RE: Mercedes-AMG launches 421hp GLA 45 S

RE: Mercedes-AMG launches 421hp GLA 45 S

Thursday 27th February 2020

Mercedes-AMG launches new 421hp GLA 45 S

The GLA was an unexpected star of the previous '45 range; let's hope for more of the same



While it's easy to be dismissive of the 'utility' aspect of modern sports utility vehicles, Mercedes is clear about the possibilities for the new GLA 45 S. "A brisk lap of the race circuit or a weekend trip to the mountains with your sports gear stowed in the back: the new GLA 45 4Matic+ and GLA 45 4Matic+ S are the assured masters of a multitude of disciplines." And that's just the first sentence of the press release...

So the GLA 45 gets a sequel, following very much in the tyre tracks of what went before: it's like an A45, but more lifestyley. As with the hatch, the UK will only get the 421hp S version, which in a GLA is powerful enough for a 4.3-second dash to 62mph. Mercedes itself says the car "jostles with considerably higher vehicle classes"; assuming the weight hasn't climbed too significantly from the hatch - which has a kerbweight of 1,555kg - the GLA looks likely to put a lot of power in a reasonably compact, not obscenely heavy package. For reference an RS Q3, likely the GLA's closest rival, is 1,700kg.


Otherwise, it's a direct carry over from the A-Class, which is no bad thing given how good that car is: same eight-speed DCT, same 4Matic+ four-wheel drive with AMG Torque Control rear differential, same AMG Ride Control adaptive damping, same MacPherson strut/four-link rear suspension set-up... You get the picture. But just in case you don't, it's worth noting this particular AMG 45 S also shares the six-piston, 360mm front brakes, AMG Dynamics 'integrated agility control' and reinforced bodyshell of the AMG 45 S we already know.

Obviously, however, there are certain aspects that differentiate GLA from A, most noticeably in the "athletic and muscular interior". Points of note from Mercedes include the bonnet powerdomes, AMG grille, wider arches, 90mm tailpipes and bespoke aero bits; for what it's worth the S also comes as standard on 20-inch wheels, an inch up on the hatch. Moreover, there are 21s on the options list, which will surely benefit the "emotional appeal" of the exterior, yet may well adversely impact the ride.


The interior will again be familiar to any A-Class users, carrying over the MBUX infotainment, customisable dash display and AMG Track Pace data logger. For customers of the GLA 45 S, the AMG Performance wheel seen here is standard, as are the yellow highlights. Yes, really. They "emphasise the motor racing heritage", you see.

While this is hardly likely to appeal to the die-hard AMG fans, the inexorable rise of the performance SUV fairly guaranteed the arrival of a second-gen GLA45. And, whisper it, but the last GLA wasn't bad, keeping the hatch's bombastic performance while softening off the ride a tad. Given how well received the new A45 has been, it wouldn't be absurd to have high expectations for this car - whatever you think about the concept. Hey, and if it doesn't appeal, there'll probably be a GLB45 on the way soon as well...


Read the Mercedes-AMG A45 S review here









 

Author
Discussion

MrBarry123

Original Poster:

6,027 posts

121 months

Tuesday 25th February 2020
quotequote all
What a horrid, dumpy little thing the GLA has become.

It’s a shame as I thought the previous GLA 45 looked pretty good.

Dave Hedgehog

14,550 posts

204 months

Tuesday 25th February 2020
quotequote all
MrBarry123 said:
What a horrid, dumpy little thing the GLA has become.

It’s a shame as I thought the previous GLA 45 looked pretty good.
yeah, i loved mine, its like someones put it in a hot oven and its just started to melt and deform so all cleans lines have gone

the front grill is just horrific


Wills2

22,810 posts

175 months

Wednesday 26th February 2020
quotequote all
The last one was awful too like someone had flattened the body of a small sav.


MikeM6

5,004 posts

102 months

Wednesday 26th February 2020
quotequote all
Funny that, I was just thinking how much better it looked than the last one. Not for me this one.

Gitwhoismiserable

767 posts

123 months

Wednesday 26th February 2020
quotequote all
Love it, COG is on point

scottygib553

530 posts

95 months

Wednesday 26th February 2020
quotequote all
I wonder if the GLB will steal many sales from this as it is a much more handsome and (superficially) useful looking thing.

Amanitin

421 posts

137 months

Wednesday 26th February 2020
quotequote all
Without the badges, i would guess it's a VW from the rear.
From the front, I'd have no idea whatsoever.

Kenny Powers

2,618 posts

127 months

Wednesday 26th February 2020
quotequote all
I normally have a lot of time for a nice performance SUV, but I’m not feeling this one in pictures. It looks pretty uninspiring, and the wing clashes with the otherwise sober styling.

Absolutely no doubt it will be a great car though.

cerb4.5lee

30,568 posts

180 months

Wednesday 26th February 2020
quotequote all
Wills2 said:
The last one was awful too like someone had flattened the body of a small sav.
Same for me and I didn't like the look of the previous one at all. While this one won't win any beauty contests...I do find it a little easier on the eyes.

0a

23,901 posts

194 months

Wednesday 26th February 2020
quotequote all
421bhp from a 4 cylinder in an SUV! Remarkable that Mercedes can make that engine tough enough.

AmosMoses

4,041 posts

165 months

Wednesday 26th February 2020
quotequote all
i want to hate it, but that engine and with some suspension travel its basically a rally car laugh

C.A.R.

3,967 posts

188 months

Wednesday 26th February 2020
quotequote all
Finally someone did it-

Front Canards on an SUV laugh

Would rather save a few quid, have slightly less real-world performance and have a T-Roc R in this class. At least it's got this beat in the looks department!

steveb8189

473 posts

191 months

Wednesday 26th February 2020
quotequote all
Gitwhoismiserable said:
Love it, COG is on point
I assume that's sarcastic?!

wab172uk

2,005 posts

227 months

Wednesday 26th February 2020
quotequote all
Purely a personal preference thing, but just on Looks, I'd be more inclined to buy the RSQ3. And at least you get some character with the 5-pot motor.

Still, this GLA will be a blisteringly fast SUV.

cerb4.5lee

30,568 posts

180 months

Wednesday 26th February 2020
quotequote all
steveb8189 said:
Gitwhoismiserable said:
Love it, COG is on point
I assume that's sarcastic?!
It is an easy fix though, and all they did on the M3 was stick a carbon fibre roof on it...and then all of a sudden the COG was as low as a race car! biggrin

Gitwhoismiserable

767 posts

123 months

Wednesday 26th February 2020
quotequote all
C.A.R. said:
Finally someone did it-

Front Canards on an SUV laugh

Would rather save a few quid, have slightly less real-world performance and have a T-Roc R in this class. At least it's got this beat in the looks department!
Do you think canards actually do anything on a road car

Gitwhoismiserable

767 posts

123 months

Wednesday 26th February 2020
quotequote all
steveb8189 said:
I assume that's sarcastic?!
You assume wrong

steveb8189

473 posts

191 months

Wednesday 26th February 2020
quotequote all
I don't get this one. I argue the points for fast SUVs all the time for families that can only have one car and still want something sporty, but that only really applies to the mid size and up SUVs. Is it really that much easier to get a kid into the back of one of these than a normal 5 door a-class?

steveb8189

473 posts

191 months

Wednesday 26th February 2020
quotequote all
Gitwhoismiserable said:
You assume wrong
Maybe I also assumed incorrectly that you meant Centre of Gravity?

Court_S

12,932 posts

177 months

Wednesday 26th February 2020
quotequote all
hurl

That's rancid - I don't really get the appeal of fats crossovers anyway but this looks worse than the old one to me. Cracking engine no doubt, but the interior of the A Class isn't great in my opinion either.