up until 2004. 

By that time the 406 had come to an end, Peugeot had decided it didn't want any more help from the Italians in creating its next two-door four-seater. The resulting 407 Coupe, launched in 2005, was an entirely home-brewed product. Because Peugeot naturally wanted to make some money out of it, the Coupé had to be different from the 407 saloon in more ways than the bleedin’ obvious one of having two fewer doors. A price tag up to £7000 higher than that of the top spec 407 saloons was certainly a bold move to help deliver exclusivity – but what were the justifications for that, given that the Coupé had no posh design-house heritage?


Well, er, it was a bit longer than the 407 saloon. It also had a wider front track, ostensibly for better handling, but maybe also to save us punters from recoiling at the sight of what would otherwise have been an an uncomfortably narrow-looking coupe. How else could Peugeot justify the price differential? Exclusive engines, maybe? Tick that box, Gaston. 

Two of the Coupé’s motor options weren’t available in the regular 407. One was PSA’s 2.9 ES, an old shoe of a petrol V6 that had seemed somewhat out of step with the times some eight years earlier when it made its debut in the 406 Coupé. The 211hp 407 Coupe 2.9 manual tipped the scales at 1,612kg (you could also get a 1,637kg auto). It ran the 0-62 in 8.4sec, topped out at 151mph and recorded an official combined mpg figure of 27.7.

The other Coupé-exclusive unit was the 210hp 2.7 V6 HDi diesel we have here. Again, a big-inch diesel seemed like a slightly queer choice for an elegant coop in the heavily ecology-conscious mid-2000s. In a car weighing a hefty 1,725kg it delivered a 0-62mph time of 8.7sec, a top whack of 143mph and combined fuel consumption of 33.2mpg.

The rest of the justification for the Coupe’s £7000 premium was a lush specification that, in the GT model we’ve lassoed here, included hand-stitched leather, sat nav, cruise, climate control, heated seats, aluminium cabin trim panels and parking sensors at both ends. 


Sadly for Peugeot it soon became obvious to anyone reading the contemporary road tests that the only vaguely sensible Coupé was the decidedly un-exclusive 163hp 2.2 petrol. Weighing in at 1,525kg, it wasn’t much slower than the dino-motored versions (0-62mph in 9.2sec, top speed 138mph) and it was considerably less demanding when it came to company car tax payments. Unfortunately, the 2.2 only managed to shrug off that £7k Coupé premium by being much more miserably equipped, so it was no more of a sales hit than any other Coupé.

Nine years after the 407 Coupé died, the 24-valve 2.7 V6 diesel now comes across as a rather intriguing old thing. Remember that this intercooled twin-Garrett engine was also put to good use in Jaguar S-types, XFs and XJs. It’s a gutsy (325lb ft) and mechanically strong unit. It’s no lightweight though, so in the 407 it will put stress on the double-wishbone front suspension and the steering components. It also has a DPF, so if you’re lounging around in it you run the risk of bunging it up wfluid onto the offside front tyre. Tyre pressure sensors go west too, and the electrical comfort features will need monitoring but otherwise these Coupés hold up well enough on the reliability front. 

This car would have been just short of £31k new. £1,250 now for a lowish-mileage example (albeit in Boring Silver and in need of a bit of a spruce up) seems like a decent shout. The MOT runs out at the end of the month but there were no advisories on last year’s ticket and the road tax isn’t too tragic at £325 a year. These Coupés are not a stellar drive but they’re strongly built and they’re a bit different. Maybe that’s enough on its own to warrant further beard strokage.


Click here for the full ad

Author
Discussion

DailyHack

Original Poster:

3,123 posts

110 months

Friday 3rd January 2020
quotequote all
Lovely to look at! Good shed

Really liked these when they came out - but the diesel would of been more appropriate, so i suspect they hold their price better..£300+ annual tax is not nice on this either...yikes!

MikeM6

4,985 posts

101 months

Friday 3rd January 2020
quotequote all
Pleasant and a real bargain, but it would have to be the petrol V6 for me.

schmalex

13,616 posts

205 months

Friday 3rd January 2020
quotequote all
Awful, ungainly looking things.

ecs0set

2,471 posts

283 months

Friday 3rd January 2020
quotequote all
Front overhang worthy of a bus.

the_hood

769 posts

193 months

Friday 3rd January 2020
quotequote all
An ugly looking French coupe that isn't fast and £325 road tax. Non merci.

blue_haddock

3,143 posts

66 months

Friday 3rd January 2020
quotequote all
Such a let down after the 406 coupe.

kett

128 posts

194 months

Friday 3rd January 2020
quotequote all
Fugly coupe but ‘on point’ for shed territory.
Good find. clap

greenarrow

3,551 posts

116 months

Friday 3rd January 2020
quotequote all

I am trying to find a saving grace for this car and I'm struggling. Basically its

Very overweight
Slow for its BHP figure
thirsty for a diesel
saddled with a complex engine relative to a petrol V6 or the 2.2
and rather ungainly to look at compared with the beautiful 406.

The final nail for me is that it was built during Peugeot's worse era in terms of dynamics and reliability.

Its different, I'll give you that, but not one of Shed's better efforts IMO. Hopefully the second SOTY in 2020 will inspire me more. Still, I am sure it will appear to some on here, different strokes and all that...

But me, I'm ooot!!

AmosMoses

4,039 posts

164 months

Friday 3rd January 2020
quotequote all
This could have been a very handsome car, all it needs is the front wheels moved 4 inches forward laugh

sledge68

749 posts

196 months

Friday 3rd January 2020
quotequote all
Decidedly French electrics are mainly German, ie Siemens.

anonymous said:
[redacted]

can't remember

1,077 posts

127 months

Friday 3rd January 2020
quotequote all
In the photos the front looks like the problem but in real life the rear is just as bad being a huge blob of a thing.

I can't think why anyone would buy an ugly coupe.

Richard-390a0

2,224 posts

90 months

Friday 3rd January 2020
quotequote all
Happy new year shedders!

sledge68

749 posts

196 months

Friday 3rd January 2020
quotequote all
Suppose each to their I quite like this, same engine as the Jag 2.7 oil burner, Seimens electrics can be sorted if you know a good ex PSA mechanic, which I do.
My last 407 had iffy electrics, plug and play box in glove box, 60 quid later, solved. Only let go at 170k when the fuel pump failed, £800 so write off, MOT the previous week it failed on the emissions, due to running too clean to activate the sensor the MOT tester said, first car he had seen at 170k miles to be that clean.
The issue PSA had was it tested its technology on the general public, DPF etc.

pSyCoSiS

3,581 posts

204 months

Friday 3rd January 2020
quotequote all
I quite like the interior on this, but not too keen on the external looks.

Not one for me, but I can see the appeal.

spikyone

1,413 posts

99 months

Friday 3rd January 2020
quotequote all
Happy new year. Can PH please make it their new year's resolution to fire whoever keeps chopping words out of articles?

Shed said:
It also has a DPF, so if you’re lounging around in it you run the risk of bunging it up wfluid onto the offside front tyre.
Doesn't make much sense, I assume from the apparent typo (and the fact that it happens all the bloody time) that there are some words missing.

Horrible car though. FWD, diesel, ugly, and heavy. Weight might be forgivable in a big coupe, but only if it has a decent engine. ETA - and £325/year tax isn't tragic for this thing?!

Snubs

1,166 posts

138 months

Friday 3rd January 2020
quotequote all
ecs0set said:
Front overhang worthy of a bus.
^^^ This. It's always struck me as an 'almost' car, in as much as the design was going in the right direction and almost looked really good. But a couple of mistakes, most notably putting so much of the car ahead of the front wheels, unfortunately ruined it.

Barchettaman

6,282 posts

131 months

Friday 3rd January 2020
quotequote all
I ‘bought’ one of these via a popular online auction site a couple of years ago.

The exhaust particulate warning light was on, and the automatic gearbox wouldn’t change up nicely. Neither fault had been mentioned in the advert. I walked.

Some post-sale research revealed that the gearbox struggles with the higher torque of the V6 Diesel unit. I seem to remember that it’s a Toyota-sourced transmission.

Pity really. I quite liked it!


Nickp82

3,165 posts

92 months

Friday 3rd January 2020
quotequote all
Good shed to start the year, always quite fancied one of these, ideally with the red leather but at the same time just know it would probably be a constant source of disappointment.

Kawasicki

13,041 posts

234 months

Friday 3rd January 2020
quotequote all
That front overhang!

It’s not just appalling looking...you need to be careful driving it up and down ramps, parking, etc.


How could they? Peugeot completely lost the plot.

PSB1967

273 posts

155 months

Friday 3rd January 2020
quotequote all
Ah! the hallowed '55' plate. Whilst this car does not make use of the loop hole of being a 2006 with high g/km's but just too old for the DVLA to tax it into oblivion, this is often a search criteria I use. With this in mind the old V6 petrol would have been more of a hit for me.
Still, nice find but not for me. Happy New year all!